Guiding Questions for Ramsey's "Facts and Propositions"

1. What is the purpose of the paper?

2. What’s Ramsey’s account of Russell’s “On the Nature of Truth and Falsehood?”

3. What’s Ramsey’s argument to the conclusion that truth is just a linguistic muddle?

4. What’s the conclusion Ramsey draws from it?

5. Why is, according to Ramsey, pointless to analyse truth in terms of correspondence?

Google Sites

Report abuse