In this project, we examined the applications of nuclear chemistry to astronomical subjects. We began with an investigation of the mechanisms of nuclear chemistry, starting with the basics of the structure of atoms and leading to fusion, fission, and how to balance nuclear equations. We also performed an experiment — the Flame Test Lab — where we investigated why certain metals give off different colored flames when placed into a fire. After this, we researched how stars use nuclear chemistry to produce elements and how the universe began in the Big Bang. This research came together to complete 3 "Tic-Tac-Toe" projects (selecting three adjacent projects to complete from a 3x3 board). Our group chose to undertake:
A mathematical project, solving various nuclear equations and creating a tutorial for their solution. I completed this entire project myself. This was perhaps the most straightforward project, as it consisted only of solving various types of nuclear equations (identifying alpha/beta/gamma decay, solving word problems, etc) and then explaining how they were solved in a video.
An artistic project, creating a comic strip describing the Big Bang theory and the evidence for it. Emerald (my teammate) completed all of the artwork on this project, and I helped edit some of the writing. In this comic, we described the basic idea of the Big Bang and explained some of the evidence for why scientists know it happened.
A visual project, creating an infographic describing how stars create the elements. We completed this project jointly. In the infographic, we described how stars form from stellar dust, the life cycle of star, and what elements a star produces at each stage of its life cycle.
These projects combined our group's differing skills so we could divide the work accordingly. After completing the project, we presented one of our projects (the comic strip) to the class.
Tutorial, Part 1
Tutorial, Part 2
Subatomic particles are extremely small units of matter. They come in three types:
Protons, which have mass and positive charge
Neutrons, which have mass but zero charge
Electrons, which have negligible mass but negative charge
As one could expect, protons and neutrons are roughly equal in size, while electrons are significantly smaller.
When subatomic particles combine, they form larger units of matter, called atoms.
Atoms are the basic building blocks of the universe. They are the smallest "units" of a given element that cannot be reduced further without altering their physical properties. In practice, an atom contains groups of subatomic particles — protons, neutrons, and electrons. Protons and neutrons are found clumped together in the nucleus of the atom, while electrons are found zipping around in the outer electron cloud. This means that most of an atom is actually empty space; the area between the nucleus and the outermost electrons is almost entirely empty!
Since protons and neutrons have mass, the atom's mass comes (almost entirely) from the nucleus. However, since the nucleus is quite small, the size of the atom comes from the electrons.
The "type" of atom — that is, which element the atom is — is determined exclusively by its number of protons. For example, any atom with 6 protons is a carbon atom (carbon is element #6 on the periodic table). This quantity, the number of protons, is called the atom's atomic number. We will see in a moment how the other particles can affect an atom.
An atom is said to have a net charge, the sum of the charges of all its particles. Since protons have positive charge, and electrons have negative charge, this is simply equal to the number of protons minus the number of electrons. Most normal atoms are "neutral", meaning their net charge is zero. Equivalently, that means that most atoms have an equal number of protons and electrons.
But what happens when the charge is not zero? Firstly, in terms of number of particles, this means a different number of electrons than protons — as we cannot change the number of protons without changing the atom to another element. When you remove or add extra electrons to an atom, it thus changes the charge, and such an atom with a nonzero charge is called an ion. An atom with extra electrons has a more negative charge, and this is called an anion; likewise, an atom with too few electrons has a more positive charge, and this is called a cation.
We can also change the number of neutrons in an atom. The atom's mass number is its number of protons plus its number of neutrons; thus, by keeping the number of protons constant, we can change an atom's mass by adding or removing neutrons.
To describe the many different aspects of an atom concisely, we use isotopic notation. We have already encountered the quantities involved, so what is left is merely to apply them. We write an atom's isotopic notation like so:
Note that the element symbol is merely an abbreviation of the element (though sometimes it does not align with the English word for the element — take lead's abbreviation, Pb). These element symbols can be found on a periodic table.
We can describe reactions on the nuclear scale with nuclear equations. The logic behind a nuclear equation is straightforward — in a reaction where atoms are combined, ripped apart, or anything else, protons, neutrons and electrons cannot simply "disappear" or "appear". That is, their totals must be conserved before and after a reaction. This information makes solving nuclear equations straightforward. Let's start with a few examples:
The piece on the left of the arrow represents what existed before the reaction (in the first example, an atom of Uranium-235 is combined with a neutron), and the piece on the right of the arrow represents the configuration afterwards (in the last example, a Helium-3 atom and an electron are present).
If we recall that the bottom numbers indicate the number of protons, then one can indeed see that the sum of the bottom numbers on the left always equals the sum of the bottom numbers on the right (the number of protons stays the same). Likewise, the top number represents the number of protons plus neutrons — so if we know that the number of protons does not change, and the number of neutrons does not change, we would expect the top number to not change as well. This is indeed verifiable fairly straightforwardly.
As it happens, there are a few kinds of reactions which occur frequently and are thus classifiable. We call a Helium-4 nucleus an alpha particle, and a reaction which involves an "ejection" of an alpha particle an alpha decay. (Note that an "ejection" simply means "there originally was an atom, but it split up into an alpha particle and some atom by the end".) We can thus see that the second equation above is an example of alpha decay.
Similarly, an electron is called a beta particle, so the third equation is an example of beta decay.
There is a third kind of named particle which is somewhat more elusive — the gamma particle. The gamma particle is pure energy and as such has zero mass (top number) and zero protons (bottom number). It is often released in reactions involving atoms which have too much energy to be stable, whereupon the atom will release a gamma particle to lower its energy. Such a reaction is called (unsurprisingly) gamma decay.
There are two more kinds of common nuclear reactions: fusion and fission. Nuclear fusion refers to a reaction involving two nuclei being "smashed together" with extreme force to produce one larger nucleus. As such, fusion requires an environment with extreme pressure and temperature to occur, and large amounts of energy are released in the process. Fission, on the other hand, involves one nucleus being "ripped apart" to create two smaller nuclei and some leftover neutrons. Fission also involves a release of large amounts of energy in an extreme environment. Two examples of nuclear equations for fusion and fission are shown below.
Notice how the fusion reaction involves two smaller nuclei forming one larger one, while the fission reaction involves one large nucleus forming two smaller ones.
Sometimes, an element is inherently in an unstable state. This "instability" occurs from a nucleus having too much energy for its current configuration. In this unstable state, the forces that bind and repel the nucleus' protons and neutrons are unbalanced, meaning some of these nucleic particles may drift away. This loss of particles is precisely radioactive decay, the slow decay over time of an unstable element into an eventually stable form (when the nucleus loses particles, it eventually loses enough that the forces are balanced once more).
Because this process of particle ejection is stochastic, at any given moment it is up to chance whether a particle will happen to be ejected. Intuitively, that means that the more particles there are, the more chance there is that one will be ejected, so this decay should happen quickly at first (while there's lots of particles) but slow down over time (once most of the particles are lost to decay). To model such a decay, we use an exponential curve, which essentially means that the mass of the nucleus will "halve" after a certain amount of time. This amount of time is called the half life of the element.
To make this more clear, let's use a concrete example. The half life of strontium-90 is 29 years. That means that if you take 100 grams of strontium-90, in 29 years you'll only have 50 grams of it left (the other 50 grams will have been lost to decay). In 29 more years (that's 58 years total), you'll only have 25 grams of it left, since 25 is half of 50. In 29 more years (87 total), you'll only have 12.5 grams of it left, and so on.
"Radiation" may conjure images of Chernobyl, but it's simply the word for the emission of energy. Sometimes, that energy might be dangerous, like in nuclear accidents, but that's not always the case. To classify the different kinds of radiation, we use the electromagnetic spectrum.
To understand the electromagnetic spectrum, we need to understand that all radiation is really just a form of light. It's not necessarily the light that we can see, but the light that we can see is a part of the electromagnetic spectrum. Take a look at it below:
We encounter forms of radiation in our everyday lives — when we listen to the radio, when we turn on the microwave, when we look around, or when we get an X-ray. All of this radiation is carried by photons — or more accurately, photon waves.
Because light and everything else on the electromagnetic spectrum is actually a wave, we can organize them by wavelength, and this is precisely why the electromagnetic spectrum is called a spectrum! In the spectrum above, larger wavelengths are shown on the left, while higher wavelengths are shown on the right. Notice that visible light is around the middle, things that we encounter on a day-to-day basis tend to be on the left, and really dangerous things tend to be on the right. In fact, this is no accident.
When wavelength increases, the "size" of the wave decreases. That means that if we imagine the wave of radiation passing through you, there's less wave "passing through you" at any given moment. Think about that for a moment; if the wave is really long, then it's going to take a long time for just that one crest of wave to pass through you, while if it's really short, then it won't take long for the whole crest to pass through you. This provides an intuition for why longer wavelengths mean lower energy levels (and vice versa). The reason that the radiation on the right is dangerous is because it carries high amounts of energy, while radiation on the left does not.
Quantitatively, we can describe the relationship between wavelength and energy as follows:
Where E is the energy of the wave, h is Planck's constant (6.62607015 × 10^-34 m² kg / s), c is the speed of light (2.998 x 10^8 m / s), and λ is the wavelength. Making sense of the equation, as λ increases, E decreases, so as the wavelength increases the energy decreases (and vice versa).
We can also work backwards using the equation. Given an energy, we can find the wavelength of the light that is emitted. This is important in the flame test, a procedure involving examining the color produced by a given metal when it is placed into a fire. When the metal is heated, its electrons become "excited", jumping outward to a higher energy level. They cannot remain excited forever, so they put their energy into emitting light in order to return to their ground state (moving back down towards the nucleus again). Given this change in energy, one can compute the wavelength of light emitted, or vice-versa, using the equation.
Billions of years ago, the universe began as a tiny point. The point was an infinitely small singularity, and the point was truly the extent of the entire universe. Then, a violent "explosion" caused the universe to start expanding outwards, cooling as it expanded. As the universe cooled, matter began to form — first quarks formed into subatomic particles, and then those particles formed into small atoms like hydrogen and helium. Over time, this "cosmic dust" was compacted together by gravity, forming ever larger structures like planets and stars. Stars, in turn, performed fusion in their extremely hot, pressurized insides, forming larger and larger elements. When the stars ran out of elements to fuse, they lacked the energy to continue burning, and for stars where the pressure inside won out over gravity a massive supernova occurred. These supernovae created such hot, pressurized environments that even larger elements could form, thus explaining the creation of the elements we know today. (In actuality, a few of the heaviest elements known were created by scientists in a lab.)
This idea is likely not surprising, but it was understandably novel when first proposed. When George Lemaitre, a priest and physics professor, first put forward the idea, it was laughed away and given the joking nickname "The Big Bang". (The name, as it happened, stuck.)
But scientists have found extensive evidence supporting the idea of the Big Bang. Perhaps most obviously, hydrogen and helium make up a vast majority of the universe, suggesting that they were created first (in the Big Bang) and then other elements formed from them. We can also see the "leftover" radiation from the violent explosion itself in the Cosmic Microwave Background, pictured below. (Essentially, it is a map of sky showing how much leftover radiation can be seen by a microwave telescope. Redder hues indicate more radiation.)
Finally, the universe is in fact still moving apart to this very day — when we look at galaxies, they are redder than we would expect them to be, and this redshift indicates that they are moving away. Redshift is best explained with a diagram; essentially, because the object is moving away, the light wave gets "stretched out", giving it a longer (redder) wavelength.
Overall, this project was very successful, as we were able to produce quality work with a limited team. In this way, our conscientious learning was a strong point during this project. Because we only had 2 people but had to complete the same amount of work in the same amount of time, we effectively had to be twice as efficient as other groups to complete the work on time. However, we were able to complete this without compromising quality of work, illustrating that we were able to effectively manage our time. At the start of the project, we immediately divided the workload so that there would never be any downtime or confusion as to job allocation. We used all of the in-class time productively and we put in extra work outside of class to meet the deadline. This leads to the second strong point of the project: our collaboration. Throughout the project, we worked together as a unit to complete the work in a manner satisfactory to both parties. We agreed beforehand that we would complete the infographic portion in tandem, so we both tackled different aspects of the infographic and reconvened frequently. We then worked together to check each other's work and ensure that the graphic was up to our standards. In this regard, our collaboration was stellar, as we were able to constructively synthesize our ideas without conflict or overbearance.
As always, there were also some ways to improve. While our conscientious learning was excellent in most aspects, it was not entirely perfect either. Though we did complete all of the work on-time, we quickly approached the deadline and required time almost all the way to it in order to complete all of the projects. This was non-ideal, as it did not allow for time to proofread our work fully. (In fact, this did cause one small issue in the comic — the dark energy section inaccurately reads "73% of mass" instead of "73% of matter".) For future projects, we should aim to complete all work at least one or two days in advance of the deadline to provide time simply for proofreading and editing, ensuring that there are no small mistakes in the work. Obviously, this was partly a product of our limited group resources, but it was still avoidable by planning further ahead. Next time, we will create a rough schedule to determine when everything needs to be completed and give "padding time" for issues or editing.
Finally, our communication was also somewhat lacking. While we did manage to communicate well towards the very end of the project, our communication was poor shortly before the deadline as we were unable to properly coordinate the times when each of us could work. For the comic, the work had to pass back and forth between us since Emerald planned to do the art while I planned to edit the writing. In order for this to happen, Emerald had to first make a draft, which I could then edit, which Emerald could then finalize, which we could then proofread. However, because of the fact that the times when we were available to work on this project did not align, it took multiple days for this "back-and-forth" process to carry out, much longer than it should have taken ideally. Because of this, there was not sufficient time for us to proofread. (This ties into the issues with time-management already mentioned above.) This issue could have been fixed through better communication, as had we communicated when we were available we could have found an earlier time to complete our portions of the work.
These small issues were small, however, compared to the success of the project. The final products produced were clean, fairly professional and conveyed the information needed. In this light, the project was on the whole a great success, with a few notes to be applied in the future.