Illegal Registration

That is a typical work purely for illegal registration.

If my manuscript (He(2009)) is not maliciously delayed by reviewers, it should be published in February 2008, The submission date of Lin (2009)[Biometrika, Volume 96, Issue 1, March 2009, Pages 243–247] happened to be January 30, 2008. The paper has been reviewed quickly in three months and is published within one year, which is rare. If it is really an original masterpiece, I have nothing to say.But the construction method and results of this article are the same as mine, showing the characteristics of illegal cybersquatting.

The title is Construction of orthogonal and nearly orthogonal Latin hypercubes, but she neither defines orthogonal and nearly orthogonal Latin hypercubes, nor does it describe her own construction method. Its structure is divided into three sections. The first and second sections review the methods of Steinberge, D.M & Lin, D.K.J, and Pang Fang. The third section announced the results of the author's "search". These results were not constructed using her own methods, nor were constructed using the literature methods introduced in section 1 and section 2, but using my method. What does search mean? Where to search? It is searching in the permutation set S of a generating vector. This process is generally called construction, not search, Only I used it to replace the construction process of zero-correlation design in order to simplify the narrative in the abstract of "Weak Correlation Experimental Designs".

She stole my optimization objective function mcc and renamed it to max. But she did not and dare not define it accurately. For further discussion, see "Optimization Guidelines Theft and Falsification" in Appendix 3. In her doctoral thesis and Lin(2010), she said that she used not max (i.e. mcc), but ρ² from Bingham (2009), her lies and deceptions were exposed by herself.

If only optimization criterion, without the exchange algorithm cannot construct the OLHD published by her in Lin (2009). She stole the core in the core for the OLHD construction technology, the exchange algorithm. As the technical core of constructing OLHD, not a word has been seen.

Their OLHD set does not include these OLHDs that run-size are a form of 4k+2, she stole the existence theorem in He (2009), and was also afraid to mention it.

Without mentioning so many basic elements, what paper is this?

B.Tang recommends his friends and collaborators to be reviewers. The evidence is that Pang Fang’s work was mentioned many times in the paper. Pang is a postgraduate of Professor Liu Minqian of Nankai University, China. The method used in his master's thesis comes from Steinberge, D.M & Lin, D.K.J (2006). Its printing date was May 1, 2008, which appeared in the main text of Lin (2009) submitted 4 months ago but not in its reference list, which must be added by the reviewer. These reviewers must be related to Pang and must be friends of B.Tang, and there is a transaction between them.

The second author of this article is Biometrika’s Indian associate editor Rahul Mukerjee, The paper has no substantive content, and Rahul has no substantive contribution to the paper. The credible funding for Lin’s PhD project is ” the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada“ and "This research was supported by the Center for Management and Development Studies, Indian Institute of Management Calcutta." is an absurd story fabricated on the spot. This is important evidence of the transaction between B.Tang and Rahul. All the above behaviors that are contrary to academic ethics cannot be achieved without Rahul's cooperation.