Figure A.9: Distribution of the obtained W MS TET for the different algorithms and combinations for the CW case study
Figure A.10: Distribution of the obtained W MS TET quality indicator for the different algorithms and combinations for the EMB case study
Figure A.11: Distribution of the obtained W MS TET quality indicator for the different algorithms and combinations for the CC case study
Figure A.12: Distribution of the obtained W MS TET quality indicator for the different algorithms and combinations for the Tiny case study
Figure A.13: Distribution of the obtained W MS TET quality indicator for the different algorithms and combinations for the AC Engine case
study
Figure A.14: Distribution of the obtained W MS TET quality indicator for the different algorithms and combinations for the Two Tanks case
study