- Is it the librarian’s duty to keep the youth’s information private?
- Is it the duty of the library to offer library cards to any age, with privacy attached to that card?
- Currently at the Phoenix Public Library, youth are sent to collections after turning 18 for fines accrued as a minor for damaged or lost items. Is it appropriate to have the trade off of privacy for financial protection? Is it ethical for the financial responsibility to be tied to the parent, when they do not have access to youth’s circulation history? Is it the parent’s responsibility to pick up fines where the child left off?
- How would Kant apply youth services to keeping children safe?
- Do you believe that behind Rawls veil of ignorance, would teens have full privacy from, or full "protection" from their parents?
- Using Ortega y Gasset’s philosophy is it the librarian’s duty to offer information to the youth population so they can form meaning for themselves concerning self actualization and individualism?
- How would Mill’s theory help the librarian reach equilibrium between the parent’s rights to monitor and the youth’s right to privacy?
- As an opponent to teen privacy when would you use Ross' theory, to break the privacy of a teen?