Enrolling in Professor Gerd Nonneman's Introduction to International Relations course provided an insightful look at the historical dynamics of global superpowers. When examining World War I, attributing blame to Germany revealed a nuanced narrative that took into account factors such as its pursuit of dominance and trade constraints. The Treaty of Versailles, rather than addressing underlying issues, exacerbated postwar European instability by focusing too much on blame.
One of the central themes that piqued my interest was the assignment of blame to Germany for the outbreak of World War I. The reading shed light on Germany's complicated position, emphasizing factors such as its desire for dominance, trade constraints, and perception as a latecomer among colonial powers. While the Treaty of Versailles aimed to address the aftermath, its emphasis on blaming Germany rather than addressing underlying issues created political instability in Europe, laying the groundwork for future conflicts.
The concept of appeasement in the buildup to World War II also piqued my interest. Hitler's use of appeasement, granted by weak allies, demonstrated the dangers of short-term diplomacy. Alternative strategies, such as negotiating deals and forming military alliances against Germany, could have prevented Hitler's unchecked rise to power and possibly avoided the war's disastrous consequences.
The course's investigation of the atomic bombings of Japan raised ethical concerns for me. The justification for dropping the bombs solely to end the war is questionable, with lingering doubts about alternative motives and the necessity of such drastic action. The human cost and long-term consequences, both in terms of immediate casualties and radiation-related illnesses, highlight the gravity of the decision and call for a thorough examination of the ethical considerations surrounding the use of such destructive weapons.
Finally, this course has provided a better understanding of the complex relationships between nations, the consequences of historical decisions, and the ethical dimensions of international actions. Professor Gerd Nonneman's guidance has enabled me to critically analyze historical events and their broader implications, which has helped shape my evolving perspective on the complexities of international relations.