Stata Command: rdqte
Stata Command: rdqte.ado
Estimation and robust inference for quantile treatment effects (QTE) in the regression discontinuity designs (RDD) based on Chiang, Hsu, and Sasaki (2019). Use it when you consider a sharp or fuzzy regression discontinuity design and you are interested in analyzing heterogeneous treatment effects. The method is robust against large bandwidths and arbitrary functional forms.
Installation:
. ssc install rdqte
Example:
. regress outcome covariate
. predict resid, residuals
. rdqte resid running_var
Help:
. help rdqte
Reference: Chiang, H.D., Y.-C. Hsu, and Y. Sasaki (2019) Robust Uniform Inference for Quantile Treatment Effects in Regression Discontinuity Designs. Journal of Econometrics, 211 (2), pp. 589-618. Paper.
rdqte -- Executes estimation and robust inference for quantile treatment effects (QTE) in regression discontinuity designs (RDD).
Syntax
rdqte y x [if] [in] [, c(real) fuzzy(varname) cover(real) ql(real) qh(real) qn(real) bw(real)]
Description
rdqte executes estimation and robust inference for quantile treatment effects (QTE) in the sharp and fuzzy regression discontinuity designs (RDD) based on Chiang, Hsu, and Sasaki (2019). The command takes an outcome variable y and a running variable or forcing variable x. In case of a fuzzy design, a binary treatment variable d is specified in the option fuzzy(varname) - see below for details of the usage. The primary results consist of estimates and a uniform 95% confidence band of QTEs across multiple quantiles. In addition to these primary results, the command also conducts tests of: 1. the null hypothesis that the QTEs are zero for all the quantiles (i.e., uniformly null treatment effects); and 2. the null hypothesis that the QTEs are constant across all the quantiles (i.e., homogeneous treatment effects) against the alternative of heterogeneous treatment effects. The method is robust against large bandwidths and unknown functional forms.
Options
c(real) sets the discontinuity location for the RDD. The default value is c(0). (Note: the discontinuity location itself is included as a part of the observations with negative x.)
fuzzy(varname) sets the treatment variable used for estimation in a fuzzy design. Not calling this option tells the command to assume a sharp design by default.
cover(real) sets the nominal probability that the uniform confidence band covers the true QTE. The default value is cover(.95).
ql(real) sets the lowest quantile at which the QTE is estimated. The default value is ql(.25).
qh(real) sets the highest quantile at which the QTE is estimated. The default value is qh(.75).
qn(real) sets the number of quantile points at which the QTE is estimated. The default value is qn(3).
bw(real) sets the bandwidth with which to estimate the QTE. A non-positive argument, as is the case with the default value bw(-1), will translate into an optimal rate.
Examples
1. y outcome variable, d treatment variable, x running variable
Estimation and inference under a sharp design:
. rdqte y x
Estimation and inference under a fuzzy design:
. rdqte y x, fuzzy(d)
Estimation of the QTE at 10th, 20th, ..., and 90th percentiles:
. rdqte y x, fuzzy(d) ql(0.1) qh(0.9) qn(9)
(The default is the inter-quartile range: 25th, 50th & 75th percentiles.)
2. score scores on the Woodcock-Johnson sub-tests, treat an indicator for participation in the pre-K program in the previous year, bdate birth date - example drawn from Chiang, Hsu, and Sasaki (2019, Sec. 6). Students with bdate >= 0 (location-normalized) are eligible for a participation in the pre-K program. Participation in the program is not sharp, and we therefore use a fuzzy RDD. Quantile treatment effects of the program on scores on the Woodcock-Johnson sub-tests are estimated with 90% uniform confidence bands by:
. rdqte score bdate, fuzzy(treat) cover(0.9) ql(0.1) qh(0.9) qn(9)
Stored results
rdqte stores the following in r():
Scalars r(N) observations r(c) cutoff location r(h) bandwidth
Macros r(cmd) rdqte
matrices r(q) quantiles r(b) QTE estimates r(V) variance matrix r(CBlower) lower bounds of confidence band r(CBupper) upper bounds of confidence band
Reference
Chiang, H.D., Y.-C. Hsu, and Y. Sasaki. 2019. Robust Uniform Inference for Quantile Treatment Effects in Regression Discontinuity Designs. Journal of Econometrics, 211 (2), pp. 589-618. Link to Paper.
Authors
Harold. D. Chiang, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN. Yu-Chin Hsu, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan. Yuya Sasaki, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.