Throughout my research on microplastics and their effects on plant systems, I developed a much deeper understanding of how widespread and complex this issue truly is. Before starting, I saw microplastics mostly as an environmental pollution problem in oceans. Through my work, I learned that they are also an agricultural and food safety concern, with the potential to affect plant physiology, water uptake and ultimately human consumption.
One of the most important insights from my research was that particle size matters significantly. While my statistical analysis did not show significant differences in water uptake, my observations revealed that smaller particles appeared to cause more visible stress in wheatgrass, including reduced root development and discoloration. This aligns with existing literature suggesting that smaller particles can more easily penetrate plant tissues.
However, my biomass results challenged my expectations. The larger particle group showed the highest biomass, which forced me to reconsider assumptions and recognize that biological systems are not always predictable. This taught me that unexpected results are still valuable and often lead to further questioning.
If i were to continue this research, I would:
Increase my sample size to improve statistical power
Extend the duration of the experiment
Incorporate soil-based systems to better reflect real-world conditions
Use more objective plant health measurements (ex. chlorophyll analysis)
Moving forward, I am interested in continuing research related to environmental biology and human health, especially how invisible pollutants impact food systems.
The process of writing my academic paper and completing my presentation and oral defense pushed me to think more critically and communicate more clearly than ever before.
Writing the paper taught me to:
Structure a formal scientific argument
Integrate and synthesize scholarly sources
Present data in a clear and unbiased way
The oral defense was especially valuable because it required me to go beyond memorization and truly understand my work. Answering questions about my methodology, limitations and conclusions helped me realize where my understanding was strong and where it needed improvement.
One key takeaway is that being able to explain your research clearly is just as important as conducting it. In the future, whether in college or a career in STEM, I will apply these skills when writing lab reports, presenting findings and defending ideas.
This project taught me a lot about myself, not just as a student, but as a researcher and person.
As a researcher, I learned
Patience: experiments don't always go as planned
Adaptability: adjusting methods when initial plans fail
Persistence: continuing despite unexpected or unclear results
As a student, I became more independent and self-driven. Given the timeframe and nature of this project, I had to strengthen my time management and accountability in a way that most classes don't require. Finally, I learned to be comfortable with uncertainty. Not everything has a clear answer.
Moving forward, I will carry these lessons into college and beyond, especially my ability to think critically, stay resilient through challenges and approach problems with curiosity rather than frustration.
I would like to express my sincere gratitude to the people who supported me through this journey
Mrs. Dobos: Thank you for guiding me through the research process and constantly pushing me to think deeper and supporting my ideas throughout. Your feedback helped shape both my paper and my thinking.
Mr. McBride: Thank you for you support and encouragement throughout the course, especially in helping me stay on track and helping me through uncertainty.
Ms. Wills: Thank you for your help at the beginning of my research process and supporting me through the end of my project.
Cospheric: Thank you for providing the silica microspheres at a discounted cost, which make my experiment possible.
Abstract
This study examined the effects of size-dependent microplastic particles on water uptake, plant health and biomass in a hydroponic system using Triticum aestivum (wheatgrass). Silica microspheres of two sizes (1.54 μm and 0.166 μm) were tested alongside a control group. Water uptake was measured daily, plant health was assessed through observational scoring and biomass was determined by driving plant material at the end of the experiment.
A one-way ANOVE found no statistically significant difference in water uptake between groups (F = 1.96, p = 0.148). However, plants exposed to smaller particles showed greater visible stress, including reduced root development and discoloartion. Unexpectedly, the larger particle group produced the highest average biomass.
These results suggest that while smaller microplastics may increase plant stress, their impact on measurable outcomes remains unclear under these conditions. Limitations include small sample size and a short time frame. Future research should expand sample size and incorporate more realistic growing environments.
Research Paper
Research Presentation
Next Steps
I will be attending Baylor University in the fall to study Medical Humanities on the pre-med track. As I move into this next chapter, I hope to continue exploring research opportunities, whether through Baylor or beyond. This project has shown me how powerful research can be in addressing real-world issues, especially those that impact human health and the environment.
In the future, I want to continue investigating topics at the intersection of science and human well-being, building on the curiosity that this project sparked. The skills I developed, critical thinking, adaptability and persistence, will carry into my college coursework and future research experiences. This is not the end of my research journey, but the beginning of a much larger path in science and medicine.