Following the abstract, the introduction starts on a new page, headed by the report title using a Level 1 heading. This section is where you introduce your report topic by providing the background to the research, the rationale for your study and your aims (your broad reason for doing this), and ending with your research hypotheses (specific predictions). Your introduction should, therefore, explain what other researchers have previously done and what the point of your study is. For example, you might show how prior findings are inconsistent or ambiguous and explain how your research clarifies the problem. The theoretical and empirical research presented logically leads to your aims /hypotheses.
The introduction moves from the general discussion of the topic area to specific predictions. Successive paragraphs should be explicitly connected to create a coherent argument. Using Field’s (2016) example, you would:
Define the beer goggles effect and why it is important.
Describe the relevant previous research and what it has told us about the beer-goggles effect. This could include relevant theories.
Describe the problems with the previous research and/ or explain any unresolved issues.
Describe how you are going to overcome these problems/resolve this issue and why that will be an important advancement to knowledge (and/ or any practical benefit).
State your hypotheses.
It is essential a rationale for the study is provided here. Most studies subtly vary previous experiments which mean they are replicating previous work but with some variation. For example, if you are using a different procedure or method, you should state what the differences are and why; to show how your results extend their findings. Or you may be extending research by applying it to an area not previously done (as far as you know). For example, looking at attractiveness ratings for same-sex mates whereas previously they have focused on heterosexual couples. Whatever the rationale is for your study it is important that you state it in the introduction.
You can think of the introduction as an inverted triangle- it starts off broadly and then narrows down in focus to the specific hypotheses of your research study. Figure 2 below provides an example of this structure.
Hypotheses (clear statements predicting the outcome of the study) are stated at the end of the introduction after you have explained your research and the thinking that led to it. Therefore, they naturally flow from your rationale and should be consistent with the literature review.
State the hypotheses in operational terms – that is, the variables should be defined in words that describe how they are measured.
Do not refer to the null hypothesis or H0.
Your predictions about the study outcomes should be clearly stated (e.g., alcohol is expected to …) and why you expect these results (do not leave readers guessing).
Write the hypotheses in past tense. Useful phrases are: “It was hypothesised that….” or “It was predicted that…”.
Check with your lecturer or journal about numbering and using bullet points for hypotheses.
Below you will find examples of a poorly written research hypotheses and a good one. On the left we have a poor hypothesis. Hypothesis 1 predicts that older adults will be less able to ignore the interspersed to relevant material than younger adults. The issues with this hypothesis are that the outcome measure is not clear. From this description, we cannot decipher what is being measured in terms of the interspersed relevant material. This hypothesis should have also been written in past tense. The decision to include a numbered hypothesis is a personal choice, but may depend on the requirements of the assignment or journal that you are submitting.
On the right-hand side, we have a well written research hypothesis. This hypothesis states that “it was anticipated that adults older than 45 years would be less able to ignore the interspersed relevant material and, as a result, would read more slowly and show poor comprehension than adults younger than 25 years. As you can see, this hypothesis is more detailed and provides an operational definition of how old the younger and older adults are and tells us that comprehension is the outcome measure.
Next: Method