View of Commencement Bay shoreline, heavy with urban infrastructure
Commencement Bay is located between Tacoma and Browns Point. During our second sampling of Commencement Bay, we expanded our stations to include 4 more stations further northeast of our initial 4 stations. The locations of our stations can be seen in Figure 1, the station map.
The salt water in this area comes from the Strait of Juan de Fuca and travels south, down through East passage, to the east of Vashon Island, while fresh water is fed directly from Puyallup River. This fresh water is glacier melt from Mount Rainier and carries sediment into the bay. The Puyallup River contributes the third largest annual river sediment load to Puget Sound (Takesue et al. 2017). We can expect to see larger sediment near the mouth of the Puyallup River as smaller sediment takes longer to settle and will wash further out into the bay.
The Puyallup River delta used to be an estuarine wetland, rich in nutrients and supporting a biodiverse ecosystem, until it was turned into a bustling shipyard to support the growing industries of Tacoma in late 1800s and early 1900s. These industrial activities contributed to the contamination of the bay sediment. "Beginning in 1991, the Commencement Bay trustees, under NOAA’s leadership, have negotiated 19 settlements with polluters—recovering funds, services, and properties to support restoration projects" (NOAA [date unknown]).
Mixing of the water column in this area occurs during ebb tide as water from south Puget Sound rushes north through the Tacoma Narrows and Colvos Passage. During flood tide, dense, saline rich ocean water travels south through East Passage into Commencement Bay at the bottom increasing stratification with the Puyallup River bringing in fresh water at the surface.
Figure 1: Map of stations and transects. Second image contains color coded lines depicting transects.
Table 1: Station identification and information.
The weather during the time of the survey ranged from partially cloudy to sunny and back to cloudy, with breezes picking up towards the end of the survey.
April 16, 2026
April 17, 2026
Figure 2: Weather report for 16 April, 2026 (top), and 17 April, 2026 (bottom). (Sourced from Weather Underground -- measurements taken from SeaTac).
Figure 3: Barometric pressure for 16-17 of April 2026 (Sourced from NOAA).
Meteorological observations | NOAA Tides and Currents
Figure 4: Tidal patterns for 17 April, 2026 (Sourced from NOAA). Color coded by transect.
Commencement Bay Outer Latitudinal Transect
(Stations: 1, 2, 3).
Temperature (°C)
Figure 5: Temperature CTD graph for outer transect.
Salinity (PSU)
Figure 6: Salinity CTD graph for outer transect.
Density (kg/m³ )
Figure 7: Density CTD graph for outer transect.
Temperature, salinity, and density have a close relation and can give information of the waters. The low salinity and density show a fresh water layer on the upper portion of Commencement Bay, with this layer slightly decreasing in size going east to west, from station 3 towards station 1. The changes in salinity, density, and temperature are slight across the depths at all sites, showing a well mixed water column. The temperature does not range as much as salinity does through the water column, showing salinity takes a larger role in the density changes.
Dissolved Oxygen (mL/L)
Figure 8: Dissolved Oxygen CTD graph for outer transect.
Fluorescence (mg/m³)
Figure 9: Fluorescence CTD graph for outer transect.
Transmissivity (%)
Figure 10: Transmissivity CTD graph for outer transect.
Dissolved oxygen is in higher concentrations near the surface, with the higher of the concentrations being skewed towards station 3 and 2. Fluorescence is also higher, with that high being located around station 2 and 3. Over all stations the transmissivity is around the same, though the extent in which it reaches is lower at stations 2 and 3. With the fluorescence, dissolved oxygen, and transmissivity being higher within stations 2 and 3, this shows an bloom of phytoplankton to the east of Commencement Bay.
Commencement Bay Longitudinal Transect
(Stations: 2, 4, 6).
Temperature (°C)
Figure 11: Temperature CTD graph for longitudinal transect.
Figure 12: Salinity CTD graph for longitudinal transect.
Figure 13: Density CTD graph for longitudinal transect.
A longitudinal transect taken from stations connecting the outer and inner bay shows an input at the upper layer along with a decrease in salinity and density at the surface at the inner bay. Stations 4 and 6 have lower salinities and densities at lower depths, showing some mixing of the water to cause these lower values to be seen at these depths. There is also a slight dip in the temperature in terms of depth at station six, again reinforcing this influx of freshwater.
Figure 14: Dissolved Oxygen CTD graph for longitudinal transect.
Figure 15: Fluorescence CTD graph for longitudinal transect.
Figure 16: Transmissivity CTD graph for longitudinal transect.
Dissolved oxygen was higher at the surface waters, decreasing minimally as lower depths were reached. Fluorescence and dissolved oxygen both increase on the surface the further out in Commencement Bay that was sampled. Transmissivity at the surface decreased the further out in Commencement Bay that was sampled. There was lower transmissivity along the downward slope of the bottom of the bay, likely from sediment being kicked up from the flow of water.
Longitudinal surfer graph credit: Kendall Burch and Ronnie Sullivan, minor edits by Cristian Carreno
Commencement Bay Inner Latitudinal
Transect (Stations: 5,6,7,8).
Temperature (°C)
Figure 17: Temperature CTD graph for inner transect.
Figure 18: Salinity CTD graph for inner transect.
Figure 19: Density CTD graph for inner transect.
The data shows a high correlation between temperature, salinity, and density at these stations. These graphs show distinct layers because the circulation of Commencement Bay is tidal driven during ebb tide whereas these stations were sampled during flood tide as seen in Figure 4. Cold, saline rich ocean water coming south from East Passage is more dense than the fresh surface water from the Puyallup River and without a method of mixing, stratification as seen in the graphs will be present.
Figure 20: Dissolved Oxygen CTD graph for inner transect.
Figure 21: Fluorescence CTD graph for inner transect.
Figure 22: Transmissivity CTD graph for inner transect.
Phytoplankton live in oxygenated water near the surface and fluorescence detects how many are present. Where phytoplankton are present, there will be lower transmissivity due to turbidity.
Near the surface, station 5 does not reach the levels of dissolved oxygen seen at the other stations. It has a drop in fluorescence and an increase in transmissivity at a higher depth showing that it may not be as supportive of phytoplankton life as the other stations at the time of sampling.
Figure 23: Correlation between discrete and CTD Chlorophyl data.
Figure 24: Correlation between discrete and CTD Dissolved Oxygen data.
(Left) - The R2 value of 0.4617 shows a weak correlation between the fluorescence found with the CTD and the chlorophyll values found in the lab. This was our second location to perform chlorophyll analysis in the lab; therefore, some error was introduced leading to a lower correlation.
(Right) - The correlation found between dissolved oxygen readings found with the CTD and the reading produced in the lab had an R2 value of 0.8891 showing a good correlation. This data shows an improvement in correlation compared to the week prior at Commencement Bay.
Figure 25: Secchi reading depth in meters from each station sampled.
Stations 2-8 had Secchi depth readings between 1.5 and 4 meters. Station 1 is an outlier with a Secchi depth of 8 meters. Station 1 is the only station that was sampled during ebb tide, as seen in Figure 4, which could account for a more mixed water column
Our data shows that station 1, in the outer longitudinal stations, had the deepest Secchi depth with a reading of 8 meters. Near the surface, station 1 has the highest transmissivity, lowest fluorescence, and lowest dissolved oxygen; because, station 1 is the only station that was sampled during ebb tide. As the fresh surface water rushes north from Tacoma Narrows during ebb, it wraps around the Dune Peninsula increasing the clarity of the water around station 1.
Figure 26: Surface phytoplankton counts graph.
(Color schemes of phytoplankton counts differ between pages)
Table 2: Surface phytoplankton abundance.
Each site sampled had a large amount of phytoplankton present with at least one species blooming at each location. The least amount of phytoplankton was seen at station 4 with a concentration greater than 100 cells per liter seen in Figure 26. Stations 2 and 3 host the greatest amount of phytoplankton with more than 180 cells per liter.
Figure 27: Si(OH)₄ concentrations
Figure 28: NO₃ concentrations (right).
Table 3: Nutrient levels for both surface and deep water measurements in Commencement Bay.
Left graph: Si(OH)₄ concentrations were seen to be greater in surface samples, with a picking up of concentration with proximity to the inner bay. The concentrations of Si(OH)₄ in the deep water samples were relatively even across all the stations.
Right graph: NO₃ concentrations were typically higher in deep waters, with the exception of in station 1 where it was slightly above the concentration found in the deep waters.
Bottom table: Recorded nutrients (PO₄, Si(OH)₄, NO₃, NO₂, and NH₄) from both surface and deep water samples at all eight stations.
FIgure 29: Higher particle size and concentration values correlate with higher TOC %.
Samples were taken at Commencement Bay on April 17th, 2026. Besides differences with the freshwater surface layer, minimal to no stratification was observed within the deep water column of Commencement Bay aside from the upper layer with the present freshwater input by the Puyallup river that feeds into Commencement Bay.
Starting with the outer bay (stations 1, 2, and 3), the graph resulting from the CTD data shows that the outer bay has a layer of freshwater at the surface, with a slightly deeper layer of that fresh water to the right of the bay as the water keeps to the right while flowing out of the bay. There was similarly a higher level of fluorescence, dissolved oxygen, and lower transmissivity to the right of the bay at stations 2 and 3, showing the outflowing freshwater positively impacting the productivity of phytoplankton in Commencement Bay. Aside from this freshwater layer on top, the water column below is well mixed, with the temperature remaining relatively consistent, salinity having a slight decrease of 1 PSU down the water column, and density following a similar trend of a decrease of 1 sigma-t. There was also a decreased level of nitrate in the surface when compared to the bottom layers of stations 2 and 3, correlated with the bloom of algae in those stations. Station 1 saw a higher level of nitrate in the surface layer than the deep waters which was to be expected with the lower level of phytoplankton activity.
A longitudinal transect was taken between the outer and inner bay with stations 2, 4, and 6. With the contour graphs constructed from the CTD data, there was a clear mixing of water that occurred with the transition of the inner bay to the outer bay. The decrease of salinity and density of the inner bay was seen to occur at lower depths when compared when to the outer bay. A layer of stratification at the surface of station 6 was more pronounced than that at station 2, which had a much thinner layer of freshwater moving over top of it. This was from the incoming freshwater that flowed into Commencement Bay from the Puyallup river, first flowing through station 6 before it reached station 2. There were higher levels of dissolved oxygen that could be seen toward station 2, likely related to the less turbid waters that allowed for phytoplankton to propagate in the outer bay compared to the inner bay.
Stations 5-8 were sampled near the Puyallup River delta. The graphs produced for these sites show similar stratification throughout the water column, which was especially clear in their thermoclines, pycnoclines, and transmissivity seen in this section's graphs. The phytoplankton counts found at these stations, along with dissolved oxygen and low transmissivity at the surface of this section, shows that phytoplankton were beginning to thrive. With this high activity, the phytoplankton will begin to consume the oxygen and nutrients in this area. If sampled at a later date, it is possible that lower DO and phytoplankton counts will be found along with higher transmissivity as the phytoplankton will have reproduced, consumed the vital resources that made it possible for them to thrive, and the population will have thinned out.
Phytoplankton analysis: Despite having the highest visibility with a Secchi disk, low fluorescence, and remaining high in NO3 concentration, station 1 saw a bloom of several species just as other stations had observed. This difference in fluorescence, visibility, and nutrient concentration in the water may potentially be inferred to be due to Chaetoceros socialis, as it was the only species of phytoplankton that was observed at every other site, but was not present at station 1. Though, due to the early learning period of identifying phytoplankton during the time this count took place in, it is not entirely certain that Chaetoceros socialis were not miscounted as the general species.
Nutrient analysis: Si(OH)₄ had a relatively even distribution across the deep water samples but had higher amounts with inner stations near the mouth of the Puyallup river, with a higher concentration to the inner stations north of the mouth. This suggests an influx of Si(OH)₄ from the outflow of the Puyallup river. NO₃ was seen to be lower at the surface in all stations aside from at station 1 where the NO₃ concentration was slightly higher than in the deep. This shows a use of NO₃ by the phytoplankton blooms in these areas, decreasing the concentration as the NO₃ was taken up at the surface.
Sediment analysis: Both sediment samples from the inner bay, station 8, and the outer bay, station 1, had high levels of sand as well as silt, with silt being in higher concentration in station 8 which may be attributed to its proximity to the outflow of the Puyallup river containing sediments from glacial melt. The low fluorescence at the surface of inner bay stations combined with the lowered transmissivity shows the sediment load that the incoming water was bringing into the waters of Commencement Bay. There was a higher organic carbon at station 1 compared to station 8, which may be attributed to a faster rate of sedimentation. The inner stations such as station 8 had more sediment being brought in and kicked up into the water, leading to less organic compounds to be deposited when compared to outer stations that were less affected by the freshwater input, such as station 1.
Page developed by Cristian Carreno and James Simpson