Opinion or Mere Assertion?
Lesson 5:9
Lesson 5:9
When we say “Mere Assertion”, we mean nonsense. Opinions that have no or very little basis in fact.
We urge you to substitute whatever phrase works for you (some like a certain phrase that starts with bull...and, well, you know the rest).
Before cable, the biggest names in television news were reporters like Walter Cronkite who were careful to guard their neutrality and became, as anchors of the evening news, some of the most trusted people in public life.
Along comes cable news, fighting for market share. Executives discovered that cable shows gained intensely loyal audiences when anchors and even reporters dropped their neutrality and validated the audience’s political preferences. The trend accelerated and now cable hosts startlingly partisan shows on which the paid news staff campaign for candidates, help them raise money and sometimes are even themselves candidates for office.
These pundits have no use for the SPJ’s standards of independence. They earn high ratings by affirming the audience’s beliefs, not by fact-collection and construction of logical conclusions that might aggravate viewers.
This is what we call mere assertion.
Opinion is a VIEW, a JUDGMENT or an APPRAISAL about a particular matter.
Assertion: Something declared or stated positively, often with no support or attempt at proof.
Unlike opinion journalism, which emphasizes evidence-based conclusions, mere assertion is a cluster of assumptions in search of validation. Belief and Emotion trumps evidence in this sphere.
There are plenty of examples of this that are evident both online and on news talk programs, and and in plenty of our political discourse.
The key differences for news consumers are these:
Opinion journalism draws conclusions from a fact-based inquiry with a first allegiance to the truth and a willingness to disagree with significant portions of the audience.
Mere assertion is the result of a search for ways to validate a niche audience’s political agenda. It tends to emphasize beliefs and emotions over evidence and facts. And the quality of the arguments can be quite low. When you believe that you're hearing an assertion, as yourself "are the claims verified with evidence?", "Where does that evidence come from?"