Canon 6d

Cannon and canon are occasionally confused by writers, but the two words have independent origins, and do not share a meaning. Cannon is most frequently found used in the sense of "a large gun," and can be traced to the Old Italian word cannone, which means "large tube." Canon, however, comes from the Greek word kann, meaning "rule." Although canon has a variety of meanings, it is most often found in the senses of "a rule or law of a church," "an accepted rule," or "a sanctioned or accepted group or body of related works." A loose cannon is "a dangerously uncontrollable person or thing." There are no loose canons.

On 16 March 2010, Canon announced that it was seeking to acquire a new .mw-parser-output .monospaced{font-family:monospace,monospace}.canon generic top-level domain, acquiring it in February 2015 and using it for the first time on its global website in May 2016.[18][19]

Canon 6d

DOWNLOAD 🔥 https://ssurll.com/2y3j7x 🔥

Special thanks to Jack Soslow, Jay Rughani, Marco Mascorro, Martin Casado, Rajko Radovanovic, and Vijay Pande for their contributions to this piece, and to the entire a16z team for an always informative discussion about the latest in AI. And thanks to Sonal Chokshi and the crypto team for building a long series of canons at the firm.

Update 8/5/20: Article updated to reflect that the image.canon outage was not related to the Maze ransomware attack.

Update 8/6/20: Canon has internally notified their employees of the ransomware attack.

The Code of Conduct for United States Judges includes the ethical canons that apply to federal judges and provides guidance on their performance of official duties and engagement in a variety of outside activities.

Barrett several times told Democrats that her refusal to endorse certain decisions of the court did not mean they were endangered and said such questioners were pushing her to violate judicial canons of ethics and impartiality.

Commissioning new works, taking them to the streets, reimagining the classical canon, and continuing to perform and listen to the Fifth anew all are part of an effort for classical institutions and audiences to move forward while honoring the past.

The tag_hash_122_________ canon is the continually evolving body of authoritative works comprising the official story of Star Wars, encompassing movies, television series, novels, comics, and video games. George Lucas set the six Star Wars films and the many hours of content he developed and produced in Star Wars: The Clone Wars as canon. These stories are defined to be the immovable objects of Star Wars history, the characters and events to which all other tales must align.[2]

Since the 1990s, Lucasfilm Ltd. licensed a vast collection of interconnected stories produced by numerous authors, including comics, novels and video games, forming what was known as the official Star Wars Expanded Universe, existing parallel to the "universe" directly overseen by Lucas.[3] The Expanded Universe was referred to as "quasi-canon" as opposed to Lucas' canon, which was described to be the definitive canon,[4] or the "only true canon" among "different degrees of canon"[5] or "absolute canon."[6] In 2000, Lucas Licensing created an internal database tracking and organizing all the fictional elements created for the Star Wars universe, making up a hierarchical system listing different levels of canon, which could've been divided into George Lucas' canon and vision of the Star Wars universe, comprised of the six movies and Star Wars: The Clone Wars, occupying the highest level, which have had "absolute authority", whereas material collectively referred to as the Expanded Universe, constituting Lucas Licensing's vision, was ranked as lower level of canonicity.[7][8]

After The Walt Disney Company acquired Lucasfilm on October 30, 2012, the Expanded Universe was rebranded as Legends,[2] thus, the term "canon" came to be reserved exclusively for George Lucas' canon - the six movies and the seasons of Star Wars: The Clone Wars he developed and produced - and the movies, television series, novels, comics, toys and video games created by Lucasfilm after the acquisition, including but not limited to the Sequel Trilogy.

The Star Wars "gospel" or canon was first defined in Fall 1994 in the first issue of the Lucasfilm magazine Star Wars Insider,[9] by Lucasfilm Production Editor Sue Rostoni and Continuity Editor Allan Kausch:

In 1996, The Secrets of Star Wars: Shadows of the Empire, a reference book written by Mark Cotta Vaz, covering the Shadows of the Empire multimedia campaign, featured two, different canons: a chronology complied by continuity editors by Lucasfilm, and a collection of "the screenplays, novelizations and other core works."[12]

In January 2000, Lucasfilm hired Leland Chee to create an internal database for Lucas Licensing's Publishing department, called the "Holocron." The database replaced the "bibles"[14] tracking and organizing all the fictional elements created for the Star Wars universe, making up a hierarchical system listing different levels of canon. The database had a canon field for each individual entry and for sources. "G" canon referred to George Lucas' canon, initially made up only of the six Star Wars movies and unpublished internal notes from him or the movie production department. "C" canon, referring to continuity, consisted all licensed properties, thus including most of the Expanded Universe, whereas "S" canon, with the "S" standing for "secondary," encompassed works that were created before Lucasfilm strived to maintain an internal consistency within the Expanded Universe. "N" canon meant "non-continuity", used only in the case of blatant contradiction.[15][8]

In April 2000, in a post published on the official Star Wars forums, Sansweet clarified the distinction between canon and "quasi-canon" even further, referring to "different degrees of canon" among which there is "only one true canon":[5]

In June 2001, the fourth issue of the Star Wars Gamer magazine raising the issue of what is and isn't considered to be "canon" in the Star Wars universe. On August 14 2001, in Star Wars Gamer 6, Sue Rostoni was quoted by the magazine, defining canon as an authoritative list of books complied by Lucas Licensing editors:[16]

On August 17 2001, when Sansweet was asked to clarify what is and what is not canon, he directed fans' attention to Christopher Cerasi's statement about the "absolute canon" and the "real story of the Star Wars universe":[6]

In August in the section Rebel Rumblings of the 57th issue of the Star Wars Insider magazine Sansweet again defined the films as the "one, true, absolutely and only canonical source."[17]

In May 2003, questions about canon were raised on the official Star Wars forums when the sixty-eighth issue of Star Wars Insider stated that David West Reynolds' Incredible Cross-Sections books "would receive Lucasfilm's formal imprimatur as canon," as some saw it as contradictory to what Sansweet and Cerasi said in 2001. In his answer, Leland Chee made a clear distinction between "Lucasfilm's canon" and "movie canon":[20]

Addressing the topic, Sue Rostoni admitted that canon can be confusing, as all Star Wars material that are not published with the "Infinity" logo is considered canon, however, canon has a hierarchy to it, reiterating what was established by Slavicsek, Sansweet and Cerasi:[21]

In August 2004, Chee was asked, "a clarification is needed if the C and G level are separated, i.e. do they form independent canon or are both part of the overall continuity?" It should be noted that the question is confusing: in the Holocron continuity database, "C-canon" and "G-canon" are making up two separate canons, with Rostoni and Kausch stating, in 1994 and 1996, Lucas Licensing seeks to maintain an overall continuity. Echoing those statements, Chee replied:[24]

In December 2005, Chee was asked questions about whether or not the interview Lucas gave to Starlog means that he doesn't consider the Expanded Universe canonical, to which Chee gave a somewhat evasive answer:[27]

He answered a question about whether George Lucas, Lucas Licensing and Lucas Publishing are using the same canon policy or Lucas and Lucasfilm use different policies, in which he stated, anybody can have their own perception of what is and isn't canon, and that the Holocron continuity database applies when something official is developed for books, games, websites and merchandise, but for anything beyond that it's just a reference tool:[28]

Furthermore, he stated, Lucasfilm Ltd. doesn't have a canon policy, as it couldn't be applied beyond merchandise and online, and there is no such thing as a document that could be used to determine what is and what is not canon.[27]

In November 2006, Chee was asked to resolve a debate between two fans, with one of them stating that based on George Lucas' interviews from 2002 and 2005, there are two official continuities, one encompassing the movies only, reflecting Lucas' vision, and one made up of the Expanded Universe, whereas the other claiming, based on Chee's comments on the Holocron continuity database, that there is only one official continuity comprised of Lucas' movies and the Expanded Universe, divided into different levels of canonicity. In his answer posted in December, Chee confirmed that there is not one, but two distinct official continuities and that when it comes to Lucas' views on the Star Wars universe one must not go beyond the movies:[29]

On May 6 2008, Star Wars Insider 101 was published. The magazine featured an article, titled "The Essential Expanded Universe" by author Daniel Wallace, dedicated entirely to the Expanded Universe. Wallace indicated that the Expanded Universe is official, but, as it was done previously, he made a distinction between the canon of the six movies, that had "absolute authority" and a canon on a "lower level":[8] ff782bc1db