Design in language teaching is the meaningful organization of materials, strategies, principles, assessments activities to meet “objectives” or in teachers’ fashion, let’s say, ‘learning outcomes’.
Design in language teaching is the meaningful organization of materials, strategies, principles, assessments activities to meet “objectives” or in teachers’ fashion, let’s say, ‘learning outcomes’.
Think of design as an art that brings different elements together in a way that they communicate a perfect meaning, be it color, shape, layout, or brush strokes to communicate a cohesive meaning. Similarly, design in language teaching is the meaningful organization of materials, strategies, principles, assessments activities to meet “objectives” or in teachers’ fashion, let’s say, ‘learning outcomes’. There have been several endeavors by scholars to integrate design into language learning and teaching. These efforts have led to innovative approaches that make learning experience more engaging, intuitive, and thoughtful for learners. It is hard to stick to one ‘best’ design but think of it again as an art that involves bringing elements of language learning together in a way that makes it more effective, accountable, and enjoyable for learners. For example, a grammar lesson has an instructional design that starts with an implicit interactive activity coupled with diverse authentic material, leading to an explicit explanation of grammatical patterns, a group task, and finally, feedback. Again think of lesson plan as a ‘design’ and language teacher, a designer who has the art of making meaningful patterns of language learning for learners.
The Curriculum and Materials Development Course LT 548 exemplified this ‘design’ aspect of language. Not limited to theoretical discussion, this course provided a hand-on practice in understanding and diving into the process that goes on behind the scenes for the design of product (curricula/courses) learners see and experience, as shown in the poster image here.
REKHTA: Conversational Urdu Language Learning Course
Need Analysis
For this course, I designed a course, Rekhta: Conversational Urdu Language Learning Course without any suggested syllabus or prescribed book. Drawing on backward design (Wiggins & McTighe , 2005), I celebrated my freedom to design the course driven by the needs assessment of learners (Graves, 2000). At the time of this course, I was teaching Hindi/Urdu as a Fulbright foreign language teacher for the Self-study language program at Yamada Language center. Inspired by the experience of teaching my first language during the time of this course, I relied heavily on my on-going teaching experience. The enrollment audience of my course were heritage language learners who had unique needs to make their learning a self-directed process. Therefore, I started with need analysis (NA) that involved gathering data from learners and stakeholders. The proposed data collection process for NA included interview with the coordinator of the self-study language program and face-to-face group discussion with learners. Important thing to note in this needs analysis work is that it is not limited to only a one-time event but it is a continuous process of gathering and interpreting information to make some instructional decisions (Brown & Lee, 2015). For this reason, this needs analysis included long-term and short-term goals assignment, personal progress reports, and reflections in Week three and five.
Along the same lines of design, the lesson plans from the course LT 536, Design for Learning Language Systems, focus on the use of different instructional approaches and methods to emphasize the effectiveness of intentional language teaching. For example, the first lesson plan illustrates the use of task-based learning as a central component of Communicative Language Teaching (Ellis, 2003). Through scaffolding and interactive input such as pair work and peer assessment, students draft paragraphs on given topics. Completing specific writing tasks encourages the active role of students so that they use language to accomplish tasks rather than never-ending grammar instruction. (Brown & Lee, 2015).
The second lesson plan from the course LT 536 is an example of topic-based instructional design as a part of project-based learning (Beckett & Slater, 2005). The project involves students in writing tasks for creating a blogsite on different topics such as traveling and hospitality, destination, accommodation, restaurants and culinary, directions, tour package, and money. Through the tasks in this project, students exhibit their skills and knowledge of language. The project-based learning is another form of scaffolding that encourages deeper learning of learners by engaging them with materials in a way that they can explore in a self-directed way and integrate different skills together as they would do in real life.
Teaching Reduced/Contracted Forms of Modal Verbs
The lesson plan from the course LT 539, Design for Language Learning Pronunciation, shows another way to explore the design perspective of language and language education in practice. The objective of this lesson is to teach learners to pronounce reduced/contracted forms of modal verbs that used to express regret in affirmative sentences. The focus on intelligibility and communication in this lesson offers practical recommendations for teaching pronunciation in language education (Derwin & Munro, 2005). The explicit instruction of forms combined with meaning in this lesson emphasizes the importance of intelligibility. Following the communicative framework of Celce-Murcia et al. (2010), this pronunciation lesson is divided into five steps including, “analysis and consciousness raising to listening discrimination and finally production” (p. 45). Moreover, the activities such as reflection and communication-focused bingo in this lesson encourage students reconsider the ideology of standard way of speaking and debunk the myth of nativespeakerism (Holliday, 2005). One of the materials, The Correct Way to Spell Potato, used in this lesson also focus on archaic nature of language that encourages them to focus more on intelligibility and worry less about perfecting and adopting another accent.
Through all my lesson planning work during the LTS program, I have been thoroughly exploring the relationship between language teaching and design. The design aspect of language teaching reinforced my understanding of intentional teaching that needs thoughtful planning and strategic decision making. Also, it is through adopting holistic approach towards language teaching that supports a connection between learners and their goal of learning a language, communication. However, it is design that connects learners with their experience of learning a language.
Beckett, G. H., & Slater, T. (2005). The project framework: A tool for language, content, and skills integration. ELT Journal, 59(2), 108-116
Brown, H.D. & Lee, H. (2015). Teaching by principles: An integrative approach to language pedagogy (4th ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.
Celce-Murcia, M., Brinton, D. and Goodwin, J. (2010). Teaching pronunciation: A course book and reference guide. Cambridge University Press, New York.
Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (2005). Second language accent and pronunciation teaching: A research‐based approach. TESOL Quarterly, 39(3), 379-397.
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford University Press.
Graves, K. (2000). Designing language courses : a guide for teachers. Heinle & Heinle.
Holliday, A. (2005). The struggle to teach English as an international language. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Wiggins, G. P., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design. Alexandria: ASCD.