AI Tools for Educators

Promoting Equitable and Ethical Education by Empowering Teachers with the Latest AI Technology 

Welcome Educators

This website explores the intersection of digital and critical pedagogy in the context of AI tools in education. There is a pressing need to address the challenges and opportunities presented by AI in the classroom. AI will create a divide: between those who can use the tools well, those who cannot, those who have access versus those who do not, and those who are undercut by algorithms versus those who are not. (ainow.org) By learning AI tools, educators can not only enhance their performance but teach these tools effectively.  Educators must promote equitable access to AI tools, foster critical thinking skills, and ensure the responsible and ethical integration of AI technologies in education. Drawing upon the influential critical pedagogy works of Paulo Freire and Audrey Watters, this site hopes to promote the ethical use of AI tools to create an inclusive educational environment that empowers both educators and students.

Equitable Access to Tools and Software

Paulo Freire's Pedagogy of the Oppressed serves as a guiding light. Access to tools is critical for education, and we must advocate against the perpetuation of AI segregation based on zip codes, school types, socioeconomic status, tech monopolies, and biased algorithms. Paid tools should not create barriers but instead should be made accessible to all in education. Freire's insights underscore the importance of providing equal opportunities for all students, irrespective of their background, through free access to tools and software. By eliminating gatekeeping practices, we can bridge the digital divide and create a more inclusive educational landscape (Freire 2000).

Plagiarism and Critical Thinking Skills

There is an urgent need to define what is AI plagiarism. Plagiarism is best combated by avoiding the banking model of education of depositing information into students but instead using problem-posing, real-world, critical analysis in discussions between students and educators that lead to real-world solutions (Duncan-Andrade & Morrell 2008).  Teachers who know their students' writing styles, and thinking, and ask for writing that promotes critical thinking through the reflection of personal experience can avoid the pitfalls of AI plagiarism. Freire's Pedagogy of Hope: Reliving Pedagogy of the Oppressed inspires us to evaluate and update our teaching practices, shifting the focus from rote learning and recall skills towards cultivating critical thinking abilities. In the era of AI, it is crucial to leverage AI tools to enhance critical thinking rather than replace human thought (2000). By engaging students in meaningful dialogue and encouraging them to question and evaluate AI-generated content, we empower them to become critical consumers and creators of knowledge.

Responsible and Ethical AI Integration

In Audrey Watters' book, Teaching Machines: The History of Personalized Learning the effort to standardized yet individualize education through machines is criticized and she concludes technology is a detriment to our freedom of thought (2021). While Watters may take an extreme anti-technology view in education, we as a society have seen the effects of algorithms in social media on society, both in the 2020 US presidential election and in Instagram’s failure to protect children (Graham 2023). In addition, we must acknowledge the other potential drawbacks and limitations of AI, including personal data safety concerns, plagiarism risks, and job displacement. While all these risks should be actively monitored, AI is here to stay and as Watters says, technology is “not a short-lived fad but rather a recurring trend,” (p 246, 2021). It is a trend that has connected the world and provided raw information that was once delayed and propagandized before it was available for consumption. Educators are responsible for advocating for ethical AI integrations from ourselves, our students, and commerce. 

Summary

This website provides a small resource for teachers interested in AI tools. While this focus is on the tools from a teacher's perspective, the importance of student agency and critical engagement with AI technology should not be overlooked. By integrating critical pedagogy into the digital classroom and addressing the potential pitfalls of AI segregation, we can lessen the perpetuation of educational inequalities. Together, let us work towards an education system that ensures equitable access to tools, fosters critical thinking, and empowers students to navigate the ever-evolving world of AI with confidence and ethical responsibility.

Bibliography

Duncan-Andrade, J. M. R., & Morrell, E. (2008). The art of critical pedagogy: Possibilities for moving from theory to practice in urban schools (Vol.     285). Peter Lang. Chapter 2: “Contemporary Developers of Critical Pedagogy”.


Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. 30th Anniversary ed. New York, Continuum.


Graham, Durbin Lead Bipartisan Judiciary Committee Letter to Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg on Instagram Algorithm Facilitating Child Sexual Abuse Material | United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary. (2023, June 30). Retrieved July 20, 2023, from Senate.gov website: https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/press/rep/releases/graham-durbin-lead-bipartisan-judiciary-committee-letter-to-meta-ceo-mark-zuckerberg-on-instagram-algorithm-facilitating-child-sexual-abuse-material


Home Page of AI Now Institute. (2023, July 19). Retrieved July 20, 2023, from AI Now Institute website: https://ainowinstitute.org/


Watters, A. (2021) Teaching machines - The history of personalized learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.