DAY1: 8th July
12:30 - 13:00
Title: From an implicit sense of self to an explicit self-consciousness
Author: Shogo Tanaka
Abstract: In the past two decades, an abundance of research has explicated the implicit sense of self in terms of embodiment at the intersection of cognitive science and phenomenology. The implicit sense of self, also referred to as the minimal self, is considered to be embedded within direct embodied experiences. As every direct experience always involves an implicit sense that “this is my experience,” we can consider it the fundamental ground of the phenomenal self. The minimal self has been investigated in two ways, that is, as a sense of ownership and as a sense of agency, using experimental paradigms such as the rubber hand illusion. What I would like to argue in this presentation is how we can expand our research from an implicit sense of self to an explicit self-consciousness while keeping its focus on embodiment. An explicit self-consciousness is different from an implicit sense of self in terms of the structure that involves reflective consciousness represented as “I think of me.” Although this type of consciousness may seem abstract and disembodied on the surface, Maurice Merleau-Ponty (2012) pointed out that the experience of double sensation induced by self-touching is “a sort of reflection.” (p. 95). Taking his words as a clue, I will explicate the structure of reflective consciousness as an embodied experience in which one perceives one’s own body. It is possible to find such structure not only in tactile sense but also in auditory sense. As one’s body appears as a subject of perception as well as an object of perception, the body itself is open to sensory experiences of self-reflection that serve as a prototype of “I think of me.” The necessary components of “I” and “me” that constitute an explicit self-consciousness has its basis in bodily experiences.
DAY1: 8th July
13:30 - 14:00
Title: Is this my rubber hand? - A critical reflection on body ownership illusion studies
Author: Andreas Kalckert
Abstract: The introduction of the rubber hand illusion (RHI) has significantly impacted the field of cognitive neuroscience, offering a novel way to investigate the processes underlying body ownership and self-awareness. Originating over 25 years ago, the RHI has sparked considerable interest in the study of embodiment, leading to a proliferation of research paradigms aimed at understanding these complex phenomena. However, despite extensive investigation, several aspects of body ownership illusions remain elusive, prompting recent critiques of experimental paradigms. Critics have questioned the authenticity of these effects, stirring debate on their perceptual underpinnings and contributions to our comprehension of body ownership.
Notwithstanding these criticisms, the notion of multisensory integration remains a compelling explanatory framework for these experiments. This paper seeks to defend this perspective while highlighting areas of the illusion that warrant further exploration. Specifically, it aims to address the illusion's temporal dynamics and the subjective nature of the experience, areas that have received insufficient attention in past research. Moreover, the heterogeneity in methodological approaches and definitions poses a significant challenge, reflecting in the varied conduct of experiments. This paper will present new data and critical reflections that offer a more nuanced understanding of RHI experiments, focusing on the onset of the illusion, the use and interpretation of questionnaire data, and the variability in individual experiences.
By advocating for a more uniform approach and consensus on key methodological aspects, this presentation aims to address current challenges in the field and, consequently, enrich our understanding of embodiment from an experimental viewpoint.
DAY1: 8th July
13:00 - 13:30
Title: It should have been me: from owning to willing
Author: Lorenzo Pia
Abstract: It is largely accepted that the so-called “Sense Of Agency” SOA (i.e., “this action is due to my own will”) comes from the interplay among a variety of internal, motor-related, efferent signals (e.g., motor intentions, planning, sensorimotor predictions, and so on). Notwithstanding, new evidence supports the idea that those body-related (purely afferent) signals subserving Body Ownership BO (i.e., “this body is mine”) act per se on human conscious awareness of willed actions.
I will discuss data from both stroke patients and intact brain functioning supporting such a view. Subsequently, I will suggest that, whenever the context requests, BO can directly act on agency attribution (i.e., regardless of efferent signals). This claim supports the notion that a coherent subjective experience of willed actions (i.e., “this willed action is being achieved by my own body”) needs both awareness of being an agent and of owning the body.
DAY1: 8th July
14:30 - 15:00
Title: Developing awareness: A visceral afferent training perspective on the origins of consciousness
Author: Andrew W. Corcoran
Abstract: Embodied and enactive perspectives on consciousness are concerned with the question of how conscious experience is constituted through the agent’s bodily composition and interaction with the world. Although such approaches are often characterised by an emphasis on temporal dynamics, surprisingly little attention has been paid to the way developmental processes may shape or constrain consciousness. In this presentation, I will argue that fundamental elements of conscious experience are rooted in early developmental trajectories established during gestation. Specifically, I will outline a recently-proposed account of the way neural development is structured by spontaneous rhythmic dynamics arising from visceral systems within the foetal body, which serve to attune the cognitive system towards particular patterns of sensory input. I will then develop this ‘visceral afferent training hypothesis’ to show how the earliest actions of the nascent nervous system give rise to self-specifying information delineating controllable bodily processes from external perturbations. By virtue of asserting control over its proximal (bodily) environment, the developing brain begins to establish its self as both a subject and an agent of experience.
DAY1: 8th July
15:00 - 15:30
Title: A neurophenomenological investigation of the Rubber Hand Illusion: Combining elicitation interviews and EEG
Authors: Camille Lépingle, Miyuki Azuma, Mika Ishizu, Momoka Kimuro, Fugo Suzuki, Yves Rossetti, Jean-Michel Roy, Sotaro Shimada
Abstract: Since the seminal work of Botvinick and Cohen (1998), the Rubber Hand Illusion (RHI) has been the primary experimental paradigm used to study the sense of ownership and the neurocognitive processes involved. However, although the sense of body ownership is considered one of the constitutive elements of minimal self-awareness, few RHI studies pay close attention to its phenomenological dimension, and brain activity analyses are generally driven by predetermined experimental conditions. Therefore, the present study proposes a neurophenomenological investigation of the sense of body ownership based on first-person data collected through on-line elicitation interviews to guide the analysis of brain activity recorded under two experimental conditions. Sixteen healthy Japanese students (15 right-handed, 8 females, age 21.25±0.56 years) were asked to describe their experience while undergoing synchronous or asynchronous visuo-tactile stimulations. Electroencephalography (EEG) was recorded using 30 electrodes according to the extended international 10-20 system. The phenomenological analysis of the first-person data highlighted the existence of various successive phases in participants' lived experience as well as the occurrence of illusions both in the synchronous and asynchronous conditions, thus finding new evidence to support the initial results of a previous phenomenological study by Valenzuela Moguillansky et al. (2013). Our analysis lead to distinguish between six subphases before reaching the state of “Illusion” (phase 2) or “Absence of illusion” (phase 2’) and to isolate three main phenomena that can be classified as “illusions”. The phases identified were subsequently used to cluster the collected EEG data, thus, offering a new perspective on the neurocognitive mechanisms involved in the sense of ownership, closely tied to lived experience.
DAY1: 8th July
15:30 - 16:00
Title: A mathematical perspective on the role of embodiment in predictive coding frameworks
Author: Manuel Baltieri
Abstract: In the past few decades, Bayesian frameworks such predictive coding (processing) and active inference have emerged as a dominant paradigm for the study of cognition and consciousness, often claiming to fully embrace crucial aspects of embodied theories of the mind. In this work we look at some of the mathematical assumptions underlying these Bayesian frameworks and question the extent to which they can be said to conform to principles from embodied cognitive science.
To do so, we will use the fact that in recent years, parts of these frameworks have been recast in more abstract mathematical terms, providing principled accounts of Bayesian inference in the brain using constructions from (applied) category theory (St Clere Smithe, 2023), and an equational language in graphical form, string diagrams, to streamline and generalise current theories to a larger class of (dynamical) systems (Tull et al., 2023).
We will then follow the tracks of St Clere Smithe (2023) and Tull et al. (2023), and further propose a characterisation of the interactions between an agent and its environment inspired by classical formulations of dynamical systems-based approaches to embodied cognition (Beer, 1995) in a categorical framework via structure preserving relations, i.e. bisimulations, between an agent and its environment.
This work will shed (some) light on the relation between embodied cognition and predictive processing, showing cases where current predictive coding/processing frameworks appear as fundamentally limited from an embodied perspective.
DAY1: 8th July
16:00 - 16:30
Title: Category-Theoretic Approach to the Sense of Ownership: Implications for Life-Mind Continuity
Author: Ryuzo Hirota
Abstract: This presentation extends a category-theoretic framework previously developed for understanding autonomy in living systems (Hirota et al., 2023) to the phenomenon of the sense of body ownership, with implications for the continuity between life and mind. The rubber hand illusion, in which synchronous multisensory stimulation causes a fake hand to be experienced as part of one's body, reveals that the sense of ownership is not strictly delineated by the physical body but depends on the coherence of sensory information from different modalities. This finding is consistent with the principles of category theory, which characterizes objects not in terms of their intrinsic components but in terms of their relationships called “arrows” with other objects and themselves. In other words, in a category, the characteristic of an object is solely defined by what kind of arrows it 'connects' to each other.
Here, I hypothetically propose a monoid (category with a single object) representing a sense of ownership, where the object represents the (feeling of) “self” and the arrows represent various sensory modalities. The composition of arrows represents the integrability or coherence of the multisensory information. In this view, the rubber hand illusion occurs when arrows representing visual and tactile inputs related to the rubber hand are composed because of their temporal and spatial coherence, resulting in a change in the characterization (range) of the self. This formalization suggests a deep continuity between the autonomous organization of living systems and the structure of embodied cognition. It enables us to formalize the role of membranes in autonomous living systems (i.e., self-distinction) and the sense of bodily ownership in subjective experience in a unified way: Their essence lies in “connecting” various loop-like relationships. The category-theoretic framework thus provides a unified way of describing the phenomenological mind and the dynamics of living systems.
Reference:
Hirota, R., Saigo, H., & Taguchi, S. (2023). Reformalizing the notion of autonomy as closure through category theory as an arrow-first mathematics. ALIFE 2023: Ghost in the Machine: Proceedings of the 2023 Artificial Life Conference. https://doi.org/10.1162/isal_a_00627
DAY1: 8th July
17:00 - 18:30
Title: Hybrid Embodied Agency in Human - AI Interactions
Authors: Anna Ciaunica, Shaun Gallagher
Abstract: For most of us, most of the time, our experiences seem to be tacitly accompanied by a sense of self – a sense of being an embodied agent within a world, among but distinct from others (Gallagher 2000). Everyday experience also seems to involve experiences of agency; namely, the feeling that I am in control of my own bodily actions, that I can leverage them to access and change the external world’ (Gallagher 2000; Haggard 2017). It is now well established that humans attribute human-like states to artificial others. However, the effect of interacting with artificial minds and bodies on the human sense of agency is less understood. In this talk we will present theoretical and empirical work looking at embodied joint agency in human/ human versus human/ robotic and virtual agents. Specifically, we will outline the key role of the human embodiment and sense of self in establishing joint agency with artificial others. We will argue that in order to establish a “sense of we” with both humans and artificial agents, humans need to feel connected to their own bodies first. We introduce the notion of ‘hybrid agency’ to describe these new, technologically mediated ways to embody and control in tandem human and artificial minds and bodies in real and virtual environments. Do we develop a sense of hybrid “we” in interacting with these artificial agents? If yes, in which sense this sense of “we” is different from the sense of togetherness that we have when we interact with biological systems? We will discuss key implications of these questions on recent efforts to design autonomous and interactive artificial others.
DAY2: 9th July
10:30 - 11:00
Title: Mapping the space of altered states of consciousness
Author: Paweł Motyka
Abstract: Altered states of consciousness are defined as a transient change in the overall pattern of subjective experience. While states of consciousness are increasingly better understood across a spectrum ranging from unconsciousness (e.g., coma or anesthesia) to the waking state, we still lack a unified approach for capturing the qualitative diversity within conscious wakefulness. A fundamental challenge is to identify the dimensions that can effectively structure the coarse-grained representation of the phenomenological landscape. Here we aimed to create the empirically grounded classification of pharmacologically induced altered states using a bottom-up approach. In a preregistered study (n = 739), participants assessed the dissimilarity between pairs of vividly remembered experiences associated with the use of various psychoactive substances. The ratings were given on a continuous labeled dissimilarity scale, originally used for capturing unimodal qualia spaces. We employed the multidimensional scaling technique (MDS) to create models representing the averaged dissimilarity ratings between states as distances in a geometric space. First, we observed that states induced by pharmacologically similar substances clustered closely, serving as a control validation for our methodology. The primary dimension, interpreted as the 'intensity of mind alteration', positioned baseline/ordinary state alongside states evoked by depressants, and stimulants at one end, while situating psychedelic- and dissociative-induced states at the other. The second dimension covered the inhibition-stimulation spectrum, ranging from states evoked by depressants and opioids to classical stimulants. The MDS analysis was complemented by other multidimensional reduction techniques (PCA, UMAP, and t-SNE), which enabled us to preserve subject-level information. Consequently, we derived a set of empirically grounded models mapping dissimilarity ratings for radically diverse experiences and reflecting the variability of these ratings across subjects. We propose that such avenue of research may eventually inform our understanding of the dimensionality, topology, and metrics underlying the landscape of consciousness states.
DAY2: 9th July
11:00 - 11:30
Title: Altered States of Viscereality: Augmenting Breathwork with Bio-Responsive Virtual Reality
Author: George Fejer
Abstract: This project explores enhancing breathwork with bio-responsive virtual reality (VR) to induce altered states of consciousness (ASC). Our goal is to design a bio-responsive VR interface that synchronizes breathing patterns with spatial changes—expanding during inhalations and contracting during exhalations—to influence conscious states. Previous research on breathing and embodied cognition has shown that people perceive larger quantities after inhaling compared to exhaling (Belli et al., 2021). This is likely because they associate the expansion of lung volume with larger quantities. In our VR scenario, we aim to directly link the subjective sense of spaciousness to lung mechanics, making participants feel as though the room is breathing, thereby inducing an altered state of consciousness. We plan to achieve this by either coupling a VR headset with a breathing mask (Tatzgern et al., 2022) or placing the VR controller on the belly to measure diaphragmatic breathing (Rockstroh et al., 2021). In one condition, we will couple the expansion of space to lung volume; in the other, we will couple the expansion of lung volume to contraction. Our hypothesis is that the subjective sense of space will be larger in the former condition.To evaluate the effectiveness of our VR setup, we will use psychometric time series tracing, behavioral assessments, body-size estimation, random number generation, and neurophysiological markers related to the representation of peripersonal space (Serino et al., 2018). In light of previous work, which has shown that Breathwork can effectively induce ASCs comparable to those produced by psychedelics (Bahi et al., 2024; Lewis-Healey et al., 2024), we aim to explore methods for embodied technologies to influence our conscious state, with the hope of developing non-pharmacological methods for inducing ASCs with therapeutic applications.
References
Bahi, C., Irrmischer, M., Franken, K., Fejer, G., Schlenker, A., Deijen, J. B., & Engelbregt, H. (2024). Effects of conscious connected breathing on cortical brain activity, mood and state of consciousness in healthy adults. Current Psychology, 43(12), 10578-10589.
Belli, F., Felisatti, A., & Fischer, M. H. (2021). “BreaThink”: breathing affects production and perception of quantities. Experimental Brain Research, 239(8), 2489-2499.
Lewis-Healey, E., Tagliazucchi, E., Canales-Johnson, A., & Bekinschtein, T. (2024). Breathwork-Induced Psychedelic Experiences Modulate Neural Dynamics. bioRxiv, 2024.2002. 2019.580985.
Rockstroh, C., Blum, J., & Göritz, A. S. (2021). A mobile VR-based respiratory biofeedback game to foster diaphragmatic breathing. Virtual Reality, 25(2), 539-552. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-020-00471-5
Serino, A., Noel, J.-P., Mange, R., Canzoneri, E., Pellencin, E., Ruiz, J. B., Bernasconi, F., Blanke, O., & Herbelin, B. (2018). Peripersonal space: an index of multisensory body–environment interactions in real, virtual, and mixed realities. Frontiers in ICT, 4, 31.
Tatzgern, M., Domhardt, M., Wolf, M., Cenger, M., Emsenhuber, G., Dinic, R., Gerner, N., & Hartl, A. (2022). Airres mask: A precise and robust virtual reality breathing interface utilizing breathing resistance as output modality. Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems,
DAY2: 9th July
11:30 - 12:00
Title: The Embodiment of Embeddedness through Huatou Chan: Data and Insights from Chinese Buddhism, Deep Ecology, and Neuroendocrinology
Author: Brianna Morseth
Abstract: Coining the term ecology, zoologist Ernst Haeckel’s definition encompasses its panoramic scope: “By ecology, we mean the whole science of the relations of the organism to the environment including, in the broad sense, all the ‘conditions of existence.’” Meanwhile, eco-philosopher Arne Naess inextricably embeds identity within the interrelational matrix of the broad manifold of nature. Existentially relational in context, ecological theory has since been applied to a range of fields, bridging philosophy and practice while integrating scientific methods toward the study of interconnection and its neural correlates. Especially keen on contemplating and challenging the sense of self in relation to broader ecologies are the varieties of Buddhism. However, no empirical studies have yet examined the neuro-ecology of Chinese Buddhist contemplative practices, particularly in the context of a monastic ecosystem. Thus, employing ecological and neuroendocrinological methods, this paper reports on data collected through monastic fieldwork in Taiwan on the effects of huatou 話頭, a form of meditation from Chan Buddhism invoking contemplative doubt through variations on the inquiry “Who am I?” Based on quantifiable trends in recycling, food waste habits, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay of saliva samples, results indicate an increase in both environmentally sustainable behavior and oxytocin, a hypothalamic neuropeptide hormone expressed in primarily interrelational contexts, as a function of huatou Chan and time on retreat over a one-month window of observation. Findings are discussed in the context of deep ecology and existing research in neuroendocrinology and phenomenology on the relationship between oxytocin and sense of self. This study is the first to empirically measure environmentally sustainable behavior and oxytocin as dependent variables in the context of Buddhist meditation practice. Hence, it offers an empirically testable framework linking oxytocin to sense of self and behavior and provides a foundation for future studies in the growing field of contemplative science.
DAY2: 9th July
12:00 - 12:30
Title: The emergence of agency or: How phenomenological methods can guide scientific research
Authors: Alessandro Solfo, Cees van Leeuwen
Abstract: In his manifesto for neurophenomenology, Varela (1996) suggests three “large issues” for testing his nonreductive method for the study of human consciousness: “attention,” “present-time consciousness,” and “body image and voluntary motion” (pp. 341–342) (i.e., sense of agency). Whereas the first two issues have been adequately addressed, sense of agency remains unexamined. We adopted a generalization of neurophenomenology—front-loaded phenomenology—to trace the emergence of agency. Unlike neurophenomenology, front-loaded phenomenology allows explorations at the limits of life (e.g., fetal stages). Our study consists of two stages: phenomenological reduction and scientific research. Phenomenological reduction redefines agency by identifying its necessary structure (essence), free of the inconsistencies of previous accounts. By apodictic self-evidence, we found that, in essence, the sense of agency is constituted by two complementary aspects: the feeling of being engaged in movement (bodily agency) and that of controlling, through movements, events temporally related to those movements (extended agency). This redefinition was front-loaded into scientific research designs. Through a systematic review of ontogenetic studies, we situated the emergence of bodily agency in the coordination patterns that humans encounter from intrauterine life (e.g., maternal–fetal heartbeat coordination). In a controlled experiment, we investigated the emergence of extended agency. When participants coordinated their finger tapping with periodic flashes, they felt to be controlling, through tapping, the flashes. Results indicated that sensorimotor coordination, operationalized as fractal time series, is necessary and sufficient for extended agency. Our study demonstrates that both aspects of agency stem from coordination and, more broadly, that phenomenological methods enable rigorous descriptions of experience that strengthen the validity of behavioral research.
Reference
Varela, F. J. (1996). Neurophenomenology: A methodological remedy for the hard problem. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 3(4), 330–349.
DAY2: 9th July
14:00 - 14:30
Title: How the Brain Performs Phenomenology: Neural Correlates of Phenomenological Attitude toward Conscious Experience
Authors: Satoshi Nishida, Hiro Taiyo Hamada, Takuya Niikawa, Katsunori Miyahara
Abstract: Phenomenology is considered one of the most promising approaches to studying conscious experience. It posits that a rigorous study of conscious experience requires a transition from the “natural attitude” (NA) to the “phenomenological attitude” (PA). NA is our ordinary stance, in which our attention is focused on external objects and events, whereas PA is a distinctive, reflective stance in which our attention is focused on our conscious experience itself. Despite its theoretical importance in both philosophy and science of consciousness, the neural mechanisms underlying PA remain unknown. This uncertainty undermines the scientific credibility of phenomenological approaches to consciousness research. To address this, our study investigated these neural mechanisms using fMRI experiments with a novel behavioral task. This task required participants to switch between NA and PA in relation to their stimulus-evoked subjective experiences. Participants were presented with two sentences designed to induce either NA or PA and were asked to select the one that best captured their experience. We found that activation patterns in action-related brain regions—the premotor cortex, posterior parietal cortex, supplementary motor area, and cerebellum—successfully discriminated between NA and PA. Furthermore, the activation strength in these regions was lower in PA, suggesting that PA involves the suppression of action-related neural processes. These findings provide the first empirical evidence of the neural correlates of PA, establishing valuable guidelines for future research in consciousness, grounded in an integrative framework of neuroscience and phenomenology.
University Psychiatric Clinic Ljubljana
DAY2: 9th July
14:30 - 15:00
Title: Clinical Neurophenomenology: Integrating Psychiatry and Enactive Cognitive Science.
Author: Aleš Oblak
Abstract: In psychiatry, we are faced with the so-called integration problem, the question of how to combine various perspectives (psychological, biological, social) on mental disorders into a coherent theory. In recent years, several frameworks were proposed tackling this problem (most notably, the Research Domain Criteria and enactive psychiatry). Typically, integrative frameworks for psychiatric disorders emphasize the need for explanatory pluralism and non-hierarchical theories. In this way, the proposed solutions for tackling the integration problem bear similarities to the project of neurophenomenology in consciousness science. Neurophenomenology refers to the systematic integration of first- (i.e., phenomenological) and third-person perspectives (i.e., neuroscientific) in order to address the hard problem of consciousness (i.e., the question of how conscious experience can arise from non-conscious matter).
I will present a neurophenomenological project that attempts to bridge the gap between the lived experience of emotional dysregulation (as a transdiagnostic marker of psychiatric disorder as well as one of the more problematic symptoms) and its associated neurocognitive networks (as a potential target for treatment with methods such as TMS). I will present two studies, focusing, respectively on a) qualitative phenomenology; and b) electrophysiology. With the use of qualitative phenomenological methods, I have identified the three central experiential components of emotion regulation: agency, temporality, and sensemaking. In the second step, with the use of electrophysiological methods, the behavioral and neural correlates of emotion regulation in health and depression were discovered.
In the concluding sections, I provide some methodological considerations regarding neurophenomenology of psychiatric disorders, specifically, how it can be integrated into high-precision, individualized psychiatry.
DAY2: 9th July
15:00 - 15:30
Title: On becoming aware that one is dreaming: A micro-phenomenological investigation of signal-verified lucid dream experiences
Authors: Ema Demšar, Mahdad Jafarzadeh Esfahani, Martin Dresler, Thomas Andrillon, Jennifer Windt
Abstract: Lucid dreaming (LD) is an experience in which one is aware that they are currently dreaming. LD has been reported for millennia across different cultural contexts, with some contemplative traditions even developing techniques to cultivate LD and to harness lucidity for engaging in contemplative practices while asleep. With the development of the eye-signaling protocol, where dreamers signal the onset of lucidity with intentional eye movements during REM sleep, the neurophysiology of LD can now be studied in laboratory settings. However, neuroscientific progress has been hampered by the underexplored phenomenology of LD. While it appears that lucidity is not an all-or-nothing phenomenon, but comes in different types and is often characterized by complex temporal dynamics, there has as of yet been no systematic investigation of the detailed phenomenology of LD. In my research, I use the micro-phenomenological interview method to investigate the structures and dynamics of LD experience.
In my talk, I will present findings from a neurophenomenological EEG study employing an LD induction protocol, where participants utilized eye signals to verify lucidity. Subsequent micro-phenomenological interviews (N=38, 60–90 minutes) investigated experiences associated with lucid insight and the onset and progression of lucidity. A qualitative micro-phenomenological analysis of a subset of 24 interviews that focused on signal-verified REM-sleep LD episodes identified a) distinct patterns of temporal progression leading to lucid insight and b) salient phenomenological structures characterizing phases of pre-lucidity and full dream lucidity. My talk will focus on the quality of attention and awareness in LD, meta-cognitive pre-lucidity processes, and experiences of embodiment, agency, and selfhood surrounding the onset of lucidity. I will conclude by considering the relevance of these findings for future research into dream lucidity, as well as discussing the application of micro-phenomenology and the neurophenomenological framework in dream and sleep research.
DAY2: 9th July
15:30 - 16:00
Title: Investigating the phenomenology of objectless sleep experiences
Author: Adriana Alcaraz Sánchez
Abstract: Indo-Tibetan philosophical traditions, including that of the Advaita Vedānta, as well as the Dzogchen in Indo-Tibetan Buddhism, posit the existence of a particular state of awareness during deep sleep, that of “sushupti” or “clear light sleep” (Padmasambhava & Gyatrul, 2008; Prasad, 2000, Ponlop, 2006). According to these traditions, such a state departs from any ordinary state of consciousness insofar as it is said to lack conscious content and merely involve a state of “consciousness-as-such”. However, despite the frequent mentions of this state in the key texts of these traditions, descriptions of sushupti and clear light sleep are highly heterogeneous, thus, questioning whether a single state is being described, or instead, several ones.
In this presentation, I will give an overview of my work on “objectless sleep experiences”, experiences that I describe as conscious states during sleep that appear to one as lacking a distinct object of awareness. To that aim, I will briefly present the results of two studies exploring the phenomenological blueprints of objectless sleep experiences, one of which uses a qualitative research tool inspired by the micro-phenomenological interview (Alcaraz-Sánchez et al., 2022; Alcaraz-Sánchez, Forthcoming). I will then show how such experiences of objectless awareness during sleep can be situated within other associated states across sleep and waking, including minimal forms of dreaming, deep meditative experiences, and experiences of absorption. I will end by introducing a multidimensional framework aimed at guiding research on elusive forms of altered states of consciousness, including clear light sleep and other minimal forms of awareness during sleep and waking (Alcaraz-Sánchez, Under Review).
DAY2: 9th July
17:00 - 19:00
Title: Exploring the dynamic structures of lived experience through micro-phenomenology
Abstract: Micro-phenomenology starts from the observation that the naïve descriptions we give of our experience are usually poor and unreliable. However, this does not mean that our experience is out of reach. Accessing it requires a particular expertise, which consists in carrying out specific acts. Micro-phenomenology is a new discipline aiming at eliciting such acts in the context of an interview, making it possible to collect rigorous and very fine-grained descriptions of a given experience. However the method is not limited to only describing individual tokens of experience. It also includes an analysis method aiming at identifying generic characteristics which constitute the structure of the experience under study. This work of description and analysis highlights usually unrecognized micro-dynamics, where the structures we usually consider as essential to experience fade. The first part of my presentation will focus on the methodological and epistemological aspects of micro-phenomenology. In the second part, I will give an overview of these dynamic structures
DAY3: 10th July
10:30 - 11:00
Title: Accounting for the phenomenal structure of experience: space and time
Author: Matteo Grasso
Abstract: In this talk I present an outline of IIT’s account of phenomenal space and time. First, I will introduce IIT’s methodology to study consciousness scientifically, which consists in describing the structure of experience, and finding a correspondence with the cause-effect structure unfolded from its substrate. I will then present IIT’s account of two contents of experience: the extendedness of visual space and the flow of time.
DAY3: 10th July
11:00 - 11:30
Title: Everything Everywhere All at Once? Exploring the richness of visual experience beyond words
Author: Qianchen Liang
Abstract: Subjectively, our visual experience seems rich and detailed. However, previous studies implies our experience is limited to 3~4 items at a glance. These studies tended to focus on small, easy-to-label details in the stimuli, without exhausting all we could experience. Here, to probe richness of experience, we consider semantic details together with perceptual qualities that we have no words for. For each of 100 natural scene images, we synthesised an image with equated image summary statistics. In Experiment 1, 100 online participants described each image in 5 words. Using a large language model, we confirmed that 27 out of 100 pairs had indistinguishable semantic labels. Using these semantically-equated pairs, in (registered) Experiment 2, we will perform a perceptual task on online participants. We will also use an immersive display with in-lab participants, to test in situations mimicking the real-world environment. How rich can our experience be beyond verbal description?
DAY3: 10th July
11:30 - 12:00
Title: Input-Output Functionalism and Underdetermination in Consciousness Science
Author: Francesco Ellia
Abstract: Paraphrasing Forrest Gump, we might say that for the input-output functionalist, “conscious is as conscious does.” Essentially, input-output functionalism evaluates consciousness in other systems based on the functions displayed in those systems. This view is explicitly advocated by Cohen and Dennett (2011), who consider unscientific any theory that attempts to explain consciousness without exclusively relying on functions. It is also implicitly supported by Doerig and colleagues (2019), who deem theories that dissociate subjective experience from functions as either unscientific or false. While consciousness science is arguably at a pre-paradigmatic stage (Ellia and Negro, in preparation), this view is generally widespread in contemporary neuroscience of consciousness, with most theories adopting a functionalist perspective (Doerig et al. 2019).
However, input-output functionalism presents severe problems, from risking collapse into behaviorism (Tsuchiya et al. 2020), to leading to misguided considerations on falsificationism (Negro 2020; Ellia 2021), to committing the fallacy of misplaced objectivity (Ellia, Hendren et al. 2021). It is not a trivial question to ask about the capacity of input-output functionalism to discriminate between conscious and unconscious systems in a world where technological advancements have introduced artificial systems capable of mimicking complex cognitive functions. In this talk, I explore another shortcoming of input-output functionalism when applied to clinical cases beyond thought experiments (Ellia 2021), demonstrating how input-output functionalism is underdetermined—it cannot reliably distinguish between different cases of consciousness despite claiming it can. I argue that structural approaches are preferable instead (Ellia, in preparation).
DAY3: 10th July
11:30 - 12:00
Title: Towards blinded classification of loss of consciousness: distinguishing wakefulness from general anaesthesia and sleep in flies using a massive library of univariate time series analyses
Author: Angus Leung
Abstract: Studies frequently discover new time-series features as potential markers of consciousness. However, these features often lack principled, theoretical justifications as to why they should be related to consciousness. This raises the issues of 1) the particular time-series features being selected due to researcher biases towards specific types of analyses, while other potential features could have been explored but were not, and 2) how to interpret identified features to understand neural activity underlying consciousness, especially when features are identified from recordings which summate across large areas such as electroencephalography. To address the first concern, we take the approach of staying agnostic to particular analysis types and apply as many univariate time-series features as feasible, from various research fields (~7000) as potential consciousness markers. To address the second issue, we apply this approach to high-quality neural recordings from a relatively simple brain, the fly brain (Drosophila melanogaster) obtained during wakefulness, anaesthesia, and sleep. Using a registered report format and multiple independent sets of flies (N = 62) to evaluate the performance of each feature in distinguishing wakefulness from loss of consciousness, we find that features related to fractal geometry seem to generalise across datasets, while features related to well-known markers of consciousness, such as those related to spectral power or complexity, fail to generalise across datasets.
DAY3: 10th July
15:00 - 15:30
Title: Reverse Engineering Agentive Control in Biological Neural Systems
Author: Jingyue Xu
Abstract: Sensorimotor enactivism posits that perceptual experience is constituted by the dynamic coupling of the sensorimotor system and its environment, which comprises the system’s actions on the environment. When an agent is confronted with the Selection Problem of actions, implementing agentive control is the process of finding a solution to this problem. How do our brains endogenously generate voluntary action control over our bodies and mental faculties? This presentation brings forth a new theoretical perspective, interfacing neuroscience, control theory, and philosophy of mind, by taking a system-level approach to modeling the brain’s control of its internal processes. In a feedback control system, a controller is implemented to define a closed-loop map and subsequently a solution given its current state. The enactive brain can be similarly viewed as an online control system operating with a “pre-defined” controller design that at least yields local stability and robustness (namely, the agentive state does not dissolve in an arbitrarily near future). Therefore, to characterize the source of agentive control is to reverse engineer the internal controller design, which does not necessarily have a physical mapping, in the brain. To do this, I will deploy a data-driven version of System Level Synthesis (SLS), which is a novel system-level parameterization of linear systems in control theory. SLS is compatible with systems that are large-scale, localized, and endowed with internal communication delays, all of which are problems that theoretical neuroscientists are constantly faced with. Data-driven SLS offers a unique approach to learning the controller in the brain using physiological data as state/input signals without requiring an explicit identification of the system model of the brain. Given the near-ubiquitous layered architecture of the brain across the animal kingdom, one can approximate the source and structure of agency in various networks/sub-systems of neurons by appropriately constraining the agentive state of the subject, and thereafter characterize the performance of the brain controller in terms of its closed-loop behavior.
DAY3: 10th July
15:30 - 16:00
Title: Telic states: towards a computational phenomenology of purposeful behavior
Authors: Nadav Amir, Yael Niv, Angela Langdon
Abstract: Goals fundamentally shape how we experience the world. For example, when we are hungry, we view objects in our environment according to whether or not they are edible (or tasty). Alternatively, when we are cold, we view the very same objects according to their ability to produce heat. Computational theories of purposeful behavior, such as reinforcement learning, assume that agents employ fixed and pre-defined state representations to capture behaviorally-relevant features of their environment. Here, we propose an alternative view in which state-representations are not assumed veridical, or even pre-defined, but rather emerge from agents' goals through interaction with their environment. We introduce a notion of goal-directed, or telic, states – defined as goal-equivalent experience distributions – and use it to develop, from first principles, a parsimonious framework of purposeful behavior, driven by rich and complex features of experience, beyond the maximization of extrinsically defined reward functions. By coupling states with goals, this framework provides a fresh perspective on recent findings in cognitive neuroscience indicating that neural activity previously thought to encode prescriptive (or normative) aspects of experience also conveys information about descriptive (or positive) ones, and vice versa. It also provides a novel approach to the problem of goal formation as a tradeoff between the granularity and the controllability of telic state representations. Taken together, this framework provides a step towards a computational phenomenology of state-representation learning through the lens of goals.
DAY3: 10th July
16:00 - 16:30
Title: The sense of agency from active causal inference
Author: Acer Chang
Abstract: This study investigates the active component of the sense of agency (SoA), positing that SoA is fundamentally an outcome of active causal inference regarding one's own actions and their impact on the environment. Participants controlled visual objects via a computer mouse, with tasks designed to test their ability to judge control or detect controlled objects under varying noise conditions. Our findings reveal that participants formed high-level, low-dimensional action plans that were idiosyncratic across but consistent within individuals to infer their degree of control. Employing transformer-LSTM-based autoencoders, we captured these action plans and demonstrated that the geometrical and dynamical properties of these action plans could predict behavioural profiles in the tasks with remarkable accuracy. This suggests that participants' sense of control is shaped by actively altering action plans, viewed as generating causal evidence through intervention. Further, participants proactively expanded the diversity of their action plans, facilitating the exploration of available action plan options while accumulating causal evidence for the inference process. Contrarily, patients with schizophrenia exhibited reduced action plan diversity, suggesting impaired active control inference and detection of self-relevant cues. These findings offer a more comprehensive understanding of the sense of agency, deeply rooted in the process of active causal inference.
DAY3: 10th July
16:30 - 17:00
Title: Cleaning up the Perceptual Spill: Phenomenal overflow in the context of predictive coding models of cortical function
Author: Krzysztof DOLEGA
Abstract: Ned Block’s (2008) ‘overflow’ hypothesis about perceptual experience is the claim that phenomenal consciousness is richer than the processing capacities of cognitive functions. According to this view, subjects enjoy a detailed phenomenal experience of the whole visual field, but are unable to reliably access all the perceptual information presented in consciousness. In this paper, I present a new argument against the overflow hypothesis based on structural features of the human visual system as well as state-of-the-art predictive coding algorithms used for modeling perceptual information processing. I begin by discussing the morphology of the early visual system, where some form of signal compression is already necessitated at the ganglionic layer of the retina (Srinivasan et al., 1982). While this does not rule out the possibility of overflow taking place further downstream, it speaks against the idea that subjects could experience the full array of the available visual information at any point in time. Furthermore, hierarchical predictive coding models of cortical function (Rao & Ballard, 1999; Spratling, 2008, 2017) show that the kind of compression present in very early sensory processing can be found across the perceptual hierarchy. This speaks against the possibility of overflow taking place at later stages of processing for two reasons. Firstly, the compression involved in predictive coding is realized by attenuating bottom-up signals congruent with context-dependent expectations in a way that does not allow for a later recovery of the previously removed components of the sensory signal. Secondly, under predictive coding, it is the context-dependent expectations and not the sensory signals that serve as the vehicles for the content of perceptual experience. Thus, predictive coding models overturn the traditional view of bottom-up perceptual processing, leaving no room for phenomenal overflow to take place. I conclude by considering some possible objections.
Author: Tommaso Ciorli
Abstract: The feeling of owning a fake hand can be induced when this is perceived in first- (1PP) as compared to third- (3PP) person perspective, and when synchronous (synch), as compared to asynchronous (asynch), visuo-tactile stimulation is delivered over the fake and real hands. Despite multisensory integration is known to occur even if one modality is unconsciously perceived, the role of visual awareness on the illusion it’s still unknown. Capitalizing on immersive virtual reality and Continuous Flash Suppression, we investigated whether visual awareness is necessary to induce the illusory feeling of ownership. We hypothesized that body ownership, as measured by the proprioceptive drift, would still occur in absence of visual awareness. Thirty-six subjects participated in a virtual hand illusion procedure to assess the presence of illusory feeling of body ownership. Those susceptible to the illusion underwent a virtual hand illusion task where we manipulated spatial perspective (1PP/3PP), stimulation congruency (synch/asynch), and awareness (conscious/unconscious) through Continuous Flash Suppression, measuring proprioceptive drift and stimulus visibility. Results showed that, in the conscious condition, proprioceptive drift was significantly higher in the 1PP synch condition as compared to asych/3PP conditions, indicating the efficacy of the procedure in inducing the ownership illusion. Crucially, proprioceptive drift in the 1PP unconscious condition was comparable to the drift in 1PP synch conscious condition, regardless of tactile stimulation. A significant difference in proprioceptive drift was found between the unconscious 1PP and 3PP conditions, being higher in 1PP. This suggests that proprioceptive drift was induced without visual awareness only when the virtual hand was unconsciously perceived in 1PP. Our findings demonstrate that objective ownership responses are modulated by unconscious processing of bodily perspective, being similar as when stimuli are consciously perceived. This work suggests that body ownership can be triggered without visual awareness, highlighting a complex interplay between consciousness and bodily-self-perception.
Authors: Nevia Dolcini & Gary Kin Lok Chu
Abstract: Self-consciousness is typically viewed as consciousness of oneself as oneself (Smith 2017), implying that for self-consciousness more is required than mere consciousness of such and such (Independency Thesis). This view is controversial, with opponents claiming that consciousness fundamentally depends on self-consciousness (Dependency Thesis). Proponents of the Dependency Thesis often share insights into the ‘phenomenology of the self’ and the ubiquitous, pre-reflective, non-conceptual, and peripheral form of self-awareness accompanying all experiences (Goldman 1970; Frankfurt 1988; Flanagan 1992; Hurley 1997, 1998; Bermúdez 1998; Kriegel 2004; Gallagher & Zahavi 2020). This primitive self-awareness is intended as a kind of perspectival consciousness, inherently first-personal. In this paper, we argue against the first-personal character of such primitive perspectival consciousness, supporting the Independence Thesis. We begin by distinguishing broad and narrow readings of ‘perspectival consciousness’ in the literature. The broad reading considers perspectival consciousness as inherently first-personal. Thus, the Dependency Thesis suggests that perspectival consciousness contains an insoluble first-personal core, or character. Conversely, the Independency Thesis entails that perspectival consciousness is not necessarily first-personal, requiring more for self-consciousness. We then argue, by means of linguistic analysis, that the thoughts expressed by self-referring statements – those involving indexicals, as well as co-referential descriptions and proper names – do not support the broad reading of perspectival consciousness. Rather than being a first-personal source of experience, perspectival consciousness is the a-personal origin – but not source – of experience. This geometrical perspective-specific (view-)point contributes a common locus of agency which aligns well with embodied approaches to consciousness. Furthermore, we show that our linguistic analysis provides insights that are consistent with clinical reports on the Cotard syndrome, where patients exhibit the symptom of ‘speaking of oneself in the third person’ (Leuret 1834; Séglas 1892; Ribot 1897; Minkowski 1933). These patients systematically refer to ‘themselves’ using proper names, demonstratives, or third-person pronouns, thereby providing further evidence for the narrow reading of perspectival consciousness and, consequently, the Independency Thesis.
Authors: Camilo Miguel Signorelli & Joaquin Diaz Boils
Abstract: An algebraic interpretation of multigraph networks is introduced in relation to conscious experience, brain and body. These multigraphs have the ability to merge by an associative binary operator, accounting for biological composition. We also study a mathematical formulation of splitting layers, resulting in a formal analysis of the transition from conscious to non-conscious activity. From this construction, we recover core structures for conscious experience, dynamical content and causal constraints that conscious interactions may impose. An important result is the prediction of structural topological changes after conscious interactions. These results may inspire further use of formal mathematics to describe and predict new features of conscious experience while aligning well with formal tries to mathematize phenomenology, phenomenological tradition and applications to artificial consciousness.
Authors: Kingson Man, Ignacio Cea, and Naoto Yoshida
Abstract: Homeostasis is the regula6on of internal body states within a range compa6ble with life. In organisms capable of forming mental states, conscious feelings are the mental expression of these internal viability states [1-2]. It has been proposed that machines that implement a process resembling homeostasis could exhibit a feeling-like device for the mo6va6on and evaluation of their behavior [3]. Recent developments in machine learning have implemented homeostatic processes in reinforcement learning (RL) agents and observed the emergence of integrated behaviors [4-8]. Here we extend these ideas to a model of the function of conscious feeling and social behavior using mul6-agent RL, where each interac6ng agent is formulated as a vulnerable homeostat. Vulnerability is defined as the circular causality in which an agent’s homeostatic states affect its ability to regulate those homeostatic states. In the limit, the agent loses cons6tu6onal integrity – it dies. We offer a novel treatment of mortality in the RL context. The standard RL op6miza6on objec6ve maximizes the expected value of reward, but in non-ergodic RL scenarios [9], the popula6on-average reward differs from the 6me-average reward achieved by most individuals. These situations arise in RL with absorbing states (death) that foreclose any future reward. Mortal agents, who play mortal games, end up behaving in ways far different from those who 'ra6onally' maximize the expected value of reward across a population [10]. This treatment extends to social behavior when the capacity for self-feeling is augmented with the capacity for fellow-feeling, or empathy [11-12]. Vulnerable agents can communicate homeostatic feeling states as emotions. The empathy mechanism creates a positive feedback loop in which agents act for the observed good of others in order to feel good for themselves. We offer a computational approach to the emergence of prosocial behaviors from vulnerable agents guided by homeostatic feelings.
References
1. Damasio, Antonio R. The feeling of what happens: Body and emotion in the making of
consciousness. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 1999.
2. Damasio, Antonio, and Gil B. Carvalho. "The nature of feelings: evolutionary and
neurobiological origins." Nature reviews neuroscience 14.2 (2013): 143-152.
3. Man, Kingson, and Antonio Damasio. "Homeostasis and soft robotics in the design of
feeling machines." Nature Machine Intelligence 1.10 (2019): 446-452.
4. Kerama6, Mehdi, and Boris Gutkin. "Homeosta6c reinforcement learning for integra6ng
reward collec6on and physiological stability." Elife 3 (2014): e04811.
5. Yoshida, Naoto. "Homeosta6c agent for general environment." Journal of Ar6ficial
General Intelligence 8.1 (2017): 1.
6. Yoshida, Naoto, et al. "Embodiment perspec6ve of reward defini6on for behavioural
homeostasis." Deep RL Workshop NeurIPS 2021. 2021.
7. Yoshida, Naoto, Hoshinori Kanazawa, and Yasuo Kuniyoshi. "Homeosta6c reinforcement
learning through soft behavior switching with internal body state." 2023 Interna6onal Joint
Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN). IEEE, 2023.
8. Laurencon, Hugo, et al. "Con6nuous Time Con6nuous Space Homeosta6c Reinforcement
Learning (CTCS-HRRL): Towards Biological Self-Autonomous Agent." arXiv preprint
arXiv:2401.08999 (2024).
9. Baumann, Dominik, et al. "Non-ergodicity in reinforcement learning: robustness via
ergodicity transforma6ons." arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.11335 (2023).
10. Ororbia, Alexander, and Karl Friston. "Mortal computa6on: A founda6on for biomime6c
intelligence." arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.09589 (2023).
11. Lim, Angelica, and Hiroshi G. Okuno. "A recipe for empathy: Integra6ng the mirror
system, insula, somatosensory cortex and motherese." Interna6onal Journal of Social Robo6cs 7
(2015): 35-49.
12. Asada, Minoru. "Towards ar6ficial empathy: how can ar6ficial empathy follow the
developmental pathway of natural empathy?." Interna6onal Journal of Social Robo6cs 7 (2015):
19-33.
Authors: Michael Timothy Bennett, Sean Welsh, Anna Ciaunica
Abstract: Why is there consciousness[1]? To answer we construct a formalism that unifies lower and higher order theories of consciousness[2-8]. We assume a pancomputational[9] environment in which natural-selection learns organisms that learn cause. Cause is learned by constructing object X such that X causes Y, not by presupposing the world is divided into objects including X and then testing to see if X causes Y[10-13]. If one cannot presuppose objects, then one must construct objects by being attracted to or repulsed from contentless[14] quality (affect). Learning reduces quality to behavioural policies. Policies classify causes of affect, and so have quality. As capacity for learning scales, progressively higher orders of ‘causal-identity’ are constructed[13]. These facilitate reafference[8], then self-awareness[2] and access-consciousness[3]. Reafference lets an organism discern the immediate consequences of its actions. A policy called a “1st-order-self” performs this function. It has a quality that accompanies everything an organism does. That quality is what it is like to be the organism, so it has phenomenal-consciousness. An unconscious zombie would be less able to learn cause and adapt. Likewise, survival may demand organism-X infer organism-Y's prediction of X's interventions (“2nd-order-selves” to see one's self through another's eyes). Contents of which we are access-conscious are those we can communicate in the Gricean sense (recognising communicative intent), so they must be contents of 2nd-order-selves (unifying access and phenomenal-consciousness). We present the psychophysical principle of causality; consciousness is learning and acting in accord with a hierarchy of causal identities. This ‘dissolves’ the hard-problem by going a level down. There is consciousness because it serves the fundamental biological drive: stay alive!
References
[1] Chalmers,D.:Facing up to the problem of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies 2(3), 200–19 (1995)
[2] Morin, A.: Levels of consciousness and self-awareness: A comparison and integration of various neurocognitive views. Consciousness and Cognition 15(2), 358–371 (2006)
[3] Block, N.: On a confusion about a function of consciousness. Brain and Behavioral Sciences 18(2), 227–247 (1995)
[4] Parvizi, J., Damasio, A.: Consciousness and the brainstem. Cognition 79(1), 135–160 (2001)
[5] Panksepp, J.: The affective brain and core consciousness: How does neural activity generate emotional feelings? In: M. Lewis, .L.F.B. J. M. Haviland-Jones (ed.) Handbook of Emotions, pp. 47–67. The Guilford Press (2008)
[6] Christoff, K., Cosmelli, D., Legrand, D., Thompson, E.: Specifying the self for cognitive neuroscience. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 15(3), 104–112 (2011)
[7] Boltuc, P.: The engineering thesis in machine consciousness. Techn ́e: Research in Philosophy and Technology 16(2), 187–207 (2012)
[8] Merker, B.: The liabilities of mobility: A selection pressure for the transition to consciousness in animal evolution. Consciousness and Cognition 14(1), 89–114 (2005)
[9] Piccinini, G., Maley, C.: Computation in Physical Systems. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Sum. 21 edn. Stanford University, Stanford (2021)
[10] Pearl, J.: Causality, 2nd edn. Cambridge Uni. Press, United Kingdom (2009)
[11] Leike, J., Hutter, M.: Bad universal priors and notions of optimality. Proceedings of The 28th Conference on Learning Theory, in Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, 1244–1259 (2015)
[12] Bennett, M.T.: The optimal choice of hypothesis is the weakest, not the shortest. In: Hammer, P., Alirezaie, M., Strannegard, C. (eds.) Artificial General Intelligence, pp. 42–51. Springer, Cham (2023)
[13] Bennett, M.T.: Emergent causality and the foundation of consciousness. In: Hammer, P., Alirezaie, M., Strannegard, C. (eds.) Artificial General Intelligence, pp. 52–61. Springer, Cham (2023)
[14] Thompson, E.: “Précis of Waking, Dreaming, Being: Self and Consciousness in Neuroscience, Meditation, and Philosophy”. In: Philosophy East and West 66.3 (2016), pp. 927–933.
Author: Zhiguo Huang
Abstract: What is the explanatory basis of our egocentric experiences? Recent developments of what I call “embodied accounts” highlight the role of bodily action in shaping egocentric space. Drawing from this trend, I identify three phenomena for any theory of egocentric experience to explain: hereness, perspectival unity, and bodily priority. This paper explores the possibility of taking agentive capacities as fundamental to theorizing the egocentric experience. Drawing from Gareth Evans' notion of behavioral space and Wayne Wu’s action theory, it deΞnes agentive capacities as the ability to select physical or mental actions from an abstract behavioral space through control mechanisms. The selection problem, which involves resolving competition among perceptual stimuli and corresponding actions, is central to this framework. They typically include dynamic sensory and biasing mechanisms that are empirically tractable. Based on this notion of agentive capacities, this paper proposes an agentive account that explains all three phenomena. It argues that all three phenomena can be constitutively explained by having a uniΞed action selection process through biased competition. The arguments for embodied accounts cannot rule out the agentive account as an alternative hypothesis. Moreover, the embodied accounts are limited in scope, failing to explain modiΞed cases of egocentric experiences like out-of-body experiences, meditative states, and artiΞcial scenarios. Instead, potential non-bodily agentive capacities, such as attention and mental actions, help explain these phenomena. This paper argues for a broader understanding of agentive capacities, encompassing both physical and mental actions, to better elucidate the structure of egocentric space and guide empirical research in cognitive sciences and virtual agents.
Author: Naoto Yoshida and Tadahiro Taniguchi
Abstract: Understanding how communication influences the cognition of the survival agents requires a computational theory that integrates the emergence of communication and the survival of autonomous agents. As a starting point, we will present our on-going concept, which explores the integration of homeostatic behavior emergence principles [1] with collective predictive coding (CPC) [2]. Homeostasis motivates integrated behavior emergence in individual survival agents, while CPC views emergent communication as decentralized Bayesian inference. Our approach considers the entire system (environment, multiple agents, and their body) as a multi-modal generative model that includes both exteroception and interoception. Within this framework, we describe the communication between agents through a sampling process. Using our variational CPC formulation, we will demonstrate that the predictive coding of the entire system can be decomposed into individual optimization problems for single agents. This corresponds to the learning of communicating individuals performing decentralized Bayesian inference. Essentially, these communicating agents exhibit a “connected brain”. Furthermore, we will discuss how this connects to active inference, deriving homeostatic behavior emergence from the variational CPC concept. Previous models of emergent communication in natural environments have relied on unnatural assumptions. Multi-agent reinforcement learning models [3,4] assumed the centralized training process for multiple individual agents. Unsupervised learning approaches using auto-encoders [5] and Markov chain Monte Carlo methods [6,7] imposed limited conditions for multi-agent communication. Our variational CPC aims to overcome these limitations by decentralizing the learning process for centralized objectives and constructing a theory that accommodates more dynamic environments.
Reference
[1] Yoshida, Naoto, et al. "Emergence of integrated behaviors through direct optimization for homeostasis." Neural Networks (2024): 106379.
[2] Taniguchi, Tadahiro. “Collective Predictive Coding Hypothesis: Symbol Emergence as Decentralized Bayesian Inference.” PsyArXiv, 15 Aug. 2023. Web.
[3] Foerster, Jakob, et al. "Learning to communicate with deep multi-agent reinforcement learning." Advances in neural information processing systems 29 (2016).
[4] Kim, Daewoo, et al. "Learning to Schedule Communication in Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning." International Conference on Learning Representations. 2018.
[5] Ueda, Ryo, and Tadahiro Taniguchi. "Lewis's Signaling Game as beta-VAE For Natural Word Lengths and Segments." The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations. 2023.
[6] Hagiwara, Yoshinobu, et al. "Symbol emergence as an interpersonal multimodal categorization." Frontiers in Robotics and AI 6 (2019): 134.
[7] Taniguchi, Tadahiro, et al. "Emergent communication through metropolis-hastings naming game with deep generative models." Advanced Robotics 37.19 (2023): 1266-1282.
Author: I-Jan Wang
Abstract: Contemporary philosophy of episodic memory, i.e., experiential remembering of personal past events, is dominated by representationalism. Despite some initial efforts from those who promote the radical enactive cognition framework (REC) (Caravà 2021; Hutto & Peeter 2018), many debates in the field are left untouched by enactivism. This presentation aims at reconstructing and, in turn, prompting future REConstruction of one such debate, i.e., the accuracy condition of memory content.
In its initial form, the debate focuses on whether memory should represent the objective past event only (Michaelian 2016; Sant’Anna & Michaelian 2022) or both it and the past subjective experience of the event (Berneckera 2009, 2015, 2017; McCarroll 2018). As I will show, in the debate’s recent development, the two camps have come to agree that memory accuracy is contextualized; remembered content might be put against the past event, the past experience, or both according to the occurrent context (Dings et al. 2023; Sant’Anna 2024). The debate, thus, takes a Cartesian turn. The only left point of conflict is that in contexts where memory is about the past experience, should episodic memory match the phenomenology or the objective fact that there was such an experience (Sant’Anna 2024)?
Authors: Kazuya Horibe, Takato Horii, Keisuke Suzuki
Abstract: When attempting to create artificial agent: 1. individuality: boundary, 2. asymmetry: action, 3. normativity: homeostasis) that exhibit intelligent behaviors similar to biological entities, the degree of intelligence is often replaced with goal-achieving ability. In a dynamic and unpredictable world, artificial agent, like living organisms whose survival depends on regulating their bodily states through interaction with their environment, engage in self-production (autopoiesis) of physical and informational spatiotemporal structures. This involves the formation (individuality/self-identification), maintenance (normativity/homeostasis), and action upon the environment. The reality of the physical and informational spatiotemporal structures of the self consists of chemical reactions and electrical signals, which generate primitive survival needs as internal sensory perceptions. These primitive needs play a crucial role in generating the behavior of artificial agents. Considering agents that produce the physical and informational spatiotemporal structures of the self as a meta-goal and generate behaviors in response to the resulting needs is an essential question in the study of artificial agents. This poster discusses not only the logic of this question but also the verifiability of whether it can be measured.
Author: Eiko Matsuda
Abstract: A child's understanding of consciousness evolves as they grow. Piaget (1929) observed that children aged 5 to 12 often ascribe consciousness to non-living things. For example, younger children may say, "The wall feels like it is knocked down" or "The moon knows that it moves." They even form friendships with imaginary conscious beings, known as 'imaginary companions (IC)' (Taylor and Mottweiler, 2008). In this study, we focus on children's tendency to attribute personal traits to non-living objects and how they consider them to be alive. We focus on the phenomenon known as number personification (NP), where children attribute human-like traits, like gender, age, and social relationships, to numbers. Previous research found that NP is more common in younger children and decreases as they age (Matsuda et al., 2018). In the current study, we aimed to investigate (1) the formation process of NP, whether NP is developed based on some regularities, and (2) the disappearance process of NP, why NP diminishes during development. We conducted an interview-based analysis in a single case of a child participant to investigate how children engage in personified numbers, mainly focusing on NP's formation and disappearance process. The result suggested that NP is gradually formed through experiences during the child’s daily life and knowledge of mathematics, while it diminishes as mathematics study advances. Although the case study does not provide statistical understanding, our work clarified rigorous details about the experience of NP. While the child participant understood that NP was a product of imagination, the belief in NP was tightly related to her preferences. The current study adopted a qualitative research method called SCAT (Steps for Coding and Theorization) to analyze the interview. In the future, we hope to analyze children’s testimonies from the view of phenomenological study.
Authors: Masatoshi Yoshida, Kengo Miyazono, Yoshiyuki Nishio, Yuichi Yamashita, Keisuke Suzuki
Abstract: The aberrant salience hypothesis of psychosis (ASH) suggests that positive symptoms arise when external stimuli or internal thoughts become “salient” during the prodromal period, and when such perplexed feelings grow and crystallize into delusion to make sense to the patients. One problem, however, is that the term “salience” is ambiguous. On the one hand, “perceptual salience” refers to the property of being perceptually conspicuous compared to one’s surroundings, while “motivational salience” is taken to mean the function of imparting emotional valence to an object. The purpose of this paper is to clarify the relationship between perceptual salience and motivational salience. This is expected to contribute to the elaboration of the ASH proposed in psychiatry. In this paper, we will first clarify the current definition of salience by dividing it into perceptual salience and motivational salience. Then, we show that the idea of salience as affordance is supported by two research fields (philosophy of psychology and information-theoretic models of the brain (active inference)). By rethinking salience from this perspective, salience can be classified into epistemic affordance, exploitive affordance, and aversive affordance. These affordances attract attention and motivate different behaviors: epistemic affordance motivates information seeking; exploitive affordance motivates reward harvesting; and aversive affordance motivates threat avoidance. By rethinking salience in this way, ASH can be refined. We propose that both epistemic and aversive affordances should be considered in ASH. Our hypothesis is that both epistemic and aversive affordances are enhanced in schizophrenia. The former motivates approach to the target, while the latter motivates avoidance of the target, resulting in conflicts. Such conflicts cause psychological distress to the patient and require some kind of cognitive resolution. This is not apparent from the “misattribution of salience” explanation used in the original ASH.
Authors: Hiroyuki Iizuka, Wataru Noguchi, Masahito Yamamoto, Shigeru Taguchi
Abstract: Traditional theories of social cognition often presuppose innate concepts of "self" and "other." This study presents a novel approach where these distinctions emerge naturally in artificial agents through deep neural networks employing a superposition mechanism. Our model demonstrates that basic social cognitive abilities, including shared spatial representations, perspective-taking, and mirror neuron-like activities, can develop without pre-programmed frameworks. Through simple predictive learning, the agent's neural network creates internal representations that differentiate between self and other. This emergent distinction arises solely from the interaction between the agent's predictive processes and its environment. Our findings suggest that the proposed superposition mechanism may be a fundamental condition for the development of self-other concepts, potentially offering new insights into the foundations of social cognition in both artificial and biological systems. This approach challenges existing paradigms and opens new avenues for understanding the emergence of social cognitive abilities.