The expectations I set in my classroom revolve around a central principle: mathematical communication. I firmly believe that a student’s ability to learn mathematics is closely tied to their ability to articulate and write about mathematical concepts. I’ve noticed that many students struggle to find the right words when trying to express a point of confusion. A particularly positive moment in one of my classes occurred when I encouraged a student to express their question by writing on the board. This experience was significant to me because it underscored the importance of focusing on the communication aspect of mathematics itself. In that situation, I guided the student in phrasing their question clearly and ensured the rest of the class followed along. Afterward, I set a goal to explore teaching methods that emphasize mathematical communication while also providing clear and reasonable expectations.
I begin each semester by setting expectations for attendance, engagement, and participation—expectations that are not directly tied to their grades. The goal is to foster a sense of personal responsibility in my students. To achieve this, I emphasize that learning happens both inside and outside the classroom by encouraging them to start homework assignments early, work on them gradually, and regularly read the textbook. Early on, I also stress the importance of mathematical articulation and writing. For example, I expect students to actively participate in discussions and practice sharing their thoughts on core concepts. It’s common for me to ask students to make observations or propose solutions to the current problem.
In addition to these general expectations, I establish clear guidelines explicitly related to their grades. Alongside T.I.L.T. (Transparency in Learning and Teaching) assignments, I provide lab exercises designed to teach students how to produce high-quality written solutions for homework, quizzes, and exams. I distribute a grading rubric and a problem set featuring multiple solutions for students to evaluate. Together, we discuss how they would grade these sample solutions, helping them develop a stronger understanding of what constitutes a well-written response. Following this discussion, students complete their own written problems, which I grade and comment on.
By emphasizing communication skills in mathematics, I set clear expectations for the quality of their work. As a result, I’ve observed significant improvements in the clarity and organization of their exams. This focus not only benefits my students but also makes me a more efficient grader. It allows me to provide precise feedback on both the correctness of their solutions and the structure of their written work, helping them continually improve.
Transparency is the glue that holds my first two philosophies together. From the very beginning of each semester, I frequently use the words "communication," "expectations," and "transparency" to set the tone. Early on, I provide my students with a grading assignment to give them a glimpse behind the curtain. I want them to clearly understand what is expected of them and why I approach teaching the way I do. I believe it’s empowering for students to grasp the "why" behind my choices, as it helps them take ownership of their learning experience.
Ultimately, I strive to ensure that my students never feel caught off guard. By being transparent about my teaching methods, I make it clear how they will be assessed and what they are meant to gain from each assignment and exercise. This approach fosters trust and allows students to focus on developing the skills and understanding they need to succeed.
Course Taught
MAT 130 | Precalculus
MAT 160 | Discrete Mathematics w/ LaTeX and Python
MAT 215 | Linear Algebra w/ Python
MAT 240 | Calculus III
MAT 270 | Linear Programming
MAT 390 | Advanced Calculus (Real Analysis)
MAT 395 | Complex Variables
From Fall 2021 to Spring 2023, I was responsible for coordinating the lecture sections of MAT 190 Precalculus at UNC Greensboro. Prior to 2020, the math department offered both a year-long precalculus sequence and a version of MAT 190 with a different curriculum. This was later restructured so that MAT 190 became the sole precalculus course, now offered as a 4-credit hour course. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the newly restructured MAT 190 was initially offered only as an online course. In Fall 2021, I was assigned to teach the first lecture section.
My resources were limited to the online syllabus and the MyLab and Mastering homework assignments. I took on the responsibility of creating all class notes, exams, and lab assignments for the new computer lab component, which accounted for the additional credit hour. While the course had an official faculty coordinator, I was tasked with developing the course content from scratch. Additionally, I designed a Development Canvas Page, which has since been used by myself and all subsequent MAT 190 instructors. I added a personal touch to the Canvas page by drawing the banner featured above.
Because the materials from the previous iteration of MAT 190 were no longer relevant, this project proved challenging but also rewarding. It allowed me to apply my own teaching methods and philosophies to the course. My materials were thoroughly vetted by multiple faculty members in the math department, all of whom gave their approval.
In Spring 2022, I co-taught the two available lecture sections of MAT 190 alongside another graduate student. This experience gave me the opportunity to take on a leadership role. I gained valuable insight into the course’s effectiveness from another instructor’s perspective and implemented improvements and changes based on this feedback as I progressed.
I am proud to say that this continues to be a well functioning course at UNC Greensboro!
Transparency in Learning and Teaching (T.I.L.T.) assignments were introduced to me by Dr. Tom and Dr. Beth Lewis at UNC Greensboro when I was assigned to teach Calculus I under their guidance. The purpose of these assignments is to have students write a complete, detailed solution to a single math problem. This approach is designed to teach students how to effectively communicate their problem-solving process and provides them with a solid foundation for writing mathematical steps clearly and logically.
Each T.I.L.T. assignment includes a sample problem, solution, and answer. The sample solution is what sets this type of assignment apart. It demonstrates how to write, format, and organize a thorough mathematical solution. Students are encouraged to borrow phrasing and sentence structures that best fit their given problem, fostering better articulation of their mathematical reasoning. To learn more about these assignments, click here!
I have incorporated T.I.L.T. assignments into my MAT 190 class as take-home exams, which complement their in-class exams (see below for more details). I describe these assignments to my MAT 190 students as "math book reports." As I mentioned in my Personal Teaching Philosophy above, I believe in setting clear expectations for my students. These assignments align perfectly with that philosophy.
Each exam consists of two parts: the in-class portion assesses students' abilities to solve short, straightforward problems, while the take-home portion dives deeper. The take-home assignments encourage students to put significant effort into their problem-solving and written communication skills, giving me a clear understanding of their grasp of the material. This, in turn, allows me to provide more personalized guidance. Below is the first T.I.L.T. assignment I use to train students in my precalculus lab.
As mentioned above, this course was given to me without any lecture material. I had only the curriculum, the online textbook, and the MyLab and Mastering homework assignments to use. I would construct my own notes that followed the schedule and structure of the course. Since I had taught calculus I multiple times before this, I was able include my useful precursors and motivating questions in my lectures.
Content Created: 20+ PDF files with detailed notes and examples, as well as supplementary materials and handouts.
I implemented a two-part exam structure in MAT 190. The in-class portion of each exam is 75 minutes long and is designed to assess students' surface-level understanding of the material. These problems include tasks like "Determine the roots of f(x) = …" or "Solve 8 sin(θ) = 4 where 0 < θ < π ." In other words, they focus on problems that a Calculus I student should be able to solve quickly by identifying key characteristics of the given function or variable. I also use in-class exams to evaluate how well students follow directions. To support them, I provide detailed review guides that explicitly outline what to prepare for. This aligns with my teaching philosophy on clear expectations. As I like to tell my class, "This exam has no surprises on it."
The second component of the exam is the take-home portion, modeled after the T.I.L.T. assignments I mentioned earlier. I’ve become a strong advocate of this type of assessment. It allows me to evaluate how well students follow instructions, as they are provided with a sample problem to guide them. The greatest strength of this approach is the opportunity it provides for students to explore a single problem in depth. One former student remarked that they had never known a problem "forwards and backwards" like this before.
In-class exams can be stressful, and even I have never considered myself the best test-taker. The take-home exams, however, offer a way for students to demonstrate their attention to detail and hard work in a less pressured environment. Personally, I love seeing the results of their effort!
As a fun side note, I always award 2 points of extra credit on each exam for telling a joke. Before the exam begins, I ask, "Does everyone have a joke ready?" Phones come out, and the room fills with giggles as students search for a joke to write down. I believe this little touch of comic relief helps ease test anxiety. Sometimes, a simple smile can make a big difference, and I always enjoy seeing the jokes they choose to share.
Content Created: LaTeX files of both the in-class and take-home exams, 4 versions each with answer keys.
Previously, both homework and quizzes were conducted online using MyLab and Mastering. While I aimed to transition all assignments away from this online tool, the official course coordinator and I reached a compromise: we moved quizzes to an in-person format. As a result, I began offering weekly quizzes that aligned with the online homework and mirrored the types of questions found on the exams.
I firmly believe that students should be encouraged to study consistently in any math course, and these weekly quizzes helped reinforce that habit. As I’ve mentioned before, college is a time for students to be held accountable for their learning. The increased frequency of assessments has provided me with a much clearer picture of which students need additional support and which are progressing well. These quizzes have become an effective tool for promoting regular study habits and identifying areas where intervention may be needed.
Content Created: LaTeX files of 11 quizzes, 4 versions each with solution keys. See below for a sample.
The new precalculus curriculum includes a computer lab component to account for the additional credit hour. When this course was assigned to me, I wasn’t provided with a clear vision for these labs, so I had to get creative! Each lab session lasted about an hour and a half, during which I engaged students with hands-on assignments designed to assess various skills. To manage the workload, I worked alongside two or three undergraduate TAs who helped students as needed by circulating the room with me. Students had the option to work independently or in groups. While I encouraged collaboration, I allowed students to decide for themselves, fostering a natural formation of groups while respecting the preferences of those who struggled in group settings.
The lab assignments varied in focus. The first lab introduced students to the structure of a T.I.L.T. assignment. In another lab, I demonstrated how to use the online graphing calculator Desmos. I also created a lab centered on writing solutions and understanding grading criteria.
Lab grades were based on participation, making these sessions a "risk-free environment for practicing mathematics." This approach encouraged students to experiment and learn from their mistakes without fear of penalization. For example, if a student submitted a T.I.L.T. assignment in a lab that was 70% correct, I would provide feedback indicating that it would earn a 70% as a graded assignment but award 100% for participation. This system allowed students to focus on improving their skills while gaining valuable practice.
Students responded positively to this approach, as it gave them a safe space to try new things, make mistakes, and refine their understanding of the material.
Content Created: LaTeX files of 12 lab assignments which include exam review guides and solutions if applicable. See below for samples.
I taught MAT 115 College Algebra as an asynchronous online class. I've taught this class using both Pearson MyLab™ & Mastering™ and ALEKS™. Each system is flavored differently, so it was good experience to familiarize myself with both. MyLab seems to be appropriate for both lecture and online format since the homework assignments and quizzes follow a strict schedule. ALEKS™ on the other hand seems to be appropriate for an asynchronous online format, since this system makes a greater effort to assess each student's own mathematical skills.
I taught MAT 115 College Algebra as a hybrid course as well. I would meet with my students for 50 minutes once a week to discuss course content and to give the students an activity. Outside of this, the students were required to spend at least three hours per week in the math emporium lab to work on homework assignments and quizzes. In these labs, myself and other graduate and undergraduate TA's would assist the students when needed. This class provided both synchronous and asynchronous components.
When I taught MAT 191 Calculus I (3 credit hour version), it was the fall semester of 2020, and my two sections were taught in-person. Though our class was designed so that if we did need to transition back online due to COVID-19, then the transition would be smooth; I told my students that the course was "bug-out ready" which they found funny. I posted all my lecture notes on Canvas and each section of our textbook came with video lessons provided by Dr. Beth Lewis. This course did not have traditional tests. Instead, we gave the students TILT assignments (see below), concept checks, and homework assignments. The reason for this was to make no single assignment worth a significant portion of the final grade. In other words, a student's grade was determined by providing them with a lot of small assessments throughout the semester. While this course mode meant the instructor was responsible for a lot of grading, I very much enjoyed it.
It wasn't until Fall of 2021 that I was presented with the opportunity to teach a course without an online classroom component due to COVID-19. I was anxious to stand in front of my own classroom for the first time without also having to rely on Canvas for introductions. This particular semester was unique, though. As I describe in the following section, Course Coordination, MAT 190 Precalculus and well as other mathematics courses at UNCG has undergone significant redesign. Hence, I was tasked with the challenge of authoring my own content for this lecture. While this was a tough endeavor, I was able to add many of my own personal touches on this course and I certainly learned a lot from this experience! Being face to face with my students made me aware of how much I loved to teach!