Understanding the diverse ways in which individuals learn is crucial for educators seeking to create effective and engaging learning environments. In this blog, we explore four foundational learning theories—behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism, and situated learning. Each theory offers unique insights into the processes that underlie learning and provides distinct strategies for educators to apply in the classroom.
I chose these theories because they represent a comprehensive spectrum of perspectives on learning, each contributing valuable tools and methods for educators. By examining these theories, we can better appreciate the complexity of learning and develop more personalized, effective educational practices that cater to the diverse needs of learners.
A Dive into Operant Conditioning in the Classroom
On any given day you can walk into a classroom to experience theoretical aspects and practical applications of behaviorism. From the classroom rules, inspiring quotes, and what if posters on the walls, we see behaviorism being displayed. Behaviorism focuses on the idea that all behaviors are learned through interaction with the environment. Teachers are trying to create a safe, fun, engaging environment where students can learn. This post explores the foundations of behaviorism, shines a light on operant conditioning in the classroom, discusses the strengths and weaknesses of this approach, guided by examples and insights of key concepts.
I find it fascinating that early psychologists were able to conduct groundbreaking research that laid the foundation for behaviorism. While I teach computer science which is in a constant state of change, Skinner’s, Watson’s and Thorndike’s research is still studied and applied today. Skinner further developed behaviorism with his theory of operant conditioning. He introduced the concept of reinforcement and showed how consequences for a behavior could increase or decrease the likelihood of that behavior being repeated Skinner, (1953).
By using operant conditioning in the classroom, teachers can help create a positive learning environment where desirable behaviors are promoted and undesirable behaviors are discouraged. It’s all about understanding what motivates students and using that knowledge to guide them towards better behaviors.
Below are some key concepts and examples:
Positive Reinforcement:
This is all about adding something pleasant right after a behavior, which makes that behavior more likely to happen again. In the classroom, this could be praise, stickers (for younger students), or free time on the computer when students follow rules or participate actively. It’s like saying, “Hey, you did something great, and here’s a little something to show you how awesome that was!”
Negative Reinforcement:
This might sound a bit confusing, but it’s actually about removing something unpleasant to strengthen a behavior. For example, if students are working quietly and efficiently, a teacher might decide to reduce the amount of homework for that night. Here, the removal of the unpleasant task (homework) encourages students to keep up the good behavior.
My son has an Auditory Processing Disorder. All the noise from the environment comes into his brain simultaneously and can be overwhelming for him. Having him put on noise canceling headphones in the classroom helps block out (removal of unwanted noise) distractions allowing him to keep focused and concentrate on his school work.
Positive Punishment:
This involves adding something unpleasant after a behavior to decrease the likelihood of that behavior happening again. For instance, if a student interrupts the class, they might have to stay after class for a few minutes. Another example is giving a student lunch detention. It’s a way of saying, “That behavior isn’t acceptable here, and here’s a little reminder to help you remember next time.”
Negative Punishment:
Negative punishment involves taking away a favorable item or privilege in response to an undesirable behavior, aiming to decrease that behavior. Taking students' phones away in class is a great consequence to encourage them to pay attention in class. Teaching in a computer lab, I often have students off task playing computer games. Revoking their use of the computer helps decrease the likelihood of them misusing it in the future.
Extension:
This is when you ignore a behavior to decrease its occurrence. If a student is seeking attention by tapping their pencil, not giving attention to that behavior can reduce its frequency over time. It’s like the behavior just slowly fades away because it’s not getting the reaction it seeks.
Integrating operant conditioning strategies into classroom practices brings numerous advantages that enhance learning outcomes for students and teachers. Providing immediate feedback on behavior is crucial for effective learning (Columbia Center for Teaching and Learning, 2021). This immediate response helps students quickly understand what behaviors are expected and valued. In some instances, operant conditioning can encourage students to explore and be creative, especially when rewards are tied to innovative thinking or problem-solving.
While behaviorism and operant conditioning offer valuable tools for managing classroom behavior and facilitating certain types of learning, these approaches have limitations. One concern I have is that it does not account for individual differences among students, including varying learning needs and cultural backgrounds. A core principle of behaviorism, particularly through operant conditioning, involves external rewards and punishments to shape behavior (Graham, 2023). What works as a reinforcer or punishment for one student might not be effective for another. Additionally, once the reinforcement or punishment is removed, students may revert to their original behaviors.
Behaviorism, with its focus on observable behavior and the role of the environment in shaping behavior, provides a robust framework for understanding and influencing student behavior. The emphasis on positive reinforcement in operant conditioning contributes to a more positive and supportive classroom atmosphere, which can reduce stress and anxiety among students and teachers. I hope you found the operant conditioning strategies in this post helpful and will tailor it to the unique needs and motivations of your individual students, making learning more personal and effective in your classroom.
Image Credits: Freepik.com
References:
Cherry, K. (2023, February 24). What is operant conditioning and how does it work?. verywell mind. https://www.verywellmind.com/operant-conditioning-a2-2794863.
Columbia Center for Teaching and Learning. (2021). Feedback for learning. Columbia University. Retrieved May 27, 2024, from https://ctl.columbia.edu/resources-and-technology/resources/feedback-for-learning/
Graham, G. (2023). Behaviorism. In E. N. Zalta & U. Nodelman (Eds.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2023 Edition).
Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2023/entries/behaviorism/
Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and Human Behavior. New York: Macmillan. (The B. F. Skinner Foundation, 2014). Retrieved from https://www.bfskinner.org
A Cognitive View of Constructivism and Constructionism in the Classroom
In the evolving landscape of educational theory, two compelling frameworks stand out in my teaching practice. With their unique yet complementary approaches to learning: constructionism and constructivism, both champion the active role of the learner in the learning process but differ subtly in their execution and emphasis. In this blog post, I embark on a cognitive exploration of these theories, weaving together their principles to paint a picture of a holistic learning environment.
Student Artifact: 3D Prototype created with Tinkercad
Constructivism posits that learning is an active, constructive process where learners build new knowledge upon the foundation of previous understandings (Cherry, 2022). This theory, deeply rooted in the cognitive explorations of Jean Piaget, views the learner as a curious explorer, navigating the vast seas of knowledge, not merely absorbing information but interpreting and reshaping it through personal experience.
In the constructivist classroom, as a teacher, I act more as a guide. I lead students down a path of discovery through student-directed learning. As an educator of Career and Technical Education, students are active participants in their learning process constructing knowledge through hands-on learning experiences. Using a constructivist approach, students grapple with real-world problems, use inquiry-based learning to question, experiment, iterate and then reflect on their findings. This process not only deepens understanding but also cultivates critical thinking, problem-solving skills, and the ability to apply knowledge in various contexts.
While constructivism emphasizes the internal construction of knowledge, constructionism, a term coined by Seymour Papert, extends this concept into the physical realm. It suggests that learning happens most effectively when individuals are engaged in constructing a tangible product (Harel & Papert, 1991). This theory brings the cognitive processes highlighted by constructivism into the physical world, marrying thought with action.
The magic of constructionism lies in its emphasis on creation. Whether students are programming a micro:bit, designing a digital game, or building a prototype for their Shark Tank project, the act of making something brings abstract concepts to life. This hands-on approach not only solidifies learning but also sparks passion and curiosity, driving further exploration and innovation. In the computer science world iteration is creating our future.
Integrating constructivist and constructionist approaches in the classroom creates a dynamic learning environment where minds are engaged and hands are creating. It's a place where students are encouraged to think deeply, question freely, and create boldly. Here, learning becomes not just an intellectual exercise but a personal journey of discovery and creation.
As an example in my classroom, you'll see students actively engaging in both constructivist and constructionist learning by designing Apps that address issues within their community, culture, or environment. This task requires them to research (constructivist thinking), brainstorm ideas, design prototypes (constructionist making), test their solutions, and reflect on their impact. Students then share their Apps with their peers for review, collaboration on further iterations, and celebration. Through this process, students not only learn about problem solving and programming but also develop a deeper sense of agency and responsibility towards their community.
Blending constructivism and constructionism isn't without its challenges. As an educator, I have to balance guidance with freedom (lack of structure), ensuring that students have the support they need while encouraging independence. Assessing learning in this context also demands creativity, looking beyond traditional tests to portfolios, presentations, and other forms of authentic performance based assessment.
Despite these challenges, the rewards are profound. By grounding learning activities in an authentic, real-world context, constructivism stimulates and engages students (Bada, 2015). Students learn to think critically, collaborate effectively, and approach problems with resilience and creativity. They leave the classroom not just with knowledge but with the skills and mindsets needed to navigate an uncertain and rapidly changing world.
Together, constructivism and constructionism offer a holistic approach to education that prepares learners not just academically but equips them with real-world skills needed for success in life. By fostering environments where students are encouraged to construct knowledge both cognitively and physically, educators unlock the full potential of their learners. This approach does more than just facilitate the acquisition of knowledge and skills; it ignites the joy of discovery, unleashes the power of creation, and empowers individuals to effect change. It respects the complexity of learning and the diversity of learners to offer a rich, engaging, and deeply meaningful educational experience.
References:
Bada, S. O. (2015). Constructivism learning theory: A paradigm for teaching and learning. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSR-JRME), 5(6 Ver. I), 66-70.
Cherry, K. (2022, November 2). Jean Piaget biography (1896 - 1980). verywell mind.
Harel, I. E., & Papert, S. E. (1991). Situating Constructionism in I. E. Harel & S. E. Papert (Eds.), Constructionism (pp. 1-11). Ablex Publishing.