Research

The study aims to evaluate and compare the emotional distress experienced by transgender individuals with that of cisgender individuals in India. Using a between-group design, the study involved 60 participants, equally divided between transgender (30) and cisgender (30) groups, selected through purposive sampling. The Robertson Emotional Distress Scale, a validated self-assessment tool using a 5-point Likert scale, was utilized to measure emotional distress. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS software with a correlation test as the statistical procedure. The findings indicate that 49% of transgender participants experienced mild distress, 37% moderate distress, and 14% severe emotional distress. Significant demographic variables influencing distress included age, occupation, and daily income. The study concludes that reducing gender discrimination and enhancing social support may significantly improve the emotional well-being of transgender individuals. The research highlights the need for awareness and legal protection to foster equality and emotional stability within marginalized communities.

Materials and Methods

• Study Design: Between-group design.

• Sampling Technique: Purposive sampling.

• Sample Size: 60 participants (30 transgender, 30 cisgender).

• Data Collection Tool: Robertson Emotional Distress Scale (10 items, 5-point Likert scale).

• Statistical Analysis: SPSS software, Correlation Test.

Reliability and Validity

• Reliability: The Robertson Emotional Distress Scale demonstrates high internal consistency, with a Cronbach’s alpha score of approximately 0.85 in previous studies, indicating reliable measurement of emotional distress.

• Validity: The scale has been validated against clinical assessments of distress and shows strong convergent validity, particularly in diverse cultural settings. The use of standardized procedures for data collection and analysis further enhances the study’s validity.

Graphical Representation Plan

The graph includes:

• X-axis: Levels of emotional distress (Mild, Moderate, Severe).

• Y-axis: Percentage of participants.

The study explores the impact of study orientation on the academic performance of high and low achievers among graduate students in the medical field. Study orientation, encompassing study habits and study attitudes, plays a crucial role in shaping academic success. The study involved 100 participants, equally divided into high achievers (≥75%) and low achievers (≤45%), selected through purposive sampling. The Survey of Study Habits and Attitudes (SSHA) Questionnaire, a validated tool with 100 items using a 5-point scale, was employed to assess study methods, motivation, and attitudes towards academic activities. Data analysis was conducted using an unpaired T-test. Results revealed that high achievers demonstrated significantly better study habits and attitudes compared to low achievers. The findings emphasize the need for targeted interventions to improve the study orientation of low achievers, thereby enhancing their academic performance. The study contributes valuable insights into academic behavior and supports the development of educational strategies to bridge performance gaps among students.

Materials and Methods

• Study Design: Between-group design.

• Sampling Technique: Purposive sampling.

• Sample Size: 100 participants (50 high achievers, 50 low achievers).

• Data Collection Tool: SSHA Questionnaire (100 items, 5-point scale).

• Statistical Analysis: Unpaired T-test.

Reliability and Validity

• Reliability: The SSHA Questionnaire has demonstrated high internal consistency, with a Cronbach’s alpha score of approximately 0.87 in previous studies, indicating robust reliability in measuring study orientation.

• Validity: The tool shows strong construct and content validity, effectively measuring study habits and attitudes that correlate well with academic achievement indicators. The use of standardized methods for data collection and analysis further enhances the study’s validity.