2017-2018: Brian Davidson will support the West Schools (Anahim Lake, Tatla Lake, Naghtaneqed, Dog Creek, and Alexis Creek) this year as each pursues its own specific inquiry.
Project time worked well. Students were invested because they had some say in picking topics. Students loved all of the hands on learning in Science and due to this type of learning, received excellent marks. Almost half of the Intermediate students received As in Science and almost half of the Primary students received Exceeding Expectations. Students loved Applied Design Skills and Technology; especially the kits that came to the schools. The Intermediates were enthralled with the Virtual Reality Goggles! Everyone was really engaged!
We started off the year with a School Wide art unit on Fire. Students studied the history of man’s relationship with fire. Students even created a late Paleolithic cave art instillation.
Our school welcomed a refugee family from Eritrea this February. In order to prepare the students, Angela Hartwick and a few of her friends led us in a workshop on how it feels to be a refugee. The assembly started with a presentation by our students in grades 2-6 on research they have completed on countries located near the horn of Africa.
This was followed by a screening of short clips from Ai Weiwei’s film, Human Flow. Then we were led through an experiential learning process whereby the students had to decide, if they had to leave their homes and could only take three things, what they would take. They could choose from: a pet, medicine, food, water, a toy, tools, a musical instrument, a motorcycle, clothes, or an electronic device. Students then had to pay (using one of these three items) to get on a boat. All of the students got into a canoe.
They had to get to a border crossing and pay again. Finally they arrived at a refugee camp, which was set up in the gym, and had to pay with their final possession. Finally, students had to think of one thing that all humans have in common and that we all value. Students wrote these ideas on luggage tags. Some students wrote family and water on their cards. This was an excellent exercise to help the children gain a bit of understanding as to what sorts of things some refugees experience.
Students had another opportunity to showcase their research at a community information session hosted by Lisa and Angela Hartwick at the Tatla Lake Community Centre. Lisa led the audience through a process of looking at different perspectives with regards to the words “inclusion” and “exclusion”.
For the last few weeks of school, the whole Elementary School was involved in a project about creatures that live in tide pools, in preparation for our year end trip to Hakai Institute on Calvert Island. Ms. Gordon used a strategy, Four Corners, which she learned from her ELL (English Language Learners) Inquiry Group. Primary students watched videos, talked with partners, wrote on little whiteboards, wrote in their Journals, and made crafts of a variety of tide pool creatures – sea anemones, sea stars, sea cucumbers, sea urchins, hermit crabs, sand dollars, and barnacles. They made dioramas and glued their creatures into their dioramas. They presented their dioramas to the whole school. Art classes used this theme as well. Students listened to stories about sea creatures in Story and Snack time. The Grade 2 to 6 group researched tide pool creatures, wrote paragraphs, chose photos and made cue cards, and presented their PowerPoint Projects to the whole school. These were the best Power Point Projects that I’ve seen our students produce. Students knew so much about their topics, they engaged their audience – made eye contact – and really talked about their slides.
We also were involved with an organization called Planet in Focus. We were one of four schools in Northern BC who received a Film Festival from this group. We were sent and watched an 88 minute documentary called Sea of Life – made by a young, Canadian female filmmaker. Inspired by Rob Stewart’s Revolution, young filmmaker Julia Barnes embarks on an epic journey around the world to save the ecosystems we depend on for survival, as we come closer to causing a mass extinction in the oceans. Sea of Life leads audiences through the stunning world of coral reefs into the heart of the environmental movement, meeting passionate scientists, activists and explorers who reveal an enormous opportunity to rise up and become the heroes the world needs. Our secondary students really enjoyed this film and found it thought provoking.
Our secondary students had two projects in their Socials 10 class. The first was a video game they had to create and the second was an inquiry project about World War Two. Tatla students loved the challenge and spent hours and hours on these projects. They received excellent marks; one student receiving 155% for all the extra effort she put into her project.
I (Clare Gordon) felt honoured to be able to take four students to the BC Student Leadership Conference in Surrey this past October. The Tatla students were excellent ambassadors of our school. They especially enjoyed the community service work they had to do – clean up Crescent Beach in White Rock. Our students took on the job with gusto and were thrilled being near the ocean. They brought back the enthusiasm from the conference and created a Student Council at our school. The Student Council went on to organize the Remembrance Day ceremony, made morning announcements, and created a Valentine’s assembly, complete with puppet show and school friendship dance.
Comprehensive School Health Plan
Cultural Component
Physical Environment & Healthy Eating:
Emotional Environment & School Connectedness
Teaching and Learning Curriculum
Parent & Community Partnerships
B.) Curriculum: Core Competencies & FPPL
Sharing:
We plan:
Advice:
Checking: There was a significant turnover of our students and staff during the year, but we had good buy in from everyone, and real enthusiasm to complete this first project in 2018-19.
We continued to see positive impacts in incorporating student voice in reading programs. We continued with initiatives from last year to build classroom and school library resources through having students help select additions to the collection. Students demonstrate increased engagement in our daily school wide reading time when they can pick from books they have help selected to be in their classrooms. A school wide reader of the week program proved successful. Students were nominated by their teachers and had their pictures featured in the public/school library space as well as the school newsletter along with their book recommendations and short interview about what they liked about reading.
2016-2017: Brian Davidson will support the West Schools (Anahim Lake, Tatla Lake, Naghtaneqed, Dog Creek, and Alexis Creek) this year as each pursues its own specific inquiry.
Anahim Lake:
Anahim Lake staff spent considerable time in the scanning phase of the inquiry process this year and is prepared to take action and continue with the same question next year.
Naghtaneqed:
Dog Creek:
Tatla Lake:
Alexis Creek:
Inquiry Question: What is the effect of using tactile real world learning experiences in K-10 mathematics classrooms?
Analysis:
Reflection:
2015-2016: Brian Davidson will facilitate the West Schools (Anahim Lake, Tatla Lake, Naghtaneqed and Alexis Creek) this year.
West Rural Schools met at the first CI Day of the year to consolidate planning for the year. In the previous May/June we had come to consensus that our question for the year would revolve around investigating the impact training teachers in the SIOP would have on student literacy. With the turnover in staff (teaching and admin), there was a desire to look again at the question. As a new starting point, and to test out how technology might support a different model of collaborating, we decided to meet together after school to discuss reading/writing reciprocity as shared at the Summer Institute this year by Sandy Figueroa. We met online but experience technical glitches at both Naghtaneqed and Anahim Lake. At the same time, I learned that Alexis Creek had obtained funding to support a 0.1 PLC position and the school was going to investigate its school-based question. Both Naghtaneqed and Anahim Lake were keen to not take on any other initiatives and wanted to focus inwardly this year. Both schools committed to doing some thinking and planning toward what next year would look like so that a good, quicker start could be achieved in September 2016. Tatla is keen to find a model that allows for continuing face-to-face contact. Each school still put effort into thinking about and working on their Building Resilient Learners Plan Goals, as follows:
Anahim Lake: How will using specific structures increase student independence in writing?
Naghtaneqed: To what extent will our students’ writing skills improve if we demonstrate an explicit focus on current writing instruction practices as outlined in the book, Writing Power, by Adrienne Gear?
Tatla Lake: How will writing a book (Hoofprints in History) at the secondary level and having writing anthologies displayed at the K-7 level, increase student writing output?
Alexis Creek:
Our second criteria for success was that student engagement in writing tasks increase as measured by teacher assessment through anecdotal records. Disengagement with typical academic writing tasks was an identified challenge at the beginning of the project. Both Primary and Intermediate teachers noticed a high level of engagement on two levels: (1) the inclusion of Chilcotin culture and language and (2) the use of iPads as a writing tool.
All teachers and support staff involved with the project remarked on the high level of engagement with storytelling aspect of the project. On the inclusion of Chilcotin culture and language:
Both primary and intermediate teachers used the iPad at the final stages of the story writing process. Teachers introduced the iPad as a ‘final draft’ tool, initial drafts having been written in a more traditional manner by hand as a part of various classroom assignments. Students used the “Book Creator” app to craft illustrated picture books which were then published as both digital and hard copy books. Teachers related that student engagement with editing and re-writing a final draft increased with the introduction of the iPads.
Both teachers identified an interest in their students in using iPads for writing again. Both teachers also expressed a commitment to utilize iPads in writing tasks in the future.
Our final criteria for success was that students demonstrate an increase in writing level based on teacher assessment as per BC Performance Standards indicators. Both teachers identified a higher level of achievement overall linked to the project. The final project represented a higher level of achievement for many students, likely linked to their level of engagement throughout the writing, editing, and publishing process. However, both teachers also mentioned that as writing for the project primarily occurred in the latter half of the year. It is hard to ascertain if the increase in writing skills for individual students when measured against their September SWW is directly linked to the project or represents an overall increase in skills over the course of the school year. Students were also supported by the iPad technology in writing mechanics, which both teachers identified as lowering their level of frustration with the writing process and resulted in a higher level of achievement than if they were writing without supports.
Another challenge was supporting teacher release time so that they might focus on the project. TTOC shortages impacted our ability to secure a TTOC particularly during the winter months. The primary and intermediate teachers elected not to request release time as a result. However, both teachers identified that they felt the time could have been useful to them. All teachers and support staff involved with the project remarked on how many stages of the project required one on one support. Particularly at the primary level, students required a lot of support in publishing their books on the iPad.
Both intermediate and primary teachers identified the project as a success based on the criteria set at the beginning of the project. They both expressed that following the writing process through to a publication of a digital and hard copy book was an important part of the students’ experience:
There were other ‘spill over’ positive impacts of the project. All involved staff have an increased level of comfort with teaching and facilitating learning with iPads as a result of the project. The awareness of the iPad as a useful and useable tool for learning, both writing and for other academic tasks, increased throughout the duration of the project. Hopefully this will lead to increase use for future projects and assignments. Many of the teachers involved with the project expressed an interest in further professional development in the use of iPad apps for classroom learning.
Another positive impact was an increased awareness of Chilcotin language among non-Chilcotin teaching and support staff. In having to facilitate the inclusion of Chilcotin language and culture in student projects, teachers and support staff found their own knowledge bases growing. Several new initiatives at the school can be linked to this increased awareness including the creation of Chilcotin language room signs throughout the school and a planned project for a Chilcotin language welcome sign at the entrance of the school. In addition, the use of Chilcotin language for months and days has been incorporated into the main senior classroom.
Overall, the project was a successful and positive experience for the school but also has left us with opportunities for continued growth.
The West Schools (Anahim Lake, Tatla Lake, Naghtaneqed and Alexis Creek) will be working together this year, supported by Brian Davidson. The inquiry questions they are working on are:
What is the effect of filling our classroom libraries with First Nations content and authors on literacy engagement?
How will a focus on developing student background knowledge/vocabulary help improve student comprehension?
How will activating discussions on reading/writing tasks improve student comprehension?
Anahim Lake: Studying upcoming potentially difficult vocabulary words before students read chapters did improve student reading comprehension. Some of the patterns that emerged from this process were that on the chapters that we did pre-study potentially difficult vocabulary words, there was an improvement in comprehension testing for those chapters. We know this because our data shows that out of the ten chapters that we did study vocabulary beforehand compared to the chapters that we did not demonstrated statistical improvements in comprehension testing. The group that did study the vocabulary beforehand demonstrated a 7.5% improvement over the group that did not study vocabulary before chapters (56% yes compared to 48.5% no.)
Naghtaneqed: Focusing on developing student background knowledge and vocabulary has improved student comprehension. The results tell me that direct teaching of vocabulary and discussing background knowledge prior or during the lesson has increased the comprehension level of the students. Patterns show that students have started to use more varied vocabulary words in their everyday speech but vocabulary usage has not transferred to their writing unless there has been specific emphasis on incorporating vocabulary words. Students have also gained the confidence to ask or confirm about words that they don't know instead of staying quiet. While reading the story 'A Bad Case of the Stripes', one of the boys stopped the reading and asked what the word contagious meant. Without me having to say anything, another student jumped in and said that it meant that it could be spread. Then a short but effective discussion happened between the two students which led to greater comprehension of both students and the class. In the students’ writing, specifically their journals, there is little evidence that the vocabulary teaching has transferred to their writing. Three of the nine students showed use of a more varied vocabulary usage in their journal writing, but one was already strong in his language usage and the other two only used vocabulary words when specifically reminded or prompted.
Anahim Lake: I have learned as a result of this process that teaching difficult vocabulary related to the upcoming lesson before the unit or chapter will improve student comprehension. I have noticed that if my students better understand the words that are part of the unit that they will be more successful in their learning. I will definitely consider continuing to teach vocabulary before units and during units as it will help students better understand the material that is being taught. Some things I might do differently in the future is to actually tell the students the reasons that I am doing vocabulary some units and not in others so that the students understand the process. I would also like to work a bit closer with other teachers through the collaborative process. Overall, I am glad that we did this inquiry and find the information to be valuable. I will use the information learned through this process to help guide future lesson plans.
Naghtaneqed: For next time, I would focus more on oral notes rather than the writing part for gathering data. It seems that the students need to master using the vocabulary words in their everyday speech before they can comprehend, transfer and use these word in their writing. Looking at the writing is good, as it shows growth, but probably should be a more secondary data collection with less emphasis. Next time I would try to stick to teaching one general vocabulary word a week and build activities around it so students would be able to both use the word while speaking and give opportunities for them to use it when they write. This year I taught vocabulary mainly through other lessons which did work very well but was topic specific. I feel that a more general vocabulary basis would be more beneficial to teach as these words are used more frequently in conversation. For examples words like lethargic, ruckus, profuse, and extraordinary. For next year, having a once a month conferencing time with the other teachers in the school or a short thirty minute meeting twice a month would be beneficial to getting everyone on the same page and problem solving. This time would be a nice focus time to just think about the inquiry process and how it is evolving, what could be changed, or what is going really well. Maybe looking at meeting up with all of the other primary or intermediate teachers from the rural schools would also be helpful so ideas could be shared on how the same inquiry topic is being tackled at different schools by teachers.