New work samples added regularly!

Improving Interview Consistency with Microlearning Decision Practice

Microlearning onboarding module that standardizes interview questioning and decision quality

eLearning Work Sample built in Articulate Rise 360

Challenge

Originally developed in graduate study, later adapted for internal training use, and adapted for portfolio review

Krell Technologies (gov/security environment) faced an EEOC complaint tied to interview questioning. Risk often appears in “gray area” questions or informal small-talk prompts that feel harmless but create documentation exposure.

Performance Gap: Committee members lack a shared question set and evaluation cues, leading to inconsistent questioning + documentation exposure.
Constraint: Rotating membership requires repeatable onboarding.
Risk: Inconsistency creates unequal candidate experience + audit vulnerability; drift from HR/EEOC guidance over time.

Sole designer and developer responsible for storyboarding, Rise 360 build, narration production, and revision based on instructor QA feedback.

READ_ Overview - Mini-Project 2.pdf

Fictional organization created for the training scenario. Logo and scenario branding developed for this project.

Link to Mini-Project Brief →

Implementation NoteAlthough originally developed as a graduate project, the core design was later adapted and implemented within my organization to support interview training. The internal version was modified for organizational context, but the interaction structure and instructional strategy were retained.Because the deployed version includes internal materials, implementation data and artifacts cannot be shared publicly.

Resources

Design Inputs & Supporting Resources

Guide for Conducting Behavioral Interviews

Primary interviewing framework used to structure lesson content.

Guidance by the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) outlining how hiring managers use behavioral questions to evaluate past performance and predict future job success.

Society for Human Resource Management Guide for Conducting Behavior Interviews with Early Career...SHRM_Behavioral_Interview_Guide.pdf

e-Learning Principles Review Checklist

Design QA checklist used during module development.

Structure based on Mayer’s Multimedia Principles and C.R.A.P. design principles to review clarity, alignment, and cognitive load in the lesson build.

E-LEARNING PRINCIPLES - CHECKLIST MP #2.xlsx

Beware Hiring Managers: 51 Illegal Interview Questions to Avoid

Example set used to develop practice scenarios.

EEOC-aligned reference identifying common illegal interview questions across protected categories with compliant alternatives by Anindo Chatterjee on iMocha.

Screenshot of the article “Illegal Interview Questions to Avoid in 2026” used as a reference for identifying legally risky interview questions.

Table of Appropriate/Inappropriate Interview Questions

Reference used to build the “gray area questions” lesson.

UC Berkeley's reference table resource contrasting appropriate and inappropriate interview prompts, with explanations of legal and bias-related risks.

Appropriate Inappropriate Interview Questions inappropriate_interview_questions.pdf

Goals

Increase consistency of interview questioning across rotating committee membership.
Reduce use of legally risky or irrelevant questions during interviews.
Improve defensibility of interview documentation by standardizing evaluation cues.

Learning Outcomes

Differentiate appropriate vs. inappropriate interview questions, including “gray area” questions.
Apply behavioral interviewing structure (ex: STAR) to evaluate candidate responses consistently.
Practice selecting and re-framing interview questions in-the-moment (with targeted feedback).
Reduce likelihood of legally risky questions by using standardized cues + feedback.

Solution

A short onboarding microlearning module with embedded decision practice that allows learners to rehearse legally safe questioning and consistent evaluation cues.

Rise 360 module landing page introducing the course “Conducting Interviews Legally & Effectively at Krell Technologies.”

A short interactive microlearning module was developed in Articulate Rise 360 to provide onboarding guidance for incoming hiring committee members. The module combines concise instructional content, guided practice activities, and feedback-based knowledge checks to reinforce legally appropriate interview practices.

Tools

Articulate Rise 360

ElevenLabs

Fairlight

SCORM 1.2 export

Lesson Storyboard

Design Decisions / Interaction Rationale

Early interaction structure used to translate interview guidance into applied practice

Mini Project 2 Rise 360 Storyboard template - JJ.docx

- 3–5 minute onboarding microlearning in Articulate Rise 360 for new hiring committee members.
- Included STAR framework overview, “gray area” question guidance, and interactive question-spotting practice using a Rise Scenario block with immediate corrective feedback.
- Exported as SCORM 1.2 for LMS delivery and repeatable onboarding.

Approach

Committee membership rotates, so the solution needed to be repeatable onboarding with minimal seat time and fast refresh.
The risk isn’t just knowing rules; it’s recognizing red flags in real time. Immediate feedback supports correction at the point of decision.
Scenario interactions allowed contextual prompts + choice-based practice with targeted feedback, without adding the complexity of a full branching simulation.
- Added goal to be able to complete the module in ~3–5 minutes with high clarity + low extraneous load (Clark & Mayer alignment).

Net Result: A short onboarding-ready learning object that demonstrates build quality, interaction design choices, and iteration based on review feedback.

Instructional Strategy

Built a microlearning module in Rise 360, exported as SCORM 1.2, designed for onboarding incoming hiring committee members.

Iteration & QA Improvements

Iterated based on instructor QA: added navigation instructions to interactive blocks and removed forced progression when interactions were optional.
- - Added explicit “how to use this interaction” instructions for accordions/tabs and other interactive elements.
  - Removed gating/forced progression where audio/PDF/interactions were optional, aligning interaction rules with learner control.
  - Standardized font sizing and ensured transcript accuracy.
  - Added audio to Lesson 2 for media consistency.
  - Added image source credits.

Cognitive Load & UX Decisions

Applied Clark & Mayer multimedia principles.
Produced 3+ minutes of narration (paced, edited, aligned to content) and ensured accessibility expectations (transcripts and/or matched audio-to-text).

Interaction Design Decisions

Used interactive blocks purposefully (not decoration):
- - Accordion/tabs for chunking process steps (ex: STAR breakdown)
  - Knowledge checks with targeted feedback
  - Scenario/practice component redesigned to feel more like interview practice (not a linear quiz)

Selected Interaction Examples

Click each title to expand and view example screens of each interaction.

Lesson Overview

Module entry point and lesson map

Introduces the module’s purpose, expected outcomes, and lesson flow so learners understand what they will do before beginning.

Accordion-Based Content Chunking

Expandable sections used to organize STAR guidance and legal-question categories

Accordion blocks were used to reduce visual overload and let learners review one concept at a time, supporting both procedural explanation and legal-category guidance.

Sample STAR Response Walkthrough

Tabbed process interaction used to chunk procedural guidance across steps

Uses a step-by-step tab interaction to break a STAR response into Situation, Task, Action, and Result, helping learners see how structured answers are evaluated.

STAR Prompt Breakdown Practice

Tabbed interaction for guided response analysis

Learners work through common interview prompts and identify which parts of a response belong to Situation, Task, Action, and Result.

Knowledge Checks

Multiple-choice checks with immediate corrective feedback

Knowledge checks reinforce legal-question recognition and STAR concepts by correcting misunderstandings at the point of response rather than delaying feedback until the end.

Risky Question Sorting Activity

Immediate corrective feedback to strengthen red-flag recognition

Learners sort sample interview questions into appropriate or inappropriate categories, reinforcing legal boundaries through fast classification and feedback.

Guided Interview Practice

Rise Scenario block used for contextual decision practice Subtitle

Learners step through a short interview exchange and choose from possible questions, practicing how to identify risky prompts and respond with more job-relevant alternatives.

Lesson Recaps

Checklist recap used to reinforce confidence and self-monitoring

Each lesson closes with a short recap checklist that helps learners confirm understanding before moving forward.

Narration Transcripts

Accessible text alternative for narrated content

Narration was paired with transcripts to support accessibility, learner control, and review without sound.

External Resource Links

Optional reference tools for deeper review and just-in-time support

The wrap-up lesson includes curated external links and downloadable references so learners can revisit interview guidance after completing the module.

Results

Design Capabilities Demonstrated

- Practice activity redesigned to support interview decision-making rather than simple recall
- Interactive practice design (Rise 360 Scenario block) with immediate corrective feedback
- Accessibility-aligned narration and transcript development
- Iterative improvement based on structured QA review
- Translation of policy guidance into applied performance support

Planned Success Metrics

- Completion required prior to serving on hiring panel
- Reduced incidence of inappropriate/irrelevant questions flagged by HR
- Improved consistency of candidate evaluation notes (STAR-aligned cues)

Instructor Feedback

- - - Professional narration pacing
    - Polished writing
    - Effective use of interactive blocks
    - Strong visual consistency/readability
    - Well-designed “gray area questions” section
    - Clear, concise instructional feedback in knowledge checks
    - Effective wrap-up lesson with resources
- Interaction behavior was revised to better align with learner autonomy and optional media consumption.

References

Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2016). E-learning and the science of instruction (4th ed.). Wiley.
Society for Human Resource Management. (n.d.). Guide for conducting behavioral interviews with early-career candidates.
EEOC guidance on appropriate and inappropriate interview questions.

Appendices

Appendix A. OPWL 523 Mini-Project 2 brief — Project brief outlining the performance problem, goals, constraints, and initial requirements for the microlearning solution.
Appendix B. Project Storyboard — Detailed blueprint of the learning experience, including content flow, decision points, and interaction design for the module.
Appendix C. e-Learning Principles Review Checklist — Evaluation tool used to assess alignment with eLearning best practices, including usability, clarity, and instructional effectiveness.
Appendix D. SHRM Guide for Conducting Behavioral Interviews with Early Career Job Candidates — Source material informing the interview framework, question design, and decision-making criteria used in the module.

← Back to eLearning Work Samples

Photo by Christina @ wocintechchat.com M on Unsplash

Page updated

Report abuse