Quartermaster Harbor is a shallow, sheltered bay located between Vashon and Maury Islands in the Central Basin of the Puget Sound in Washington State. Prior to 1916, water could enter the bay from the Central Basin during high tide, as the isthmus between the islands is an artificial construction built by the Army Corps of Engineers in 1916. The bay is bordered by the two islands on its western, northern, and eastern sides, with the harbor itself opening up to the south/southwest. Judd Creek enters the inner harbor in the northwestern portion and is the largest source of freshwater input to the harbor (DeGasperi 2010). Quartermaster Harbor is a significant natural resource for the region, providing critical rearing and spawning habitat for herring, surf smelt, sand lance, and salmonids, such as chinook, coho, chum, and cutthroat. In addition to this, it is also an important wintering ground for migratory birds (DeGasperi 2010). Quartermaster Harbor has also been characterized as being a hotbed for Alexandrium catenella, a species of dinoflagellate that causes paralytic shellfish poisoning (Tobin and Horner 2011). In recent years, the harbor has been an area of study as low dissolved oxygen levels have been recorded. Additionally, the harbor has been identified as sensitive to anthropogenic nutrient inputs (DeGasperi and Ferguson 2012).
Figure 1. Map of stations sampled in Quartermaster Harbor 1 May 2026. (Credit – Miranda Chatwood).
Table 1. Station data for sites sampled in Quartermaster Harbor 1 May 2026. (Credit - Audrey Lambert)
Note: CTD data was not collected for station 50 and purposefully not included on map.
Figure 2. Barometric pressure from 04/30/2026 - 05/01/2026 (Source - NOAA in Tacoma)
Figure 3. Weather conditions on the day preceding sampling, April 30, 2026. (Source - SeaTac Airport SeaTac, WA Weather History | Weather Underground)
Figure 4. Weather conditions on the day of. It was partly sunny with calm waters during both morning and afternoon sampling☀️, May 1, 2026. (Source - SeaTac Airport SeaTac, WA Weather History | Weather Underground)
Figure 5. Tidal information in Commencement bay May 1, 2026 (closest NOAA station to Quartermaster Harbor). (Source - Tidal Graphs from NOAA)
Figure 6. CTD temperature readings with stations listed across the top.
Figure 7. CTD salinity readings with stations listed across the top.
Figure 8. CTD density readings with stations listed across the top.
Temperature ranged between 8 ℃ and 14.5 ℃ with the highest temperature recorded at both Stations 55 and 54. The lowest temperature was at Station 51 at around 20m and deeper. All stations show a consistent trend in temperature drop as depth increased. Both Stations 53 and 52 show a clear thermocline at around 7m. The highest salinity measurement was at Station 51 with 28.9 PSU at around 33m. The lowest salinity was at the surface of Station 52 with 26.7 PSU. All stations display a trend in increased salinity with increased depth. Density ranged from 19.5 kg/m³ to 22.2 kg/m³. The lowest density was at Station 52 at 1m. The highest density was at Station 51 at around 30m. All of the stations show a clear stratification of temperature, salinity, and density, in which all three readings closely resemble one another.
Figure 9. CTD dissolved oxygen readings with stations listed across the top.
Figure 10. CTD fluorescence readings with stations listed across the top.
Figure 11. CTD transmissivity readings with stations listed across the top.
Dissolved oxygen ranged from 2 to 9.5 mL/L. The highest DO measurement was at Station 52 at 9.5 mL/L at a depth of 3m and the lowest DO measurement was Station 55 with 2 mL/L at a depth of 11m. Of all the areas sampled by the research team, Quartermaster displays the highest dissolved oxygen concentrations. Fluorescence is also the highest at Quartermaster. These high dissolved oxygen levels indicate good conditions for phytoplankton blooms, which follows that fluorescence would also be high in these areas.
Fluorescence ranged from 1 mg/m³ to 24 mg/m³. The highest fluorescence reading was at Station 51 at a depth of 5m and the lowest reading was at Station 56 at a depth of 2m. Stations 51, 52, and 53 especially display a rapid increase in fluorescence from around 2m to 10m, before decreasing with depth. It is notable that these stations are further outside the harbor, with 51 being nearest to Commencement Bay. Station 51 shows a sudden increase in fluorescence at about 22m before decreasing again. Transmissivity ranged from 45% to 90%. All stations show a steep increase in transmissivity between 5 and 13m, and Station 51 had the highest transmissivity value of 90%, which was reached at about 30m. All stations show a general trend of increased transmissivity with depth.
Comparative data was available from King County's Dockton Park monitoring station (see link below) for temperature, salinity, dissolved oxygen, and fluorescence. Due to incomplete data from 2025, the year 2024 was chosen as a comparison and to get a complete visualization of the fluctuations at Dockton over the course of an entire year. The graphs below show the change in temperature, salinity, dissolved oxygen, and fluorescence at Dockton from January 2024 to December 2024. CTD data from May 1 2026 is an average of the readings, denoted as a red dot on the graphs, and uses the same units as the data from King County. The comparison reveals that the CTD readings from May 2026 are relatively similar to what was recorded in May 2024.
Figure 12. Temperature (°C) data from the King County Dockton Park monitoring station for the 2024 year. Data collected at Dockton by the 2026 UWT Estuaries class from May 1 2026 is noted as a red dot. Credit - Hannah Seerden)
Figure 13. Salinity (PSU) data from the King County Dockton Park monitoring station for the 2024 year. Data collected at Dockton by the 2026 UWT Estuaries class from May 1 2026 is noted as a red dot. Credit - Hannah Seerden)
Figure 14. Dissolved oxygen (mL/L) data from the King County Dockton Park monitoring station for the 2024 year. Data collected at Dockton by the 2026 UWT Estuaries class from May 1 2026 is noted as a red dot. Credit - Hannah Seerden)
Figure 15. Fluorescence (mg/m³ ) data from the King County Dockton Park monitoring station for the 2024 year. Data collected at Dockton by the 2026 UWT Estuaries class from May 1 2026 is noted as a red dot. (Credit - Hannah Seerden)
Figure 16. Fluorescence measured by CTD vs discrete. (Credit - Hannah Seerden)
Figure 17. Dissolved oxygen measured by CTD vs discrete. (Credit - Hannah Seerden)
(Left) Discrete chlorophyll samples were collected from both the surface of the water column at about 1m and close to the bottom of each respective station. The R² value of 0.004 shows a weak correlation between lab analyzed chlorophyll values and CTD recorded fluorescence. This may point to human error in the lab, calibration issues with the fluorometer, or during titration. Note: One discrete chlorophyll measurement was considered an outlier at 66.31 µg/L ChlA, and thus was not included in the graph.
(Right) Discrete dissolved oxygen samples were collected from both the surface of the water column at about 1m and close to the bottom of each respective station. The R² value of 0.1106 similarly shows a relatively weak correlation between lab analyzed dissolved oxygen samples and what the CTD recorded.
Figure 18. Secchi depth readings at each station. (Credit - Miranda Chatwood)
The average Secchi depth observed across all stations was 2.35m. The deepest observation was made at Station 56 at 3.5m, and the shallowest at Station 51 at 1.25m.
Table 2. Phytoplankton concentrations from net samples. (Credit - Hozoji Roseanne Matheson-Margullis)
Figure 19. Phytoplankton concentrations from surface water samples. Note that phytoplankton species colors differs by page (Credit - Hannah Seerden)
Phytoplankton tow net results (Table 2) show that most phytoplankton species across stations are either rare or common, though there were a few species that are considered to be abundant or blooming. Chaetoceros socialis is considered to be blooming across Stations 52, 55, 56, and Dockton. Chaetoceros spp. is also considered to be blooming across Stations 50, 52, 54, 56, and Dockton.
Surface samples of phytoplankton (Fig. 19) show that of the various genera/species of phytoplankton recorded, the most common across stations were Chaetoceros spp., Skeletonema costatum, and Detonula pumila (with the exception of Station 51).
Figure 20. Si(OH)₄ concentrations in Quartermaster Harbor stations at surface and depths.
Figure 21. NO₃⁻ concentrations in Quartermaster Harbor stations at surface and depths.
(Left) Orthosilicic acid (Si(OH)₄) is a water-soluble form of silica, which is a necessary component of cell construction for diatoms. Concentrations for surface samples were on average about half the concentration of Si(OH)₄ for deep samples.
(Right) Nitrate (NO₃⁻) is a commonly available form of nitrogen in coastal and oceanic waters, making it greatly important for marine life. Concentrations for surface samples were zero or close to zero for all stations, while deep samples display a much higher availability of NO₃⁻.
Table 3. Nutrient table for Quartermaster Harbor
Figure 22. Percent composition of sediment collected by Van Veen device. (Credit - Kendall Burch)
Sediment analysis revealed a primary composition of silt, with silt being about 75% of total particle size. Station 54 had a higher TOC concentration at 70%, while Station 56 had a lower TOC concentration at around 59%. The abundance of silt and a high TOC content may be attributed to QMH's slow flushing rates.
Due to a battery malfunction, the CTD did not record data for Station 50, so it was not included in the CTD profile section, nor was it included in the correlation graphs. However, discrete field samples were taken from Station 50 (DO, chlorophyll, nutrients, and both phytoplankton surface and net samples). It was unclear as to the reason for this event, as the subsequent stations (50 was sampled first) were all recorded normally. It is possible this could have been due to Station 50 being the deepest station sampled that day (Table 1).
Both the morning and afternoon team had fine weather during sampling, with partial sun and calm water conditions. Stations 50, 51, 52, and 53 all occurred during an ebb tide, while Stations 54, Dockton, 55, and 56 occurred during a flood tide (Fig. 5). Secchi data (Fig. 18) display an increase in visibility for the inner harbor stations (54, 55, 56, and Dockton), while the outer stations had a decrease in visibility from the Secchi readings. The fact that the Secchi could be seen deeper into the water column is indicative of the water having less particulates—such as suspended sediments or phytoplankton. Shallower Secchi readings could be an indication of phytoplankton blooms or the Puyallup River plume. The fact that the outer harbor stations showed decreased visibility could be attributed a phytoplankton bloom that had been flushed out of the surface of Quartermaster Harbor and/or to their placement closer to main body of the Main Basin, receiving mixing from the current pushing ocean water clockwise around Vashon as well as outflow from the Puyallup River.
When comparing Quartermaster Harbor to the other regions sampled by the research team, Quartermaster had some of the highest concentrations of dissolved oxygen and fluorescence (Fig. 9 and 10). The highest dissolved oxygen reading was 9.5 mL/L at Station 52. Dissolved oxygen being so high is notable, as in previous years there was concern over the low dissolved oxygen levels at Quartermaster (DeGasperi and Ferguson 2012, Beachcomber 2014). While follow-up studies would have to be conducted to confirm this, it would seem that mitigation efforts that have been put forth have been effective in reversing Quartermaster’s previous low dissolved oxygen levels. Data from 2024 (Fig. 14) also shows that the summer months average around 7 mL/L, while winter months average around 5 mL/L.
Interestingly, Station 56 had a lower total organic carbon (TOC) content than station 54 despite higher concentrations of phytoplankton at 56. This may be due to station 56 being the shallowest station. However, this TOC reading is still quite high, which is probably due to the inner harbor’s long flushing times (Albertson 2013), which allows organic content to accumulate.
Fluorescence readings (Fig. 10) being high and following the trends seen for dissolved oxygen supports increased phytoplankton activity, as phytoplankton largely contain chlorophyll. Data for nitrate (NO₃⁻) (Fig. 21) emphasizes this high phytoplankton activity near the surface, as surface concentrations for nitrate are practically at zero, while nitrate concentrations deeper into the water column are higher; nitrate is an important nutrient for phytoplankton to thrive, and in oceanic and coastal ecosystems, dissolved nitrate is the most commonly available form of nitrogen (Kramer and Roesler 2014). Dockton’s surface nitrate readings are low at both the surface and near the bottom, though this could be attributed to it being one of the shallowest stations (Table 1). However, Fig. 19 reveals a huge concentration of phytoplankton at the surface— with nearly 900,000 cells/L, when compared to the second highest—Station 52—with almost 500,000 cells/L. Orthosilicic acid (Si(OH)₄) which includes silicate, a necessary building block for diatoms (Amo and Brzezinski 1999), is also depleted at the surface (Fig. 20), though not nearly as much as nitrate.
The most prominent species found at Dockton was Chaetoceros spp., which was also the most prominent at all other stations, with the exception of 52, in which Thalassiosira spp. had the majority. It’s important however to keep in mind that due to the limited magnification of the compound microscopes (100x), that these are identified by genus only and not species, so those identified as either Chaetoceros or Thalassiosira could be any species within that genus. This skews the data heavily towards these genera, as some other phytoplankton are identified at the species level and therefore more difficult to say for certain the species in many cases. However, the high concentration of phytoplankton found in the surface samples reveals that Quartermaster Harbor is an ideal blooming ground for them, likely due to its partially enclosed and shallow bathymetry. Alexandrium catenella was present at Stations 55 and 50, though it is considered rare in both areas. This lines up with previous research done in the area (DeGasperi 2010) which characterized Quartermaster Harbor as a common blooming ground for A. catenella. A. catenella can cause paralytic shellfish poisoning (PSP) and this finding highlights the need for continued monitoring for blooms.
Page Developed By Miranda Chatwood and Hannah Seerden