Accessibility options:
Click through the slides or download a PDF
Watch the video or get the transcript
or Scroll down to select what you want to read.
Autistic people* and the parents/caregivers of people on the autism spectrum need to be part of research teams. This helps make sure research focuses on what matters to the autistic community and what truly improves health and quality of life.
There are many barriers to participation, especially in a rural state like Vermont. Some of these barriers include a housing shortage, transportation issues, and a lack of healthcare access and support personnel. Community members have little time and energy left to engage as partners in research. There is also mistrust between autistic people and non-autistic people, especially in the healthcare and research world.
We designed this project together as a group of autistic and non-autistic partners to achieve the following goals:
Build trust with the Vermont autism community.
Learn how to engage more autistic adults and parents/caregivers as research partners in a sustainable manner.
*People use different words to talk about autism. In this project we say "Autistic person" and "person on the autism spectrum." Many people prefer these words.
17 Autistic adults and 16 Non-autistic caregivers joined us for this project
On a scale of 1-5, most autistic participants, and non-autistic caregivers responded being (4) "Somewhat" or (5) "Very much" interested in joining as autism research partners.
94%
On a scale of 1-5, most autistic participants reported (4) "somewhat" or (5) "very much" feeling understood throughout the project.
100%
On a scale of 1-5, all autistic participants reported (4) "somewhat" or (5) "very much" feeling respected throughout the project.
On a scale of 1-5, 88% of autistic participants responded being (4) "Somewhat" or (5) "Very much" satisfied with their participation in the project.
On a scale of 1-5, 100% of non-autistic caregivers responded being (4) "Somewhat" or (5) "Very much" satisfied with their participation in the project.
Among 17 autistic participants, 5 were parents of autistic children.
We discussed "autistic participants" and "parents/caregivers" needs for joining as research partners. Wording our prompts this way implied a separation between both roles.
Allow people to choose which group they want to represent.
Use language like “autistic and non-autistic parents, and doctors”.
Quote:
“There are autistic doctors, autistic parents, autistic researchers, but phrasing the prompt or defining the group as this is here makes it seem like autistic participants are separate, rather than a part of diverse humanity.”
All autistic participants and 86% non-autistic parents/caregivers said the chat option on Zoom was a helpful tool.
Making time to hear and treat everybody equally, including those communicating in the chat, is important.
Using gender neutral pronouns when we are not sure helps to respect the different experiences of autistic participants.
“I was feeling a little uncomfortable by a participant who kept defining traits as "male" or "female." There are several people in these studies that are trans and nonbinary and I would have appreciated someone (other than me) mentioning that the claim of standard "male" or "female" traits in autistics is what made it more difficult for many people to get help. I also tried to ask for people to move away from "you guys" but even after my explanation it was used several times again.”
Quotes:
"Facilitators acknowledging the possible tensions, normalizing them, holding space for them [makes me feel safe]."
"Defense of identity in a space by the facilitators would make me feel like I have to defend myself less/be less guarded in general."
"How much did you learn during the project?"
On a scale of 1 to 5, all non-autistic participants learned "some things" (4) or learned "a lot" (5).
Quotes:
"I think it's an exciting thing to see how other people are experiencing autism in their life. And how that might help me in my views, in my learning process to help my son"
When asked what was surprising in the results: "that non-autistics want to learn from autistic people"
Five (5) of the 17 autistic participants said they were self-diagnosed autistics. They were also all parents of autistic children.
Quotes:
“it was explicit that self-diagnosed autistics are welcome here.”
“Diagnosis is a privilege not available to a lot of autistics."
Quote:
"it's difficult to get across that i'm disabled, because I think a lot of people expect a lot of abilities from me when they see me and they get confused. If I don't meet those or I do some things really perfectly, and then they just assume I can do everything really perfectly. But I have a lot of limitations."
"I'll just say I really relate to what you said, [...]. Yeah, my daughter has some verbal language, but you know, could not contribute to, verbally, to a conversation like this, and we don't yet. We have not found, you know, the tools to support, you know, her to do so yet. So yeah, I’m also, I do my best, based on knowing her so intimately. But I know there's a lot that I don't know. You know what her perspective would be, and I hope I do my best. But yeah."
Many autistic participants and non-autistic caregivers asked for support for participating in Zoom meetings.
Quotes:
"RESTATE STUFF IN PLAIN ENGLISH"
"Anyone can be a research researcher or research team member. but you gotta have that material or materials to actually do the job and actually present it with other researchers to as well. because researchers are one big team and without, you know. accessibility components
to do the work on that team. Everything is get lost in the mix. So it's about accessibility information"
Both groups of participants, autistic and non-autistic, included people with intellectual disability (ID) and who used Augmentative Alternative Communication (AAC). (One Autistic person used AAC and also reported ID).
Some participants had vision impairments or were hard of hearing.
Some disabilities are invisible.
Some people did not disclose their disability.
Using principles of universal design with multiple options for participation supports everybody.
"How accessible was the focus group for you?"
On a scale of 1-5:
100% of autistic participants selected 4 (somewhat) or 5 (very much)
0% selected 1 (not at all), 2 (Not really) or 3 (Neutral)
"How accessible was the last meeting for you?"
On a scale of 1-5:
69% of autistic participants selected 4 (somewhat) or 5 (very much)
25% of autistic participants selected 2 (Not really) or 3 (Neutral)
1 person did not attend the Datawalk (missing).
More autistic participants are comfortable in groups of 1-5 or 6-10 persons
More non-autistics caregivers are comfortable in groups of 6-10 or 11-20 persons.
In Vermont, some people use land lines
to connect and participate in virtual events
Autism and Long Covid
Causes of autism
Autism in families and a potential genetic link
How the autistic brain works
Gut and diet health for autistic people
Imaging studies of the brain
Medical cause for sensory sensitivities
How autism is diagnosed
Autism and alternative medicine
Differences in autism across the population
Burnout, masking, code switching, etc.
Autism in non cis-white male children, specifically including women, non-binary, LGBTQ, adults, and people of color
Topics around adult autism, including challenges in and transitioning to adulthood
Specific features of autism
Autism and mental health
Autism and social interactions in dating and relationships
Barriers to employment
Employment supports
Barriers to getting more autistic people in the medical, research and social service fields.
Helpful medication
ABA for adults
Longitudinal study of outcomes and trauma from ABA; alternatives to ABA
ABA being accepting of Facilitated Communications
Early intervention
Provide tools to help autistic people with limited verbal skills communicate effectively
Poverty impact on healthcare of autistic people
Impact of how autistic people are treated based on characteristics like race or poverty
Examine underrepresented autistic populations
Rethink exclusion criteria for participation in a study so people with a range of abilities and skill level can be included
What kind of accommodations help?
Autistic people involved in the research
How to be part of a better environment
Parenting and autism
More research relevant to lived, real life experience and struggles
Learn new things about autism and connect it to the autistic person's experience
Research things that make our lives easier
Ways to give sensory feedback to providers
Helping the world understand us as much as we are forced to understand them
Sensory acceptance rather than fixing
Learn what our talents are and how our extra-sensory skills help the world rather than just annoy neurotypical people
Lesson #1: Autistic people have multiple other identities.
Allow people to choose which group they want to represent.
Use language like “autistic and non-autistic parents, and doctors”.
Lesson #2: Non-autistic research partners may also have a disability and need accommodations.
Using principles of universal design with multiple options for participation supports everybody.
Lesson #3: Many people prefer closed captions by a person.
They are more accessible than those generated automatically by Zoom.
This is especially important for participants who are deaf or hard of hearing.
Lesson #4: Smaller group size (5-10) is more comfortable and accessible.
Provide the size of the group in advance.
Let people know in advance if breakout rooms will be used.
Allow time for people to meet with others with similar experiences so they can share more candidly.
Lesson #5: How visual information is presented is important.
Some people use regular phones and many use smartphones to join a Zoom meeting in Vermont.
Provide printed materials in advance if information will be shared on the screen during the meeting.
Provide a PDF version of the material so it is easy to zoom in for people with visual impairments.
Make sure website material is accessible to screen readers and add alt text to pictures.
Lesson #6: Language is very important.
Autistic people use both identity-first language or person-first language.
Choose language that is not medical. Consider using "condition" instead of "disorder". Use "person with autism" or "person on the spectrum" instead of "person with autism spectrum disorder".
Plain language does not mean to "dumb it down":
Use simple, common language to give the same information.
Plain language is not the same as "easy read" language. Training on plain language is available. Some people with disability are expert on plain language and can be hired to help with language.
"Accessibility" requires access to the information. Provide options for accessing different levels of information.
Making pronouns optional, using someone's pronouns or using gender neutral pronouns when unsure is important.
There are many different gender identities in the autism community and respecting everybody is important.
Lesson #7: It's easy to skip breaks during Zoom meetings.
People need breaks.
Include breaks in the agenda and on slides.
Planned all aspect together with many different perspectives.
Careful attention to language to respect different people's needs and perspectives.
Learning from each other and adjusting from our mistakes.
Support needs and preferences were assessed before the meetings to plan ahead.
Used participants' prefered mode of communication: email, text, phone, communication supporter.
Meeting agenda and questions were sent in advance.
Training and information were shared in many formats: written online, videos, paper.
All ways of participating were welcomed:
camera on/off,
chat, speak up or listen in,
share more thoughts after the meetings
Questionnaires were provided when people could not join a meeting.
Provided small group opportunities for autistic participants with similar experiences.
Asked what people cared about.
Strived to create a safe space and welcoming culture.
Provided training modules on "Ableism", "Group Participation" and "Patient Centered Outcome Research".
For this project we used a convergent parallel mixed method: This means we collected data from what people said in focus groups or wrote in follow-up questionnaires. At the same time, we collected survey information like the number of people who wanted closed captions. We mixed these sources of data and analyzed if they meant similar or different things about how people preferred to engage as research partners.
We also used a participatory action research design. This means that a diverse team (autistic and non-autistic people, caregivers, clinicians, researchers, and representatives from local organizations) designed all aspects of the project together.
Finally, the project was based on critical disability theory. This is when we want to specifically hear from the people who are less often heard in society. For this project, we prioritized the perspectives of autistic people.
We wanted to talk to at least 15 autistic adults and 15 caregivers of autistic youth and/or adults.
Forty-one (41) persons were interested in joining the focus groups. Thirty-three (33) persons joined the project with only one person not completing the project. See the image below for the recruitment process.
The questionnaires were designed with input from the whole team and our community consultants.
Demographics
Project tools and support
Focus group and Datawalk questions
Satisfaction survey after the focus group
Final satisfaction survey after the Datawalk
The focus group questions were carefully crafted with input from our whole team, including community consultants. Focus groups were conducted over Zoom.
We organized 3 small focus groups for autistic participants. There were 5-6 people in each group.
Autistic participants who also disclosed having an intellectual disability or using Augmentative Alternative Communication AAC (6)
Autistic parents of a child on the autism spectrum (5)
Autistic participants (6)
We organized one large focus group for non-autistic caregivers. There were 16 people in this group
We shared the results through a larger Zoom meeting called a Datawalk (or Data Walk).
Learn more about Datawalk in general with this article.
In small groups, our team read the transcripts of the Zoom meetings and identified the main messages from each focus group.
Then, we asked the group participants if the main messages accurately represented what was said in the focus groups. We used the feedback to improve the main messages.
Our team combined similar main messages from all groups and presented them to all participants at the Datawalk and through an optional questionnaire. We used the feedback to further improve the main messages.
Finally, we looked at all the questionnaires and survey data and looked for similarities and differences between the key messages that were shared.
We reflected on all that we learned from the project more generally.
We identified what we would do the same and what we would change in the future as we engage with potential research partners.
And some wonderful University of Vermont graduate and undergraduate students: Caitlin Allan, Sophie Knox and Emma Tschaikowsky.
This project was funded through a Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) Eugene Washington PCORI Engagement Award EACB 24096
For more information:
Contact the project co-leader Dr. Liliane Savard at liliane.savard@uvm.edu