Published Papers
"The historical role of energy in UK inflation and productivity with implications for price inflation" with Jennifer L. Castle and David F. Hendry, Energy Economics, Volume 126, October 2023, 106947.
Supplemental Material: Working Paper
Media Coverage: VoxEU
Abstract: We model UK price and wage inflation, productivity and unemployment over a century and a half of data, selecting dynamics, relevant variables, non-linearities and location and trend shifts using indicator saturation estimation. The four congruent econometric equations highlight complex interacting empirical relations. The production function reveals a major role for energy inputs additional to capital and labour, and although the price inflation equation shows a small direct impact of energy prices, the substantial rise in oil and gas prices seen by mid-2022 contribute half of the increase in price inflation. We find empirical evidence for non-linear adjustments of real wages to inflation: a wage-price spiral kicks in when inflation exceeds about 6%–8% p.a. We also find an additional non-linear reaction to unemployment, consistent with involuntary unemployment. A reduction in energy availability simultaneously reduces output and exacerbates inflation.
"A globally consistent local-scale assessment of future tropical cyclone risk" with Nadia Bloemendaal and others, Science Advances, Vol. 8, Issue 17.
Supplemental Material: Supplemental Tables and Figures, Code, Datasets
Media Coverage: CNN
Abstract: There is considerable uncertainty surrounding future changes in tropical cyclone (TC) frequency and intensity, particularly at local scales. This uncertainty complicates risk assessments and implementation of risk mitigation strategies. We present a novel approach to overcome this problem, using the statistical model STORM to generate 10,000 years of synthetic TCs under past (1980–2017) and future climate (SSP585; 2015–2050) conditions from an ensemble of four high-resolution climate models. We then derive high-resolution (10-km) wind speed return period maps up to 1000 years to assess local-scale changes in wind speed probabilities. Our results indicate that the probability of intense TCs, on average, more than doubles in all regions except for the Bay of Bengal and the Gulf of Mexico. Our unique and innovative methodology enables globally consistent comparison of TC risk in both time and space and can be easily adapted to accommodate alternative climate scenarios and time periods.
"Forecasting: theory and Practice" with Fotios Petropoulos and others, International Journal of Forecasting, Vol. 38, Issue 3, July-September 2022, pp. 705-871.
Supplemental Material: arXiv Working Paper / Online Version: https://forecasting-encyclopedia.com/
Abstract: Forecasting has always been at the forefront of decision making and planning. The uncertainty that surrounds the future is both exciting and challenging, with individuals and organisations seeking to minimise risks and maximise utilities. The large number of forecasting applications calls for a diverse set of forecasting methods to tackle real-life challenges. This article provides a non-systematic review of the theory and the practice of forecasting. We provide an overview of a wide range of theoretical, state-of-the-art models, methods, principles, and approaches to prepare, produce, organise, and evaluate forecasts. We then demonstrate how such theoretical concepts are applied in a variety of real-life contexts. We do not claim that this review is an exhaustive list of methods and applications. However, we wish that our encyclopedic presentation will offer a point of reference for the rich work that has been undertaken over the last decades, with some key insights for the future of forecasting theory and practice. Given its encyclopedic nature, the intended mode of reading is non-linear. We offer cross-references to allow the readers to navigate through the various topics. We complement the theoretical concepts and applications covered by large lists of free or open-source software implementations and publicly-available databases.
"Jointly Modeling Male and Female Labor Participation and Unemployment" with David H. Bernstein, Econometrics, 2021, 9(4), 46.
Supplemental Material: GWU Research Program on Forecasting Working Paper No. 2021-006
Abstract: The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in the most abrupt changes in U.S. labor force participation and unemployment since the Second World War, with different consequences for men and women. This paper models the U.S. labor market to help to interpret the pandemic’s effects. After replicating and extending Emerson’s (2011) model of the labor market, we formulate a joint model of male and female unemployment and labor force participation rates for 1980–2019 and use it to forecast into the pandemic to understand the pandemic’s labor market consequences. Gender-specific differences were particularly large at the pandemic’s outset; lower labor force participation persists.
"Improving Normalized Hurricane Damages" Nature Sustainability, 2020, 3(7), pp. 517-518.
Supplemental Material: Supplemental Information
Abstract: Normalized hurricane damage can be used to assess the risk of damaging hurricane seasons. Weinkle and colleagues use an economy-wide price deflator to produce a normalized damage estimate which suggests that losses from the 2017 hurricane season are likely to be seen again in the future. I argue that a building cost deflator is more relevant for hurricane damage. I find that normalized damage estimates that account for changes in building costs are consistent with historical trends in hurricane landfalls and indicate that there is an even higher probability of extremely damaging hurricane seasons in the future.
"Forecast Accuracy Matters for Hurricane Damage" Econometrics, 2020, 8(2), 18.
Supplemental Material: GWU Research Program on Forecasting Working Paper No. 2020-003 | Hurricane Damage Prediction Tool | Poster
Media Coverage: Marginal Revolution (blog post) | Climate Econometrics (blog post) | National Geographic
Abstract: I analyze damage from hurricane strikes on the United States since 1955. Using machine learning methods to select the most important drivers for damage, I show that large errors in a hurricane’s predicted landfall location result in higher damage. This relationship holds across a wide range of model specifications and when controlling for ex-ante uncertainty and potential endogeneity. Using a counterfactual exercise I find that the cumulative reduction in damage from forecast improvements since 1970 is about $82 billion, which exceeds the U.S. government’s spending on the forecasts and private willingness to pay for them.
"Evaluating Forecasts, Narratives and Policy using a Test of Invariance" with Jennifer L. Castle and David F. Hendry, Econometrics, 2017, 5(3), 39.
Supplemental Material: University of Oxford Department of Economics Discussion Paper No. 809
Abstract: Economic policy agencies produce forecasts with accompanying narratives, and base policy changes on the resulting anticipated developments in the target variables. Systematic forecast failure, defined as large, persistent deviations of the out-turns from the numerical forecasts, can make the associated narrative false, which would in turn question the validity of the entailed policy implementation. We establish when systematic forecast failure entails failure of the accompanying narrative, which we call forediction failure, and when that in turn implies policy invalidity. Most policy regime changes involve location shifts, which can induce forediction failure unless the policy variable is super exogenous in the policy model. We propose a step-indicator saturation test to check in advance for invariance to policy changes. Systematic forecast failure, or a lack of invariance, previously justified by narratives reveals such stories to be economic fiction.
"Evaluating Multi-Step System Forecasts with Relatively Few Forecast-Error Observations" with David F. Hendry, International Journal of Forecasting, Vol. 33, Issue 2, April-June 2017, pp. 359-372.
Supplemental Material: University of Oxford Department of Economics Discussion Paper No. 784
Abstract: This paper develops a new approach for evaluating multi-step system forecasts with relatively few forecast-error observations. It extends the work of Clements and Hendry (1993) by using that of Abadir et al. (2014) to generate ‘‘design-free’’ estimates of the general matrix of the forecast-error second-moment when there are relatively few forecast-error observations. Simulations show that the usefulness of alternative methods deteriorates when their assumptions are violated. The new approach compares well with these methods and provides correct forecast rankings.
"How good are US government forecasts of the federal debt?", International Journal of Forecasting, Vol. 31, Issue 2, April-June 2015, pp. 312-324.
Supplemental Material: Data and Forecasts | University of Oxford Department of Economics Discussion Paper No. 727
Abstract: This paper compares annual one-year-ahead and five-year-ahead forecasts from government agencies for the US gross federal debt and deficit from 1984 to 2013. Other studies have compared two of these agencies’ forecasts, but not for debt. The current paper finds that the forecast from the Analysis of the President’s Budget performs best across both horizons but does not encompass the other forecasts. Instead, each of the forecasts lacks information included by the other agencies and therefore a combination of all three outperforms all individual forecasts.
"Overview of U.S.-China Trade in Advanced Technology Products" with Alexander Hammer and Robert Koopman, Journal of International Commerce and Economics, Vol. 3, May 2011, pp. 1-16.
Supplemental Material: USITC Office of Economics Research Note 1 | USITC Office of Economics Research Note 2