Moving from universal Tier 1 support to supplemental Tier 2 intervention should not be based on a single score, behavior, referral, diagnosis, student characteristic, or educator concern.
Tier 2 should be considered when multiple sources of data identify a specific need and indicate that a student requires supplemental support beyond what can reasonably be provided through differentiated and responsive Tier 1 practices.
Before adding Tier 2 support, teams should examine the student's strengths and needs, access to high-quality Tier 1 instruction and supports, relevant contextual factors, implementation fidelity, and the student's response to previous instructional or environmental adjustments.
Tier 2 is not a place a student goes—it is additional support matched to an identified need.
Certain patterns may signal that additional problem-solving or assessment is needed. These indicators should initiate inquiry—not automatically determine a tier.
Persistent difficulty with specific grade-level skills or concepts across multiple measures
Limited response to well-implemented Tier 1 differentiation, scaffolding, re-teaching, or instructional adjustment
Significant or increasing gaps between current performance and grade-level expectations
Patterns of course failure, credit accumulation concerns, or declining academic performance
A need for more diagnostic information to precisely define the skill or instructional need
Increasing frequency or duration of absences
Patterns of tardiness, early departure, or missed instructional time
Declining participation or engagement
Difficulty reconnecting following absences
Attendance patterns that may indicate an emerging barrier
Persistent patterns of behavior that interfere with the student's or others' access to learning
Repeated difficulty meeting expectations despite explicit teaching and responsive Tier 1 support
Patterns of dysregulation, withdrawal, conflict, avoidance, or disengagement requiring additional problem-solving
Difficulty generalizing taught skills across settings or contexts
Concerns occurring across multiple settings, classes, or domains
Increasing frequency, duration, or intensity of difficulty
Multiple indicators occurring together—for example, changes in attendance + behavior + academic performance
A pattern that persists despite purposeful Tier 1 adjustments
Can we define the concern in observable, measurable terms rather than labels such as struggling, unmotivated, disruptive, or below level?
Do screening, classroom, diagnostic, attendance, behavioral, student work, observational, or other relevant data show a consistent pattern?
What skills, relationships, strategies, interests, contexts, or conditions support success?
Was instruction/support evidence-based, grade-level appropriate, accessible, culturally responsive-sustaining, and implemented consistently?
What was changed, for how long, and what happened?
Consider attendance, language, opportunity to learn, mobility, instructional match, relationships, belonging, environment, task demands, or other contextual factors.
Can we identify an intervention that directly matches the specific need we've defined?
Before referring multiple students for supplemental intervention, examine whether the data reveal a broader Tier 1 pattern.
If many students within the same classroom, grade level, course, subgroup, skill area, time period, or setting demonstrate a similar concern, teams should examine curriculum, instruction, environment, expectations, access, relationships, opportunity to learn, and implementation before concluding that each student independently requires Tier 2.
When many students need the same intervention, ask what the pattern may be telling you about Tier 1.
Tier 2 is supplemental, targeted support provided in addition to universal Tier 1. It is matched to an identified need and delivered with greater specificity, dosage, or intensity than can reasonably be provided through Tier 1 alone.
Tier 2 should include:
A clearly defined need
An evidence-based or evidence-informed intervention matched to that need
A measurable goal
Defined frequency, duration, and intensity
A plan for implementation
Progress monitoring
Fidelity information
Predetermined criteria for reviewing student response
Decisions to continue, adjust, intensify, fade, or discontinue support
Continued access to strong Tier 1
Flexible grouping, re-teaching, additional modeling, scaffolding, check-ins, and differentiated support may all occur within Tier 1. The tier is determined by the purpose, specificity, intensity, dosage, and use of data—not simply by group size or location.