Project 2: Earthquake and Boise River Bridge Design - A Project-based STEM +Computing Inquiry (90 minutes in total including 10 minutes break in the middle of the session)
Overall guiding question: How can we build a bridge for the Boise River that is strong enough to resist earthquake forces?
Task Challenge: How can we design and construct a bridge over the Boise River to resist an earthquake?
Learning outcome:
Think through the process of designing and constructing a bridge to resist earthquakes
CT component embedded in student activity:
Heuristics: Students will build a bridge to satisfy requirements by trial and error
Conditional logic: Students will apply logic learnt regarding shapes and bridges in designing the bridge
Communication: Students will keep a journal and make a presentation to the class
Entry Event (5 minutes)
This session is a continuation of the design challenge that started in Week 7 session 1. Students are asked to recollect their experience last week with bridge design and construction. Depending on what went wrong with their particular bridge, students are given 10 minutes to discuss what changes they think will result in a better bridge performance.
For teams whose bridges passed the required specifications, they are asked to check the economy of the bridge. Students go through the table below and estimate the total cost of their bridge. Then, they try and optimize their design to meet specifications for a lower cost bridge.
Redesigning, planning, preparation of plans and rebuilding
WHAT TO DO FIRST (10 minutes)
Review the test results from the bridge testing
Review the design task challenge again understand the rules of the competition.
Make sure that all members of your team understand what has to be accomplished and the rules of the competition. If unsure ask your teacher to explain.
Good planning is the key to any successful project. During this phase it is up to your team to look at the resources available – human as well as material – and to plan how best they can be used to complete tasks within the time available.
REDESIGNING and PREPARATION OF PLANS (20 minutes)
Brainstorm ideas to improve the design:
Use a flip chart (if available) or a large piece of paper to write down everyone’s ideas before discussing them one by one.
Every person on the team has a valid contribution to make and every idea should be evaluated on its merits.
Remember to check with the design details to make sure your ideas keep on track.
Assign tasks to team members.
Produce plan drawings (front, side and top elevations).
Decide how the bridge will be constructed.
Produce estimates for the K’NEX building materials.
Present the bridge design for the project to your teacher before the end of this session.
REBUILDING (20 minutes)
Students can modify the bridges they built in the last session. If the bridge completely collapsed after the testing in the last session, they start from scratch. If not, they can just modify existing bridge.
This will be the final design of the bridge that will be tested in the next session.
Student Led Presentation: 15 minutes
The students discuss their experiences and consider what are most important aspects of this process to share. This discussion should follow the individual group roles established by the instructor during the research portion of class (e.g. recorder, internet researcher, simulation participants, time-keeper, and presenter).
The students discuss decisions for how to best proceed with the bridge-building project with other groups. The teacher asks questions to clarify student choices and reasoning.
End of Session Reflection and Debriefing: 5-10 minutes
Using the Problem Solving Process diagram, the teacher will ask students to identify what kind of problem solving skills/process/computational thinking they used in this session and explain how they used it. The following are some sample questions that can guide the debrief.
What did I learn today?
What problem solving skills/processes or CT components I used today in this diagram?
How did you use the problem solving skills/processes/CT components?
Copyright 2018 Boise State University