Outerwear

Coats and Jackets, Mittens and Hats, Winter Overshoes

INTRODUCTION

When it came to outfitting the Civilian Conservation Corps, nothing caused the Army Quartermaster Corps greater initial difficulty than outerwear.

The CCC was a field work program--the boys were required to perform hard manual labor, outdoors, in all weather conditions and in every climate. It followed that the 3Cs needed warm, durable outerwear cut for bending, stretching, and lifting.

This seemingly-simple requirement was one the Quartermaster Corps initially struggled to meet.

Some of the problem was logistics: in April 1933 the Army Quartermaster Corps faced the challenge of outfitting 250,000 men within a span of weeks. Fortunately, the first term of enrollment from April to September corresponded with summer in the continental U.S., affording the QMC some latitude in skimping on functional coats for the initial enrollees. The second term of enrollment from October 1933 to March 1934 brought this matter of coats to a crisis, and sent the Quartermaster scrambling for expedients to keep a quarter million men living in tents and improvised camps warm through the winter.

Compounding the difficulty of finding enough warm clothing was a cultural issue: the Army flatly refused to issue to the CCC the one wool field coat it had in great profusion, the standard soldier's wool Service Coat or tunic.

BACKGROUNDER: THE ARMY SERVICE COAT

Typical WWI-era service coat--the iconic "Doughboy Coat" of the Great War. Note the high choker collar, narrow tailored waist, four large front pockets with scalloped flaps, and shoulder tabs. Source: image of the author's grandfather, Gus Buermeyer, at Fort DuPont, DE, November 1918. Collection of the author.

1926 revisions to the Service Coat design, intended to update the coat with a cleaner image. Major changes include a falling collar with notched lapels similar to a civilian business suit. Military signifiers include the tailored waist with belt loops, four functional front pockets, brass buttons, and shoulder tabs. Source: January 1939 US Army publicity image (deliberately showcasing the older M1926 tunic), reproduced in Christopher Reuscher's Army Uniforms of World War II website.

In the U.S. Army of the early 20th century, an enlisted man was issued a single wool Service Coat. This "coat for all reasons" doubled as a spit-and-polish service coat in garrison, and, when stripped of decorations and kitted out with web gear, as a combat field coat.

In its original high-collared form the Service Coat was an icon of World War I. The "doughboy coat" was hip-length sack coat made from heavy 16 oz. or 20 oz. Melton wool. Common characteristics include a stiff standing "choker" collar, a fitted form with a high "natural" waist and a wide skirt, provision for an external belt at the waist, four functional front pockets with scalloped pocket flaps, and military brass buttons and shoulder tabs. Late war versions switched the large lower pockets from external patch to internal hanging fabrication.

The doughboy tunic was replaced in Regular Army service in 1926 by an updated Service Coat design with a falling collar with notched lapels, somewhat more like a civilian business suit coat. Pockets were simplified with cleaner lines and simple rectangular flaps. The waist was tightened for a sharper, more tailored appearance in garrison. Though still intended to be a combat tunic in wartime, the trim fit made the Service Coat of the later 1920s ill suited either to the rigors of combat or to fatigue work involving bending and lifting.

As the component of the uniform most visible to civilians in peacetime and to the enemy in wartime, the Service Coat signified a soldier's legal status as a man under arms. The Civilian Conservation Corps, however, was a civilian program. From the inception of the Conservation Corps in 1934 to its end in 1942, there was great concern that the CCC be clearly understood to be a civil work program not a covert military training system.

It was therefore the firm policy of the Army Quartermaster Corps never to issue an unaltered Service Coat to a Conservation Corps man. I have yet to discover a written mandate setting out this policy. Instead, it seems to have been a cultural assumption, but one so powerfully shared as to be beyond the need for formal articulation.

MOBILIZATION CRISIS: 1933-1934

If the Service Coat was not to be worn as the basic outer layer by the CCC, the problem remained: what was?

The QMC's enormous supply of unissued World War I-surplus tunics became the raw material for a solution. No longer able to be issued to the Regular Army since the introduction of the revised service coat in 1926, surplus WWI-era coats with choker collars were available to be issued to the CCC in enormous numbers provided they could be stripped of their most military features. "Military uniforms, of course," noted Col. Duncan K. Major, the official War Department representative to the Emergency Conservation Work advisory council, in a widely reprinted 1934 article, "were not suitable for issue to the civilian members of the Conservation Corps. However, it was possible to alter this clothing so that it was not of a distinctive military appearance and to issue the clothing so altered to the foresters... . Alteration of this clothing was done very largely at the factory of the Philadelphia Quartermaster Depot."

For additional warmth, the Quartermaster Corps turned to yet another WWI legacy--simple wool vests or jerkins which had been developed as a wartime expedient back in 1918, but which had never been issued. Finally, the QMC drew on its equally enormous stocks of WWI surplus wool overcoats to provide a heavyweight outer layer.

From April 1933 until well into 1934, QMC seamstresses labored under enormous pressure to demilitarize the outdated WWI-era garments. For the staff of the Philadelphia Quartermaster Depot, many of them women and minorities, clothing the Corps in its initial mobilization was an epic achievement. During the first 90 day period, noted the Army-Navy Journal on 8 July 1933, the Depot altered 200,000 wool coats, 225,000 overcoats, and 200,000 pairs of pants. The CCC owes much of its initial success to the work of these unsung seamstresses, cutters, and laborers.

COAT: CUT DOWN WWI WOOL SERVICE COAT, EMERGENCY EXPEDIENT

Cut-down WWI Service Coat, modified for issue to CCC. Shield-shaped patch rather than hanging front pockets suggest the original tunic was M1917 pattern or earlier. Note removed upper breast pockets and replacement of standing "choker" collar with civilian Mackinaw-style shawl collar. Source: Post by Gareth Thompson in topic Civilian Conservation Corps Patches Insignia in the US Militaria Forum.

To modify a WWI-era service coat for CCC use, the seamstresses at the Philadelphia Depot made several alterations. First and foremost, the iconic "choker" collar was cut away, replaced by a shawl collar clearly derived from contemporary civilian Mackinaw cloth work coats. Shoulder tabs and waist belt loops were also cut away. Brass military buttons if present were replaced by brown bakelite or plastic. Finally, the upper two patch breast pockets were usually cut off.

The result was a garment which was neither fish nor fowl--clearly military with its tailored natural waist, thigh-length cut and combined yoke and center back panel, but stripped of all Army ornamentation. The lack of upper pockets and the small proportions of the shawl collar in comparison to the large lower pockets and flared skirt give it a curiously unbalanced look.

To me, no garment speaks more eloquently both to the hybrid military and civilian character of the CCC and to the achievement of the emergency mobilization than this one.

Original examples are exceedingly scarce on the secondary market. Understandably, given its wretched appearance, it has never been reproduced.

Two images left: A second example of an original cut-down WWI Service Coat. The QM tag in this garment dates the original tunic from which it was cut down to a 1920 contract. Source: expired eBay auction archived in Worthodepia.

Six images above and below: third cut down Service Coat, modified from an M1918 "Pershing" tunic. Note contrast in color between OD source tunic and gray wool replacement shawl collar. Five images clockwise from center above show details of replacement collar stitching; note fabric tape backing on underside of folded and sewn outer hem. On this tunic, the upper hanging pockets and flaps were left functional, perhaps because a hanging pocket would have been harder to remove than patch pockets, which can simply be cut off. Source: collection of Kent Vining, private communication to the author.

Cut-down tunics in the field with the CCC. Three images, left to right: 1934 image of boys at the Fort Knox induction camp, post "Raising and Deploying a Conservation Army" in the Forest Army blog; Arnold Benson of Camp Hill City, Newton Lake, in the Black Hills of South Dakota, 1935, Arnold Benson Collection, Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC) Museum of South Dakota; CCC Camp, TVA #22, near Esco, Tennessee, 1933, Lewis Hine Photograph, U.S. National Archive.

Two tunics, on the boys far left and far right. On left, note the yoke-cut fabric panel in the center back of the coat. On the right, note the shield-shaped patch lower pocket. Both are strongly indicative of cut down tunics from an M1917 or earlier pattern. Source: CCC Camp, TVA #22, near Esco, Tennessee, November 17,1933, Lewis Hine Photograph, U.S. National Archive.

COAT: WOOL, TUNIC STYLE, NEW MANUFACTURE, QM TENTATIVE SPECIFICATION DATED 7 DECEMBER 1934

New manufacture wool work coat in a modified tunic style. Source: post by user "reuscher" in topic CCC Coat & Cap in the US Militaria Forum.

As enrollment in the CCC swelled to 500,000 in 1935, demand for coats appears to have exhausted the supply of WWI tunics. In response, the Quartermaster Corps turned to the private market to contract for new coats.

At left is an example of one such a coat which appeared in a posting in the US Militaria form. The coat includes a pristine QMC tag revealing it to have been made by the noted manufacturer Sigmund Eisner under an Emergency Conservation Work contract dated June 17, 1935 to a specification issued on December 7, 1934.

At a casual glance, it appears similar to the cut-down WWI tunics which preceded it. However, close examination reveals several differences. It is cut to a looser fit and lacks the tapered natural waist of a true service coat--and was probably a more practical work jacket as a result. The pockets are now hanging rather than patch, with simple square flaps without a button. The coat has a falling collar with a notched lapel, an interesting departure from the QMC's apparent conviction that shawl collars made a more "civilian" impression. Overall, the impression is of a hybrid between a service tunic and a civilian chore coat.

That the QMC was still issuing contracts for such a hybrid coat even as it was developing specifications for the improved CCC-specific wool lumber jackets discussed below speaks to a continuing sense of emergency in outfitting the Corps as late as mid-1935. This tunic and the "M1926-style" OD Mackinaw discussed below, the specification for which was adopted on the same date of June 17, 1935, may have been a short-term "bridge" procurement, intended to plug a gap between declining stocks of Great War surplus garments and the improved, CCC-specific outerwear which was not quite ready to go into production.

JERKIN: WOOL, WWI EMERGENCY EXPEDIENT, NO KNOWN QM SPECIFICATION

Wool jerkin. This garment was posted to the US Militaria Forum and tentatively identified as an unissued emergency wool jerkin from WWI. It is possible that the jerkins issued to the CCC were a mix of WWI surplus and new manufacture. Several examples similar to this one, all finished with fabric tape around the ends of the wool panels and fabric backing behind the placket, have traded in the secondary market. Source: World War I Nerd's "A.E.F. Jerkins 1917-1919" in the US Militaria Forum. Underlying credit: photo from catalog of Advance Guard Militaria.

To provide additional warmth under the recycled tunic jackets, the QMC turned to a cache of WWI-era wool jerkins or vests.

By the time the US entered the Great War in 1917 our British and French allies had already fielded a variety of jerkins: simple sleeveless vests intended to warm and protect the core. Troops on the front lines preferred to wear the jerkin rather than a wool overcoat as the vest-style garment was far less constraining.

French and English jerkins were made of durable leather outers somewhat like a modern flight jacket, and were lined on the inside with thick woolen blanket felt.

In addition to purchasing French- and British-made jerkins, the Quartermaster Corps developed its own US-made versions in russet leather. However, as the expert WWI textile historian "World War Nerd" of the US Militaria forum writes:

"As the supply of leather began to dwindle in 1918, the Quartermaster Corps was forced to substitute other materials, such as cotton and wool for leather, whose availability was limited due to the urgent demand for more hobnailed shoes. Some of the emergency measures included making rifle slings from cotton webbing and fabricating jerkins entirely from wool."

"World War Nerd" is uncertain whether these late-1918 emergency wool jerkins were ever issued to American troops in France.

"Aside from having seen numerous physical examples of this particular garment," he writes, "I have been unable to find any mention of it in either wartime or post war Quartermaster or government publications... . The only conclusion I can come to, is that like so many other articles of late war equipment and clothing made for the AEF late in 1918, the wool jerkin was either never issued or it was only issued in very limited quantities."

After languishing in Quartermaster Depots for 15 years, the WWI wool jerkins appear to have been issued wholesale to the CCC in 1933. Several period CCC photographs show boys wearing jerkins with fabric tape on the edges of the panels identical to the garment at left.

That said, other photographs of the CCC at work show jerkins lacking the fine finish work of the World War I surplus garments. In the absence of any written evidence, I hypothesize that these rougher jerkins may be new garments produced specifically for the CCC in 1933 and 1934. Finally, some images seem to show wool jerkins with a more tailored waist, or with lower front patch pockets. It is possible that these more tailored jerkins could be WWI tunics cut down into vests by QMC seamstresses.

Note the strong flare to the skirt of this jerkin in comparison to the straight cut sides of the WWI jerkin above. It is possible that this is a cut-down WWI tunic. Camp S-51 Groton State Forest, 1933. Source: Vermont Historical Society.

Wool jerkin with fabric tape around the skirt and arm holes--a close match to the original above. Location and date unknown; image source Living New Deal website.

Jerkins seemed to remain in common use in cold-climate CCC camps well into the middle 1930s. They may have been taken in locally in summer by individual camp supply offices to be reissued to new enrollees the next winter. Source: "CCC boys in Apple Trees," Acton, Maine, 1934, A Maine Encyclopedia.

OVERCOAT: WOOL, WWI SURPLUS, M1918, M1917 OR EARLIER

M1918 overcoat with original brass buttons and ink marks confirming issue to CCC. Source: expired eBay listing Vintage Original WWI Overcoat US USGI CCC Civilian Conservation Corps

For a heavy warm outer layer, the QMC provided the first four cohorts of CCC enrollees with WWI surplus overcoats of made from heavy 20 or 22 oz. Melton wool cloth.

Though details differed among models, all these coats had a double breast with a swallow cut and a V-shaped pattern of buttons, and a standing collar without notches in the lapels. Enlisted men's versions of these coats had brown plain buttons; officers' coats had embossed brass buttons.

World War I production saw several simplifications to the basic design. The M1917 update included modifications to reduce the amount of wool required to produce the garment, including a simplified breast and plain rather than turned-back cuffs, albeit now with ornamental straps. The V-pattern of the buttons was retained. The final M1918 version reflected still further economies: a shorter above-the-knee cut, and loss of the ornamental cuff straps.

During 1933 and 1934 World War I-era overcoats were issued promiscuously to the CCC. Where possible, the QMC removed the brass buttons from officer's models and substituted bakelite or other synthetic buttons. However, numerous photographs show coats with brass as well as plastic buttons in the hands of CCC boys.

Like the jerkins, overcoats seem to have been taken back into inventory by individual camp supply officers during the summer to be reissued during the following winter. The names of two different enrollees inked into the lining of the coat at left testify to this practice.

Despite its ubiquity the heavy wool overcoat with its long skirt was never a good garment for the kind of active field work the CCC boys were expected to perform. After 1935 it was superseded by the CCC-specific lumber jackets and Mackinaw coats discussed below.

Another original World War I overcoat with a March 1918 QMC contract tag and ink marks on the collar confirming issue to a CCC boy named Butter, enrollee number 282268. This garment has green plastic buttons, likely post-manufacture replacements sewn on either by the QMC prior to issue to the CCC or during some subsequent repair. It is remarkably poorly cut, with asymmetrical buttonholes and a misaligned collar when fully buttoned up--eloquent testimony to poor quality control during WWI emergency production. Source: Collection of the author.

Original M1917 overcoat with CCC unit and rate patches; contract date April 12, 1917. Differences from the wartime M1918 include a longer, calf-length cut and an ornamental cuff strap (the strap on this garment was cut off before reissue to the CCC, but a stub of fabric and stitching remain). Company 1671 was a Michigan veteran's company, as symbolized by the "USCCC within V" patch. Organized in spring 1933, the men were stationed on Mackinac Island through late 1934 when they moved to Grayling. Credit: Images Deb Patten, garment now in collection of the author.

WWI-era overcoats are common in images of the very earliest days of the CCC. Left: recruits at Fort Hoyle, NJ conditioning camp, April 1933. Source: Suddeutscher Zeitung photograph in Alamy Archive. Above: one of the iconic images of the first weeks of the New Deal, recruits entering a section of George Washington National Forest near Luray, 18 April 1933. Source: New York Times photo, Alamy Archive. Note overcoats slung over arms.

Enrollee Sy Lenzen of Glidden, Wisconsin, at a camp in Malheur County, Oregon in 1935. The youngest of 12 children in his family, he was 21 years old when he joined the Corps. Lenzen wears a typical World War I surplus great coat, likely a longer M1917 model--clearly such coats were still in circulation when Lenzen reported to his work camp in October 1935. Source: Lenzen Family photograph, Connie Lenzen geneology page.

OVERCOAT: SHORT, WOOL, OD, M1926 MACKINAW STYLE, QM TENTATIVE SPECIFICATION DATED 7 DECEMBER 1934

Three images, original "M1926" OD Mackinaw with original ECW contract tag. Source: unknown expired auction, cached images provided to author in private communication by Mark Headlee.

As stocks of WWI-surplus wool overcoats dwindled in 1934, the QMC turned briefly to one of its own specifications, the Officer's Short Overcoat pattern adopted in 1926, for a replacement.

Unlike enlisted men, who were issued clothing contracted for and purchased by the QMC, Army officers of the 1920s and 1930s purchased their own uniforms from private tailors, often in superior grades of fabric and finish. So long as the resulting garments complied with the corresponding written specifications they were acceptable to the Army. The "M1926" Officer's Short Overcoat specification appears to have authorized officers to purchase and wear Mackinaw-style coats in olive drab. The specification called for a short double-breasted overcoat with a single vent, deep shawl collar, belt loops and belt with an overlapped double-button closure, large functional patch front pockets with rectangular flaps, and plain cuffs.

For a short time around 1934-35 the QMC seems to have taken this specification for an officer's garment and issued it as a tentative specification for winter overcoats in heavy, blanket-weight wool for the CCC.

At left is an original OD "M1926-style" Mackinaw with a pristine QMC tag. The tag references a tentative specification adopted on December 7, 1934 and an Emergency Conservation Work contract date of June 17, 1935.

It's suggestive that the tentative specification date for this OD Mackinaw is the exactly the same as for the "tunic-style OD wool coat" discussed above. Both garments may have been a short-term "bridge" procurement to cover the gap between dwindling stocks of WW1 surplus and the introduction of the improved CCC-specific jackets discussed in the next section.

Many olive drab Mackinaws in this style survive, but most are finished in finer wool and bear private tailor labels--these are U.S. Army officer's garments. The true CCC OD Mackinaw will have a QMC tag and be made of much rougher wool.

Local Experienced Man "Big Jim" Richardson in an "M1926-style" OD Mackinaw at Camp Free Soil, Michigan in 1936. Richardson was a farmer and a much-respected LEM in CCC Company 2695. Source: Bentley Historical Library, University of Michigan, image BL019890.

"M1926-style" OD Mackinaw worn by enrollee on upper left, Company 3489, Crosby, MS, 1935. All his mates are wearing the OD lumber jacket. Source: "Civilian Conservation Corps, Racial Segregation, and the Building of the Angeles National Forest," KCET.org.

WINDBREAKERS: WOOL, CIVILIAN BASEBALL STYLE, NO KNOWN SPECIFICATION

Three images of CCC enrollees wearing dark-colored, zippered baseball or field-sports style windreakers. First: Group of CCC enrollees from Idaho just arrived in camp near Andersonville, Tennessee, on October 20, 1933. Source: NARA. Second: Boy in line at Camp Dix NJ conditioning camp. Image captioned 1935 but I strongly suspect 1933 actual date. Source: Getty Images.

Images of CCC boys in the mobilization years commonly show enrollees wearing a variety of lightweight zippered wool windbreakers. These jackets closely resemble contemporary civilian baseball and field sports jackets.

The CCC windbreaker jackets are form-fitting, waist-length coats of what appears to be light or medium-weight wool. However, they differ wildly in details such as collar shape, pocket placement, presence or absence of cuff straps or ornamentation, and presence or absence of separately-sewn waistbands. Most are closed with a front zipper--this at a time when zippers were unknown in military clothing design. However, button-closed versions are seen as well.

Some of these ubiquitous "baseball-style" jackets may have been the private property of their wearers. But a remarkable series of high-resolution portraits of the men of CCC Company 1995 at Heyburn State Park near Plummer, Idaho, in 1934 show multiple enrollees wearing identical dark-colored zippered jackets; these must have been some type of uniform issue. Written evidence confirms what we see in the photographs: the Table of Allowance in the 1935 edition of the War Department Regulations for the Civilian Conservation Corps calls for each enrollee to be issued a "windbreaker" (not otherwise described) in addition to a modified WW1 OD tunic and a modified WW1 OD overcoat.

Cryptic hints in written accounts may shed further light on these mystery jackets. Writing in 1934, Maj. John A. Porter of the QMC noted that

"The problem of supplying winter clothing to the camps during the second period presented another problem to the Quartermaster Corps, as it meant going into the market for large quantities of special types of winter clothing and equipment suitable for the welfare and comfort of the members of the Civilian Conservation Corps during the winter months. To provide these men with winter clothing has necessitated the purchase of the following articles:

  • 300,000 winter caps
  • 300,000 lumber jackets or windbreakers
  • 300,000 felt jerkins
  • 300,000 pairs arctic overshoes
  • 300,000 comforters
  • 600,000 mattress covers
  • 300,000 mattresses
  • 1,200,000 sheets

at an approximate total cost of $6,720,000, or $22.40 per man. This purchase has contributed much toward the revival of the clothing industry of the country and has indirectly given employment to thousands of textile workers at a time when it was severely needed."

It seems highly probable that these baseball-style jackets are indeed Maj. Porter's "windbreakers."

As for the many variations among this class of CCC jackets, consider Quartermaster Corps historian Erna Risch's observation that even as modification of the World War 1 surplus clothing was underway at the Philadelphia Quartermaster Depot, regional quartermasters were given great latitude to procure locally any type of garment which Philadelphia could not yet supply:

"The Quartermaster General decentralized the purchase of all classes of supplies to [the other regional] depots, directing depot quartermasters to circulate information as widely as possible among prospective bidders, including those at facilities listed in the procurement plans. Once the Civilian Conservation Corps completed initial mobilization, the Philadelphia Depot purchased all clothing and equipage to avoid competition among the depots, but it continued to make contracts in all parts of the country."

The hypothesis that these dark zippered windbreakers are civilian baseball-style jackets purchased by the regional QM Depots for the CCC, probably without benefit of any single specification, fits nicely with the available photographic and written evidence. For now, however, it remains just that -- a hypothesis.

Two images: four men wearing identical windbreaker jackets, CCC Company 1995 at Heyburn State Park near Plummer, Idaho, in 1934. Source: Library of the University of Idaho.

PRIME YEARS: 1935-1938

Even as seamstresses were still cutting down World War I Service Coats, the Quartermaster Corps' designers were drawing up patterns for new coats and warmth layers purpose-made for the ECW program.

In doing so they followed two approaches. In some cases, the QMC drew on specialized military designs, especially clothing developed during the 1920s and early 1930s for the Army Air Corps. To supplement these military patterns the QMC also adopted designs inspired by contemporary civilian workwear, especially the common Mackinaw logger's coat.

The QMC began issuing contracts for this new generation of CCC-specific outerwear in 1935; they were ubiquitous in the field by the end of 1936. This suite of CCC-specific outerwear would remain remarkably stable, equipping the majority of enrollees all the way through 1942.

JACKET, LUMBER: WOOL, OD, COSSACK STYLE, CCC-SPECIFIC, QM TENTATIVE SPECIFICATION, DATE UNKNOWN

Leather A-1 Flight jacket, the 1920s progenitor of the iconic wool CCC work jacket. Source: article "American Flight Jackets From 1927 to 1946 – The Complete Guide" at Heddels.com.

Original CCC-specific OD wool work jacket. Source: expired eBay listing "ORIGINAL 1927-1932 WOOL A-1 FLIGHT JACKET" archived on Worthpoint.

Second example of an original CCC OD wool work jacket, this variation with wooden rather than plastic buttons, five rather than six buttons above the waistband, and a plain wool placket carried down to the bottom hem. Source: post "Unidentified Wool Coat - A1 Pre War Flight Jacket in Wool?" in US Militaria forum.

For a three-season field jacket to replace cut-down WWI tunics and expedient "windbreakers" the Army Quartermaster Corps turned to its pioneering flight jacket design, the A-1 pilot's jacket of the 1920s, and its many civilian "cossack" derivatives.

Army clothing design between the wars was largely stagnant. As Erna Risch points out,

"In the years immediately following World War I surplus property was ... a determining factor. When World War I ended, the existence of great stocks of nearly all the items of clothing and equipment which were then standard hindered the development of new items. It was approved War Department policy to issue such stocks until they were exhausted."

That said, despite the overhang of World War I deadstock the Quartermaster Corps did create a few notably innovative clothing designs between the wars. Many of these were driven by the requirements of the burgeoning Army Air Corps. Pilots of the open-cockpit biplanes of the 1920s required a windproof shell to protect them from the harsh cold experienced at flying airspeeds and altitudes. They also needed a jacket that allowed them to bend easily at the torso to reach controls throughout the cockpit and also to scan the sky behind them for enemy aircraft.

The Quartermaster Corps' solution was the A-1 leather flight jacket, shown at top left. First produced in 1927 and replaced by a successor design in 1931, the A-1 was the ur-flight jacket, the progenitor to which all subsequent flight and bomber jackets trace their lineage.

Details vary widely on production examples. However, common features include a high cut waist to facilitate torso motion and a woolen knit waistband and cuffs to insulate the wearer from cold winds. Goatskin, sheepskin, and horsehide were all used at different times and by different contractors to fabricate the shell. The A-1 had two flapped patch pockets near the waist, though specifics of size and stitching varied wildly among contractors. The original design also had a knit "choker" collar closed by two buttons.

Aviators of the day were glamorous public figures whose "look" carried considerable cachet, so the A-1 style was swiftly adapted for sale to the civilian market under the moniker "cossack jacket." The earliest such jackets were made of leather and were close cousins of the military progenitor, albeit usually with leather rather than knit waistbands and cuffs, and a falling or shawl rather than a standing collar. As the style spread, other variations were made in every conceivable fabric, including wool and cotton.

When the Quartermaster Corps needed a purpose-built CCC work jacket these "cossack" jackets provided a ready template. Though I have not yet located an example with a legible QM tag, the tables of allowance in the 1937 War Department Regulations for the Civilian Conservation Corps suggest the actual official name of this garment was Jacket, Lumber.

The lumber jacket tentative specification called for an A-1-style jacket, but with unlined olive drab wool substituted for expensive leather in the shell panels. Windproof knit cuffs followed the same style as the ancestral military A-1, but the choker collar was replaced by a knit shawl collar closer to the civilian cossack style. Beveled pocket flaps echoed the pocket flaps on the coat-style uniform shirt. Finally, the waist band was changed to an elasticized band in a muticolored wool knit secured with two buttons to ensure a wind-tight fit.

Surviving examples of the CCC lumber jacket show some variation in fine details. Some have five placket buttons above the two-button waistband closure, others six. Buttons can be plastic or, less commonly, wood. On some models, the elasticized waistband completely covers the placket; on others, it stops short at the placket edge leaving a plain wool placket down to the bottom hem. Some jackets with the plain wool placket at the hem also include cloth backing on the back of the placket. Most of the jackets were dyed to a medium OD shade, but some appear almost brown.

Most of the elasticized waistbands are in a red palette, but multicolored green waistbands also appear. Developed prior to 1933 for civilian garments, these multi-hued elasticized waistbands became a signature feature of Quartermaster Corps jackets designed exclusively for the CCC -- they do not appear on non-CCC Army designs.

Trim, flexible, and warm for the weight, the OD lumber jacket was a winner. Unique to the CCC, it became an icon of the Corps. So practical and attractive is the basic design that replica versions are made and worn as streetwear to this day.

This jacket has caused considerable confusion among militaria collectors. Due to its close resemblance to its military progenitor, it has made its way into some reference books under the misnomer "wool A-1 flight jacket." In truth, there is no evidence that this jacket was designed for the Army Air Corps or was ever original issue for Air Corps pilots. However, there is reason to believe that at least some surplus CCC OD lumber jackets were reissued to Army Air Force ground crews during World War II.

Reproductions of this garment have been made several times by different vendors, but these too need to be handled with caution.

The noted Japanese heritage workwear house Buzz Rickson's produced a fine quality reproduction some years ago, but it was misidentified as a "wool A-1 flight jacket," and its authenticity was compromised by the application of a spurious US Army Air Force logo under the shawl collar. Fortunately this logo is easily concealed if the collar is kept rolled down. A second Japanese heritage boutique, The Real McCoy, currently offers an entirely correct, high-quality reproduction without the spurious USAAF details. Yet another fine Japanese boutique, Warehouse Co., presently offers a version in the less common brown shade.

Other reproductions of declining authenticity have been offered by vendors such as Alpha Industries, Spearhead Militaria, and Top Pots. Most of these second-tier replicas have a modern monochrome elasticized waistband and/or collar that bears little resemblance to the correct, CCC-specific multicolored elasticized wool knits

Third original example, very large size 50, six buttons, complete elasticized waistband. Source: expired eBay auction "ORIGINAL 1930s Civilian Conservation Corps Wool Work Jacket Size 50 CCC."

CCC OD lumber jackets worn by most of the men in this group portrait of Co 3489, Crosby, MS, 1935. Source; "Civilian Conservation Corps, Racial Segregation, and the Building of the Angeles National Forest," KCET.org.

By the late 1930s, mass issue of the OD lumber jacket was giving many CCC companies a remarkably uniform appearance, especially when contrasted to the motley outerwear of the mobilization years. Civilian Conservation Corps members assigned to Camp Meriwether, in Meriwether County, Georgia. Source: Georgia Archives, Vanishing Georgia Collection, reproduced in Georgia Encyclopedia.

JACKET, LUMBER: WOOL, BUFFALO CHECK, MACKINAW STYLE, QM TENTATIVE SPECIFICATION DATED 16 MAY 1935

Original example of the extremely rare buffalo check CCC lumber jacket. Source: formerly collection of Mr. Kenneth Lewis, now in collection of the author.

1938 photo of a Morse Code class at a CCC camp in Utah. Boy on left is wearing the buffalo check jacket. Source: Civilian Conservation Corps and the AARS.

In addition to the OD wool jacket, another CCC-specific lumber jacket was produced in buffalo check, a black and red plaid. This distinctly non-military plaid cloth closely resembles the fabrics used in civilian Mackinaw-cloth work jackets of the period.

The original buffalo check fabric was developed and popularized by the famous Woolrich Mill in Pennsylvania; however, by the 1930s similar plaids were available from many woolen mills.

The distinguished militaria collector Mr. Kenneth Lewis, author of the US Army uniform history Doughboy to GI: US Army Clothing and Equipment 1900-1945, has kindly provided images of an original example of this extremely rare buffalo check CCC jacket from his personal collection.

Though it shares a superficial silhouette with the OD lumber jacket discussed above, the buffalo check jacket differs in a number of details. Rather than being made separately from knit wool, the shawl collar of the plaid jacket is made from the same fabric as the body of the coat. Similarly, the cuffs too are made from coat material rather than knit, and are closed with a single button. Lastly, front patch pockets have a scalloped flap and V-shaped bottoms, and are much more ornate that the square pockets with notched flaps of the OD wool jackets.

In essence, this jacket seems to be a single-breasted version of a contemporary logger's coat as much or more than it is an adaptation of the flight or cossack jacket pattern.

Mr. Lewis' jacket bears an original QMC tag giving a tentative specification date of May 16, 1935 and an ECW contract number dated July 18, 1935. Given the apparently short production run, I hypothesize that the buffalo check lumber jacket predates the common OD cossack version and represents either an experimental design, or, an expedient procurement of an essentially civilian pattern.

CCC lumber jackets in buffalo check have been reproduced twice by heritage workwear boutiques, once by Buzz Rickson and once by The Real McCoy. The Rickson is a fanatically accurate stitch-for-stitch reproduction of this exact original, right down to the same spec and contract dates on the tag. The McCoy replica has a bolder plaid pattern and somewhat more severe pockets; it may be patterned on a subtly different unknown original.

Two further images of the buffalo check work jacket: back side, and detail of QMC tag with ECW contract number dated July 18, 1935, and tentative spec date of May 16, 1935. Source: collection of the author.

Men of Company 1503, Camp SCS-1, Robinson Lake in the Idaho Panhandle National Forest, ca. 1935. The entire company appears to have been issued the buffalo check lumber coat. Source: University of Idaho Civilian Conservation Corps in Idaho Collection.

SWEATER: OD, V-NECK, "TYPE A MECHANIC'S SWEATER"

SWEATER: OD, V-NECK, PULLOVER STYLE, QM SPECIFICATION 8-97 TYPE A SHAKER DATED 7 APRIL 1933

SWEATER: OD, V-NECK, PULLOVER STYLE, QM TENTATIVE SPECIFICATION DATED 8 APRIL 1936

Two images above, early production example of Type A sweater manufactured under an August 1935 ECW contract for the CCC. This example, which the tag states conforms to the original Army Specification 8-97, has a collar knit in finer wool with vertical ribs. Source: Charles R. Lemons, communication to Civilian Conservation Corps living historians and reenactors Facebook group, October 29, 2019.

For a warm underlayer to replace the WWI-surplus jerkins for the CCC, the Quartermaster Corps selected a standard Army V-neck sweater made to a pattern adopted in April 1933.

Designed to be a warmth layer for ground forces, this heavy worsted wool sweater in a ribbed shaker knit proved too warm for most foot troops. However, it found favor with the mechanics of the growing Army Air Corps. Just as pilots needed new kinds of workwear in the 1920s, so too did the mechanics who cared for the aircraft on the ground. Working outdoors on the flight line or in cold and draughty hangers, but needing flexibility and dexterity to reach deep inside cramped fuselages and engine mounts, the mechanics found the new V-neck sweater a perfect winter working layer. Carried in the Army Air Force clothing table under the title "Sweater, Mechanic's, OD Worsted, Type A," it became a staple of Army Air Force ground crews throughout the 1930s and into World War II.

Military clothing historian Charles R. Lemons notes the following identifying details:

This mid-thigh sweater is knitted of heavy weight olive drab wool with stretch knit bottom and sleeve cuffs. Overall, the knit is a herringbone pattern, with the sleeves knitted separately and sewn on. The standing neck opening is V shaped in the front and is made of tightly knit, lighter weight wool which is doubled over and sewn into place. The sleeve cuffs and waistband are knitted as part of the basic sweater, but also in a tighter weave.

ECW contracts for true Specification 8-97 sweaters with the full ribbed Shaker knit stitch were issued as early as August 1935. Later CCC production followed a tentative specification adopted on April 8, 1936. It is possible this later tentative spec relaxed the requirement for the true ribbed shaker stitch in favor of a simpler, more economical stitch, possibly a half fisherman's rib.

Type A Mechanic's sweaters are extremely common in CCC images from 1936 onwards.

Two images, above and left: later example of Type A mechanic's sweater for the CCC manufactured under a May 1938 CIV contract to a new Tentative Specification adopted April 8, 1936. The more subtle ribbing suggests the tentative spec may have relaxed the requirement for a true shaker stitch; perhaps in favor of something like a half-fisherman. Source: Charles R. Lemons, communication to Civilian Conservation Corps living historians and reenactors Facebook group, October 29, 2019.

Michigan CCC enrollee, possibly a medic, in V-Neck Mechanic's Sweater, 1936. Source: University of Michigan Bentley Historical Library Image Bank, image BL019910.


Enrollees in V-Neck Mechanic's Sweaters, Camp Charleston, Coles County IL, 1940. Source: "CCC Camps in Coles County," in Lincoln Log Cabin State Historic Site webpage.

COAT: WOOL, MACKINAW, BLUE (CIVILIAN CONSERVATION CORPS), QMC TENTATIVE SPECIFICATION DATED 16 APRIL 1935

Three images, original CCC-Specific Blue Mackinaw Coat. Manufactured by Morris Kopp under a CCC contract issued in May 1938. Source: formerly collection of Mark Headlee, now in collection of the author.

The wool lumber jackets discussed above were three-season garments, warm enough for mild winters in a temperate climate but not suited to the rigors of a northern winter. CCC boys in the Pacific Northwest, Upper Midwest, and New England required a true winter jacket.

In May 1935 the QMC released a new tentative specification for a true heavyweight wool winter work coat for the Conservation Corps made from heavy Melton cloth. This clean-sheet-of-paper design seemingly drew largely on civilian patterns for inspiration. It closely resembles a contemporary Pacific Northwest Mackinaw-cloth logger's or hunter's jacket, including the cape-style doubled fabric at the shoulders, two patch pockets on the lower front, and falling collar with notched lapel. The straight rather than fitted cut below the armpits and single rather than double breast present a striking contrast with the fitted waist and fabric belt of M1926 Army-style Mackinaw discussed above.

Its most remarkable feature is the full-length cape back, in which the second outer layer of fabric is carried down the entire back of the garment nearly to the hem. This double back afforded the wearer extraordinary protection in snowy and wet conditions.

Surviving examples seem to have been finished to a high standard, for example, with cloth backing on the undersides of the wool pocket flaps. As is usual with QMC contracts, manufacturers seem to have been permitted a degree of variation in fine details such as the width of the lapel--in some examples the lapel is equal in depth to the collar, in others, it is a half-inch or so narrower. Some lapels are straight cut, others curve out to a point at the notch below the collar.

The choice of dark navy-blue fabric is an intriguing departure from the QMC's tendency to stick with Army olive drab as the color for CCC woolens. Absent any written documentation, we can only speculate as to the QMC's thinking. Possibly, the Quartermaster felt that a coat which varied so completely from contemporary Army issue should be finished in an distinctive non-military (or at least, non-Army) color. It certainly suggests that the Army had no intention of cross-issuing the jacket to the regular military.

This CCC-specific design seems to have been an entire success. Examples are ubiquitous in wintertime images of CCC enrollees in cold climates from late 1935 onwards.

Authentic examples of this coat are scarce, and retail for north of $1500. A very high quality reproduction has been offered by the Japanese workwear boutique The Real McCoy.

Four images -- Second original example of the Blue Mackinaw Coat, in pristine deadstock condition. This example, from a September 1938 contract run, exhibits the full width lapel below the collar. Note high quality lining on underside of pocket flap. Source: private listing, White Head Eagle vintage clothing boutique, Tokyo.

Two images of the Blue Mackinaw Coat in the field with the CCC. Vintage colorization is quite accurate, especially in right-hand image. Sources unknown.

Navy Blue Mackinaw Coat in the field with CCC Company 1156 of Chicopee Falls, MA, ca. 1935-37. Note wide variety of acceptable lapel widths and shapes within the specification. Source: New England Travels blog.

These two members of CCC Company 158, Great Pond, ME, are wearing identical heavy wool coats in two different sizes. However, these are not the standard April 1935 spec coat. Note the lack of the cape shoulder, the wide collar combined with narrow lapel, and the pockets with angled bottoms echoing the pocket flap. These jackets may have been made to some sort of short-lived tentative spec, perhaps an experimental precursor to the definitive cape-backed coat. With CCC outerwear, there is an exception to be found to every rule. Source: Southwest Harbor Public Library.

LATE YEARS: 1939-1942

COAT: WOOL, SPRUCE GREEN, CCC-SPECIFIC, MACKINAW STYLE, QMC TENTATIVE SPECIFICATION DATED 3 OCTOBER 1939

Simultaneous with the introduction of the 1939 CCC-specific spruce-green dress tunic and trousers, the Corps also received a new, spruce green dress winter coat. This Mackinaw-style coat would be the first and only dress-quality outerwear ever issued to the CCC.

Though superficially similar to the rough blanket wool "M1926"-style CCC Mackinaws of the middle 1930s, this late CCC coat was finished to a much higher standard, and was clearly designed simultaneously with its companion, the 1939 spruce green tunic.

The front includes a double breast and a deep shawl collar. The breast was closed by three pairs of buttons, with a very slight V shaped spacing of button holes, wider at the top and narrower toward the hem. A fabric loop on the left side of the shawl collar permitted it to be closed up tight with a hidden fourth top button at need. Two large patch pockets with rounded corners were closed with a V-shaped flap.

The back of the dress coat echoes the pleated design of the companion tunic. However, the Mackinaw adds an arctuate shoulder yoke, and has four single pleats and one center double pleat running from the belt line to the yoke, rather than four single pleats placed symmetrically above and below the waist as on the tunic. Like the tunic, the coat is cinched at the natural waist with a half-belt. However, where the half-belt of the tunic is a true separate belt secured with buttons at the sides, the belt of the Mackinaw is stitched down across the pleats. The skirt of the coat below the belt is unvented.

With its very trim fit at the waist and lack of a vent to aid in bending, this was clearly a parade ground garment not intended to serve double duty as a work jacket.

That the CCC was willing to pay for such a high-quality, single use coat speaks to high expectations the CCC leadership had for the 1939 spruce green uniform suite. Stemming the late 1930s decline in enrollment was clearly a top priority: if a sharp, fitted, contemporary dress coat would help, money would be found to pay for it.

Four images of a pristine example of the 1939 spruce green Mackinaw coat. Counterclockwise from top: Front view, rear view, QMC tag with March 1940 contract date and October 3 1939 tentative spec date, size tag. This coat likely belonged to the same enrollee whose companion spruce green tunic and pants are discussed in the late dress uniforms section of this Handbook. Source: expired Etsy sale listing from Brier Vintage Clothing.

WINTER ACCESSORIES

HATS

In addition to coats and sweaters, CCC enrollees required warm hats and caps.

During winter of 1933-34 the Quartermaster Corps often seems to have been hard pressed to issue enrollees anything other than a WWI surplus overseas cap. Some WW1 deadstock Pattern 1907 arctic hats were available, and these seem to have been issued preferentially to enrollees headed to the northern states. Even so, images of the boys wearing their own knit civilian hats, often in the newsboy or Al Capp style, are common.

In 1934 and 1935 the Quartermaster Corps seems to have made mass orders of dark navy blue wool hats for the CCC which were direct copies of civilian "railroader" or "Stormy Kromer" models.

By the later 1930s the QMC was issuing the CCC winter hats made to a US Army pattern which bears a striking resemblance to contemporary German military caps.

CAP: WOOL, ARCTIC, "PATTERN 1907"

Original Pattern 1907 Arctic Hat, contract number 1571, World War 1 era. This example was issued to a sanitary corps lieutenant during the Great War. Dye colors of the felted linings of these hats and stitching details can vary considerably from example to example. Source: Hayes Otoupalik Military Collectibles.

Pattern 1907 Arctics in the field with the CCC, left boy with flaps down and right with flaps up (but not double-folded). Poe Valley PA, date unknown. Source: Centre County Historical Society.

During the mobilization winter of 1933-34 the Quartermaster Corps issued to some CCC enrollees its standard cold weather Hat, Wool, Arctic, a venerable design dating back to 1907.

The Pattern 1907 arctic had an outer shell fabricated from heavy cotton duck in a light OD shade. It had a fairly high peak and a short brim. At the lower edge of the cap was sewn a deep fold-down ear and neck flap with a broad, rounded front edge. This flap was fabricated from OD cotton fabric on the outside panel and felted wool, often in a darker OD shade, on the inside. When not in use the flaps could be folded up in a double fold and secured across the front of the cap with fabric ties. The inside of the cap was lined with the same darker OD wool felt as the flaps. A cotton sweatband separated the flap felt from the crown felt.

Many of the Pattern 1907 caps issued to the CCC were no doubt of World War 1 vintage. Supplies of these deadstock caps may have been somewhat limited, as it is very common to see images of enrollees during the first winter wearing garrison caps or their own private newsboy-style caps, knit beanies, and watch caps. The Pattern 1907 seems to have been supplanted in CCC service by the civilian Stormy Kromer styles discussed below as early as the winter of 1934-35, though many no doubt remained in inventory in individual camp supply rooms for some years after their initial issue.

What Price Glory stocks a fine replica of this headgear as the "M1907 Winter Cap."

BACKGROUNDER: "STORMY KROMER" AND HIS NAMESAKE HAT

Generic "Railroader" hat, 1919 Montgomery Ward catalog.

The"railroader" or Stormy Kromer was a ubiquitous wool work hat style in the early decades of the 20th century. The classic Stormy Kromer is a high-domed four-panel wool cap with a wool brim and fold-down ear flaps that tie together above the bill when not needed.

As Wikipedia explains, legend attributes the design to George "Stormy" Kromer (1876-1970):

"A semi-professional baseball player, [Kromer] later worked as a railroad engineer. Kromer lost many hats to the wind while working on trains, and in 1903 he asked his wife Ida (1877-1960) to make him a warm hat that would stay on more securely. She modified a baseball cap into what became the Stormy Kromer cap by sewing on a pair of ear flaps. A summer version, made from pillow ticking, remains in use among modern American train engineers, and variants with red or blue polka dots were formerly popular in the early 20th century.

Due to popularity with other employees of the railroad, the Kromers formed the Kromer Cap Company in 1903 to produce the caps. In 1919, due to ever increasing demand, the Kromers opened a factory in Milwaukee, Wisconsin."

Whether the Kromers deserve sole credit for their namesake style remains debatable. Certainly by 1920 many manufacturers other than Kromer were offering the cap under the generic name "railroader style."

CAP: WOOL, TYPE 1, INTERIOR FLAP, FUR TRIMMED, TENTATIVE SPECIFICATION DATED 20 JULY 1934

Three views of an original CCC Type 1 railroader cap, Premium Cap Company, Tentative Specification dated July 20, 1934, CIV contract dated May 27, 1938. Source: archived Instgram post by @junkpalacevintage. Original now in collection of Mark Headlee.

The Quartermaster Corps seems to have adopted two variants of the railroader cap to supplement or replace the Pattern 1907 Arctic in CCC service, which in the best Army style they denoted, literally, "Type 1" and "Type 2."

The Type 1 hat has a four-panel wool crown with a fabric-covered button ornamenting the joint of the crown panels at the top. The interior is insulated with four matching panels of felted wool in a light fawn or buff color. The bottom of the cap is finished with black cloth tape wrapped around the edges of the crown panels and sewn through. The bill is of matching wool fabric to the crown on the exterior with finer fabric on the underside. The bill fabric is affixed to an interior stiffener with two lines of stitching along the edge of the bill.

The CCC Type 1 differs from a standard Kromer style in replacing the exterior folding ear flap with an interior folding flap lined with fur. Folded up into the hat, the fur side of the flap is hidden and the wool side forms a sweatband. Folded down, the fur is against the ears.

At left is an original Type 1 with a QMC tag giving a Tentative Specification date of July 20, 1934, and a CIV contract number with a date of May 27, 1938. The late manufacture date demonstrates the the Type 1 remained in production in parallel with the Specification 6-255 Army winter cap discussed below.

CAP: WOOL, TYPE 2, EXTERIOR EAR FLAP, TENTATIVE SPECIFICATION DATED 1934

Original CCC Type 2 railroader, from same lot of three as the Type 1 hat above. This example now in collection of the author. Source: archived Instgram post by @junkpalacevintage.

The CCC "Type 2" railroader is, simply, a standard Stormy Kromer.

The four-panel crown and interior felted lining are similar to the Type 1. However, the Type 2 cap retains the signature Kromer fold-up external wool ear flap. Each end of the flap is pierced with two small holes finished with metal grommets. A flat fabric ribbon can be threaded through the holes in a cross pattern to lace up the earflaps above the brim when not in use.

On the interior of the cap, a 1" fabric sweatband separates the edge of the crown from the beginning of the felt lining.

At left is an original Type 2 with a worn QMC tag. A partial CIV contract number is legible, but the date of the contract can no longer be read. A tentative spec date includes the year 1934, but the exact month and day are obscured.


Second example of a Type 2, this time with legible tag. This tag has no spec information, but includes a clear ECW contract date of July 10, 1935. All three of these railroader hats, the Type 1 and the two Type 2s, were found as one assemblage in the attic of an old dry goods store. Source: archived Instgram post by @junkpalacevintage. Original now in collection of Mark Headlee.

Revisiting the same image of CCC Company 1156 of Chicopee Falls, MA, ca. 1935-37. Type 1 or Type 2 Stormy Kromers predominate. Source: New England Travels blog.

CAP: WINTER, SPECIFICATION 415/3/1338 AND DERIVATIVES

CAP: WINTER, OD, WAR DEPARTMENT SPECIFICATION 415/3/1338 DATED 25 JUNE 1919

CAP: WINTER, OD, SPECIFICATION 6-255 DATED 21 DECEMBER 1937

CAP: WINTER, SPRUCE GREEN, CCC-SPECIFIC, SPECIFICATION 6-255A DATED 15 OCTOBER 1940

Three images above: very early example of the olive drab Specification 415/3/1338 winter hat produced for the CCC under an ECW contract dated August 27, 1934. Note the higher, more cylindrical crown and the NRA code tag. Credit: collection of Dane Lengerman, personal communication to Civilian Conservation Corps Living Historians and Reenactors Facebook Group on January 21, 2020.

Image above, two examples of the later Specification 6-255A and 6-255 winter cap, the 255A in CCC-Specific Spruce Green, the 255 in standard Army OD. The OD hat is finsihed to a lower standard, lacking the fabric tape on the edge of the bill. Both hats were produced under CIV contracts for CCC issue. Source: Collection of the author.

QM tags for the two hats above. Upper image, a December 1937 CIV contract date for the 6-255 in olive drab. Lower image, a 1941 CIV contract for the spruce green version, Spec 6-255A. Source: Collection of the author.

In parallel with the Stormy Kromers, the QMC also issued CCC enrollees olive drab winter caps of its own design, Specification 415/3/1338 adopted in 1919.

Though superficially similar to the Pattern 1907 Arctic, the Specification 415/3/1338 design can be distinguished by less deep ear flaps, and by the use of a buckle rather than fabric ties to secure the flaps when folded up along the side of the cap.

Military textile expert Charles Lemons describes this hat as:

constructed with medium olive drab, wind-proof cotton with an integral earflap and wool lining. The earflap, which is folded up the side of the cap and secured in the front when not in use, reaches down below the ears and is held in place by an extension of the flap on either side. The right extension has a metal buckle through which the left extension is fastened. The bill, which also may be worn up or down, is 3" long and edged with stitching and folded cotton tape. The entire cap interior, including the earflap, is lined with dark OD blanket wool.

Given that this pattern long predates the advent of the CCC, it is unclear why the QMC went into the market for the Kromer-style winter hats in such large numbers for the Conservation Corps men. Whatever the reason, Kromers greatly outnumber the OD Specification 415/3/1338 hats in vintage CCC wintertime images prior to 1939.

In 1937, the pattern was re-designated as Specification 6-255. The pattern may also have been tweaked at this time to add a bit more taper to the front and rear of the crown.

In 1939 the QMC adopted a final round of changes to the winter cap under Specification 6-255A. The improved pattern added fabric finish tape around the edge of the bill and more tightly spaced stitching across the arc of the bill. The color for hats made under CIV contracts also changed from olive drab to a distinctive grey-green color specific to the CCC. Aesthetically, this final gray-green version bears a superficial but striking resemblance to a generic German army field cap of the same era--a perhaps unfortunate case of convergent military aesthetics.

The introduction of the green version of the 255A seems to have spelled the end for the Stormy Kromers--the gray-green cap became the universal winter headgear of the Corps in its final years.

Interestingly, one almost never sees a Specification 415 or 6-255 hat with the ear flaps folded down rather than up in vintage CCC images. Having tried out a 1940 version of this hat for routine winter wear I now understand the reason. With the flaps up, it is a warm and serviceable winter cap. With the flaps down, though the ears and back of the neck are warm, the narrow flap ends and metal buckle dangle awkwardly in front of one's chin. It is, to be honest, a poor design.

For some reason surviving original examples of this hat in the CCC gray-green color are ubiquitous, and mint examples can be had affordably on major auction sites. OD hats also trade frequently, though they are much less common than the late green versions.

Late-era CCC Section Leader in an interesting combination of sutans and an OD 6-255 winter hat. Source: Texas Parks and Wildlife.

MITTENS

CHOPPER MITTS: MITTENS, LEATHER, WORK, TENTATIVE SPECIFICATION DATED 2 FEBRUARY 1935

Two enrollees, both wearing chopper mittens and holding splitting hatchets, ready for the very work from which the mitts derive their name. The young man on the right has used his cinch strap to tighten the fit of his mittens at the wrist. Company 1156 of Chicopee Falls, MA. Source: New England Travels blog.

For outdoor work in cold and snowy climates, the QMC issued to the CCC an Army-spec version of the venerable logger's chopper mitt.

As every outdoorsperson soon learns, mittens are vastly better than gloves at retaining warmth in the fingers in extreme cold. Long before the 1930s civilian loggers and workmen had evolved "chopper mitts," a two-part mitten system which combined a tough leather outer mitt for protection with a separate wool insert for warmth. The outer leather was usually waterproofed with neatsfoot or mink oil. The name derives from the common use of these for warmth when chopping firewood with a hatchet or splitting maul.

The CCC version of chopper mitts follows a tentative specification adopted in February 1935. The leather outer shell had a simple buckle cinch on the back to tighten the fit at the cuff. Surviving examples seem to have leather outers tanned and dyed a variety of shades from brown through cream to yellow. Inserts were simple wool, dyed in olive drab or gray/oatmeal shades, and came with or without a ribbed cuff.

Chopper mitts are ubiquitous in cold-weather camp images from winter 1935-36 onwards, most often paired with the blue cape-back mackinaw coat.

Interestingly, this CCC spec may have enjoyed a second life as a US Navy specification. WWII and Korea-era Navy Mittens, Work, N-3 appear to be essentially identical to the CCC specification.

Three images, original ECW contract leather chopper mitts and wool inserts. This sample, manufactured by the Midwest Glove Co. under a 1937 contract, exhibits a brown shade of leather. Source: Charles R. Lemons, communication to Civilian Conservation Corps living historians and reenactors Facebook group, October 29, 2019.

Two images, original ECW wool inserts for chopper mittens. Source: Charles R. Lemons, communication to Civilian Conservation Corps living historians and reenactors Facebook group, October 29, 2019.

Three images, left and below: another pair of CCC choppers, this pair manufactured by C.D. Osborne Co. under a July 1935 ECW contract. These exhibit the yellow shade of leather and oatmeal shade of inserts. Source: collection of poster 'Flage Guy, posted in topic "Unissued WW2 Army Mittens and Gloves. Let’s give them a “hand”." in US Militaria Forum.

OVERSHOES AND SNOW BOOTS

Outdoor work in cold and snow places a premium on warm and waterproof protection for the feet. Prolonged immersion in cold water can lead to debilitating injuries including "trench foot," a necrotizing condition of the skin.

The Army certainly understood the importance of waterproof winter foot coverings, and provided for the CCC as well as it did for its own troops. However, the state of the art in Army cold-weather footwear left much to be desired. The US Army of the 1930s had spent decades posted largely in warm-weather stateside camps and tropical colonial garrisons, and it had limited practical experience with field work in sustained cold and snow.

This inexperience would come haunt the CCC.

OVERSHOES: ARCTIC, ALL-RUBBER, 4 BUCKLE

OVERSHOES, ARCTIC, ALL-RUBBER, SPECIFICATION 20-6A, DATED 6 JULY 1934

CCC-SPECIFIC TENTATIVE SPECIFICATION DATED 6 JULY 1934

The standard US Army cold-weather footwear of the 1930s was a rubber galosh called the Arctic Overshoe intended to be worn over the standard service shoe.

Charles R. Lemons describes the prewar version of this shoe as

Similar to the commercial patterns of overshoes, these overshoes are made entirely of cloth backed rubber. The uppers are constructed in a fashion similar to boots of the period, with a one piece tongue and with the sides of the upper open almost to the welt. ... the tongue is still exposed when the overshoe is closed up. The overshoes close with four metal buckles and clips, which are attached by folded rubber straps which are glued to the underside of the upper between the upper and the tongue. The tongue is reenforced on the outside down to the instep with a shield shaped section of rubber embossed with a diamond pattern... . Makers tags are either printed inside the overshoe or printed on a paper tag and glued inside.

At left and below are four images of a pristine arctic overshoe with an original paper contract tag referencing an ECF contract dated January 10, 1935.


Original CCC Arctic Overshoe, four images. The manufacturer is Firestone Footwear Company--a branch of the famous Firestone tire and rubber empire. Note ECF contract number and tentative spec dated July 6, 1934. The CCC overshoe conforms in every visible detail to the standard US Army 20-6A overshoe as described by Lemons. Source: post "US Army Overshoes" by Lightningdivision in WWIIReenacting.co.uk Forums.

Inside of CCC barracks at Milford, Utah. Full image left, detail on right--a pair of service shoes and a pair of arctic overshoes squared away in regulation fashion under a bunk. Source: Wikimedia Commons.

SHOEPACS: SHOE PAC, 10 INCH, QMC TENTATIVE SPECIFICATION CA. 1935

ECW contract shoepac, manufactured by U.S. Rubber Products, Inc. under a July 1935 contract. Source: Charles R. Lemons, communication to Civilian Conservation Corps living historians and reenactors Facebook group, October 29, 2019.

Company 1156 of Chicopee Falls, MA, again. Shoepacs with heavyweight calf-length white wool socks, worn with the trouser legs bloused into the shoepac under the sock, were the universal winter field dress of the later CCC. Source: New England Travels blog.

Unfortunately the CCC would learn that the arctic overshoe - service shoe combination offered very little protection from cold. Camp commandants and technical officers complained when the men had to be kept in barracks rather than put to work due to insufficiently warm footwear.

For a solution the the Boston QM Depot (the Army's shoe specialists) turned to the civilian shoe pack or shoe pac pioneered by L.L. Bean in 1912. Bean's original Maine Hunting Boot introduced two key innovations: composite construction combining a moccasin style rubber lower shoe with a leather upper, and, thick removable felt insoles for the inside of the boot. The composite construction offered waterproof protection around the foot while allowing greater bending at the ankle, essential for traversing rough terrain. The removable felt insole insulated the bottom of the foot from cold penetrating by conduction through the rubber sole. Bean boots were also cut very oversized to accomodate one or more layers of thick calf-length wool socks.

By the 1930s shoe pacs were available from a number of manufacturers, though the U.S. Rubber Products Company held a patent on the specific method of bonding the rubber lower to the leather uppers. This patent seems to have ensured that U.S. Rubber itself won all the ECW/CIV shoe pac contracts.

Distinctive features of the 1935 tentative specification ECW contract shoe pacs include a 10" upper fabricated from two pieces of russet leather stiched together with a back seam, a pull strap on the back of the upper, nine rows of eyelets (not hooks), leather laces, a low heel, and a simple, very shallow shallow grid or dot pattern on the rubber tread.

Early wartime U.S. Army (ca. 1941-43) shoe pacs, by contrast, have 10 or 12 inch uppers, bolder horizontal linear tread moldings, and usually have a total of five lower eyelets, four hooks, and a top eyelet for a total of ten cinch points. Later war (M1944) shoe pacs have 12" uppers, no pull strap, a steel shank, and a heavily molded tread with a chevron pattern.

CCC camp technical staff took great care to teach enrollees to use the shoepac properly. Rubber is of course impermeable, and sweat from warm feet inside the boot can wet out the felt insole. Once the wearer ceases to be active the wet foot can become cold and frostbitten. To prevent wet feet enrollees were instructed to rotate their removable felt footbeds: wear one pair for a day, then hang them up to dry and put in the other pair.

Years, later enrollee Henry Buck of Wisconsin could still recall his CCC "shoe packs (boots with leather uppers and spacious rubber bottoms) with thick removable innersoles." He also remembered the care required to use them correctly: "Mitten and shoe liners were removed and thoroughly dried each night... . Shoe packs, especially, had to be dry and loose. Occasionally, some 'know it all' would put on too many socks and force his feet into boots. Tight fitting boots restricted circulation."

As was so often the case, the Quartermaster Division missed an opportunity to learn a lesson from the CCC and its preference for the shoepac over the arctic overshoe. During World War II, trench foot and frostbite injuries caused by the inadequacies of the arctic overshoe would lead to a hasty introduction of the shoepac into US Army kit in Europe in the winter of 1944-45.


What appear to be shoepacs on the left, with unbuckled and buckled arctic overshoes center and right. Company 158, Southwest Harbor, ME. Source: Southwest Harbor Public Library.

Three images, above and left: early war spec U.S. Army Shoe Pac, 12 inch, included for comparison to CCC issue. These are U.S. Rubber Co. manufactured under a March 17, 1944 contract. Note upper is now fabricated from separate lower and upper pieces of leather with no back seam, bolder tread molding, and use of four rows of hooks rather than eyelets on the uppers. Source: expired auction archived in Worthpoint.

SUMMER ACCESSORIES

SUN HELMET: PRESSED FIBER, HAWLEY STYLE

Prewar Hawley Trooper style pressed fiber sun helmet without front grommet. Hand painted as a walking-away souvenir with CCC shield and names and initials of friends; the seller in the original listing specified a Colorado CCC camp provenance. Source: expired Etsy sale listing, image and information provided in personal communication to author from Mark Headlee.

Other than the ubiquitous and much-loved "suntan" khaki uniform of the later 1930s, the CCC seems to have provided only one other item of special uniform equipment for camps in extremely hot climates: the American pressed fiber sun helmet, colloquially (though not entirely accurately) termed a "pith helmet."

The U.S. pressed fiber helmet was invented by entrepreneur Jesse B. Hawley of Geneva, Illinois. Hawley's product was, in essence, an Americanized version of the classic British Army sun helmet of the 19th century. That helmet is turn was a product of 19th century British colonialism in India: a rigid, lightweight summer hat in the European military helmet style made from Sholapith or shola pith, a dried milky-white spongy plant matter from Aeschynomene species native to India. In its original form the pith helmet was covered in linen and wrapped with a decorative cloth band (or puggaree).

Hawley's Americanized version dispensed with the cloth cover. Instead, Hawley developed a pressing and manufacturing process that made the actual fiber material impervious to water. Military helmet historian Peter Suciu describes the Hawley design as taking:

"the basic shape of a safari helmet, complete with a faux ventilator at the top and a faux wrapping of puggaree around the dome of the helmet–the latter ironic because previous American sun helmets never used a puggaree. For ventilation, there were a number of vent holes with grommets on each side. The early helmets had three lower vent holes with two vents above, while the post-wartime examples feature four lower ventilation holes."

Hawley filed for a patent for his design on February 4, 1935 and the patent was awarded in March 1938.

Throughout the later 1930s Hawley vigorously marketed his helmet to police forces as the "Hawley Trooper." It would seem that from at least 1937 the CCC adopted the civilian-market Hawley helmet as limited issue for enrollees assigned to extreme hot weather camps on the great plains and in the southwestern United States. Standard white was the common color, but hats in a police olive were also issued.

Left is an image of a surviving Hawley style hat in the less common olive color with a definite CCC attribution to a camp in Colorado. The hat has been ornamented as a walking-away souvenir with names and initials of friends. The lack of a front grommet hole identifies it definitively as a pre-WWII, non-military "Hawley Trooper" style hat.

Perhaps as a result of positive CCC experience with the hat, the U.S. Army and the Marine Corps both adopted the pressed fiber sun helmet during 1940, but military versions made either by Hawley (four faux "puggaree" creases) or the International Hat Company (five creases) had a front grommet to accept a cap badge in the same style as a campaign hat.

Hawley-style pressed fiber helmets with a CCC crew outside Moab, Utah in 1937. This camp was sponsored by the U.S. Department of Grazing, project DG-37. The boys are carrying bags of poisoned grain for rodent control on range land. This is an original color slide, not a colorized black and white image. Source: U.S. National Archives at Denver.