Abstract:

The present article investigates ensemble interaction as a fundamental artistic-expressive device in choreographic composition, examining how collective bodily movement is transformed into meaningful artistic imagery through deliberate structural organisation. The study proceeds from the premise that ensemble interaction is not reducible to technical synchronisation – which constitutes merely a prerequisite – but represents a complex, multi-dimensional system of spatial, temporal, dynamic, and semantic relations among performers that generates aesthetic wholeness exceeding the sum of its constituent parts. The theoretical framework draws on choreological analysis, Laban Movement Analysis, and the history of both classical and contemporary choreography, including works by M. Petipa, V. Nijinsky, M. Béjart, P. Bausch, M. Cunningham, W. Forsythe, and A. Khan. The article proposes and characterises a typology of five principal forms of ensemble interaction: unison – simultaneous identical execution of movement that evokes images of natural forces, collective identity, and unified organisms; counterpoint – concurrent performance of differentiated movement phrases creating polyphonic imagery associated with pluralism and competing perspectives; canon – sequential repetition of a movement phrase with temporal offset, producing images of propagation, collective memory, and chain reaction; mirror – symmetrical or asymmetrical reflection between performers conveying themes of kinship, identity, rupture, and estrangement; soloist-and-group interaction – the semantically richest form, articulating archetypal narrative configurations such as the hero versus the crowd, the chosen sacrifice, or the return to community. The article further analyses the spatial and temporal dimensions of ensemble organisation, arguing that the geometric configuration of performers in stage space constitutes an independent expressive resource, while genuine ensemble energy – the perceptible force of collective presence – arises only when performers attend to one another’s movement rather than merely counting measures. The relationship between musical and choreographic ensemble structures is considered in terms of three compositional strategies: parallelism, counterpoint, and independence. The findings provide a theoretical foundation for both analytical and pedagogical applications in choreography education. 

Keywords: ensemble interaction, choreographic image, means of expression, choreographic work, stage art, synchronization, spatial dramaturgy. 

References:

1. Holdrych, O. S. (2003). Khoreohrafiia: posibnyk z osnov khoreohrafichnoho mystetstva ta kompozytsii tantsiu. [Choreography: a guide to the basics of choreographic art and dance composition]. Lviv. 

2. Sidletska, T. I. (2016). Khoreohrafichne mystetstvo v systemi kultury: teoretykometodolohichnyi aspekt. [Choreographic art in the system of culture: theoretical and methodological aspect]. Kyiv. 

3. Stanishevskyi, Yu. O. (2003). Baletnyi teatr Ukrainy: 225 rokiv istorii. [Ballet theatre of Ukraine: 225 years of history]. Kyiv. 

4. Sharykov, D. I. (2011). Klasyfikatsiia suchasnykh vydiv i zhanriv khoreohrafichnoho mystetstva. [Classification of modern types and genres of choreographic art]. 

5. Shevchenko, T. S. (2015). Narodna khoreohrafiia Ukrainy: rehionalni osoblyvosti. [Folk choreography of Ukraine: regional features]. Kyiv. 

6. Forsythe, W. (2021). Khoreohrafichni ob’yekty. Eseyi ta interv’yu. [Choreographic Objects. Essays and Interviews]. Berlin. 

7. Laban, R. (1988). Maysternistʹ rukhu. [The Mastery of Movement].