Testimonios of the Condor Years will explore the literary genre of testimonios (testimonial literature) as expressed in literary and visual form relating to the Dirty War of the Southern Cone. Focusing primarily on Chile, Argentina, and Uruguay, this course considers the social, political, and economic events of the latter half of the 20th century that led to lengthy dictatorships and consequent social/political repression in this region. This course will discuss questions of memory and forgetting, trauma and violence, and vengeance/forgiveness/reconciliation as such issues connect with the respective trajectories these countries have taken to grapple with the aftermath of state violence. Looking at many types of textual representations of this historical period, this course will investigate the relationship between literary and artistic production and collective/historical memories of the turbulent Condor Era. This course will be conducted in Spanish.
Google Form for Peer Review of Final Essays
Students submit this as part of their final paper grade (collaboration is counted in each student's final project score)
Students are walked through three forms (Basic Grammar, Intensive Grammar/Diction, Content) to review the paper in question for a specific set of issues.
Students give comments on the Google Doc and follow the steps in the Google Form to complete the review.
The form serves as a record of review performed and a check for group participation and fair distribution of labor.
The Final Essay Rubric was created using iRubric for Sakai and modified from an existing hard copy rubric. Using iRubric, students receive feedback through their LMS. The benefit of iRubric for instructors is that it links directly to the LMS gradebook without having to calculate and enter final scores outside of the rubric. The rubric uses a scale of Excellent to Unacceptable in several categories including grammar, diction/style, and content. Each criterion is explained and each point value has specific qualifiers. There is also an option for additional feedback in each category and overall feedback on the whole assignment. This rubric is designed to reflect the specific feedback given in the assignment itself (I use Google Docs to offer suggested changes and comments). Doing so gives students specific textual examples in their work to reference in relation to the feedback and score given in the rubric. It also clearly shows students areas where there is room for improvement and areas where their writing was strong.
This semester-long assignment is a collaborative Google Doc in which students pose questions for discussion prior to class and answer them to brainstorm before in-class sessions. Oral presenters of the day propose 8-10 cogent discussion questions as a starting point and the rest of the class responds by answering, adding more questions, citing quotes from relevant texts, supporting or refuting the assertions of their peers, etc. These questions guide the discussion and scaffold learning, allowing for class time to be utilized for more in-depth conversation on the texts of the day.
Example of an annotated bibliography, which is one step of the semester-long research paper project. Early in the semester, students select a topic and prepare a tentative bibliography that will support their investigation. Students evaluate the sources and prepare a succinct summary of the text. They explain why the source is relevant to their research. Guidance is given at this point regarding other possible sources or suggested revisions to the working bibliography in a brief consultation meeting. This step prepares students to write their literature reviews, the next step in the process.
The literature review outlines the theoretical framework for the final paper presentation and helps students learn how to situate their work within the larger field. Students summarize the arguments of texts they will reference in their essay as a point of departure and walk the reader through their process of argumentation, connecting each text with the thesis statement. The literature review provides a sketch of relevant texts in the field and shows that students have an understanding of how their project connects with the larger corpus of existing research on the subject. It also helps ensure that students have a plan for their project in terms of coherence and structure in the argument.
The Final Essay is the culmination of the writing process in which students submit a 10-15 page paper of their research over the course of the semester. As an upper division course, this prepares students to write longer essays that could be presented at conferences or submitted for publication in a journal. Using the process of peer review in class, students become accustomed to receiving several rounds of feedback on their work and completing revisions to make their writing stronger. This process prepares students for larger future projects such as honors theses or assignments they may have in graduate school in the future.