"Children learn as they play. Most importantly, in play, children learn how to learn."
– O. Fred Donaldson
Throughout my years of experience working in early childhood education, I have developed a strong belief that for a teacher to construct an effective lesson, they must first understand the needs of every student. While utilizing various techniques and operationalizing theoretical frameworks provide a lesson with a strong foundation, it is easy to forget that students play an active role in acquiring knowledge, and are not passive absorbers of the information. Just the same as language communication reflects community members mediating through social and cultural interactions (Lave & Wenger, 1991), knowledge acquisition mirrors a process of learners exploring new phenomena, creating new neural pathways, and negotiating information with their mentors and peers (Hung & Chen, 2000). My evenings as an early childhood teacher often consisted of collaborating with my co-teacher in constructing weekly curricula that would meet the developmental needs of our toddler-aged classroom, an age period where language development progresses dramatically and rapidly. Yet, as I navigated through my students’ wide variation in affective and cognitive factors, a question lingered: Is there truly a universal blueprint when designing a curriculum and lesson? The LTS program has provided me with the experience and skill sets to differentiate my teaching by designing curricula and lessons that would best meet the diverse array of students. The artifacts outlined below demonstrate how the pillars of language design can be intertwined with adaptability and differentiation to aid learners in meeting their goals as they progress in their language learning journeys.
When designing a curriculum, a teacher may outline a blueprint that consists of the language input to be taught, the process and methodology, and the learning outcomes that students would demonstrate at the end of a specific period. The construction of this blueprint is highly dependent on the context of the curriculum where a teacher might consider a forward design, a central design, or a backward design (Richards, 2013). In LT 548 (Curriculum Design), I elected the route of central design when constructing my dual language immersion course as it aligns with the student-centeredness present within early childhood education pedagogies of Reggio, Emergent, and Montessori. The artifact of the scope and sequence chart provided me with the opportunity to contextualize the content of the course in accordance with the two languages, the needs of the learners, and the context (Graves, 2000). Through outlining a prototype communicative syllabus (Brown & Lee, 2014), I highlighted a sequential list of potential topics that would interest the young learners, and then accordingly presented a list of grammatical and lexical forms that would be taught. I also ensured that the general themes throughout the 10-week course were broad enough for a teacher to easily adapt and alter the topics as changes to the learners' needs might emerge, which promotes not only the agency of the learners but also the educators as they exercise their philosophy in the process of design (Graves, 2023).
LT 548: Scope and Sequence Chart Artifact
LT 548: Dual Language Immersion Course
The main teaching philosophy of the dual language immersion course I constructed in LT 548 is that children learn best through engaging with the language through play. Through a variety of hands-on activities, the teacher is able to allow learners to navigate and learn more about their world in a scaffolded manner (Vygotsky, 1978). Considering this, the lesson plan artifact surrounding the theme of “Food” was designed to provide learners with opportunities to engage in developmentally appropriate but challenging activities, which would not only enhance their intrinsic motivation but also increase their autonomy and confidence throughout the learning process (Ali et al., 2018). This lesson was carefully designed to demonstrate clear learning outcomes in each activity, with integration of Bloom’s taxonomy (Bloom, 1956). The selection of the storybooks “The Very Hungry Caterpillar,” and “Pete the Cat and the Missing Cupcakes,” also reflects the approach that literature can be utilized in an innovative manner, where readiness, experimental, and developmental activities allowed learners to engage with text across in a personally enriching manner (Tomlinson, 2003). The use of literature can fulfill the personal enrichment of these young learners where by allowing them to “draw on their own personal experiences, feelings, and opinions,” their development would be facilitated across the domains of language, socioemotional, and cognitive development (Lazar, 1993, p. 24).
LT 548: Lesson Plan Artifact
In LT 539 (Design for Teaching Pronunciation), I undertook the challenge of teaching Modern Standard Arabic (MSA) pronunciation to young learners who were studying the language at immersion school located in the United States. The teaching of MSA is often subjected to debates where scholars and educators disagree on the benefits and drawbacks of teaching the most “eloquent” variety of Arabic. I aimed to transcend the underlying standard language ideologies present and advocate for MSA to be taught as a lingua franca (Jaradat & Al-Khawaldeh, 2015). As a tool of wider communication, MSA is comprehensible and intelligible to nearly all speakers of Arabic (Palmer, 2007), nevertheless, it is important for teachers to implement an integrated approach where other varieties of Arabic are introduced side by side with MSA, outlining the systematic differences that occur within pronunciation (Younes, 1990). The lesson plan artifact, “Linking with the /Al/ definitive Article,” highlights the teaching of a suprasegmental feature that occurs in most varieties of Arabic. In this lesson, the young learners are introduced to germination and accompanying stress in a contextualized manner where the vocabulary focus is on animals living in a variety of habitats. Furthermore, pronunciation acquisition is facilitated through adopting a communicative framework (Celce-Murcia et al., 2010). The activities are constructed to be personalizable and engaging, with students being able to practice the phonological feature in a scaffolded and meaningful manner.
LT 539: Suprasegmental Lesson Plan
LT 539: Teaching MSA Pronunciation Portfolio
Throughout my teaching experiences, I have found that classroom management intersects with the arts and science of teaching, where no matter how well constructed a language lesson plan is, it becomes nearly impossible to predict what a diverse array of students would do or respond. In SPED 526 (Classroom Behavior and Management), I had the opportunity to construct a lesson plan that addresses the teaching of a desired behavior through language. Challenging behavior that children exhibit always serves a function, and for a teacher to address undesired behavior they must utilize effective goal-setting strategies that would provide a child with the tools and skills to succeed in the classroom (Wheeler & Richey, 2014). The teacher would first observe a child over a period of time and then construct a plan to teach a replacement behavior that would serve the same function as the undesired behavior (Sugai et al., 2000). Through a variety of role-playing activities and discussion, the students’ language abilities would be facilitated. Furthermore, this lesson plan highlights the importance of teaching expectations in the classroom and reinforcing expected behavior through the usage of feedback and intermittent reinforcement (Langland et al., 1998).
SPED 526: Behavior Support Strategies through Language
References
Ali, E., Constantino, K. M., Hussain, A., & Akhtar, Z. (2018). The effects of play-based learning on early childhood education and development. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences, 7(43), 6808-6811.
Bloom, B. S. (Ed.). (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Cognitive domain. Ed. by BS Bloom. vol. 2. Affective domain, by DR Krathwohl and others. Longmans
Celce-Murcia, M., Brinton, D. M., & Goodwin, J. M. (2010). Teaching pronunciation hardback with audio CDs (2): A course book and reference guide. Cambridge University Press.
Graves, K. (2000). Designing language courses : a guide for teachers. Heinle & Heinle.
Graves, K. (2023). Mind the gap: A tale of two curriculum fallacies. Language Teaching, 56(2), 197-209.
Hung, D. W., & Chen, D. T. (2000). Appropriating and negotiating knowledge: Technologies for a community of learners. Educational Technology, 40(3), 29-32.
Jaradat, A. A., & Al-Khawaldeh, N. N. A. (2015). Teaching Modern Standard Arabic for non-native speakers as a lingua franca. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(5), 490-499.
Langland, S., Lewis-Palmer, T., & Sugai, G. (1998). Teaching respect in the classroom: An instructional approach. Journal of Behavioral Education, 8, 245-262.
Lazar, G. (1993). Literature and Language Teaching: A Guide for Teachers and Trainers (16th printing). Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J. C. (2013). Curriculum approaches in language teaching: Forward, central, and backward design. RELC journal, 44(1), 5-33.
Sugai, G., Lewis-Palmer, T., & Hagan-Burke, S. (2000). Overview of the functional behavioral assessment process. Exceptionality, 8(3), 149-160.
Tomlinson, B. (2003). Developing principled frameworks for materials development. Developing materials for language teaching, 107-129.
Vygotsky, L. S., & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Wheeler, J. J., & Richey, D. D. (2014). Behavior management: Principles and practices of positive behavior Supports. Pearson.
Younes, M. A. (1990). An integrated approach to teaching Arabic as a foreign language. al-'Arabiyya, 105-122.