Reflection #9
Natural Hazard Inquiry
Reflect on how you went during your inquiry. What did you learn?
Are we prepared enough to handle your natural hazard and why?
Explain how you worked toward your goals and how it helped your learning. What worked? What didn’t? What will you do differently next time?
Write your reflection here...
My ninth Inquiry went very well. I think this was because Me and George worked very well together.
The Natural Hazard Inquiry was really useful as it taught me all about Lahars and their effects on people around the world.
In terms of preparation to deal with the Natural Hazard of Lahars I think that my solution was very realistic and achievable, it could be put in place as an effective method to mitigate the effects of Lahars.
One of my goals was to show work ethic and completion in my inquiries. By working on this goal it helped me to improve my learning because I was trying hard to lock in and do a good job.
The goal I did the best with was designing and implementing complex solutions in my inquiries. The reason it went so well was because I was working hard to design a solution that could actually work in a realistic situation.
Next time I will look at the feedback and try and improve on my next inquiry more. This will help me because I can grow and improve.
Evidence of Term 3 goals being met.
Copy and paste all relevant evidence in the form of screenshots or written explanations of what was done to achieve your 4 goals for Term 3.
e.g. Test results, teacher feedback, parent feedback, peer feedback, your own explantion of things you did etc.
Commitment and work ethic in my inquiry's.
2. Designs and implements solutions to complex problems in my new inquiry's.
3. the Physical part of my Hauora I will continue to train for long distance running.
4. Honours the legacy of the inquiry programme. This term I will complete my last ever inquiry, so i will make it a good one.
6A. Most areas were really well done and your thesis and coverage of different systems to manage lahars was excellent. Numerical data was a bit undercooked and the opportunity to develop specifics about disadvantaged communities could have been developed with more concrete examples. Other than that it was a good effort with absence and sickness affecting things.