Below is an example flipped lesson
π Gives an outline of what students are to do and learn for a lesson/week.
After completing this week, you should be able to:
List the qualities of academic and non-academic sources.
β Find reliable academic sources on the internetβ .
Key vocabulary: academic sources, journal articles, peer-review, citing, reference list, popular sources.
π» Before you come to class, make sure you:Β
Watch the pre-class video called "Scientific Knowledge: Academic and non-academic source";
Complete the pre-class quiz.
βοΈ In class, we will practice finding reliable academic sources together.
π After class, make sure you:
Write a journal entry on a reliable and unreliable source you have come across.
π Material that usually includes at least some of the theoretical content of a lesson that students are expected to be familiar with before class.
π A low-stakes assessment to hold students accountable for engaging with the pre-class content, as well as to reinforce learning.
π A learning task that is done with little to no support from the instructor.
First,
1) Individually, think about a question that you are curious about and write it on this PADLET.
**
After,
2) Go to GOOGLE SCHOLAR and use keywords to search for sources.
3) Find a reliable academic source that may answer your question.
4) Post it to your question as a comment on the PADLET.
***
Lastly,
5) We will form pairs and give each other feedback.
π A task that requires students to think about how what they learned applies in the real world, which in turn increases (easier and faster) transfer of what is learned to real life.
For this week's journal entry, please link two sources that you come across during your everyday routine in the next few days: a source that you thought was reliable and another source that you thought was unreliable.
Describe both sources and how you came to conclusions about their reliability:
Why, how and from where did you find the source?
How long did it take you to realize that the source was reliable or unreliable?
What qualities of the source made you think it was reliable or unreliable?