(with Ruslan Aliyev and Ali Gunes)
Highlights:
Resource-rich economies face two pressures at once: population aging and resource depletion.
Resource revenues finance a substantial share of life cycle deficits.
3-year increase in the retirement age reduces oil financed transfers by 9.6%.
10% increase in labor productivity lowers fiscal imbalance by 23.7%.
Economic diversification improves resilience to demographic aging.
Submitted to the International Review of Economics and Finance (25.09.26)
Leverage and Financial Distress: A Meta-Analysis of Empirical Evidence
(with Miriam Brellikova)
Highlights:
First meta-analysis of leverage and financial distress, 819 estimates from 217 studies
Higher leverage predicts distress, pooled effect 0.258 with 95\% CI [0.232, 0.283]
Leverage tracks bankruptcy (0.297) more closely than Altman Z (0.245) or other indices
Market development is the strongest moderator, 0.307 developed against 0.234 developing
Correction methods place the effect between 0.18 and 0.27, mild selection at most
Submitted to the Journal of Economic Survey (17.08.2026)
Replication package at Zenodo: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21977761
Average monthly earnings in Russia, 1994-2020
Equal Access, Equal Earnings?
Regional Returns to Russia’s Unified State Exam
(with Olesia Zeynalova)
Highlights:
Estimates are consistent with earnings differences of 4-8% for USE-exposed cohorts.
The share of exposed cohorts in professional or managerial employment rises from 21% to 26–28%, while degree attainment does not measurably change.
We find no statistically distinguishable evidence that the estimated earnings difference is concentrated in Moscow and St.Petersburg.
Differences by maternal education are suggestive rather than conclusive.
Submitted to Journal of Labor Economics (10.09.26)
Replication package at Zenodo: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22123336
What distress history is worth, and how it is counted
Recurrent Financial Distress:
Does History Matter Beyond the First Episode?
(with Olesia Zeynalova)
Highlights:
One previous episode is linked to 2.3 times the hazard of a new distress episode.
Later episodes add much less, and their effect depends on the time scale.
A constant multiplier per episode is rejected in every specification.
With firm financials controlled, any past episode implies a 32\% higher hazard.
How distress is counted moves the estimated effect of history from 0.96 to 1.64.
Submitted to Finance Research Letters (13.10.26)
Replication package at Zenodo: https://zenodo.org/records/23236318