Direct Dynamic Triggering Scenarios of the Southern San Andreas Fault by Moderate Magnitude Cross Fault Earthquakes in the Brawley Seismic Zone, CA 

(Kyriakopoulos and Oglesby, 2024, SRL)

Note: for a better viewing experience use "Settings>Quality>1080p HD".

All the videos in this webpage are made using PARAVIEW.

Top panel: 8 x 8 km rupture area; rupture near the center of the cross-fault; 4 km burial (top) depth; Bottom panel: same with top panel but for a 9 x 9 km rupture area;

vertical-stack-output.mp4

Top panel: 36 km^2 rupture area; rupture near opposite edge from the SSAF; 2 km burial (top) depth; elongated rupture shape; Bottom panel: same with top panel but 0 km burial depth.

vertical-stack-output2.mp4

Asymmetric Topography Causes Normal Stress Perturbations at the Rupture Front: The Case of the Cajon Pass (Kyriakopoulos et al., 2021, GRL)

Note: for a better viewing experience use "Settings>Quality>1080p HD".

All the videos in this webpage are made using PARAVIEW.

Brawley Seismic Zone Dynamic Rupture Models (Kyriakopoulos et al., 2019, JGR)


Kyriakopoulos, C., Oglesby, D. D., Rockwell, T. K., Meltzner, A. J., Barall, M., Fletcher, J. M., & Tulanowski, D. ( 2019). Dynamic rupture scenarios in the Brawley Seismic Zone, Salton Trough, southern California. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 124. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JB016795 

Play the videos together and observe the differences around the area of the cross-faults area. The value "S" stands for "seismic parameter", the ratio of strength excess over the expected stress drop. Low S means higher tendency for rupture than high S. For example in model N2S-S2.0-X0.45 the cross faults are pre-stressed at a higher level (S=0.45) than the main faults (S=2.0). Note: for a better viewing experience use "Settings>Quality>1080p HD".

All the videos in this webpage are made using PARAVIEW.

Dynamic rupture simulation with all the participating faults pre-stressed homogeneously (no pre-stress contrast between main faults and cross-faults). [Model N2S-S2.0-X2.0]. Map Data: Google, Image Landsat, Copernicus, INEGI.

Dynamic rupture simulation with cross-faults pre-stressed at a higher level than the main faults. [Model N2S-S2.0-X0.45]. Map Data: Google, Image Landsat, Copernicus, INEGI.

Dynamic rupture simulation with high pre-stress (S=0.45) level in all the participating faults.  [Model N2S-S0.45-X0.45]. Map Data: Google, Image Landsat, Copernicus, INEGI.

Dynamic rupture simulation with high pre-stress level (S=0.45), shallower locking depth (15 km) and the cross-fault intersecting the main faults (segmented model). [Model N2S-S0.45-X0.45-d15km-14f]. Map Data: Google, Image Landsat, Copernicus, INEGI.

N2S-S2.0-X2.0-S2.0-X0.45-VertStacked.mp4

Comparisons  between model N2S-S2.0-X2.0 (top) and N2S-S0.45-X0.45 (bottom). Map Data: Google, Image Landsat, Copernicus, INEGI.

N2S-S2.0-X2.0-S0.45-X0.45-VertStacked.mp4

Comparison between models N2S-S2.0-X2.0 (top) and N2S-S2.0-X0.45 (bottom). Map Data: Google, Image Landsat, Copernicus, INEGI.

cut4.mp4
cut3.mp4

Comparison between models N2S-S2.0-X2.0 (top left), N2S-S2.0-X0.45 (bottom left), N2S-S0.45-X0.45-d15km-14f (top right) and N2S-S0.45-X0.45 (bottom right). Map Data: Google, Image Landsat, Copernicus, INEGI.

Comparison between models N2S-S0.45-X0.45-d15km-14f (top) and N2S-S0.45-X0.45 (bottom) .Map Data: Google, Image Landsat, Copernicus, INEGI.

Cucapah Earthquake dynamic rupture models (Kyriakopoulos et al., 2017, JGR)

Map Data: MapData: Landsat/Copernicus,SIO,NOAA, U.S. Navy,NGS,GEBCO,                           LDEO-Columbia,NSF 

untitled100.0.mp4

Map Data: MapData: Landsat/Copernicus,SIO,NOAA, U.S. Navy,NGS,GEBCO,                           LDEO-Columbia,NSF 

Map Data: MapData: Landsat/Copernicus,SIO,NOAA, U.S. Navy,NGS,GEBCO,                           LDEO-Columbia,NSF