Below a study examines the intended and unintended impacts of the raised MLDA; several unintended impacts were revealed after the law changed public attitude on underaged drinking.
Research performed in 1999 by Ruud T.J. Roodbeen and colleagues.
Methodology: “Systematic scoping review was conducted in which a search strategy was developed iteratively and literature was obtained from experts in alcohol research and scientific and grey databases.” (Roodbeen, 1999)
“A conceptual model for explaining the impact of raising a minimum legal drinking age (MLDA)” (Roodbeen, 1999). Courtesy of Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences.
"Texas and other states raised the age in order to keep federal highway funds. We took a look at how the change was affecting people and businesses in 1986." Courtesy of FOX 7 Austin, 1986
In 2016, Georgia Nugent, former president emerita at Kenyon College, and her colleagues said this about the raised MLDA:
Failure to Impose the Minimum Drinking Age
“Further, 60% of Americans say the penalties for underage drinking should be made more strict, while 6% say less strict, and 31% say they should remain as they are now” (Carroll, 2007). Courtesy of Gallup