It is a more ingenious and despicable plagiarism way that the reviewer stealing the author’s original results during the review and publishing them first to become their own "results",

This website discloses the theft evidence of C.D.Lin and Boxin Tang and the details of their lies and fraud. This website also clarifies my views on some related issue. In order to refute their lies and counterfeiting, I also clarified my views on some related issues.

The Chinese version of this website is <CDLTST>

Contents

1. Summary of the Case

2. Core direct evidence

1 The Optimization Criterion Is the Same

2 The necessity part of the existence theorem is exactly the same

3 The Exchange Algorithm is the Same

4 The Stacking Operation Definition of Experimental Design and the Stacking Principle of Orthogonal Design Were the Same

5 Two Results are the Same

3. A Paper Purely for Illegal Registration

4. The concept definition was imitated absurdly

1 He(2009)'s Definition for Basic Concept

2 The definition system in Lin (2009)

3 Concept definition in Lin (2008)

5. Optimization Criteria Is Suspected Theft and Fraud

6. The Theorem for Existence Is Suspected Theft and Fraud

1 Directly Comparison of the Both Existence Theorems

2 "Run size n cannot be two or three" Be a False proposition.

3 The Proof logic of the Necessity Part of Lin's Existence Theorem Was Seriously out of Specification

4 The Key Logical Premise in Lin's Proof is False

5 The Sufficiency Part of the Existence Theorem Has Not Been Effectively Proved

7. Theft Exchange Algorithm

8. Theft and fraud of both stacking concept for matrices and stacking principle for orthogonal matrices

1 He (2009)'s Description and Proof of the Stackable Property of Zero Correlation Matrix

2 Lin's Stacking Concept and Stacking Theory

3 The Stacking Operation Definition of the Both Was the Same

4 Falsification of Stacking Theory

9. References