I work in broad areas of analytical and numerical fluid dynamics like hydrodynamic instabilities, micro-hydrodynamics, non-linear, stochastic modelling, and particle dynamics in context of geophysical flows. Some of the topics I am working on are listed below.
We have studied the rotation dynamics of the settling particle in the induced uniform electric field. The motivation behind this study is to understand the dynamics of the orientation of ice crystals in a cloud with an external field. Particle orientation in an external field has also been used in microfluidic applications for the separation of anisotropic particles due to lateral migration. When an anisotropic particle experiences an electric field, it may generate rotation along with oscillation and may lead to chaotic behavior. However, as the field's strength increases, a particle is pinned to a specific angle. We further study the orientation dynamics of the particle with including particle and fluid inertia in the presence of the external field.
Then we investigate the effect of noise to the above study. The noise can be attributed to Brownian diffusion, particle-particle collision and anisotropic turbulence.
We have studied the orientation dynamics of an ice crystal subjected to a homogenous isotropic turbulence and electric field. It has been shown that most of the settling ice crystal attains the "horizontal" alignment in atmosphere. However, on-field observation revealed that this is not true for all ice crystals in clouds. We investigate the preferred alignment and rotational behavior of ice crystal on varying the intensity of turbulence and electric field. We show that, depending on parameter, these particles can exhibit field induced alignment which can change when direction of electric field changes. This electric field induced alignment can change the visibility and overall radiation budget of the cloud.
Research in past have revealed that, unlike in a horizontal stratified channel flow, two-layered inclined channel flows can have multiple base state solutions. These base states differ by the location of the interface from the wall, called holdup. In a counter-current flow, two holdups solutions are identified; in a co-current flow, up to three base state solutions can be formed at the same parameters. We have analyzed the hydrodynamic stability of each holdup solution in both counter- and co-current flows with wall slip conditions. Neutral stability boundaries are presented for each base state, with comparisons made with the previous results obtained for the no-slip boundary condition. We found that the wall slip could have both stabilizing and destabilizing effects depending on the flow rates and the value of holdup—the location of an interface.