Intelligent Support for Learning in Groups
Workshop at the 11th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems
June 15, 2012
Chania, Crete, Greece
Contact
Jihie Kim : jihie@isi.edu
Rohit Kumar : rkumar@bbn.com
Discussion Session: Group Assessment
(Moderated by Beverly Woolf)
Very little work has been done in this area of research and few research conclusions are present (even the researchers at the ITS conference did not know of significant bodies of work in the area)
Discussion Session: Tools
(Moderated by Jihie Kim)
Tools; interactive tabletops to collaboration In classroom. Capturing tools, visualizations. Problem; how can my tool be used later on by other authors? How can tools be combined?
What are the common things a table top have? What can be generalized? Simple example, two groups that have a discussion with one another. What kind of activity is measured? How relevant is the activity? How equal is the work distributed within the group. What kind of questions are proposed within group discussion?
Tool; check tool that checks specific activity on svn, gives insights in group activity.
Difference between group work with roles, and collaborative work, in which everyones works together on 1 task, rather than everyone having his or her personal role.
Tools, how can tools be intergrated with each other. How can hey talk to each other. Possible solution; standardize tools. Or change the management, they way we think and build tools. Essentials idea; a homogenious setup, the way you interact with the system is very important.
Tool intergration is a problem, the combination of tools just leads to a new tool, which does no tackle the problem necessarily.
Is there an abstract state we can make in student group behaviour? Dependancy is really of importance.
Authoring tools; authoring scenario's and knowledge, does is compare, or is it correct with existing knowledge?
Discussion Session: Strategies
(Moderated by Art Graesser)
*Cooperation of leaders and roles
Symmetrical vs. asymmetrical
All equal but different perspective
Learning Types-->strategies of collaboration
specialized k , perspectives
Task leaders
Everybody see role
* Teachers training and student learning
Difficulty of training teacher
Value added for students
Students need model of interactions
social dimensions of education
Modeling good social interaction
Rating contributions--points on quantity and quality
* different perspective, tension -> produce better solution
* Group scale: every in the world/ class/ small group
* emotion: how to get rid of negative affect
Roster
Jihie Kim, Information Sciences Institute / University of Southern California, USA
Rohit Kumar, BBN, USA
Susan Bull, University of Birmingham, UK
Ilya Goldin, Canegie Mellon Univ., USA
Ana Paiva, INESC-ID and IST, Portugal
Art Graesser, University of Memphis
Oliver Scheuer, Saarland Univ.
Fazel Keshtkar, Univ. of Memphis, USA
Beverly Woolf, Univ. of Mass., USA
Gerard Veeshof, Univ. of Amsterdam
Sebastian Gross, Clausthal University of Tech
Nguyen-Thinh, Clausthal University of Tech
Liapis Antonios, IT unit. of Copenhagen
Caitlin Mills, Univ. of Notre Dame
Blair Lehman, University of Memphis, USA
Stergios Tegos, Aristotle Univ. of Thessalouiki
David Adamson, Canegie Mellon Univ.
Keith Brawner, Army Research Lab/Univ of Central Florida
Mihai Dasaceler, Univ. of Politehnica of Bucharest/University of Grenoble
Stephan Trausan-Matu, University Politehnica of Bucharest
Erin Shaw, University of Southern California, USA
Ricky Sethi, University of Southern California, USA
Roberto Martinez, University of Sydney, Australia