Summarise the following information
•Quit India Movement
•1942
•Gandhi Led
•Called on Indians to rise up against the British & disobey orders
The Quit India Movement was a significant anti-colonial campaign launched by the Indian National Congress under the leadership of Mahatma Gandhi on August 8, 1942, during World War II. Also known as the Bharat Chhodo Andolan, it was a call for an end to British rule in India and was one of the last major pushes for Indian independence before it was achieved in 1947.
1. Background:
During World War II, India was still under British control, and the British government involved India in the war without consulting Indian leaders. This led to widespread dissatisfaction, as many Indians opposed participating in the war while being denied their own freedom.
The failure of the Cripps Mission (1942), which was sent by the British government to offer limited self-governance to India after the war, further fueled the demand for immediate independence.
2. Gandhi's Call for "Do or Die":
On August 8, 1942, at the Bombay session of the All-India Congress Committee, Gandhi delivered his famous speech in which he urged the British to "Quit India" and called for Indians to do or die in their struggle for freedom. This marked the beginning of the Quit India Movement.
Gandhi emphasized the need for non-violent resistance but made it clear that Indians should not wait any longer for independence. He believed he had been too passive in the past and that a stronger stance was required to get rid of the British finally.
3. Mass Uprising:
The movement led to widespread protests, strikes, and demonstrations across the country. People from all walks of life participated, including students, workers, peasants, and women.
The British government responded with brutal repression. Leaders of the Indian National Congress, including Gandhi, Jawaharlal Nehru, and Sardar Patel, were arrested, and the party was declared illegal.
Despite the arrests of leaders, the movement continued at the grassroots level, with people organizing protests and acts of civil disobedience.
4. Role of Youth and Women:
The movement saw active participation from young people and women. Many women leaders, such as Aruna Asaf Ali and Usha Mehta, played prominent roles in organizing protests and underground activities.
The youth were at the forefront of many of the uprisings, with students and young workers leading strikes and demonstrations.
5. Repression and Impact:
The British government responded with severe repression. Thousands were arrested, and the movement was brutally suppressed. The British also resorted to violence, with many protesters being killed or injured.
Despite the repression, the Quit India Movement intensified the demand for independence and made it clear that the British could no longer govern India without Indian consent.
The movement also exposed the deep-seated anger and frustration among Indians against British rule, making it a critical moment in the struggle for independence.
6. Legacy:
Although the Quit India Movement did not immediately result in independence, it significantly weakened British control over India. It marked a point of no return, as the demand for independence became irreversible.
The movement also demonstrated the power of mass mobilization and non-violent resistance, which had been hallmarks of Gandhi's leadership.
By the end of World War II in 1945, the British government realized that maintaining control over India was increasingly untenable, leading to negotiations that eventually resulted in India's independence in 1947.
The Quit India Movement was a decisive and powerful campaign that marked the final phase of India's struggle for independence. It unified the Indian people in their demand for freedom, despite facing severe repression, and hastened the end of British colonial rule in India.
Source study.
Evaluate the value and limitations of this source for studying the leadership of Gandhi in the Quit India Movement.
Gandhi: "I believe that in the history of the world, there has not been a more genuinely democratic struggle for freedom than ours. I read Carlyle’s French Resolution while I was in prison, and Pandit Jawaharlal has told me something about the Russian revolution. But it is my conviction that inasmuch as these struggles were fought with the weapon of violence they failed to realize
the democratic ideal. In the democracy which I have envisaged, a democracy established by nonviolence, there will be equal freedom for all. Everybody will be his own master. It is to join a struggle for such democracy that I invite you today. Once you realize this you will forget the differences between the Hindus and Muslims, and think of yourselves as Indians only, engaged
in the common struggle for independence."
How is this source useful for learning about Gandhi's vision for the future of India?
Extracts from Gandhi's famous Do or Die speech.
Mahatma Gandhi's "Do or Die" speech, delivered on August 8, 1942, at the Bombay session of the All-India Congress Committee, is one of the most famous speeches in India's struggle for independence. In this speech, Gandhi called for the British to quit India and for Indians to fight for their freedom through nonviolent means. Here are some of the most famous quotes from that speech:
This is the most iconic line from the speech, encapsulating Gandhi's resolve for complete independence. He urged Indians to be prepared to make any sacrifice necessary, including their lives, in the struggle for freedom.
Gandhi emphasized the urgency and determination of the movement. He made it clear that there was no turning back and that the struggle would continue until India was free.
This quote reflects Gandhi's belief in the power of individual action and the importance of self-liberation. He encouraged Indians to adopt a mindset of freedom, even before it was officially granted.
Gandhi invoked the imagery of a soldier, calling on Indians to take up the cause of independence with the same commitment and discipline as a soldier in battle, but through nonviolent means.
Gandhi emphasized the need for total commitment and perseverance in the struggle for independence. He called for unity and dedication until the goal of freedom was achieved.
These quotes from the "Do or Die" speech continue to resonate as symbols of courage, determination, and the relentless pursuit of justice and freedom. Gandhi's call for nonviolent resistance and his unwavering commitment to India's independence left an enduring legacy in the history of the Indian freedom movement.
What is Ghandi suggesting for the Indian people, as the best way forward?
Outline the ideals and strategies utilised by the Quit India Movement.
How did the British respond to the Quit India Movement?
Use this website to make a mind map on the features of the Quit India Movement.
https://vajiramandravi.com/quest-upsc-notes/quit-india-movement/
Summarise this article, noting the important role Gandhi played in the Quit India Movement.
Quit India Movement was a massive anti-colonial struggle in India, launched on August 8, 1942, under the leadership of Mahatma Gandhi, who gave the mantra of “Do or Die” during this Movement. Projected initially as the civil disobedience movement, this ‘third great wave’ of India’s struggle for freedom soon took a violent turn with the aim of ‘fight to the finish’ of the colonial empire. Gandhi, understanding the mood of the nation and the importance of individual liberties, was even prepared for riots and violence caused by the Quit India Movement as he thought it morally correct to defend against the state’s organised violence.
Also known as the “ August Kranti Movement,” Quit India Movement was more a rejection of British rule than a traditional Satyagraha and also influenced the unprecedented and tumultuous events for the next five years in Indian history.
The Quit India Movement was the culmination of years of Indian disillusionment with British rule, with the immediate causes being the failure of Cripps mission, hardships caused during World War II and the Japanese knocking at the doors of Indian borders. Some of the major causes of the Quit India Movement are as follows:
The attitude of the British Government:
The Indian people had grown increasingly disillusioned with the British government's failure to fulfil its promises regarding India's self-rule.
The British, although they gained Indian support in World War II, did not want to transfer the power easily.
The August offer and Cripps mission failed to satisfy the demands of the nationalists.
Further, the British support to the demand of Pakistan by the Muslim League was making the Indian nationalists (particularly Gandhi) infuriated.
Growing Nationalism:
By 1942, India's struggle for independence had been ongoing for several decades. The nationalistic sentiments were at its peak, and people grew increasingly impatient with British rule.
The extent and activities of the people during the Quit India Movement also reflect this sentiment.
They had participated wholeheartedly in the Individual Satyagraha movements of 1940. Further, along with the Kisan Sabha movements, it had prepared the ground for the final battle against the imperialist forces.
They already had tasted the sweetness of self-rule through the Congress rule in the period of 1937-39.
Therefore, now the people wanted to drive out the British from India.
Socio-Economic factors:
India's participation in World War II placed significant economic burdens and restrictions on the country.
The war effort led to rising prices, shortages of essential goods, and increased taxation, causing immense hardships for the Indian population.
The shortage of supply of essential goods and the export of rice caused large-scale deprivation and death, ultimately resulting in the Bengal Famine of 1943.
The defeat of the British in World War II:
Reverses suffered by the British in Southeast Asia and the advancement of Japanese troops towards the borders of India increased the popular discontent among the people.
The retreat of the British troops from Burma further enhanced this fear.
The British attitude towards Indian subjects also exposed the racial discrimination policy of the British.
Indians thought they were on their own. Thus there was the utmost need of a nationalist government to defend its borders.
And in this situation, the failure of the Cripps Mission led Gandhi and Congress to launch the final strike against the British.
Quit India Movement was a massive anti-colonial struggle in India, launched on August 8, 1942, under the leadership of Mahatma Gandhi, who gave the mantra of “Do or Die” during this Movement. Projected initially as the civil disobedience movement, this ‘third great wave’ of India’s struggle for freedom soon took a violent turn with the aim of ‘fight to the finish’ of the colonial empire. Gandhi, understanding the mood of the nation and the importance of individual liberties, was even prepared for riots and violence caused by the Quit India Movement as he thought it morally correct to defend against the state’s organised violence.
Also known as the “ August Kranti Movement,” Quit India Movement was more a rejection of British rule than a traditional Satyagraha and also influenced the unprecedented and tumultuous events for the next five years in Indian history.
Congress Working Committee of the Indian National Congress met at Wardha on July 14, 1942, and decided to launch a mass civil disobedience movement under the leadership of Gandhi.
Formal launch: The All India Congress Committee met at Gowalia Tank, Bombay, on 8 August 1942 and passed the famous Quit India Resolution. Gandhi sloganed his 'Do or Die' call on the same day.
Demands: It demanded an end to British rule in India with immediate effect, the formation of a provisional government after the war and the declaration of free India.
Government’s response: On the 8th and 9th of August 1942, the government arrested all the prominent leaders of Congress.
Mahatma Gandhi was imprisoned in Poona.
Jawaharlal Nehru, Abul Kalam Azad, and other leaders were imprisoned in the Ahmednagar Fort.
Although the Movement was initially started as a civil disobedience movement, it differed from other movements launched by Gandhi.
Different from earlier movements:
The NCM of 1920-22 and the CDM of 1930-34 were conceived as the peaceful resistance to British rule, and the social base expanded slowly to accommodate wider participation of people.
On the contrary, the Quit India Movement was a massive uprising from the very beginning to compel the British to quit India.
Ends justifying means:
The British’ attitude towards Indians and their endorsement to Jinnah’s communal polity frustrated Gandhi.
Knowing the mood of the Indians, especially in the limited but symbolic Individual Satyagrahas, he even believed that the masses could adopt a violent path in self-defence against a well-equipped and strong aggressor. It was reflected in his article in ‘the Harijan’ in March 1942.
He opined that every individual must consider himself free and should act for himself to attain freedom.
Thus, he was more concerned for the ends (freedom) than the means (methods).
Clear goal and objectives: The 1942 Movement’s goal was less ambiguous in its objectives as it was launched to make the complete withdrawal of the British from India. It has four main features:
Accommodative of violence against the state,
Aimed at destroying the British rule involving anybody believing in complete independence instead of trained satyagrahis,
Students were called to play the major role and should lead the Movement after the arrest of senior Congress leaders and
Total defiance of government authority.
Leaderless Movement:
Once the main leaders were arrested on 9 August, the Movement took a radical turn, often cited as the most ‘un-Gandhian’ method of the freedom movement.
As Gandhi had already sanctioned violence and the role of younger generations, the movement developed at the grassroots level.
Underground activities: The movement saw the emergence of underground radical activities.
Purpose: The purpose of such underground activities was to maintain popular morale, establish a line of command, provide guidance, and distribute arms and ammunition.
Key personalities: Rammanohar Lohia, Jayaprakash Narayan, Aruna Asaf Ali, Usha Mehta, Biju Patnaik, Chhotubhai Puranik, Achyut Patwardhan, Sucheta Kripalani, and R.P. Goenka. Usha Mehta established an underground radio station in Bombay.
Parallel governments: The movement also saw the emergence of parallel governments in certain parts of India.
Region
Associated leader
Significant activities
Ballia (August 1942)
Chittu Pandey
- Released many Congress leaders
Tamluk (1942 -1944)
Satish Chandra Samanta
- Jatiya Sarkar undertook cyclone relief work.
- Sanctioned grants to schools.
- The rich supplied paddy to the poor.
- Organised Vidyut Vahinis (electricity units).
Satara (1943 to 1945)
Y.B. Chavan, Nana Patil, etc.
- Named "Prati Sarkar" (Parallel Government).
- Organised village libraries and Nyayadan Mandals (justice forums).
- Carried out prohibition campaigns.
- Organised "Gandhi marriages" (marriages following Gandhi's principles).
Quit India Movement had two phases: themass movement phase (August to September 1942), and the quasi-guerrilla insurgency phase (afterwards). The people started burning and destroying anything that symbolised British authority, such as post offices, police stations, government buildings, Railways and telegraph lines. The scale of participation in Bihar and eastern UP was unparalleled.
Bihar:
Students, peasants, and workers were actively involved in the Quit India Movement. The underground activities were strong there, which practically broke the law and order.
Severe organisations and dacoit gangs were active, having links with Jayprakash Narayan and other members of the Congress Socialist Party.
JP Narayan and Rammanohar Lohia formed a parallel government based on the Nepal border till 1944.
The socialist group Azad Dastas carried out underground activities in Bihar.
UP:
Armed villagers targeted police posts and local courts and engaged in looting.
There were strikes in Kanpur, Lucknow and Nagpur and violent clashes with striking millworkers in Delhi.
Bengal:
The Quit India Movement primarily occurred in towns and cities, where protests, acts of sabotage, and damage to essential services took place.
In many parts of Bengal, the worker, tribal and peasant movements picked up momentum by linking up with the Quit India movement.
Western India:
In districts such as East Khandesh, Satara, Broach, and Surat large numbers of peasants took part in guerrilla-style attacks on government property, lines of communication, and people known to be sympathetic to British rule.
In Gujarat, a parallel government called the "Azad Government" was established in Ahmedabad, replicating the existing administrative structure.
Bombay was inspired by inciting underground publications such as the Bombay Provincial Bulletin, Do or Die News-sheet, Free India, War of India Bulletin, Free State of India Gazette and the Congress Gazette.
South India: K.T. Bhashyam, a Bangalore-based Congress leader who was active in trade unions and organised strikes.
Students: Workers, students and middle-class radicals were involved in most parts of the country, and the movement spread to the villages.
Bihar and eastern Uttar Pradesh witnessed the unprecedented participation of the students.
Militant students of Patna and Benares played a significant role in this movement.
Peasants: The extent of the peasants’ participation was limited as the Quit India Movement was focused more on nationalism than anything else. Still, in Bihar and Eastern UP, they were more active.
Tribals: In Bengal and Orissa, they participated in the struggle.
Government officials: Government employees, particularly those from lower ranks of the police and administration, took part, which decreased people's devotion to the government. Some government officials, including police, passed on secret information to the activists.
Women: Women's participation was remarkable during the Quit India Movement. They actively took part in protests, strikes, and demonstrations and played a significant role in organising and mobilising local communities.
While the Quit India Movement played a crucial role in India's struggle for independence, it also had several limitations that affected its overall impact:
Failed to meet its objectives: The movement did not immediately lead to freedom, and it took more years of struggle and negotiations before independence was achieved.
Lack of central leadership: The lack of central leadership hindered effective coordination and decision-making, leading to confusion and fragmentation within the movement.
No consensus: Some political parties and leaders opposed the Quit India Movement.
Muslim League, Communist Party of India, and Hindu Mahasabha were against the Movement.
Bureaucracy was also against the Movement.
B. R. Ambedkar and Periyar were also against the Movement.
Communal divide:
Muslim participation in the movement was even lower than the CDM. Jinnah appealed to Muslims to join the armed forces.
Muslim League used this time period to mobilise masses that helped it in the next elections of 1945-46, which strengthened its demand of a separate state, ultimately resulting in the Partition.
Further, there were some areas of communal violence during the Movement.
Neglected by historians:
This is due to the absence of the major political parties and the leaders playing the central role in the Quit India Movement.
The Quit India Movement was active until 1944 when the British ruthlessly crushed it. Although it failed to oust the British from India, which was its objective, the Movement was a significant phase of India’s quest for self-rule.
Most radical movement:
In terms of spirit and enthusiasm, this Movement beat all the other earlier movements.
NCM was urban-based, and CDM was wider, but the QIM was the most violent and radical, supported mainly by the poor and labour class, the hardest hit by wartime inflation.
Grassroot leadership:
Despite the lack of central leadership, the role played by the younger generations, peasants, tribals, and women was unparalleled.
The mass participation, especially in some parts of India, was unprecedented.
It was a movement of the subaltern classes of India with a bottom-up approach from the grassroots level.
The role played by the new class of leaders:
The movement witnessed the central role played by the Congress Socialist Party’s leaders, such as JP Narayan and Ram Manohar Lohia.
Further, it also gave birth to some young generation leaders, like Aruna Asaf Ali.
The way for independence: Although it did not immediately achieve its goals, it contributed to the weakening of British rule and set the tone for future protests such as during the INA Trials.