Prior engagements

I have testified (by expert report, declaration, deposition, and/or trial testimony) in the following matters:

  • 1997: Hewlett-Packard Company versus CEO of United Epitaxy Company (Taiwan). Nature: Trade secret misappropriation. Law firm: Morrison & Foerster LLP, Washington DC. Venue: US District Court.
  • 1998: Hewlett-Packard Company versus United Epitaxy Company (Taiwan). Nature: Patent infringement. Law firm: Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, Redwood Shores, California. Venue: US District Court for the Northern District of California.
  • 2006: Kerr Company versus 3M and Dentsply International Company. Nature: Patent infringement. Law Firm: Woodcock Washburn LLP, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Venue: US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin.
  • 2006: Nichia Corporation (Japan) versus Seoul Semiconductor Company (South Korea). Nature: Design patent infringement. Law firm: Foley & Lardner LLP Washington DC. Venue: U.S. District Court for Northern District of California, San Francisco Division.
  • 2008: Seoul Semiconductor (SSC) Company LTD (South Korea) versus Nichia Corporation (Japan). Nature: Patent infringement. Law firm: Morrison & Foerster LLP, Palo Alto, California. Venue: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Beaumont Division.
  • 2008: Professor Gertrude Rothschild versus Toshiba Company (Japan). Nature: Patent infringement. Law firm: DLA Piper LLP, San Francisco California. Venue: US International Trade Commission (ITC), Washington DC.
  • 2008: Honeywell Company versus Cree Company and Lumileds Company. Nature: Patent infringement and Reexamination of patent. Law firms: Paul Hastings LLP, Washington DC and Ingrassia, Fisher & Lorenz P.C., Washington DC. Venue: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division and Reexamination before the USPTO's Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
  • 2010: Landmark Screens Company versus MLB Company and Kohler. Nature: Mishandling of a patent application. Law firm: Keker & Van Nest LLP, San Francisco, California. Venue: US District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose Division.
  • 2011: Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. versus Seoul Semiconductor (SSC) Company LTD.. Nature: Patent infringement. Law firm: Latham & Watkins LLP, Washington DC. Venue: US District Court for the Central District of California Southern Division.
  • 2011: Jeou-Nan Tseng versus Home Depot USA Inc. and Guangde LEDup Enterprise Inc.. Nature: Patent infringement. Law firm: DLA Piper, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Venue: US District Court for the Western District of Washington at Seattle.
  • 2011: Lightpanels Ltd. Company versus Fuzhou F&V Photographic Company. Nature: Patent infringement. Law firm: Locke Lord LLP, New York, New York. Venue: US International Trade Commission (ITC), Washington DC.
  • 2012: Osram Company versus LG Company. Nature: Patent infringement. Law firm: Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, Washington DC. Venue: US International Trade Commission (ITC), Washington DC.
  • 2012: Osram Company versus LG Company and Samsung Company. Nature: Patent infringement. Law firm: Covington & Burling LLP, Washington DC. Venue: US International Trade Commission (ITC), Washington DC.
  • 2013: Chao Tai Electron Co. LTD. versus LEDup Enterprise Inc. and others. Nature: Patent infringement. Law firm: Hunton & Williams LLP, Washington DC. Venue: US District Court for the Central District of California.
  • 2013: Nichia Corporation versus Everlight Company and Emcore Company. Nature: Inter Partes Review (IPR). Law firm: Foley & Lardner LLP, Washington DC. Venue: IPR before the USPTO's Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
  • 2014: Everlight Electronics Co. LTD. versus Nichia Corporation. Nature: Patent infringement. Law firm: Foley & Lardner LLP, Washington DC. Venue: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division.
  • 2014: LEDup Enterprise Inc. versus Nicolas Holiday Inc.. Nature: Patent infringement. Law firm: Pendleton, Wilson, Hennessey & Crow, P.C. Denver, Colorado. Venue: US District Court for the Central District of California.
  • 2014: Nichia Corporation versus Everlight Electronics Co. LTD.. Nature: Patent infringement. Law firm: Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C. Washington DC. Venue: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division.
  • 2015: Cree Company versus Unity Opto Technology, Unity Microelectronics, and Feit Electric Company. Nature: Patent infringement. Law firm: Alston & Bird LLP, Silicon Valley, East Palo Alto, California. Venue: US International Trade Commission (ITC), Washington DC.
  • 2015: Honeywell International Inc. versus Cree Inc.. Nature: Inter Partes Review (IPR). Law firm: Arnold & Porter LLP, San Francisco, California. Venue: IPR before the USPTO's Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
  • 2015: Honeywell International Inc. versus Cree Inc.. Nature: Patent infringement. Law firm: Arnold & Porter LLP, San Francisco, California. Venue: US District Court for the District of New Jersey.
  • 2015: Cree Inc. versus Kingbright Electronic Co. LTD and SunLED Corporation. Nature: Patent infringement. Law firm: Hansen Reynolds Dickinson Crueger LLC, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Venue: U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin.
  • 2016: Acuity Brands Lighting Inc. versus Lynk Labs Inc.. Nature: Inter Partes Review (IPR). Law firm: Haynes Boone LLP, Chicago, Illinois. Venue: IPR before the USPTO's Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
  • 2016: Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1 Company versus Broadcom Company and others. Nature: Patent infringement. Law firm: Ropes and Gray LLP, New York City, New York. Venue: U.S. District Court of for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division.
  • 2016: TSMC Company versus Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1 Company. Nature: Inter Partes Review (IPR). Law firm: Greenblum & Bernstein, P.L.C., Reston, Virginia. Venue: IPR before the USPTO's Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
  • 2017: Harvard University versus Micron Technology Company. Nature: Patent infringement. Law firm: Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP, Redwood Shores, California. Venue: U.S. District Court for Massachusetts, Boston; U.S. District Court for Delaware, Wilmington.
  • 2017: Seoul Viosys Company versus P3 Company. Nature: Patent infringement. Law firm: Holland & Knight LLP, New York City, New York. Venue: U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York.
  • 2017: Nitride Semiconductor Company versus Rayvio Company. Nature: Patent infringement. Law firm: Dentons LLP, Palo Alto, California. Venue: US District Court for the Northern District of California.
  • 2018: CRX Tech LLC versus Samsung Electronics Co. LTD. Nature: Patent infringement. Law firm: Arnold & Porter LLP, Los Angeles, California. Venue: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division.
  • 2018: Macom Technology Solutions Holdings Inc. versus Infineon Technologies AG. Nature: Patent infringement. Law firm: Perkins Coie LLP Denver, Colorado. Venue: U.S. District Court Central District of California Western Division, Los Angeles.
  • 2018: Vizio Inc. versus Nichia Corporation. Nature: Inter Partes Review (IPR). Law firm: Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C., Washington DC. Venue: IPR before the USPTO's Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
  • 2018: Lowe's Companies Inc. versus Nichia Corporation. Nature: Inter Partes Review (IPR). Law firm: Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C., Washington DC. Venue: IPR before the USPTO's Patent Trial and Appeal Board.