Search this site
Embedded Files
ANGELY SUAREZ DeJESUS
  • HOME
  • ABOUT
    • Resume
  • TEACHING PHILOSOPHY
  • SYLLABUS
  • PROJECTS
    • ENC 5705-Student Writing Feedback
    • High School Student Projects
    • ENC 1101- Student Project
    • Introduction: ATTW & SigDoc
      • ATTW: Word Cloud Generators & Frequencies
      • ATTW: Journal Issues (Volume 30, 31, 32)
      • SigDoc: Word Cloud Generators & Frequencies
      • THE SYNTHESIS
  • ENC 5337
    • A Rhetorical Journey
ANGELY SUAREZ DeJESUS
  • HOME
  • ABOUT
    • Resume
  • TEACHING PHILOSOPHY
  • SYLLABUS
  • PROJECTS
    • ENC 5705-Student Writing Feedback
    • High School Student Projects
    • ENC 1101- Student Project
    • Introduction: ATTW & SigDoc
      • ATTW: Word Cloud Generators & Frequencies
      • ATTW: Journal Issues (Volume 30, 31, 32)
      • SigDoc: Word Cloud Generators & Frequencies
      • THE SYNTHESIS
  • ENC 5337
    • A Rhetorical Journey
  • More
    • HOME
    • ABOUT
      • Resume
    • TEACHING PHILOSOPHY
    • SYLLABUS
    • PROJECTS
      • ENC 5705-Student Writing Feedback
      • High School Student Projects
      • ENC 1101- Student Project
      • Introduction: ATTW & SigDoc
        • ATTW: Word Cloud Generators & Frequencies
        • ATTW: Journal Issues (Volume 30, 31, 32)
        • SigDoc: Word Cloud Generators & Frequencies
        • THE SYNTHESIS
    • ENC 5337
      • A Rhetorical Journey

ATTW & SigDoc

A Synthesis

Github Career Portfolio

MOST COMMON TOPICS IN BOTH JOURNALS

At this point in the research I merged that frequencies in the abstracts for the volumes in both journals. Still focusing on the social turns, I wanted to see what both journal were trending in the last three with the topics that emerged within this volume articles and issues. When creating the data chart for this graph, I began merging topics and their frequencies as a way to find these common points in topics and in time. 

When focusing on the journals individually, in 2021 CDQ has some interesting results. while TECHNICAL is still consistent, is not a prominent topic. Yet, its uses is closely linear to that of SCIENCE (can be connected to the health issues of the pandemic), TPC, EVIDENCE, and the HOME. The home was interesting because there were articles within the journal that wrote about new home technologies developed for either work/education sustainability and security. in 2022, this is the first time there is any mention of WRITING, but INFRASTRUCTURE dominates. I can conclude that with the dominance of technology, ethical implications and user experiences became the side-effect of mass production and without yet seeing some of its implications. STUDENTS, RESEARCH, DESIGN, PRACTICES, fall within the umbrella of the infrastructure along with new ways of learning and shifting educational pedagogies. Hence, while the exact mention of AI is not physically visible, TECHNOLOGY and its ethical boundaries of how practices, academically and industrially, have affected how students use it in the classroom, what research had been conducted to reveal the effects on the user, and how intricately technological design is inputted into new productions. Design ranges from usability, UX, to accessibility, and communication. In 2023, COMMUNITY came into play as the dominant topic. Because of the social justice issues and how writing is not reflective of EXPERIENCE, this extends beyond the classroom walls. Yet, academic pedagogical practices involve mulimodality as a way of expression and comunication. WELLBEING was interesting because it led me to connect to mental health, which is a lingering effect of the pandemic and its trauma. 

Animated INDEX: abstracts

by Flourish.studio

While my focus question is in the effect of AI in writing, I did not find any topics using AI, but TECHNOLOGY was dominant in both journals. Interestingly, WRITING was evident in 2022 within Communication Design Quarterly (CDG, SigDoc) only 15 times and none in Technical Communication Quarterly (TCQ, ATTW). At some time point I saw this as a failure to my research because the follow-up questions were specific to writing and technology with the classroom space and the production of new technologies for education.

Hence, I began to see that from 2021 to 2023, both journals began with a focus on TECHNICAL, TECHNOLOGY, followed by work, and the ending with COMMUNICATION. Since 2021, with the heavy use of technology from education to industry, the way we communicated through technology has shifted in unprecedented ways: higher speeds, broader capacities, user-centered. 

With TCQ, in 2021 this is one was heavily influence by the major social turns of the pandemic and social justical, SOCIAL, PROJECT, and WORK had congruent trends. On the hand, STUDENTS were at the forefront, with RESEARCH following its lead. Evidently, rhetoric in outside the classroom became a heavy aspect of pedagogies within it. In 2022, we are continuing with SOCIAL but now having TECHNICAL, TPC, and BLACK take the lead. The integration of technologies with a cultural rhetoric (RHETORICAL) in its design is emergent. In 2023, JUSTICE is part of the topic trend with a higher emphasis on TPC. There is a higher dominance in advocacy rhetoric. Social media played a large role in the social issues that were recording in these three years, particularly the use of cell phones as primary devices of capture and platforms such as TikTok were used for oral expressions of the human experience reflective of the social turn of the time.

Volume 9 Abstracts

CDQ Volume 9

2021

Volume 10 Abstracts

CDQ volume 10

2022

Volume 11 Abstracts

CDQ volume 11

2023

TCQ Volumes 32-30

Word cloud article Titles & Abstract Frequencies

TO BE CONTINUED....






This was an interesting process because even though I had a focus question with follow-ups, there was no direct response to my inquiries. I began with a  curiosity with the effect of AI in writing in the last 3 years, but the answer were not as concrete as I sought out to find them. The beauty of the process is that new concepts came out! When I bumped into the topic "BLACK" , I was astonished at is abrupt topical disappearance in a span of a year. The more I made connections, new questions in complete dichotomy to the original ones ensued:

  • What social turns are evident with a small impact currently? 

  • Can this be a precursor to new and larger rhetorics at play?

  • What role will technology play to keep "MINOR-ity" rhetoric at the forefront of the journal's publications? 

  • Is there something much more dominant at play that has caused the practical "...discursive attention...." (Mueller, p. 72) of minor-ity rhetoric to disappear entirely in ATTW's journal and possible other publications?

  • Does technology have a role in diminishing minor-ity rhetorics?

This intentionally mispelled term is not just referring to underrepresented groups but involves small trends that might show the possibility of something larger at play in the future. 

BLACK rhetoric in the last 3 years did not gradually diminish within the ATTW's journal, but it rather took a dive where it was no longer evident. But I would like to dig deeper of technology has a role to play in this. The deeper dive is how AI might take a part in this? 

Rather than looking at a short span, the next research migh focus on an entire publication do a broader search of key concepts to understand its patterns and trends over a longer period of time. This will allow me to make citation connections in a vast array to find these smaller social turns as predictor turns into new conversation taking rise. 

Navigation Buttons

Mapping: Introduction

ATTW: TCQ Volume Clouds

ATTW: TCQ Article Abstracts

SigDoc: Cloud Analysis

References:
Mueller, Derek N. (2017). Network Sense: Methods for Visualizing a Discipline. The WAC Clearinghouse; University Press of Colorado. https://doi.org/10.37514/WRI-B.2017.0124

Tools:Google Cloud MapsFlourish Studio AppGoogle Sheets-ExCelDatawrapper
Google Sites
Report abuse
Page details
Page updated
Google Sites
Report abuse