Dang!

Post date: Feb 23, 2014 8:40:30 PM

Dang!  Maybe you can explain to me over lunch why the expression I was using is wrong.  Does it imply dependence that is somehow squeezed out of the expression you provided?

I changed it and remade the figure, and it did make a noticeable difference in the result.  I had to move the label "bridge" on slide 23 a few points to the left.

Scott