Embedded Files
The boxplot shows the CWM SLA comparison of reference forest and reclaimed well pad. There is a significant difference in CWM SLA between reference forest (M =89.3, SD = 26.1 ) and reclaimed well pad (M = 50.4, SD = 18.8); t(df) = 6.467, p < 0.001.
The graph showed the linear regression for the reclaimed well pad’s recovery pattern (CWM SLA) by age post-certification and the boxplot showed the CWM SLA for reference forest as reference. The fitted regression model was y = 56-0.2x, and the regression was no statistically significant (R2 = 0.02, F(1, 23) = 0.477, p = 0.497).
Conclusion:
The well pad reclamation criteria in Alberta appears to be ineffective.
The community-weighted mean specific leaf area (CWM SLA) on the reclaimed well pad is significantly lower than that of the reference forest, suggesting that the reclamation process may not completely rehabilitate this critical plant community trait.
Moreover, the lack of a significant linear relationship implies that the specific leaf area of the plant community on the reclaimed well pad has not demonstrated an ideal recovery pattern over time.
Management Implication:
Customizing successful reclamation standards that encompass specific plant community characteristics is essential, which can ensure a more comprehensive and effective restoration of ecological functions in the northern forest following industrial activities.
Adaptive management practices are crucial. Flexibility in reclamation frameworks is essential to accommodate the dynamic of the recovery processes, allowing for timely adjustments based on ongoing monitoring and research.
Page updated
Report abuse