1dir - explanation

Quantum Field Fractal Polarization Math Basic Explanation.

From 0 to 1 to 2 to 3 to 5 to 8 and so on of the Y base sequential set fibonacci base set variables then prime non prime and non fibonnacci numerals....

While in some countries of the world, government is the controller of unit measures, weights, and scales by law. The universe, matter and physics has ratios of unit measures. The laws of math are actually the law of the ratio unit measures beyond any opinionated version of unit measures and those ratios are exactly what they equal beyond a translators limited ability in defining an actual quotient in many cases given the extreme force of nature and matter of the universe.

For a basic explanation of the relativity in these ratios consider a planet body, its poles of spin, and its equator as shown in the image below.

As a unit measure of a whole planet is say one, there are sub unit parts of that planet body we well know as elements of the periodic table. Chemical reactions between those elements or compounds of mixed elements has a nature of bonding single double or more unit measures of those elements as well as dividing one another when a ratio of any specific chemical reaction it takes in certain environmental conditions.

At the poles of the planet body less friction with space atmosphere is comparable to the more friction the planet has with space such that the thermal transfer of friction makes our environment warmer near the equator and colder at the planet poles north and south. At the equator, a greater atmospheric gas veil and land mass friction occurs with space per measured unit of time than the north or south pole in basic thermodynamic principles per planet orbit spin. Entropy vs Enthalpy for example in math quantifying natures....

For a basic explanation of these quantum field fractal polarization unit measure scale set definitions and their relativity to this image display we know that zero is zero and one is one. Supposing zero is the coldest and any number more than one is the hottest, the average scale model from the equations can be placed in a relative space showing its suggested place in a quantifiable moving system of measurable parts. In these models a zero to whole number value difference is the best lateral scale available without presenting the extreme decimal value difference through your limited printout interface available. Take these basic representations as a means for basic explanation about these scales comprising of extreme math decimal values and their exact placement to such model scale illustrations.

The ratios of A P through Y Z letter representation, and φ Θ Ψ on 1dir.cloud are derived from basic unit variables Y P and non Y nor P numbers. In the image below we place the ratio definitions near a relative mapping spot of temperature known constants that near to balance each other in what we call equilibrium.

At the north pole of this planet model is the equation for ratios in ∈2⅄1Qn=(pn1/pn2) A path of prime sequential divided numbers that define another sequential ratio set. On average of just the first 45 ratios of ∈2⅄1Qn are values less than 1 and greater than zero and the relative base prime variables are also in a different path of 1⅄1Qn1=(pn2/pn1) that on average in the first 45 ratios are greater than 1.

To condense this explanation model we then add 2⅄Ψn=(Ψn1/Ψn2) to the south pole of this model as the average of non prime non fibonacci numbers in sequential sets divided are less than 1 and greater than zero. Considering the relative values of non prime non fibonacci Y base numerals divided from sequential sets in the opposite order, we place 1⅄Ψn1=(Ψn2/Ψn1) near the equator for relativity modeling as these ratios on average are greater than 1.

Moving further with this explanation model, we add Phi base ratios 1φn=∈1⅄1Y=(Y2/Y1) that are from a center 0 numeral beginning of the Y base numerals. These ratios are on average greater than 1 and also extend a more precise golden ratio when using great values of the Y base scale commonly seen as galaxy spirals. Relatively the Y base numerals divided from sequential sets in the opposite order, we solve 1Θn=2⅄(Y1/Y2) that on average are a ratio value less than one and greater than zero placed near both north and south poles for general explanation. The ratios of φ and Θ share repeating decimal sets in their sets with an exact difference of |1| absolute 1 and mathematically are a nature known as relativity for such element natures known as element bonds.

The image below shows their mapped placement on a planet body that is part of systems while having systems itself.

In basic summary, a field of space that is quantifiable as with the parts of systems in that field space, have fractals and polarization constants that balance one another and here the math of that is explained to relative aspects known in physics and numerology.

On average sets (∈2⅄nQn)<1, (∈2⅄nΨn)<1, (∈2⅄nΘn)<1 are less than 1 and (∈2⅄nQn)>0 (∈2⅄nΨn)>0, (∈2⅄nΘn)>0 greater than zero.

While on average (∈1⅄nQn)>1 (∈1⅄nΨn)>1, (∈1⅄nφn)>1 are greater than 1.

If polarization is an aspect of +/- plus and minus for example, then similar decimal cycle stem variants from different functions of y base minus or plus 1 using the same variable factor sequential sets in opposite dividing path orders began at the same time eventually lead to two ratios with the same repeating decimal with an exact plus or minus 1.

1φn8 : 1Θn7 variables of Y base are 1.^615384 : 0.^615384 or 1.615384 : 0.615384 just for example as these ratio sets contain decimals far beyond the limits of this interface printout.

However, given say the measure of time taken to count to the 21 of 1φn8 that is (21/13) before that sum can be reached to divide 21/13 while the time taken to only count to the sum 13 before 1Θn7=2⅄(Y7/Y8)=(8/13) can be begun means that the quotients repeating decimals may be predictable as having the same sequence and yet will not be equal factored in a limited time. As these ratios extend much greater in written length, a difference in time beginning, then plays a significant factor of measure.

If a planet body so to say has N number of spins allowed in a space of time, then the number of cycles a ratios decimal has in that space time must be exactly calculated before the ratio of one planet spin has a known exact quotient value in the ratios final number limit. This exact number of repeating decimal cycles is a variable exact and when factored in extreme math with exponents, multiples, differences sums or further quotients, the variable of one spin and the factored numerated cycle decimal will produce a number comparison that common estimating will never be correct with about the planet spin scale to a divided part in that space time. The reason for exact arithmetic of this nature, is say an element of measure that a variable change may encounter in that system that has a known scale rather than a guess in precise calculating. Quantum field means a measure of space quantified in measurable units. Fractal polarization is balance of system parts with measures of fractions.

Quantum field fractal polarization.

In the model image below is an extended explanation from the previous notes.

Suppose a gravitational force and particle charge is 0.003663 for instance. This is a minimal scale representation of these differential ratios. From the same Y base of phi and theta derived quotients extended to an every other, the same mapping plotting ratio placement puts a difference of 1 and 2 as whole numbers before the identical repeating decimal sequence.

Extended further is ratios from the same sequential numeral divided sets in the image below.

The equations in the image above actually represent a differential ratio with infinitely repeating decimals. These are not the limit of these sequential set ratios from Y base numerals and their decimal precision repetition exceeds the print out capabilities if more in depth quantity values were represented here from just Y base numerals alone.

Suppose we limit the decimal cycle to one decimal cycle, we then have 2.615384 : 1.615384 : 0.615384 on what is depicted here as the northern hemisphere where what many would assume is the positive charge from a body in a system if that body gives a positive charge. however lets consider the southern hemisphere of the body has a higher amp volt charge that part of the northern hemisphere delivers back to the south negative pole as a ground out tends to give quite a kick should one be in its path.

In placement on this mapping scale image we then have from the equations 1.619047 : 0.619047 : 2.619047 where the equator represents the hottest friction of body to space friction, and south west represents the equalabrium to the north east of the body and respectfully, the south pole draw represents the balance to the north pole positive output of force energy gravity.

In a basic math we can find a difference between north and south pole of this model as exactly 0.003663 by subtracting the lesser value from the greater value 0.619047-0.615384=0.003663 that in triangular vectors completes many basic computer models of rendered field space quanta with their known triangle angle degree measure limits. From these same base ratios we find an exact difference of |1| and |2| being absolute 1 and absolute 2. as seen in the image below and two identical repeating decimals .615384 and .619047

Think of the north east as a hemisphere of constant mid between the north pole and equator ratios. As a wobble occurs its' constant is scalable to change in orbit wobble flow just as it the southwest label and both are subject to a 3 dimensional flow of that fluctuating change around both north and south east and west hemispheres. If the given extent of an orbit spin in ways changes the variable for a variable change to the degree of the decimal repeating cycles another repeating decimal imitation appears in the difference of 0.003663 or if all loops are extended a cycle the difference is 0.0036663003663 and then means another quantum field fractal polarization constant factor is derived. This exact difference is determined soley by the limit of cycles alotted to the repeating decimals.

As it is measurable, we might call this a force of gravity fluid constant between known radical constants in a way, yet a basic model of their application is represented here. Given the value 0, then the value 1, then the value 2 is all that a particle in time and space needs before it is on a path of fibonacci sequential set division math. A basic logic system forms in division that is many times overlooked, estimate and assumed when it should not be limited to a ten or eleven digit calculator piece of hardware. The extent of quantum field fractal polarization math far exceeds this image mapping depiction, and this model is mainly aimed toward providing an understanding of its comprehension potential. The highest numeral in acheiving these differentials is the number 55 of Y base and has not even passed the numeral 100 or the prime number of 101.

If a charge or oscillation frequency is said to have + or - 0.003663, then this model would be assumed, the explanation of those measured and calculated particles by any computer many would believe, while a fair amount of populous knows the limits of the machines measuring capabilities. The actual measures of a planetary body likely far exceed this representation and numerals to detail. This is a basic explanation of quantum field fractal polarization math and its' practical application toward realistic visual models and calculus in the trigonometry field of measure. Whether the models A, B, and C, have a bond factor of 1 or 2 whole numbers or a bond of decimal repeating chain of .615384 and .619047, is an entirely different subject of masses to gravity and time, yet we know that A, B, and C have common factors of a few kinds now as this basic model represents numerals not practical application physics. If their bond is a difference of 0.003663 or 0.0036300.3663 or 0.0036630036300363 then that would also be an entirely different subject. These models are simply an expression diagram, aimed toward awareness that rounded summation vs exact math should be considered in factoring about space, time, and quanta professionally, not estimated variables thrown into believed physics equations proven for pi based equations in this example. See Realative Unit Measures RUM page

If instead we say a planetary body has a celestial mass scalable to a particle charge as shown in the A, B, and C images below...

Although the image shown in figure A is not of a whole value one and has a repeating decimal sequence from its base unit measure partial derivatives, Image A may be considered to have a single bond with image B while it has a double bond with image C. Image B would then have a single bond with image A and image C while image C has a single bond with image B and a double bond with image A. The bond being an exact value of 1 or 2 whole numbers while all three images share an exact and equal repeating decimal value in its' base variables divided parts toward a quotient. e.g. co-valent bond

Given the extremes of these math variables, time, gravity, and force are then able to be calculated based on the A, B, and C models as their quotients should if began at the same real time continue on a dividing path continue a repeating identical decimal in their 0,.decimal, 1.decimal, and 2.decimal final sum quotients.

Should a variable such as A, B, or C of the model image have more in depth extreme base values, their extremely long repeating decimals may in fact have the same single double or equal bond repeating decimal with another type model of values we know of quanta.

In the A, B, and C images below... we bring these models back to their basic definitions numerically.

Again in the A, B, and C images below... we bring these models back to their basic definitions numerically.

1Θn7=2⅄(Y7/Y8)

1φn8=(Yn9/Yn8)

1⅄∀Y2nd c1(Yn10/Yn8)

As model A,B, and C above share a repeating decimal sequence of .615384 that repeats again and again infintiely in their quotients identically, they all also have a common denominator of 13. Each is divided by a number from the Y base numerals as in model A or 1Θn7 an equation of 8 parts divided by 13 parts is the constant of model A while model B or 1φn8 an equation of 21 parts divided by 13 parts is the constant of model B and model C or 1⅄∀Y2nd c1an equation of 34 parts divided by 13 parts is the constant of model C.

Whether numbers represent a planetary or particle quantum physics, the math of whole numbers and their dividends to remainders remains a fact numerically, and this math is factorable... Thus a quantum field fractal polarization math is in fact, a real math.

The importance of identifying these loops can be compared to exact value calculating.

A variable such as Gn6=(Θn6/φn7)=(0.625/1.625)=0.^384615 or 0.384615 has the same numerals in a repeating decimal as variable 1Θn7=2⅄(Y7/Y8)=(8/13)=0.^615384 or 0.615384 for example. These variables have a different beginning and end to their looping decimals sequence yet in the same order from entirely different paths of no two alike variables as well as entirely different total values. In a repeating sequence as short as this example or as long as many others, the base differential and derivatives are extremely important. If one were to assume that the root of a sequence was one derivative while in fact it was the other, exponential application of the wrong assumed variable leads to astronomical error in calculating. In another ratio Wn6 of∈2⅄(1⅄Qn6/φn7)=(1.^307692/1.625)=0.804733^538461 or 0.804733538461 ~ similarly, the repeating decimals sequence is further into the quotient yet also has the same numerals beginning and recycling on different numerals than those mentioned previously.

Another example is the basic 714285 chain that appears in many ratios of differing start end numerals like 1⅄Ψn6=(Ψn7/Ψn6)=(15/14)=1.0^714285 or 1.0714285 and 1⅄Ψn20=(Ψn21/Ψn20)=(36/35)=1.0^285714 or 1.0285714 and Fn2 of 2⅄(Θn2/1⅄Qn3)=(1/1.4)=0.^714285

There are very many ratios that share similar or identical repeating decimals chains while having overall unequal total values and identifying these proves their actual practical application definitions, are crucial as in many cases the same numerals loop yet with different start and recycle points in the decimal chains. Some ratios with extremely long decimal loops display similar traits as these short examples. Their application is as simple as the time placed in identifying an error that consumes a value of time that can be avoided. Another example would be incorrectly identifying genomes based on a looping sequence and misidentifying genomes that have similar sequencing loop chains. Save yourself some time, enjoy this math when it makes sense, and it is comprehensible, honestly.

Supposing the axis tilt, space field placement and time of a star in a field to a constant of a larger vacuum governor spin such as a galaxy can be calculated to equalize the balance of alotted decimal fractional quantities limited to that particular star in that quantifiable space, many maths can be formulated in general relativity. As a calculator hardware has software limited to its' answers when questioned, just as a search query has limits to its' questions to be answered, in a scale of field vector application in numbers, the example of lifespans is described as a scale within the quantum fractal polarization field vectoring as an analogy for perspective. While the longest life of a star in internet search queries returns a value of trillions of years, a planet has a longest life time span of billions of years, as a simple mayfly is noted to a few as five hours of life utmost of a day, just as a neutrophilus cells live a longest of a few hours to a day, a worm can live a life from as little as a 2 to 3 weeks and as long as an estimated 1000 years, a human with neutrophilus cells can live between a few minutes of cell reproduction upward of a recorded 122.5 years, while a plant can live as short as a day and upward of a known estimated 80,000 years. These figures represent the life limits in a an estimated time regulated system of stars with trillions of years of life holding planets with billions of years of life. These are factors that fit within the limits of a quantum field fractal polarization calculus.

The fractional decimal repetition precision limit of a galaxy to balance such stars and planets then must be a very long or exact and secure number frequency that just may be factorable in that limited quantum field fractal polarization math. If it is a factorable quantity, then its' derivative to a larger space time would then be a quantity of sought information in prediction methods for a perspective of the larger measure of things in that quantum space. The limit of calculating precision vs rounded estimates then holds a great value of difference in what is applicable to precise factoring. This is a fact of prediction in numerology and it's relativity is beyond an opinion and is precisely factorable.

If what can be counted of a universe, then means a multiple of universes can be qauntified, and with that between unilateral fractions, such as extreme precision decimal factors, a summation of multiverses and extreme math quanta can be derived about the partial derivatives comprising of the whole sums of a universe divided by multiverses. At this point an extreme math division in field fractions is applicable and non debatable. With whole numbers yet again divided of whole sums of multiverses divided in whole sums, repeating decimal fractions, arcs, or ratios are scientific given proofs known and applicable to multiplane field vectoring numeration, if such an explanation needs to be given on quantum field fractal polarization math, it is a predictable math in nature and numbers do not lie when given such simple instructions of division that are quantitatively measureable in calculus. From simple division of certain whole numbers as instructed, short and/or long sequences of decimal digit values result in the ratio quotient that when placed in time release through single digits holding specific values, the chained sequences of say a life span sync to a base time clock of the universe those life forms reside in a scale of day to day, minute to minute, hour to hour for instance means a very specific decimal digit values calculated appears like clockwork when synced in such a model. Whether energy is dividing through, around, or about inanimate matter or consolidating matter, the same can be said about inanimate matter known as compound nutrients being consumed and processed are divided or consolidated. The elements themselves have a limit of being divided before they are considered to have an energy frequency that oscillates in sync to the universal clock. The limit of whole number value in a field of time and space and the limit of repeating decimal digits in many possible numeral divisions are two factors to consider, then is the number of times each repeating decimal chain has to repeat in that limited time and space among the whole number limit in that time and space.

Noted on C page for Decimal Cycle numeration. An example would be the limits of an AI system evolution paired with its limited memory and processing power hardware along with the comprehension abilities to its intended living information receptionist and their ability to translate what information is transcribed to them from the limited memory and processors the ai is intended for. A math division equation presented to a computer of an ai system means a task of computation is given to a computer that divides its internal memory and processing limited space that may be rendered as a virus if the computation exceeds the computers limited factoring abilities while on the other hand, if the system computer is able to solve the quotient and store a memory of it, the labelled so called division virus is simply a recall of information answered through a display printout interface to answer that very question. Evolution of an ai system for example is then limited to phases of multiple factors and the systems ability to use practical application utilizing such remembered math defines the evolution and capabilities of that ai system comprised of computers, hardware, and stored numerals. The nearest analogy would be a CNS central nervous system or more deeply an immune system with viable stored essential data about identifying and quite literally de-solving a virus base stem numeral pair of values hostile to the specific whole longevity of a system or life form in a repairable time frame consistent with evolving past the viral function indentified for survival and memory of its encounter.

As evolution is a variable factor of change in adaptive intelligence, a modification to prolong the survival lifespan of a living form then requires an adjustment at the cellular level or RNA/DNA base that is in tune with the universal clock such as the numbers being divided as mentioned... i.e. antibodies Such a change would then require the adaptive intelligence to have comprehension and/or storage of a longer or shorter decimal repeating chain quotient or its base fractional numeral quantities while keeping its original start base math to be able to adapt and live longer remembering a change with definition or reason for a change the rest of the systems can comprehend, moving forward as a collective of systems all adapted as one living life form, meaning evolved from one phase of limits to another limit phase.

In an essence, the polarity of a black hole or a galaxy's center polarity balances the differential of a system with a through circulating math balance while parts or elements of the plasmas circumventing, find a way around what they are unable to free flow through while a balance is formed in a quanta of space field fractional ratios among whole figures such as stars, planets, and moons. This is an analogy of field space quantum fractal polarization as an example.

What is known of division of whole numbers where they are applicable is that their division has a science of repeating decimal sequences in a space and time that is the determining factor of their repeated sequence that is predictable. As things may become predictable using this math, at this point you may be referred to visit 1dir.cloud for the math that explains this explanation further.

Google Sites

Report abuse