Throughout this experience, the themes and guiding principles of Community-Engaged Scholarship were consistently reinforced, creating a positive and productive environment for all involved. Most notably, the instructor team and training cohort emphasized the ideas of shared goals and values and collective benefit.
Community Research Collaborative. (2021). In it together: Community-based research guidelines for communities and higher education. Salt Lake City, UT: University of Utah.
During orientation, a Community Agreements board was created by the fellows and instructional staff. Values were grouped into the following four categories:
This is a Sacred Space: emphasizing respect of the workspace, participants' time, and any provided resources
Everything From a Place of Love: focusing on different aspects of healthy, productive, positive communication in the workplace
Step Forward / Step Back: emphasis on participation and representation, making sure everyone gets an opportunity to be an active contributor to the work being done
Trust the Leader: focusing on trust whether working in small groups or as a whole, once again brining up themes of communication
This board was left up for the duration of the program, as a reminder for all participants to focus on these core values.
This activity, as well as the above descriptions, originate from an activity performed in the Princeton class LCA101 created by Shairffa Ali and scribed by Tess James. This document is provided on the right.
This program was especially built around themes of collective benefit. To summarize this exchange:
The cohort received from PPWT:
An hourly wage for participation in the program. Typically, workforce training programs require participants to pay the program. However, PPWT decided it best to do the opposite, in order to work towards removing barriers to working in the technical performing industry.
The entry-level skills needed to find employment in local theaters, including the LCA and McCarter Theatre.
PPWT received from the cohort:
A boost to the LCA's workforce, as participants from the cohort were offered positions to fill in the LCA.
Insight on how to improve the program for future years to come. As this was the inaugural year for the program, all feedback and advice was greatly appreciated, especially with potential plans to increase the size of the program for later years.
Overall, my experience at PPWT has been insightful and very educational. Though I have done some forms of small group tutoring on campus in the past, I came into the program a bit worried about my teaching ability. Some of these past experiences were in informal contexts, namely in the Princeton Triangle Club; other positions, such as being a mentor for student sound designers at the LCA and a lab teaching assistant for Princeton's introduction to computer science class (COS126), were more formal. However, they were all nowhere near as long as this program, and this was the first big opportunity in which I could closely interact with and influence the curriculum.
A very interesting aspect of mine and Kay's teaching was our different backgrounds and experiences in how we learned the skills of live sound. While Kay had gone to recording school and completed multiple certifications, taking a more structured approach to learning, I developed my skills through "trial by fire" - in other words, I was immediately thrown into a large production and had to learn things on the fly. I did have upperclassmen that I could ask questions from, but most of my learning came from making mistakes during shows and simply doing enough performances to eventually get familiar with things.
For PPWT, this allowed me to have a good eye for what the cohort might struggle to understand at first, what extra information they may need that we otherwise would brush over, and so on. I would be able to pick up on concepts that were second-nature to Kay but potentially confusing to the cohort at first - for example, what a compressor is - and provide an explanation of these ideas, trying to use a minimal amount of technical jargon. Not only did this benefit the cohort's learning, but this also allowed me to find areas in live sound that I was still feeling less confident in and review them. Through this work, I was able to gain confidence in my teaching ability and gain insight into how day-to-day lesson plans were structured and created.
This internship experience has given me good insight into how to continue passing down my knowledge to future classes at Princeton. Indeed, with the support of the LCA, I am working on founding the Design Collective of Princeton. This is a new student group focused on building community across technical designers from all performing groups on campus (theater, dance, etc.), and connecting new designers with resources and mentors to further develop their skills. I look forward to using some of the material from this program to inspire workshops for student designers on campus and help those curious in the technical side of performing arts explore their interests and passions.
In the long run, I plan to continue using these skills that I have obtained from the program to pass down my knowledge to a wider range of interested technicians, and explore the connections that can be made between live performance and engineering.