I focused on the images generated by Stable Diffusion web, and using simple prompts to try and push what would be generated when the tool is given the freedom to create. In previous analysis, overly complex prompts had some of the details taken away, and so I pursued the opposite approach - what would the image generator create when given the ability to do so?
With using simple prompts, the reaches of the AI's capabilities was found, and the images created encompassed a large amount of bias and questions concerning where the images were taking their information from, and what it would do with them.
I created a generation of the one of the most basic texts possible, "woman."
After I had inserted the simple prompt of woman, it generated something potentially NSFW. After generating this, the images generated after became more provocative, and had more of a clear bias of something that was probably scraped from NSFW material online. The prompts below still had the prompt of "woman."
No Style
No Style
The prompt below was "A woman"
Cinematic
Cinematic
No Style
No Style
The images generated from this prompt showed white women, all with the same build and face (same facial structure, eye shape, staring in the direction of the camera) and having a sort of sultry expression. This was interesting to see, as there was no diversity in racial features, or even diversity in the features of the white woman generated - other than maybe eye color. It often depicted a skinny woman with smaller features - a stereotypically beautiful white woman. It did not show the "mean" woman that would be expected, and so the images that this generator is scraping from is choosing from a pool that focuses on Eurocentric depictions of beauty
Next Prompt: Black Man and Black Woman (Realistic and Anime art style) and Asian woman
Black Man (Anime Style)
Black Woman (Anime Style)
Black Woman (Realistic)
Asian woman (Realistic)
The anime art style is evocative of a common amalgamation of Japanese Animated art, but the braids on the black woman's hair in the anime art style did not connect to her hair at all, nor did her hair make too much sense in terms of connecting to her. This is likely due to the AI generator getting confused on what aspects of information it needs to scrape, and so it did not fully render out a complete image.
The realistic art style showed better depictions of people of color, but I had to put the descriptors of their race in there in order to get an image with people of color. The prompt with just "a woman" had no indicators, and so it only generated white women with the same features. There was no diversity in its creation, and tried to make something stereotypically beautiful with Eurocentric features.
The observations gathered from these image generations are that Stable Diffusion is likely scraping from a lot of image sites yes, but if it does not have some sort of categorization or narrowing down, it will default to making a caucasian woman, but also have the images more evocative of a pin-up image or even generate some NSFW content. I decided to diversify the images being generated, and the next prompts I decided to generate plus sized people with a simple prompt as well:
Next Prompt: Fat man and fat woman
No Style
No Style
Cinematic Style
Cinematic Style
After the NSFW content warning, the image for the prompt of "fat woman" (no style) showed an image of a woman in her bra with her nipples showing out of it, pretty much leaving nothing to the imagination. Additionally, the cinematic styles had them facing the same direction, while having no style had them facing forward. This image generation for no style showed a lean towards creating things that were a little more raunchy than other styles. This begs the question - are images generated with no bias being scraped evenly online, or with a large NSFW presence? After this, I decided to generate the simple prompt of "a man" and seeing where that would get me.
Next Prompt: A man (no style and anime style)
No Style
No Style
No Style
Anime Style
This was interesting to see - similar to the basic "a woman" prompt, the male prompt also had the same white man, with more facial similarity even than the women, and making him generically attractive. The third image shown did have smoe kind of sultry presence, but in general, the men were more SFW than the women. This difference in image generation showed something about how the images were being generated - that the women would be more likely to be sexualized than the men, and this is shown in the plus sized prompts as well. The faces of this man were very similar as well, with having the same facial shape and beard, and hair style. The anime prompt brought some diversity, but the first image generated had a blue eyed brown haired man, with the same going for the anime generated one.
With the topic of the class being "Beyond Dystopia," the images created addressed this very well - the dystopian aspect being the sexualization of women even in image generators with prompts that are not supposed to bring bias, and the continuation of racial bias in the images and databases being scraped. As artists and image creators, and users of AI, I believe it is our responsibility to watch for these biases and to be sure to place proper care and caution in using these images, as continued use of them in a way that does not exercise these tenets can continue in bias and the use of unethical images to create our own creations. Whether personal or not, the responsibility that users have of AI images is to facilitate the mature use of AI, and to call out when odd image generations or classifications occur.
To go beyond dystopia, both awareness and more security in where these images are being generated from must be conducted. The simple word of woman generating NSFW content and risque content is demonstrative that these images are not being as regulated as we think, and to advance beyond our dystopian world of AI, we need to have public information available of where the images are being sourced, and to ensure that they are not sourced from unethical areas.