CORE KNOWLEDGE:
Read and preview each point below. By the end of this chapter, you should be able to answer each question
Define a belief, social norm, and material trait of a culture
Compare the differences between a habit and a custom
Compare Popular and Folk Culture
Explain how both types diffuse into other regions and what factors affect this diffusion
Identify the food, sports, music, and clothing of different regions
Explain how popular culture can be seen in today's world
Answer the questions below:
There are several components of culture, defined as the beliefs, social norms, and material traits of a group of people.
Beliefs are primarily expressed through religion and social interaction, forming the values of a society.
The concept of social norms reflects ethnicity, responsible for uniting a group with a shared heritage.
Material traits are found in a variety of objects, including clothing and food, as well as leisure activities, art, and architecture. This branch of culture is the subject of this chapter and defines a cultural landscape.
In such an evaluation of the material traits of certain cultures and how they influence everyday behavior, it’s important to understand that a habit is different from a custom. A habit is a repeated act that a particular person performs; a custom, on the other hand, is a consistent act that an entire group often performs, to the extent that it becomes a recognized characteristic of that group. A custom evolves from a habit; as a result, all aspects of culture, made up of both a folk and popular branch, are based on habitual and customary practices.
Folk culture is the type of culture mostly practiced by small groups living in remote places, whereas popular culture is the type of culture found in larger societies that may differ in their personal characteristics but have certain shared habits. Various spatial patterns differentiate folk culture from popular culture, including origin, diffusion, and distribution.
All culture develops at a certain hearth, a center of innovation. The origin and development of certain hearths of folk culture are difficult to pinpoint due to the lack of known information. Popular culture, conversely, is much more traceable, as its development is characterized by the gain of more leisure time in the societal shift from primary to secondary and tertiary economies.
The diffusion of folk culture is also typically more restricted than popular culture. The primary way folk culture diffuses is through relocation diffusion, or the moving of people from place to place. As opposed to folk culture, aspects of popular culture diffuse much more quickly, aided by modern technology. This rapid spread of popular culture is a defining trait of contagious diffusion, which sees quick diffusion of ideas from a hearth.
The distribution of folk culture is heavily affected by intervening obstacles; from a cultural perspective, these are defined as factors that prevent an idea from reaching its goal. For example, a body of water or mountain range that bisects an area, such as the Himalayas, result in unique yet similar folk cultural practices in a certain region. Widespread distribution of popular culture is not often hindered by intervening obstacles, as its rapid diffusion allows it wide availability. However, an important intervening obstacle to the diffusion of popular culture is people lacking income to purchase the material.
As previously mentioned, a cultural landscape is recognizable by the material traits of a certain culture. In any one area, everything around you, from the obvious signs, such as the language on a store’s sign, to the subtle, such as the choice of paint color on buildings, is part of the cultural landscape. As such, the material signs and symbols found in an area are the primary components of a cultural landscape. Such a landscape is always syncretic, known as fusion between cultures. The perceived assimilation of distinct groups may be a threat to some peoples’ ethnic identity, but a syncretic landscape is consistent wherever different cultures come into contact with one another.
Japanese curry rice is an example of fusion cuisine.
A part of culture in which people hold heavy preferences is their taste in food. Influenced by folk traditions, some food consumed by ethnic groups is tied to their heritage and religion. However, the overwhelming majority of food we consume is standardized and eaten by scores of people, regardless of background. This popular food culture varies from country to country but is always tied to folk cultural influences that are products of the natural environment. For example, people in Northern Europe have used their abundance of wood to roast food over fire while producing heat for the home. Asians have also found soybean plants that do not require extensive cooking, as there is often a lack of fuel in the continent. Folk practices such as these, refined over time, come together to shape the popular culture of food in a certain area.
A notable anecdote of folk food culture revolves around a taboo, or a restriction imposed by social custom. These restrictions can stem from many reasons; for instance, animism discourages eating plants or animals seen as negative forces in the environment, and some societies do not eat some species out of a concern for the natural environment - the ancient Hebrews practiced this by not eating pig, as it was not suited to their nomadic lifestyle. It also set the Hebrews apart from other groups. Obviously, then, social values play just as large of a role as environmental factors in food taboos.
In America, popular food culture may seem completely different from folk practices, but cultural preferences were formed by folk groups, making the US’ popular food culture syncretic but also distinct to the country. A strong example of this is fusion cuisine, the incorporation of multiple global traditions into a dish, that can be seen in Japanese-American or Mexican-American restaurants. Also, in some areas, popular food culture retains more of the themes found in folk culture due to strong environmental connections in that particular region.
Taste in food varies from region due to region because of the nature of both the physical environment and social customs. Although no food is grown exclusively in one area because of the vast variety of growing methods available today, the association of that food with a region has played an important role in the formation of popular food culture. Further, some foods are associated with a certain area due to that area’s respective income; for example, wine is largely consumed in more affluent areas that are nearby wineries with a strong tradition in that practice. Social customs can also limit consumption of food, as seen in the limited consumption of alcohol in the Middle East due to its negative association with religion.
A defining piece in the complex picture of a cultural landscape is architecture. The built environment that humans have developed over thousands of years is an easily recognizable product of the influence of folk and popular culture. Folk architecture is less visible in daily life, as the vast majority of buildings we encounter are mainstream and popularly accepted among architects. Of the two main types of buildings - commercial and housing - folk architecture largely leans towards the latter.
The house is an ideal microcosm to get a sense of a place’s cultural landscape, and as a result, its human geography. Housing reflects natural conditions as well as cultural traditions and functional needs. Folk housing can be seen in isolated construction, such as that of villages or small towns, which consist of buildings built largely by hand that are primarily used by those who build them. Important features are incorporated into housing due to the impact of the environment. This includes the decision of the type of building material - the two most common being wood and brick - and unique adaptations, such as a steep roof in wet climates to facilitate runoff, or window size to maximize or minimize heat.
In the United States, folk housing was initially constructed of wood, as it was the most readily available material at the time due to the large amount of land clearing. As a result, there are several popular traditional architectural styles seen around us in housing that have evolved from certain hearths largely based around this wooden construction. These include the New England,Middle Atlantic, and Chesapeake styles.
Folk architecture has largely morphed into traditional architecture, a popular form of styles originally developed by folk groups. The distribution of traditional styles is more dispersed, as housing styles are typically no longer unique to a certain area. As a result, communication and transportation allow housing to be mass-produced.
New forms of architecture continue to be developed. Modern architecture is a popular form of 20th century architecture that is characterized by geometric, ordered structures. This differs from contemporary architecture, which is defined by curves, and postmodern architecture, which favors wavy and bending yet sharply defined shapes. More recently, architecture has incorporated green energy technologies, which allow the conservation of energy and the use of recycled materials in their construction.
An example of housing found in the New England region of the United States, characterized by simple construction, chimneys, and wooden siding.
Due to the difficulty in tracking the diffusion of music, less is known about its evolution across cultures over time compared to other forms of culture.
Many folk songs are well known and recognized as iconic melodies in themselves, but few people think about the importance of folk tunes in the shaping of the world of popular music. Like all folk traditions, it is difficult to trace specific hearths of certain folk songs, as they often originate before recorded time and are transmitted by ear or orally. Folk music is important in that, like food, it reflects the diffusion of culture through its spread of similar styles across an area. Music is sometimes difficult to study due to the reasons discussed earlier, but the fact that many folk songs are directly derived from the daily life of a group of people makes them invaluable in studying folk culture.
In contrast to folk music, popular music is everywhere around us. The development of modern music styles is a reflection of the commercialized music market of today. Where folk music was retained to a specific region, the development of rapid communications technology has made music accessible to every corner of the world with the income to purchase the technology. As a result, today’s music artists are spread across the globe, and artists take inspiration from this new, globalized network.
Similar to sport, the origin and diffusion of sports is another lens that allows one to view folk and popular culture through the study of a leisure activity.
Some folk sports survive today, a product of a cultural group that originated in an isolated location and recognized as characteristic that group. Baseball, for instance, was previously exclusively a North American sport before gaining widespread popularity in Japan by American soldiers spreading the game during World War II. Cricket is another sport that was previously confined to a place, in this case being former British colonies in South Asia, South Pacific, and the Caribbean Islands, that has now gained worldwide popularity.
The diffusion of soccer is a perfect example of how popular sports have rapidly diffused. Just as with many cultural aspects, it became more popular with an increase in leisure time - in this case, in 19th century England. As British citizens diffused their customs through relocation diffusion, soccer also increased in popularity. The introduction of TV and radio only expedited its advancements. With so many folk-based sports to build upon, the widespread popularity of today’s spectator sports such as football, baseball, and soccer, remains an important example of how popular culture expands upon the roots developed by folk groups.
Soccer provides an apt example of how certain sports have become found around the globe.
The photo above shows a Bulgarian Folk outfit.
In regards to clothing, styles vary drastically between folk and popular culture. Like all cultural aspects, folk clothing varies more across space, and popular clothing styles vary across time. This is because folk clothing styles are typically in response to cultural influences such as religion as well as environmental factors - for instance, snowshoes in arctic climates. Another contributing factor to the preservation of folk clothing styles is to preserve old memories, which can be attractive to tourists. However, wearing popular clothing in areas dominated by folk styles can be a point of contention and vice-versa, such as some European countries viewing traditional face coverings as unacceptable and demeaning to women.
Although some aspects of folk clothing culture have evolved into popular styles widely diffused today, today’s popular clothing habits largely reflect one’s occupation - a doctor in California would not be expected to dress like a mine worker in West Virginia - and income, as affluent people can afford to update their wardrobe more often. The rapid diffusion of these styles has been made possible by the internet and space-time compression, making it possible for a clothing designer in New York to have his or her styles manufactured in an Asian factory just days after they are approved.
In the late 20th and early 21st centuries, popular culture has been diffused rapidly around the globe with the advent of new communication technologies in electronic media. With the development of TV and more recently, the internet, culture has become instantly attainable by anyone on the planet with the technology to access it. This last note is significant; developing countries are often either unwelcoming to popular media or simply do not have the technology to receive it.
There are two types of threats which other cultures see that media poses to their folk-based lifestyle: external, or originating from other countries, or internal, as people in these developing countries can then control production of some of their own content. External threats are often viewed as a form of cultural imperialism by developing countries, such as an American TV program that differs from that society’s traditional norms, or news that is controlled by an outside country and may be biased towards that country’s interests. Internal threats are mainly characterized by social media and the fact that residents of a developing country are able to attain information - even if their country’s government does not desire them to - as long as they have the proper technology. Even so, many countries, especially those with undemocratic governments, often try to limit access of media that is politically based or socially unacceptable.
The cultural landscape is characterized by physical items established by different ethnic groups that may not be reflective of an area's folk culture, such as this mission, constructed by religious missionaries.
The widespread diffusion of popular culture poses several threats to environmental sustainability. In the desire of a country to create a uniform landscape in a suburban area, landscape pollution can occur. As consumers are more attracted to something that they are familiar with, the construction of chain stores and restaurants is often done without regard for the physical landscape of that particular area, possibly damaging the ecology of that region through actions such as the filling in of valleys and the flattening of hills. The depletion of rare natural resources - mainly used for energy production - is another concerning impact of the spread of popular culture. Although it is possible to recycle certain materials, from 1990 to 2010, Americans increased their share of waste to match that offset by the use of recycled materials. When these wastes are discharged into the environment, the problem of a rising population compounded with the production of an unsustainable amount of waste arises.