Blog

Keeping Humanity at the Heart of AI in Education

The rapid advancement of Artificial Intelligence, particularly Generative AI (GenAI), presents both exciting opportunities and profound challenges for the field of education. As educators, our primary concern remains the growth and development of our students, fostering critical thinking, creativity, and a deep understanding of the world. The integration of AI into this human-centered endeavor requires thoughtful consideration, ensuring that technology serves as an amplifier of human potential, rather than a replacement for genuine connection.

At its core, education is a deeply human enterprise. It thrives on interaction, empathy, and the unique spark that ignites between a teacher and a student. When we talk about AI in education, it's crucial to position it not as an autonomous agent, but as a sophisticated tool that, when wielded effectively, can enhance our ability to teach, learn, and administer. The goal isn't to hand over our pedagogical responsibilities to algorithms, but to leverage AI to personalize learning, streamline administrative tasks, and unlock new avenues for exploration, all while keeping the human educator firmly at the center of the learning experience.

The Power of Conversational AI: A Mirror to Our Practice

One of the most foundational and illuminating exercises for educators seeking to understand AI's potential is to engage directly with it in a structured conversation. Imagine posing a prompt like this to a GenAI: "As an expert of GenAI, ask me a series of leading questions, one at a time, so you can gain insight into my teaching philosophy, workflows, responsibilities, objectives, and performance indicators. When you have enough context, make two obvious and two non-obvious recommendations for how GenAI can help me in my work life."

The benefits of such a conversation are multifaceted:

• Self-Reflection and Articulation: The very act of responding to an AI's probing questions forces us to articulate aspects of our teaching practice that we might otherwise take for granted. It encourages us to define our philosophy, break down our workflows, and clarify our objectives in a way that is rarely demanded in our daily routines. This structured introspection can reveal underlying assumptions, unexamined biases, and areas for improvement that were previously unseen.

• Gaining an "Outside" Perspective: While the AI itself doesn't possess human intuition or lived experience, its ability to process vast amounts of information and identify patterns allows it to synthesize our responses into coherent recommendations. It acts as a kind of neutral, objective mirror, reflecting back insights that a human colleague might miss due to their own subjective lens or limited bandwidth. This external perspective can be incredibly valuable for generating novel ideas.

• Demystifying AI: Engaging in a direct, conversational manner with GenAI helps to demystify the technology. It transforms AI from an abstract concept into a tangible, interactive tool. This hands-on experience builds confidence and familiarity, making educators more comfortable exploring its practical applications in their classrooms and professional lives.

• Personalized AI Application: The recommendations generated by the AI are inherently personalized because they are based on your specific input. Unlike generic advice, these suggestions are tailored to your unique teaching context, subject matter, student demographics, and professional goals. This personalization increases the likelihood of finding genuinely useful and implementable solutions.

• Prompt Engineering Practice: Crafting an effective prompt for a conversational AI is a skill in itself. This exercise provides valuable practice in "prompt engineering" – learning how to ask precise, nuanced questions to elicit the most helpful responses. This skill is transferable to countless other applications of AI.

Imagine the insights gained. Perhaps the AI, after understanding your meticulous lesson planning, suggests an obvious recommendation: "GenAI can assist in generating diverse question types for quizzes and assignments, saving you time." And then, a non-obvious one: "Based on your emphasis on collaborative problem-solving, GenAI could help design complex, multi-stage group projects with differentiated roles, complete with scaffolded resources for each role, encouraging richer peer interaction and deeper learning."

From Conversation to Classroom Practice

The insights gleaned from such a dialogue are not merely theoretical; they are a direct springboard for integrating AI into our teaching practice. Once we have concrete, personalized recommendations, the next step is to experiment and adapt.

For instance, if the AI suggests using GenAI for content creation, we might start by having it draft multiple versions of a challenging concept explanation, catering to different learning styles. We can then refine these drafts, injecting our own pedagogical wisdom and ensuring they resonate with our students. If the AI highlights an opportunity for personalized feedback, we might explore how GenAI can help categorize student responses or suggest targeted resources, freeing us to focus on the nuanced, human-centric aspects of feedback that only a human can provide.

The key is an iterative process: converse, gain insight, experiment, reflect, and refine. As educators, our role is not to passively accept AI's suggestions, but to critically evaluate them through the lens of our professional expertise and our students' needs. We become the orchestrators of this powerful technology, guiding it to serve our educational goals.

Ultimately, integrating AI into education is about empowerment – empowering educators with more time for meaningful interaction, empowering students with personalized learning pathways, and empowering the entire learning community with enhanced resources and insights. By engaging with AI in a human-centered, conversational manner, we can ensure that this transformative technology genuinely enriches the art and science of teaching, keeping humanity at the heart of every educational endeavor.

The EdTech Flex · Student Annotations Assignment

Tired of lugging stacks of paper home to grade? The Student Annotation assignment submission type in Canvas LMS is a fantastic tool to create a more efficient and paperless classroom. 

This feature allows you to upload a document—like a PDF worksheet, Microsoft Word document, a historical text, or a scientific diagram—directly into an assignment. Students can then use a built-in set of digital tools to mark up the document right in their browser. They can highlight key passages, add text comments, draw connections, or label parts of an image without ever needing to print a single page.

Think of all the worksheets, articles, and diagrams you typically print. By using Student Annotations, you can digitize that entire workflow. Students complete and submit their work electronically, and you can grade it directly in SpeedGrader, adding your own feedback and annotations. It keeps everything organized in one place and significantly reduces the amount of paper you and your students use throughout the year. It's a simple way to save time, resources, and a few trees! 

Check out the video tutorial above to see how easy it is to set up this assignment type.