Publications
Publications in Refereed Journals
[104] Gilbert, F, Russo, I. 2024. Mind-reading in AI and neurotechnology: evaluating claims, hype, and ethical implications for neurorights. AI and Ethics. DOI:10.1007/s43681-024-00514-6
[103] Gilbert, F, Russo, I. 2024. Neurorights: The land of speculative ethics and alarming claims? American Journal of Bioethics -Neuroscience. 15(2):113-115. DOI: 10.1080/21507740.2024.2328244
[102] Harris, A, Gilbert, F. 2024. The need for greater post-trial support for clinical trial participants assessing high-risk, irreversible treatments. Journal of Medical Ethics. 10.1136/jme-2023-109719
[101] Gilbert, F. Pateraki, M, Harris A, Forthcoming. Benefits vs. Risks: Neural Device Maintenance and Potential Abandonment. American Journal of Bioethics -Neuroscience. 15(3):10.1080/21507740.2024.2365145
[100] Okun, MS, Marjenin T, Ekanayake J, Gilbert F et al. 2024 Definition of Implanted Neurological Device Abandonment: A Systematic Review and Consensus Statement. JAMA -Network Open.
[99] Harris, A., McGivern, P, Gilbert, F, Van Bergen, N, 2024. Defining biomarkers in stem cell-derived tissue constructs for drug and disease screening. Advanced Healthcare Materials: e2401433. doi:10.1002/adhm.202401433.
[98] Gilbert, F, Ienca, M, Cook M, 2023. How I became myself after merging with a computer: Does human-machine symbiosis raise human rights issues? Brain Stimulation. 16 (3): 783-789. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2023.04.016
[97] Gilbert, F, Harris, A, Viana JN. 2023. Addressing the nuances of racial disparities in deep brain stimulation. The Lancet -Regional Heatlh Americas. 27:100614
[96] Gilbert, F, Russo, I. 2023. Making the Cut: What Could Be Evidence for a 'Minimal Definition of Neurorights'?. American Journal of Bioethics- Neuroscience. 14(4):382-384
[95] Tacca, A., Gilbert F., 2023. Why Won't You Listen to Me? Predictive Neurotechnology and Epistemic Authority. Neuroethics. 10.1007/s12152-023-09527-0
[94] Bublitz, C, Gilbert, F, Soekadar, SR, 2023. Concerns with the promotion of deep brain stimulation for obsessive-compulsive disorder, Nature Medicine. 29. 18 DOI:10.1038/s41591-022-02087-5.
[93] Bublitz C., Gilbert, F., 2023. Legal aspects of unwanted device explantations: A comment on the patient R case. Brain Stimulation. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2023.09.008
[92] Gilbert, F., Russo, I., Ineichen, C., 2023. Caused by Deep Brain Stimulation? How to measure a Je ne sais quoi. American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience. 14(3): 305-307. DOI: 10.1080/21507740.2023.2243888
[91] Gilbert, F, Smith, J. 2023. Empirical imperatives in understanding self-related changes. Philosophical Explorations. DOI: 10.1080/13869795.2023.2185660
[90] Pantoja, I.E, Smirnova, L, [..] Gilbert, F. [...] et al, 2023. First Organoid Intelligence (OI) workshop for form an OU cmmunity. Frontiers Artificial intelligence, Volume 6 DOI:10.3389/frai.2023.1116870
[89] Scarpazza C, Costa C, [...] Gilbert, F, [...] , et al., 2023. 'Acquired Pedophilia: international Delphi-method-based consensus guidelines', Translational Psychiatry pp. 1-17. ISSN 2158-3188
[88] Hartung T, Smirnova L, Pantoja IEM, [...] Gilbert, F, [...], et al., 2023. 'The Baltimore declaration toward the exploration of organoid intelligence', Frontiers in Science pp. 1-3. ISSN 2166-6083
[87] Gilbert F, Smith J, Daly A. 2022. Is theory fading away from reality? Examining the pathology rather than the technology to understand potential personality changes American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience. 14:1, 45-47 DOI: 10.1080/21507740.2022.2150712
[86] Gilbert, F., Tubig, P., Harris A. 2022. Not-So-Straightforward Decisions to Keep or Explant a Device: When does Neural Device Removal Become Patient Coercion? American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience. 13(4), 230-232 DOI 10.1080/21507740.2022.2126544
[85] Stevens, I., Gilbert., F. 2022. International regulatory standards for qualitative measurements in deep brain stimulation in clinical research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics. 10.1177/15562646221094922
[84] Kagan, B Duc, D, Stevens, S., Gilbert F. 2022. Neurons embodied in virtual world: Evidence for organoid ethics? American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience. 13:2, 114-117, DOI: 10.1080/21507740.2022.2048731
[83] Harris, A and Gilbert F. 2022. Visualising the risks of clinical trials for fair treatment and appropriate informed consent of participants. Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophtalmology. DOI:10.1007/s00417-022-05558-0
[82] Harris, A., Walker, MJ, Gilbert, F, McGiven, P. 2022 Investigating the feasibility and ethical implications of phenotypic screening using stem cell derived tissue models to detect and manage disease. Stem Cells Reports. Vol 7:1-10, DOI: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2022.04.002
[81] Gilbert, F., Viana, JNM, Bittlinger, M., Stevens, I., Farrow, M., Dodds, S., Vicker J., Illes, J. 2021. Invasive experimental brain surgery for dementia: ethical shifts in clinical research practices? Bioethics http://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12961
[80] Gilbert, F., Harris, A., Kidd, M. 2021. Burnt in Your Memory or Burnt Memory? Ethical Issues with Optogenetics for Memory Modification. American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience. 12 (1): 22-24
[79] Harris, A and Gilbert F . 2021. Restoring vision using optogenetics without being blind to the risks. Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophtalmology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-021-05477-6.
[78] Stevens, I., Gilbert, F. 2021. Ethical examination of deep brain stimulation’s ‘last resort’ status. Journal of Medical Ethics. DOI 10.1136/medethics-2020-106609
[77] Gilbert, F. Lancelot, M. 2021 Incoming ethical issues for Deep Brian Stimulation: When long term treatment lead to a "new form of disease". Journal of Medical Ethics. 47: 20-25 DOI 10.1136/medethics-2019-106052
[76] Gilbert, F. Viaña JMN., Ineichen C. 2021 Deflating the "DBS causes personality changes" bubble. Neuroethics. DOI: 10.1007/s12152-018-9373-8
[75] Gilbert, F. Viaña JMN., Ineichen C. 2021. Deflating the "DBS causes personality changes" bubble: The Authors Reply. Neuroethics DOI 10.1007/s12152-020-09437-5
[74] Stevens I., Gilbert F. 2020 N-of-1 Trial for Closed-Loop Deep Brain Stimulation Devices. Ethics & Human Research - The Hasting Center. DOI 10.1002/eahr.500045
[73] Gilbert, F., Cook, M., O'Brien, T., Illes, J., 2019 Embodiment and Estrangement: Results from a First-in-Human "Intelligent Brain Computer Interface" Trial. Science and Engineering Ethics. 25 (1): 83-96 DOI 10.1007/s11948-017-0001-5
[72] Gilbert, F., Pham, C., Viana, JNM, Gillam, W., 2019. Increasing brain-computer interfaces media depictions: pressing ethical concerns. Brain-Computer Interfaces. 6(3):49-70 https://doi.org/10.1080/2326263X.2019.1655837
[71] Pham, C., Gilbert, F., 2019 Unbacked Futures: Ethical issues raised by news media futuristic depiction of Brain-Computer Interfaces. Bioethica Forum. 12(1/2):15-28.
[70] Gilbert, F., Brown, T., Dasgupta, I., Martens, H., Klein, E., Goering S., 2019 An instrument to capture the phenomenology of implantable brain device use. Neuroethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-019-09422-7
[69] Gilbert, F., O'Brien T., Cook M. 2018 The effects of closed-loop Brain Implants on Autonomy and Deliberation: What are the Risks of Being Kept in the Loop? Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics (Neuroethics Now) 27(2): 316-325.
[68] Gilbert, F., Tubig, P., 2018 Cognitive Enhancement with Brain Implants: The Burden of Abnormality. Journal of cognitive Enhancement. 2(4): 364-368 doi.org/10.1007/s41465-018-0105-0
[67] Gilbert, F. and Viaña JMN, 2018 A Personal narrative on living and dealing with psychiatric symptoms after DBS surgery. Narrative Inquiry in Bioethics. 8(1): 67-78. 10.1353/nib.2018.0024
[66] Viaña JMN, Carter A, Gilbert, F, 2018 Of Meatballs and Invasive Neurotechnological Trials: Additional Considerations for Complex Clinical Decisions. American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience. 9 (2): 100-104
[65] Viaña JMN, Gilbert, F., 2018 Deep Brain Stimulation for people with Alzheimer's disease: anticipating potential effects on the tripartie self. Dementia: International journal of social research and practice. 18(7-8):2836-2855 DOI:10.1177/1471301218761147
[64] Gilbert, F. 2018 Deep Brain Stimulation: Inducing Self-Estrangement. Neuroethics. 11(2): 157-165 DOI: 10.1007/s12152-017-9334-7
[63] Gilbert, F., Goddard, E., Viaña JMN, Carter, A., Horne, M., 2017 "I Miss Being Me": Phenomenological effects of Deep Brain Stimulation. American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 8(2):96-109 DOI 10.1080/21507740.2017.1320319
[62] Gilbert, F., Viaña JMN, O'Connell, C., Dodds S., 2018 Enthusiastic Portrayal of 3D Bioprinting in the Media: Ethical side effects. Bioethics 32(2):94-102 DOI:10.1111/bioe.12414
[61] Viaña JMN, Vickers, JC, Cook, MJ and Gilbert, F., 2017 Currents of memory: recent progress, translational challenges, and ethical considerations in fornix deep brain stimulation trials for Alzheimer's disease, Neurobiology of Aging. 56: 202-210 DOI 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2017.03.001
[60] Viaña JMN, Bittlinger MA, Gilbert, F., 2017 Ethical considerations for deep brain stimulation trials in patients with early-onset Alzheimer's disease, Journal of Alzheimer's Disease. DOI 10.3233/JAD-161073
[59] Gilbert, F., O'Connell, C., Mladenovska, T., Dodds S., 2018 "Print me an organ?" Ethical and regulatory issues emerging from 3D bioprinting in medicine. Science and Engineering Ethics. 24. 73-91 DOI 10.1007/s11948-017-9874-6
[58] Viaña JMN, Bueno RJ, Gilbert F., 2017 Beyond genomic association: ethical implications of elucidating disease mechanisms and genotype-influenced treatment response. American Journal of Bioethics. 17 (4): 24-26
[57] Gilbert, F., Viaña JMN, Vranic A., 2016 Acquired Paedophillia and Moral Responsibility, American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience, 7 (4):209-211 DOI: 10.1080/21507740.2016.1244221
[56] Viaña JMN, Freitas L, Severo MC, Gilbert F 2016 Decoded Neurofeedback: Eligibility, Applicability and Reliability Issues for use in Schizophrenia and Major Depressive Disorder, American Journal of Bioethics: Neuroscience. 7 (2): 127-129
[55] Viaña, JNM, Gilbert F, 2016 Big Explanations for Big Expectations: Deriving Lessons from the Human Genome and Blue Brain Projects, American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience. 7 (1): 18-20.
[54] Gilbert, F., 2015 A threat to Autonomy? The Intrusion of Predictive Brain Devices. American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience. 6 (4): 4-11 DOI: 10.1080/21507740.2015.1076087
[53] Gilbert, F., Cook, M., 2015 Are Predictive Brain Implants an Indispensable Feature of Autonomy?, Bioethica Forum. 8 (4): 121-127
[52] Gilbert, F., Harris, A., Kapsa, R., and Dodds, S., 2015 Is a 'last chance' treatment possible after an irreversible brain intervention? AJOB Neuro 6 (2) W1-W2 DOI:10.1080/21507740.2015.1037469.
[51] Gilbert, F., Vranic, A., 2015, Pedophilia, Invasive Brain Intervention and Punishment, Journal of Bioethical Inquiry. 12 (3): 521-526 DOI:10.1007/s11673-015-9647-3
[50] Gilbert, F., 2015, State of the Concussion Debate: From Sceptical to Alarmist Claims. Neuroethics. 8 (1): 47-53. DOI 10.1007/s12152-014-9219-y
[49] Johnson, L.S, Partridge, B., Gilbert F., 2015, Framing the Debate: Concussion and Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. Neuroethics 8(1):1-4 DOI 10.1007/s12152-015-9233-8
[48] Gilbert, F., Focquaert, F., 2015 Rethinking Responsibility in Offenders with Acquired Pedophilia: Punishment or Treatment? The International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 38-1: 51-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2015.01.007
[47] Gilbert, F., Harris, A., and Kapsa, R., (2014), Controlling Brain Cells with Light: Ethical Considerations for Optogenetics Trials, American Journal of Bioethics: Neuroscience. 5 (3):3-11. DOI:10.1080/21507740.2014.911213
[46] Gilbert, F., (2014) Self-Estrangement & Deep Brain Stimulation: Ethical issues related to Forced Explantation Neuroethics. 8(2): 107-114 DOI 10.1007/s12152-014-9224-1
[45] Gilbert, F., (2014), Just Another Spot: How to Miss the Ethical Target?, American Journal of Bioethics: Neuroscience. 5 (4): 85-87.
[44] Gilbert, F., Goddard, E., (2014), Thinking Ahead too Much: Speculative Ethics and Implantable Brain Devices, American Journal of Bioethics: Neuroscience. 5 (1): 49-51. DOI: 10.1080/21507740.2013.863252
[43] Vranic, A., Gilbert, F., (2014), Prognostics Implication of Preoperative Behavior Changes in Patients with High-grade Meningiomas, The Scientific World Journal, vol. 2014, Article ID 398295, 5 pages. DOI:10.1155/2014/398295.
[42] Gilbert, F., (2013) Deep Brain Stimulation and Postoperative Suicidability Among Treatment Resistant Depression Patients: Should Eligibility Protocols Exclude Patients with History of Suicide Attempts and Anger/Impulsivity? American Journal of Bioethics: Neuroscience. 4 (1): 28-35. DOI: 10.1080/21507740.2012.740143
[41] Gilbert, F., Dodds, S., (2013) Is There a Moral Obligation to Develop brain Implants Involving NanoBionics Technologies? Ethical Issues for Clinical Trials. Nanoethics: Ethics for Technologies that Converge at the Nanoscale. 8:49-56 DOI 10.1007/s11569-013-0177-3
[40] Gilbert, F., (2013) Deep Brain Stimulation for Treatment Resistant Depression: Postoperative Feeling of Self-Estrangement, Suicide Attempt and Impulsive-Aggressive Behaviours. Neuroethics. 6(3): 473-481 DOI: 10.1007/s12152-013-9178-8
[39] Gilbert, F., Dodds, S., (2013) How to Turn Ethical Neglect into Ethical Approval? American Journal of Bioethics: Neuroscience. 4 (2): 59-60 DOI: 10.1080/21507740.2013.782914
[38] Gilbert, F., Vranic, A., Hurst, S., (2013), Involuntary & Voluntary Invasive Brain Surgery: Ethical Issues Related to Acquired Aggressiveness. Neuroethics. 6: 115-128 DOI: 10.1007/s12152-012-9161-9 Epub 2012.
[37] Gilbert, F., (2012), The Burden of Normality: From 'chronically ill' to 'symptom free'. New Ethical challenges for Deep Brain Stimulation postoperative treatment, Journal of Medical Ethics. 38: 408-412, doi:10.1136/medethics-2011-100044
[36] Gilbert, F., Harris, A., and Kapsa, R., (2012) Efficacy Testing as a Primary Purpose of Phase 1 Clinical Trials: Is it Applicable to First-in-Human Bionics and Optogenetics Trials? American Journal of Bioethics: Neuroscience. Volume 3, Issue 2, 20-22
[35] Gilbert, F., and Partridge., B., (2012) The need to tackle concussion in Australian football codes, The Medical Journal of Australia. 196 (9). 561-563.
[34] Gilbert, F., and Johnson, S., (2011) The impact of football-related concussion in youth athletes, American Journal of Bioethics: Neuroscience, Volume 2, Number 4, 48-59.
[33] Bretzner, F., Gilbert, F., Baylis, F., & Brownstone, R., (2011) Target populations for first-in-human embryonic stem cell research in spinal cord injury, Cell Stem Cell, 8, 468-475.
[32] Gilbert, F., and Baertschi, B., (2011) Neuroenhancement: Much ado about Nothing?, American Journal of Bioethics: Neuroscience, Volume 2, Number 4, 45-47
[31] Gilbert, F., (2011), Working while under the influence of performance enhancing drugs: is one “more responsible”?, American Journal of Bioethics: Neuroscience. Volume 2, Number 3, 57-59.
[30] Bretzner, F., Gilbert, F., Baylis, F., & Brownstone, R., (2011), Subject selection for first first-in-human hESC-derived GRNOPC1 research: A Response to Wirth et al. 2011, Cell Stem Cell, Online Comments, Epub.
[29] Gilbert, F., and Ovadia, D., (2011) Deep brain stimulation in the media: over-optimistic media portrayals calls for a new strategy involving journalists and scientifics in the ethical debate, Journal of Integrative in Neuroscience, 5 : 16, doi:10.3389/fnint.2011.00016.
[28] Fenton, A., and Gilbert, F., (2011), On the Use of Animals in emergent embryonic Stem Cell Research for Spinal Cord Injuries, Journal of Animal Ethics, Volume 1, (10), 37-45.
[27] Gilbert, F., Burns, L., Krahn, T., (2011) Imaging the brain: The inheritance, power and predicaments of the “brain reading metaphor”. Medicine Studies. Volume 2, Number 4, 229-244. ISSN 1876-4533, DOI 10.1007/s12376-010-0054-0
[26] Gilbert, F., (2010), Is an exclusive retributive justice appropriate to tackle paedophilic crime? Une justice exclusivement rétributive est-elle adaptée à la lutte contre le crime pédophile ? Psychiatrie et Violence, Volume 10, n. 1. DOI : 10.7202/1005715ar
[25] Munsterhjelm, M., Gilbert, F., (2010) How do research duties conflict with Aboriginal Rights? Genetics Research and Biobank Problem in Taiwan. Dilemata : International Journal of Applied Ethics, 4, 33-56. ISSN 1989-7022
[24] Gilbert, F., Wenger, A., (2010), Reading in the brain. Hektoen International Journal. Volume 2, Issue 2 - May 2010, ISSN: 2155-3017
[23] Gilbert, F., Outram, S., (2009) Chemical Interventions and Ethical side-effects, ACCN Canadian Chemical, September 2009, 20-21.
[22] Wenger, A., Gilbert, F., (2007), The brain like an open book? Le cerveau à livre ouvert, Revue Médicale Suisse, vol 3, 2564-2566.
Scholarly Book Chapters
[21] Tacca A., Gilbert F., 2024. Just Copy-paste me! Assessing the risk of epistemic dependence on large language models. In Anna Strasser (ed.) Anna's AI Anthology. Berlin: Xenemoi
[20] Furlanis, T., Gilbert, F., (2023) Aiming at Well-being with Brain Implants: Any risk of Implanting Unprecedented Vulnerabilities ? Eds Boubil & Ferrarello. The Vulnerability of the human world. Springer.
[19] Tubig P. Gilbert, F., (2023) "The Trauma of losing your own identity again": The Ethics of Explantation of Brain-Computer Interfaces. in Dubljevic V and Coin A (eds) Policy, Identity, and Neurotecnology: The Neuroethics of Brain-Computer Interfaces. Springer
[18] Harris, A., Gilbert, F., (2022) Incorporation of high risk Brain-Computer Interface experiments into a stratified risk framework clinical trials . In D. Messelken/D. Winkler (eds) Health Care in Contexts of Risk, Uncertainty, and Hybridity. Military and Humanitarian Medical Ethics. pp 253-273. Springer
[17] Furlanis, T., Gilbert, F., (2023) Is enhancement with brain-computer interfaces ethical? Evidence in favour of symbiotic augmentation. Eds Jotterand & Ienca. The Routledge hanbook of the ethics of human enhancement.
[16] Gilbert F., Dodds S., (2020) Is there anything wrong with using AI implantable brain devices to prevent convicted offenders from reoffending? Neuro-interventions and the Law: Regulating Human Mental Capacity, Edited by Nicole A Vincent, Oxford University Press.
[15] Steven, I, Gilbert F. (2020) Experimental Usage of AI Brain-Computer Interfaces: Computerize errors, side-effects, and alteration of personality. In Military and Humanitarian Medical Ethics, Volume Ethics of Military Medical Innovation, Experimentation, and Enhancement. Editors D. Messelken/D. Winkler. Springer
[14] Miletic, T., Gilbert F. (2020) Does AI Brain Implant Compromise Agency? Examining Potential Harms of Brain-Computer Interfaces on Self-Determination. In Artificial Intelligence and Information: A Multidisciplinary Perspective. Eds S.S. Gouveia & J.F. Teixeira. Vernon Press.
[13] Gilbert, F., Stevens, I., Hurst, S., (2023) Fairness in military care: Might a hybrid concept of equity be the answer? For Military and Humanitarian Medical Ethics Series. Editors D. Messelken/D. Winkler. Springer
[12] Gilbert, F., (2013) Nano-Bionic Devices for Purpose of Cognitive Enhancement: Toward a Preliminary Ethical Framework, Chapter 11, 125-138, In E. Hildt and A. Franke (eds.), Cognitive Enhancement: An Interdisciplinary Perspective, Trends in Augmentation of Human Performance 1, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-6253-4 11, © Springer Science Business Media Dordrecht 2013.
[11] Gilbert, F., (2013), Does neuropathology dictate morality? Acquired paedophilia as a neuroethical case. Chapter 7, 97-110, In Morality: Reasoning on Different Approaches, Vasil Gluchman (ed.), Rodopi Publication. Value Inquiry Book Serie, Amsterdam New-York.
[10] Gilbert, F., Burns, L., Krahn, T., (2012) Imaging the brain: The inheritance, power and predicaments of the “brain reading metaphor”, 81-102, In Medical Imaging and Philosophy : Challenges, reflections and actions, (eds.: H. Fangerau, R. Chhem, I Muller, S-C Wang, ), Franz Steiner Verlag, Stuttgart.
[9] Gilbert, F., (2009), Does neurobiological determinism entail the end of criminal responsibility?, Applied ethics: Life, Environment and Society, Edited by Center for Applied Ethics and Philosophy, Published by Center for Applied Ethics and Philosophy, Hokkaido University, Japan, 37-45 ISBN: 978-4-9904046-1-1
Refereed Conference Proceedings (full papers)
[8] Gilbert, F., (2008), Neuroethics: Should We Rethink Free Will and Criminal Responsibility?, Proceeding of the Third International Conference in Applied Ethics at Hokkaido University, Japan, November 21-23, 2008, 87-95
Reprint (Refereed Publications)
[7] Gilbert, F., and Ovadia, D., (2012) Deep brain stimulation in the media: over-optimistic media portrayals calls for a new strategy involving journalists and scientifics in the ethical debate, in The Development of Deep Brain Stimulation for Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders: Clinical, Societal and Ethical Issues. Edited by T.E. Schlaepfer and C. Saviane. Frontiers in Integrative in Neuroscience, doi:10.3389/978-2-88919-040-9
Book
[6] Wallace, G.G., Cornock, R.C., O'Connell, C.D., Beirne, S.,Dodds S and Gilbert, F., (2014) 3D BioPrinting: Printing Parts for Bodies. ARC Centre of Excellence for Electromaterials Science, ISBN:978-0-646-92867-8
Book Review
[5] Viaña JMN, Gilbert, F, (2018) 32 Shades of Neuroethics - A Review of The Routledge Handbook of Neuroethics edited by Johnson and Rommelfanger. American Journal of Bioethics. W1-W3
Other publications
[4] Vickers, J., and Gilbert, F., (2013) Brain Danger, Medical Journal of Australia InSight. Epub. 29 January 2013.
[3] Partridge B and Gilbert F, (2012) Correcting our Blurred Vision on Football Concussions, The Conversation, http://theconversation.edu.au/correcting-our-blurred-vision-on-football-concussions-6926
[2] Gilbert, F., (2010) Deep Brain Stimulation: From Parkinson’s treatment to personality enhancement? CyberTherapy & Rehabilitation Magazine, Issue 2, 17-18, ISSN: 2031-278.
[1] Gilbert, F., (2009) Geron’s hESC trial for spinal cord injury: The risk of therapeutic misconception, Bioethics Forum, The Hastings Center, April 17.