Get help on the following topics

 Provisional Guidelines Using Generative AI for Instructors

1. UPEI’s existing academic integrity regulations apply when using generative AI. Read Regulation 20 from the Undergraduate Academic Regulations on the UPEI website. For Graduate students it is Regulation 6 from the Graduate Academic Regulations.  

2. Instructors have the freedom to choose whether or not to use generative AI tools in designing course materials, activities, or assessments. If an instructor chooses to use generative AI, the decision should be based on course learning outcomes, the interests of the individual instructor, and conventions and expectations of the discipline.  

As with any pedagogical tool or approach, instructors should weigh the benefits of incorporating generative AI into their courses against any risks inherent to the tool or approach. Instructors should also take into account the rapidly evolving nature of generative AI technology and reassess the opportunities and risks of any tool or approach on a regular basis.    

3. Instructors with courses that incorporate generative AI should: 

• Build their own AI literacy. 

• Ensure the incorporation of generative AI will support core learning outcomes and offer meaningful learning. 

• Describe or discuss with students the strengths, limitations, and ethical considerations of the technology, including factual inaccuracies and gaps, societal biases present in the training data, and the rationale for using generative AI in the course. 

• Be aware of (and regularly review) the terms and conditions of Generative AI tools they use in their courses, including age restrictions that may preclude some students from accessing the tool(s). Alternatives for tools that require users to be 18+ should be provided for students who are under 18. 

4. If instructors use generative AI in their course and teaching materials (including for student assessment), they should describe in the course outline and/or materials the extent to which generative AI has or will be used. Instructors are responsible for the quality, ethics, and relevance of all of their course and teaching materials, including those produced by generative AI tools. Instructors using generative AI should take reasonable efforts (e.g., updating associated digital literacies) to mitigate potential adverse impacts to instruction and assessment. 

5. Instructors should clearly communicate to students if and to what extent use of generative AI is acceptable in the assessments and learning activities in their course(s) - as well as how it should be acknowledged or cited. It's recommended that instructors be very clear about their expectations regarding generative AI, and explicit when providing assignment instructions. To help reduce confusion, these expectations should be communicated in various ways, such as including them in course syllabi, on Moodle, in instruction guidelines, or when assignments are discussed in class. Explain how different instructors can have different expectations for AI tools, and if use is permitted by one instructor, this does not mean AI tools will be permitted by others (see Appendix A for example syllabi statements).

6. As with other course materials, instructors should ensure that all students have a fair and equitable opportunity to gain access to the same set of features for any tools required in the course. Any required subscriptions, including their cost and the time period during which a subscription is required, should be disclosed in the syllabus at the beginning of the course. Age-, geographic-, cost to students, and other restrictions should inform the instructor’s decision to require the tool (or provision of other activities or assessments where applicable). 

7. Instructors should be prepared to address student concerns about required Generative AI use in their courses. With the approval of the course instructor, students may opt out of learning activities or assessments that require the use of Generative AI, if opting out will not compromise the learning objectives of the course. In these cases, students will be required to provide alternative and equivalent evidence of their learning as proposed to, and agreed to by, the course instructor.

8. Instructors who include assessments that incorporate student use of generative AI should:  

• Consider including reflective components that invite students to comment on the use of/experience with Generative AI in the assessment. 

• Explicitly review criteria and/or rubrics in ways that demonstrate how the use of generative AI is being assessed (see Appendix B or the TLC Instructional Resources Hub for examples). 

• Foster a learning environment that promotes academic integrity in all course learning activities. 

9. Both instructors and students are prohibited from inputting anyone else's personal information into a Generative AI tool. This includes other students' or faculty members' personal information such as class lists, students' grades, etc. Instructors should not encourage or instruct students to input their own or others personal information into a Generative AI tool.

UPEI is legally obligated to ensure the safe collection, use and disclosure of personal information. As such all use of personal information must adhere with the UPEI Access to Information and Protection of Personal Information and Privacy Policy. Personal information includes any identifying information such as, name, address, health information, contact details, race, religious or political beliefs, age, gender, educational history (non-exhaustive list) and includes audio recordings and photographs of identifiable individuals. Please watch this video to learn more about personal information.

Instructors incorporating Generative AI tools should thoroughly review the tools’ privacy policies before use and advise students of any privacy implications. Any unauthorized disclosure of personal information will be investigated in accordance with UPEI's privacy complaint process.

10. As per the UPEI Undergraduate Academic Regulations, third-party tools designed to detect AI-generated content can not be used to substantiate allegations of academic dishonesty. Current evidence demonstrates that third-party AI-detection tools do not reliably work to detect content generated by artificial intelligence.

11. If you suspect student work may have violated the academic integrity policy, please review the steps to take and refer to Undergraduate Academic Regulation 20 and Graduate Academic Regulation 6. You may want to use this educator resource on conducting a discovery interview with a student to understand the situation.

12. Exposing a student’s work to any AI tool requires the consent of the student. Otherwise, doing so could be a breach of the student’s privacy and intellectual property rights.