WORKING PAPER
Ahmad. A, “Why Are Some Countries In A Fiscal Procyclicality Trap?”
We study the cyclical behavior of fiscal policy to explain why some countries exhibit procyclical fiscal policy – fiscal authorities that increase taxes and cut government spending during the recession while adopting expansionary policies during booms. In this paper, we reinvestigate the procyclicality evidence proposed by the previous literature and estimate the cyclicality stances by applying the instrumental variable techniques. By utilising alternative estimation techniques, and using a comprehensive set of data from 137 countries for 1970-2014, our results are in line with earlier literature and suggests that fiscal procyclicality has become the norm rather than the exception in many countries. More specifically, over the last 45 years, a substantial number of emerging and low-income developing countries are trapped within the procyclical policy, in the sense of not being able to move from procyclical to countercyclical fiscal policy. We then ask a critical question, why these group of countries fall under procyclicality trap? We rely on political ideology to answer this question. We argue that the lack of appropriate government quality, which appears to be a key determinate of a countries inability to get out of this trap. We show that, even after controlling for the endogeneity of government quality and other determinates of procyclicality, there is a causal link running from better government quality to more countercyclical or less procyclical policy.
Ahmad. A, “On the Consequences of Macroeconomic Policy: Procyclicality, Volatility and Growth.”
This paper studies the impacts of procyclical fiscal and monetary policy on output volatility, inflation volatility and growth. Using 137 countries’ fiscal policy cyclical stances and 100 countries’ monetary policy cyclical stances over the period 1960-2014, our results suggest that on average emerging and low-income developing countries conduct procyclical policies. Does it matter whether a country adopts a procyclical policy stances-being contractionary in bad times and expansionary in good times, rather than a countercyclical one? We provide empirical evidence that procyclical fiscal and monetary policy is costly for the macroeconomic outcomes; in a sense, procyclical countries have lower rates of economic growth, higher rates of output volatility and inflation volatility. Our results are robust to control for the endogeneity and wide range of control variables.